Re: [125902] trunk/dports/science/arb/Portfile
On Sep 28, 2014, at 22:19, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.org wrote:
On Sep 28, 2014, at 10:32 PM, jerem...@macports.org wrote:
Revision
125902
Author
jerem...@macports.org
Date
2014-09-28 20:32:20 -0700 (Sun, 28 Sep 2014)
Log Message
arb: Take a stab at fixing the SL build on the builder
Modified Paths
• trunk/dports/science/arb/Portfile
Diff
Modified: trunk/dports/science/arb/Portfile (125901 = 125902)
+platform darwin {
+if {${os.major} 11} {
+depends_build-append port:coreutils
+
+configure.env-append INSTALL=${prefix}/bin/ginstall
+}
+}
The error I see on the buildbot is:
install -s dvtditr dndfast7 dndblast sextet5 mafft-distance pairlocalalign
pair2hat3s multi2hat3s rnatest pairash addsingle splittbfast disttbfast
tbfast mafft-profile f2cl mccaskillwrap contrafoldwrap countlen seq2regtable
regtable2seq score getlag dndpre dndpre2 setcore replaceu restoreu
setdirection makedirectionlist version
/opt/local/var/macports/build/_opt_mports_dports_science_arb/arb/work/arbsrc_12565/lib/mafft
strip: object:
/opt/local/var/macports/build/_opt_mports_dports_science_arb/arb/work/arbsrc_12565/lib/mafft/dvtditr
malformed object (unknown load command 13)
So it looks like it's strip, not install, that's having a problem with the
object's load command.
Yes, it is strip that has the issue with the object's load command, and my goal
is to use the strip executable provided by the cctools port.
The problem is that 'install -s' is /usr/bin/install which runs 'xcrun strip'
which executes the older version of strip from Xcode (which does not know about
newer load commands). I was trying to get the port to use ginstall -s which
will run 'strip' which will pick up MacPorts' cctools strip instead.
--Jeremy
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
Re: imake
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 5:58 AM, Joshua Root wrote: rasmol - Packaged version released in 2008, latest release was in 2009 This is probably used by some of our scientist users. There does seem to be a 2.7.5.2 release from 2011, and more files added to their sourceforge site in 2013. So certainly not dead. (Probably just developed by academics in their spare time, like many such tools.) I totally agree with the last few sentences. I used rasmol lot in the past, but haven't used it for years now. Tools like pymol have been developed in the meantime which are using newer technologies and are slightly more user-friendly. Still, this doesn't mean that authors shouldn't be asked about moving to a modern build system. Or that MacPorts definitely needs to support the tool (they seem to provide some apple-specific downloads). Mojca ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
Re: [MacPorts] #33179: xymon and xymon-server disagree about whether clientlaunch.cfg should be registered to the port or not
Hi, Why is the xymon port now a stub ? Francois. Le 29/09/14 16:50, MacPorts a écrit : #33179: xymon and xymon-server disagree about whether clientlaunch.cfg should be registered to the port or not ---+--- Reporter: ryandesign@… | Owner: fclaire@… Type: defect| Status: closed Priority: Normal| Milestone: Component: ports |Version: 2.0.3 Resolution: wontfix | Keywords: Port: xymon | ---+--- Changes (by mf2k@…): * status: new = closed * resolution: = wontfix Comment: Closing this since the xymon port is now a stub. ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
Re: [MacPorts] #33179: xymon and xymon-server disagree about whether clientlaunch.cfg should be registered to the port or not
Because according to port info, it was replaced by xymon-client. $ port info xymon xymon @4.3.7_3 (net) Replaced by: xymon-client Description: Xymon is a system for monitoring of hosts and networks, inspired by the Big Brother system. This port is a stub and has been replaced by the xymon-client port. Homepage: http://www.xymon.com/ Conflicts with: xymon-server Platforms:darwin License: unknown Maintainers: nomaintai...@macports.org On Sep 29, 2014, at 8:54 AM, Francois Claire fcla...@free.fr wrote: Hi, Why is the xymon port now a stub ? Francois. Le 29/09/14 16:50, MacPorts a écrit : #33179: xymon and xymon-server disagree about whether clientlaunch.cfg should be registered to the port or not ---+--- Reporter: ryandesign@… | Owner: fclaire@… Type: defect| Status: closed Priority: Normal| Milestone: Component: ports |Version: 2.0.3 Resolution: wontfix | Keywords: Port: xymon | ---+--- Changes (by mf2k@…): * status: new = closed * resolution: = wontfix Comment: Closing this since the xymon port is now a stub. ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
Re: [MacPorts] #33179: xymon and xymon-server disagree about whether clientlaunch.cfg should be registered to the port or not
Yes, sure. Sorry for the stupid question: I remembered why just after pushing the send button... Cheers, Francois. Le 29/09/14 16:57, Frank Schima a écrit : Because according to port info, it was replaced by xymon-client. $ port info xymon xymon @4.3.7_3 (net) Replaced by: xymon-client Description: Xymon is a system for monitoring of hosts and networks, inspired by the Big Brother system. This port is a stub and has been replaced by the xymon-client port. Homepage: http://www.xymon.com/ Conflicts with: xymon-server Platforms:darwin License: unknown Maintainers: nomaintai...@macports.org On Sep 29, 2014, at 8:54 AM, Francois Claire fcla...@free.fr mailto:fcla...@free.fr wrote: Hi, Why is the xymon port now a stub ? Francois. Le 29/09/14 16:50, MacPorts a écrit : #33179: xymon and xymon-server disagree about whether clientlaunch.cfg should be registered to the port or not ---+--- Reporter: ryandesign@… | Owner: fclaire@… Type: defect| Status: closed Priority: Normal| Milestone: Component: ports |Version: 2.0.3 Resolution: wontfix | Keywords: Port: xymon | ---+--- Changes (by mf2k@…): * status: new = closed * resolution: = wontfix Comment: Closing this since the xymon port is now a stub. ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org mailto:macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
Releasing code as portgroup instead of in base/ (was Re: imake)
On Sep 28, 2014, at 2:55 AM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.org wrote: Moving this code to a portgroup would make it possible for us to fix this problem and any other problems that might come up later without having to produce a new MacPorts release. I think we really should move in the other direction: -make releases easier -less code in portgroups (move as much as possible to base/) someone can say I did foo with macports version x.y.z, it's hard for an end-user to know I did foo with macports verison x.y.z and the revision of portgroup blah that I got in my last portsync which corresponds with rXX in your repo -- Daniel J. Luke ++ | * dl...@geeklair.net * | | *-- http://www.geeklair.net -* | ++ | Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily | | reflect the opinions of my employer. | ++ ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
Re: imake
On 29/09/2014, at 3:25 PM, Nicolas Pavillon wrote: On 29/09/2014 13:03, Brandon Allbery wrote: On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 11:51 PM, Brandon Allbery allber...@gmail.com wrote: If I understood other discussions correctly, KDE3 is already being removed. Sorry, not discussions; recent commit messages indicate that it's being obsoleted and slated for removal starting from the leaves. See for example r125868, r125871. I had mentioned the idea of making KDE3 obsolete quite some time ago (months) on the list, but never got to do it. I indeed started (independently from the imake discussion, just a coincidence) some days ago with the dependents ports. I going slightly slowly on this part as I am trying to find replacements for the few remaining kde3-based apps whenever possible. The idea would be to then remove the kde3 suite after all dependents have been taken care of. The biggest remaining issue is koffice. Ideally, it could be replaced by calligra (requested in ticket #https://trac.macports.org/ticket/37579), but it seems plagued with several problems at runtime making it only very partly usable on OS X. As Ryan said, it is not really the duty of MacPorts developers to keep ports alive if they are not supported upstream. KDE 3 is long since dead (unmaintained) and all KDE apps dependent on KDE 3 with it. So, do not worry about KOffice… :-( As a KDE developer, I do not like this aspect of KDE, but it is a fact of life. If there is nobody available to port a KDE app to a new version of KDE, then the app becomes unmaintained and is no longer released. KDE 4 is heading that way right now, as the emphasis (in the KDE project) shifts to Frameworks and KF5. Marko, René and I are working to make the transition easier for MacPorts developers and users this time around. When we have time, we should see what can be done to make Calligra more workable in KDE 4 on Apple OS X. ATM I do not see more than a trickle of KDE 4 apps that have been ported to KF5. Maybe that will become a flood later. Meanwhile, I do not know what other FOSS office suites might be a goer on MacPorts. I use LibreOffice… Cheers, Ian W. ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
Re: [125934] trunk/dports/mail
On Sep 29, 2014, at 5:48 PM, pixi...@macports.org wrote:
Revision
125934
Author
pixi...@macports.org
Date
2014-09-29 15:48:32 -0700 (Mon, 29 Sep 2014)
Log Message
mail/postfinger:
- New port for postfinger, a postfix configuration reporting tool.
Added Paths
• trunk/dports/mail/postfinger/
• trunk/dports/mail/postfinger/Portfile
Diff
Added: trunk/dports/mail/postfinger/Portfile (0 = 125934)
--- trunk/dports/mail/postfinger/Portfile (rev 0)
+++ trunk/dports/mail/postfinger/Portfile 2014-09-29 22:48:32 UTC (rev
125934)
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+# -*- coding: utf-8; mode: tcl; tab-width: 4; indent-tabs-mode: nil;
c-basic-offset: 4 -*- vim:fenc=utf-8:ft=tcl:et:sw=4:ts=4:sts=4
+# $Id$
+
+PortSystem 1.0
+
+namepostfinger
+version 1.30
+categories mail
+platforms darwin
+maintainers pixilla openmaintainer
+license GPL-2+
+
+description Postfix Configuration Summary Reporter
+long_description${description}
+
+homepage
http://ftp.wl0.org/SOURCES/postfinger
+master_sites
ftp://ftp.wl0.org/ftp.wl0.org/postfinger/
+
+extract.suffix
+
+distfiles ${name}-${version} \
+README
+checksums ${name}-${version} \
+rmd160 62f8e8ce2888bf3d9e615072e9f25284d3f4155e \
+sha256
2c993b87ca3063eb4b81f7f652d6292a72d777be500bda214d54ce485aee2fd0 \
+README \
+rmd160 7f08ecd13c073d81ca11ef097370fbdd361adb3d \
+sha256
1e842f569b1d7878adc6bb38a1f5e80d8d3d25de051b820527f7f9fb9a8a4d95
+
+extract.mkdir yes
+extract {
+file copy ${distpath}/[lindex ${distfiles} 0] ${worksrcpath}/${name}
+file copy ${distpath}/[lindex ${distfiles} 1] ${worksrcpath}/
+}
+use_configure no
+build {}
+destroot {
+xinstall -m 755 ${worksrcpath}/${name} ${destroot}${prefix}/bin/
+xinstall -d -m 0755 ${destroot}${prefix}/share/doc/${name}
+xinstall -m 644 ${worksrcpath}/README
${destroot}${prefix}/share/doc/${name}/
+}
+
+livecheck.url [lindex ${master_sites} 0]
+livecheck.regex ${name}-(\[0-9.\]+)
I presume this is noarch?
Remember you'll have to use the unversioned distfile recipe eventually, if the
README ever changes.
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
