Re: rsync server out of date?
On Jul 22, 2017, at 09:48, Marcus Calhoun-Lopez wrote: > I just ran `port sync`, but the ports are several days behind the GitHub > repository. > Is anyone else having this problem? I've reset it again (third time this month) and it should sync up again in a couple hours.
Re: rsync server out of date?
Hi, On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 07:48:59AM -0700, Marcus Calhoun-Lopez wrote: > I just ran `port sync`, but the ports are several days behind the > GitHub repository. Is anyone else having this problem? We're aware of the problem and are in contact with GitHub support to resolve the issue. If you want to help out, we'd welcome a pull requests that makes https://github.com/macports/macports-infrastructure/blob/master/jobs/mprsyncup use Git instead of SVN. -- Clemens
rsync server out of date?
I just ran `port sync`, but the ports are several days behind the GitHub repository. Is anyone else having this problem? -Marcus
Re: rsync server out of date?
On Dec 31, 2016, at 14:08, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > I think we can work around the problem by checking out a fresh working copy > of macports-ports on the server for mprsyncup to use. Done.
Re: rsync server out of date?
On Dec 31, 2016, at 13:31, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > Starting on 12/28, mprsyncup is unable to update the Subversion working copy > of the macports-ports git repository: > > > 2016-12-28T11:28:40-0600 + PORTS_OLD_REV=131029 > 2016-12-28T11:28:40-0600 + /opt/local/bin/svn --non-interactive -q update > /var/tmp/mprsyncup/release/ports > 2016-12-28T11:30:49-0600 svn: E175002: Unexpected HTTP status 502 'Bad > Gateway' on '/macports/macports-ports.git/!svn/vcc/default' > > > 2016-12-28T12:01:02-0600 + PORTS_OLD_REV=131029 > 2016-12-28T12:01:02-0600 + /opt/local/bin/svn --non-interactive -q update > /var/tmp/mprsyncup/release/ports > 2016-12-28T12:03:18-0600 svn: E175002: Unexpected HTTP status 504 'Gateway > Timeout' on '/macports/macports-ports.git/!svn/vcc/default' r131038 is the revision in which $Id$ lines were removed from all remaining 9292 ports. Seems like the GitHub git-to-svn gateway is not able to handle a change that large. I have reported that problem to the GitHub support team. I think we can work around the problem by checking out a fresh working copy of macports-ports on the server for mprsyncup to use. I imagine we can avoid the problem in the future by not modifying that many files at once.
Re: rsync server out of date?
> On Dec 31, 2016, at 06:45, Clemens Langwrote: > > Hi, > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 11:13:21PM -0700, Marcus Calhoun-Lopez wrote: >> I just ran `port sync`, but the ports are several days behind the >> GitHub repository. I have never encountered this before and am at a >> bit of a loss as to how to proceed. Is anyone else having this >> problem? > > Can confirm, my cronjob has been telling me for two days now. The last > update to ports.tar was at 2016-12-28 17:57:54.0 +0100. > > Ryan, can you check what's wrong? Starting on 12/28, mprsyncup is unable to update the Subversion working copy of the macports-ports git repository: 2016-12-28T11:28:40-0600 + PORTS_OLD_REV=131029 2016-12-28T11:28:40-0600 + /opt/local/bin/svn --non-interactive -q update /var/tmp/mprsyncup/release/ports 2016-12-28T11:30:49-0600 svn: E175002: Unexpected HTTP status 502 'Bad Gateway' on '/macports/macports-ports.git/!svn/vcc/default' 2016-12-28T12:01:02-0600 + PORTS_OLD_REV=131029 2016-12-28T12:01:02-0600 + /opt/local/bin/svn --non-interactive -q update /var/tmp/mprsyncup/release/ports 2016-12-28T12:03:18-0600 svn: E175002: Unexpected HTTP status 504 'Gateway Timeout' on '/macports/macports-ports.git/!svn/vcc/default'
Re: rsync server out of date?
Hi, On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 11:13:21PM -0700, Marcus Calhoun-Lopez wrote: > I just ran `port sync`, but the ports are several days behind the > GitHub repository. I have never encountered this before and am at a > bit of a loss as to how to proceed. Is anyone else having this > problem? Can confirm, my cronjob has been telling me for two days now. The last update to ports.tar was at 2016-12-28 17:57:54.0 +0100. Ryan, can you check what's wrong? -- Clemens