Re: force a compiler install, or default the port to reduced features?
> On Sep 26, 2016, at 4:11 PM, Ken Cunningham> wrote: > > And of course I find out that the preferred variant (a nice MacOSX GUI) > doesn't build with the default installation on about the only system I didn't > test it on - a vanilla 10.6 system (my 10.6 systems are LibCxxOnOlderSystems > now, with clang-3.7). > > So my choice is to let it use the existing default compiler and build a > somewhat impaired but usable command-line only version, or force a compiler > install (clang-3.4 works, maybe 3.3, clang 3.7 would be best), and get the > really much better racing-stripes GUI version. The compiler would be > installed precompiled on a vanilla 10.6 system. (LibCxx... systems already > have clang-3.7, and so don't have this problem). > > I'm tempted to force the compiler install, and if so it might as well be to > clang-3.7. > > Is this the "MacPorts" way? The usual approach is to blacklist compilers that *don't* work. vq ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
force a compiler install, or default the port to reduced features?
One of the ports I've been working on (hatari, an Atari ST emulator) was accepted for inclusion. Thank you! Hope everyone enjoys using it. And of course I find out that the preferred variant (a nice MacOSX GUI) doesn't build with the default installation on about the only system I didn't test it on - a vanilla 10.6 system (my 10.6 systems are LibCxxOnOlderSystems now, with clang-3.7). So my choice is to let it use the existing default compiler and build a somewhat impaired but usable command-line only version, or force a compiler install (clang-3.4 works, maybe 3.3, clang 3.7 would be best), and get the really much better racing-stripes GUI version. The compiler would be installed precompiled on a vanilla 10.6 system. (LibCxx... systems already have clang-3.7, and so don't have this problem). I'm tempted to force the compiler install, and if so it might as well be to clang-3.7. Is this the "MacPorts" way? Thanks, ken ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev