Re: [macports-ports] 02/02: gtk3: update to version 3.22.26

2017-11-14 Thread Eitan Adler 
Hi,

It seems that gtk3 has been broken for me since this commit or thereabouts.

===
:info:patch Executing:  cd
"/opt/local/var/macports/build/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_macports_release_tarballs_ports_gnome_gtk3/gtk3/work/gtk+-3.22.26"
&& /usr/bin/patch -p0 <
'/opt/local/var/macports/sources/rsync.macports.org/macports/release/tarballs/ports/gnome/gtk3/files/patch-browser-demo-revert-add-copy-to-clipboard-button.diff'
:debug:patch system:  cd
"/opt/local/var/macports/build/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_macports_release_tarballs_ports_gnome_gtk3/gtk3/work/gtk+-3.22.26"
&& /usr/bin/patch -p0 <
'/opt/local/var/macports/sources/rsync.macports.org/macports/release/tarballs/ports/gnome/gtk3/files/patch-browser-demo-revert-add-copy-to-clipboard-button.diff'
:info:patch patching file demos/icon-browser/iconbrowserwin.c
:info:patch patching file demos/icon-browser/window.ui
:info:patch Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n]
:info:patch Apply anyway? [n]
:info:patch Skipping patch.
:info:patch 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file
demos/icon-browser/window.ui.rej
:info:patch Command failed:  cd
"/opt/local/var/macports/build/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_macports_release_tarballs_ports_gnome_gtk3/gtk3/work/gtk+-3.22.26"
&& /usr/bin/patch -p0 <
'/opt/local/var/macports/sources/rsync.macports.org/macports/release/tarballs/ports/gnome/gtk3/files/patch-browser-demo-revert-add-copy-to-clipboard-button.diff'
:info:patch Exit code: 1
:error:patch Failed to patch gtk3: command execution failed
:debug:patch Error code: CHILDSTATUS 53895 1
:debug:patch Backtrace: command execution failed
:debug:patch while executing
:debug:patch "system {*}$notty {*}$nice $fullcmdstring"
:debug:patch invoked from within
:debug:patch "command_exec patch "" "< '$patch'""
:debug:patch (procedure "portpatch::patch_main" line 33)
:debug:patch invoked from within
:debug:patch "$procedure $targetname"
:error:patch See
/opt/local/var/macports/logs/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_macports_release_tarballs_ports_gnome_gtk3/gtk3/main.log
for details.
===

On 7 November 2017 at 14:11, David B. Evans  wrote:
> David B. Evans (dbevans) pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository macports-ports.
>
> https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/commit/0c30b81e703ff1f3683203b9ef3548643190c068
>
> commit 0c30b81e703ff1f3683203b9ef3548643190c068
> Author: David B. Evans 
> AuthorDate: Tue Nov 7 14:11:45 2017 -0800
>
> gtk3: update to version 3.22.26
> ---
>  gnome/gtk3/Portfile | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gnome/gtk3/Portfile b/gnome/gtk3/Portfile
> index 1d068b4..fa56e0d 100644
> --- a/gnome/gtk3/Portfile
> +++ b/gnome/gtk3/Portfile
> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ PortGroup   compiler_blacklist_versions 1.0
>  namegtk3
>  set real_name   gtk+
>  epoch   1
> -version 3.22.25
> +version 3.22.26
>  set branch  [join [lrange [split ${version} .] 0 1] .]
>  categories  gnome x11
>  license LGPL-2.1+
> @@ -29,8 +29,8 @@ use_xz  yes
>
>  master_sitesgnome:sources/gtk+/${branch}/
>
> -checksums   rmd160  420537b13d9882e1c30c51f08be128fdee80951e \
> -sha256
> e25eaed5ab0775ddc211898fbfdc873b19e4a7ab03c0dbe88dff1938b433739e
> +checksums   rmd160  42c684ce7f7fdd10accc86c8e7042509e5125d64 \
> +sha256
> 61eef0d320e541976e2dfe445729f12b5ade53050ee9de6184235cb60cd4b967
>
>  minimum_xcodeversions {9 3.1}
>
>



-- 
Eitan Adler

Re: [macports-ports] branch master updated: smlnj: fix https://trac.macports.org/ticket/47232

2017-11-14 Thread Eitan Adler 
Wow. a three year old patch. Thanks!

On 14 November 2017 at 22:24, Toby Peterson  wrote:
> tobypeterson pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository macports-ports.
>
> https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/commit/01c37e8ae32a00f0b6edd197c4eb9a85f5e4f5bd
>
> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
>  new 01c37e8  smlnj: fix https://trac.macports.org/ticket/47232
> 01c37e8 is described below
>
> commit 01c37e8ae32a00f0b6edd197c4eb9a85f5e4f5bd
> Author: Toby Peterson 
> AuthorDate: Tue Nov 14 22:24:36 2017 -0800
>
> smlnj: fix https://trac.macports.org/ticket/47232
> ---
>  lang/smlnj/Portfile | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lang/smlnj/Portfile b/lang/smlnj/Portfile
> index a2a2a64..6a5009f 100644
> --- a/lang/smlnj/Portfile
> +++ b/lang/smlnj/Portfile
> @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ destroot {
>  file copy ${worksrcpath}/bin ${destroot}${smlnj_home}
>  file copy ${worksrcpath}/lib ${destroot}${smlnj_home}
>
> -xinstall -m 555 ${filespath}/sml.sh ${destroot}${prefix}/bin/sml
> +xinstall -m 755 ${filespath}/sml.sh ${destroot}${prefix}/bin/sml
>  reinplace "s|__SMLNJ_HOME__|${smlnj_home}|g" \
>  ${destroot}${prefix}/bin/sml
>
>



-- 
Eitan Adler

Re: how to build against an older SDK - library not found for -lcrt1.10.6.o

2017-11-14 Thread Ken Cunningham 
> 
> 
> Are you also using a 10.4 deployment target?
> 
> - Josh

I think that might be it. If you don't pass -macosx-version-min to the linker, 
it assumes 10.6. I'll work on that.

Thanks,

Ken

Re: how to build against an older SDK - library not found for -lcrt1.10.6.o

2017-11-14 Thread Joshua Root 
On 2017-11-15 12:14 , Ken Cunningham wrote:
> Hi, smart people.
> 
> I'm trying to write up a Portfile (for TenFourFox) that requires building 
> against an older SDK (10.4u) and I'm on 10.6 Intel.
> 
> It's easy enough to pass in the sysroot
> 
>   configure.cxxflags-append -isysroot 
> ${developer_dir}/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk
>   configure.cflags-append -isysroot ${developer_dir}/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk
>   configure.cppflags-append -isysroot 
> ${developer_dir}/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk
> 
> 
> but then the compiler errors out generating files due to a missing library 
> that the compiler expects to see on 10.6, but doesn't exist in the 10.4u SDK.
> 
> configure:3576: /opt/local/bin/gcc-mp-4.8 -o conftest -Os -isysroot 
> /Xcode3/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk -m64  -L/opt/local/lib 
> -Wl,-headerpad_max_install_names  conftest.c  1>&5
> ld: library not found for -lcrt1.10.6.o
> 
> 
> 
> I have a feeling this is not something fixable, other than maybe hacking a 
> symlink for crt1.10.6.o into the 10.4u SDK (which is easy enough, but I'm 
> trying to see if the can be done "the right way".
> 
> Any ideas?

Are you also using a 10.4 deployment target?

- Josh

how to build against an older SDK - library not found for -lcrt1.10.6.o

2017-11-14 Thread Ken Cunningham 
Hi, smart people.

I'm trying to write up a Portfile (for TenFourFox) that requires building 
against an older SDK (10.4u) and I'm on 10.6 Intel.

It's easy enough to pass in the sysroot

configure.cxxflags-append -isysroot 
${developer_dir}/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk
configure.cflags-append -isysroot ${developer_dir}/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk
configure.cppflags-append -isysroot 
${developer_dir}/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk


but then the compiler errors out generating files due to a missing library that 
the compiler expects to see on 10.6, but doesn't exist in the 10.4u SDK.

configure:3576: /opt/local/bin/gcc-mp-4.8 -o conftest -Os -isysroot 
/Xcode3/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk -m64  -L/opt/local/lib 
-Wl,-headerpad_max_install_names  conftest.c  1>&5
ld: library not found for -lcrt1.10.6.o



I have a feeling this is not something fixable, other than maybe hacking a 
symlink for crt1.10.6.o into the 10.4u SDK (which is easy enough, but I'm 
trying to see if the can be done "the right way".

Any ideas?

Thanks,

Ken

Help with port/bug ticket

2017-11-14 Thread iEFdev 
On 11/12/17 17:58 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:

>> Bumping rules?
>> I have this bug ticket open: https://trac.macports.org/ticket/55187 - where 
>> you were kind to make it assigned, and fixed the keywords, etc.
>>
>> Haven't heard anything in 2 weeks now. Is there any “protocol” how to bump 
>> tickets. It's for the ntfs-3g and osxfuse.
> Looks like Dan, the maintainer of the failing port, osxfuse, hasn't responded 
> to the ticket. It's fine to send a message to the macports-dev mailing list 
> asking if another developer could look into it.

Hi all,

If there's any one who would like to take a look at it, I'd appreciate that 
very much.

I did a last try today uninstalling osxfuse (and the (4) ones depending on it), 
and tried a new install instead of trying to upgrade - w/o luck.

· Eric