Re: mozjs102
Following Ryan's suggestion, I am working on an update which should remove the mozjs102 dependency, and enable gjs and glade for Sonoma. Please try the portfile from PR https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/22974 . On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 5:22 PM Lukas Oberhuber wrote: > i was never able to get gjs to work (at least when included in GIMP. It > did compile, at least when I last tried (which was at least a year ago). > > On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 at 12:23, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> On Mar 6, 2024, at 06:13, Gregory Dodwell wrote: >> >> >> >> Will there ever be a mozjs102 port for the Sonoma version of MacPorts >> 2.9.1? >> >> I can't install Glade without it. On the MacPorts bugs re mozjs102 page >> there's a big red 'X' near the Sonoma version. >> >> Any plans for an update? >> >> >> Nobody maintains this port. Somebody has to volunteer to investigate and >> fix the problem. This is the bug report: >> >> https://trac.macports.org/ticket/68511 >> >> mozjs115 does build on Sonoma so perhaps a fix already exists that can be >> backported to mozjs102. >> >> And/or maybe the ports that depend on mozjs102 (currently only gjs and >> gjs-devel) can switch to mozjs115. >> >
Re: mozjs102
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 5:22 PM Lukas Oberhuber wrote: > i was never able to get gjs to work (at least when included in GIMP. It > did compile, at least when I last tried (which was at least a year ago). > > On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 at 12:23, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> On Mar 6, 2024, at 06:13, Gregory Dodwell wrote: >> >> >> >> Will there ever be a mozjs102 port for the Sonoma version of MacPorts >> 2.9.1? >> >> I can't install Glade without it. On the MacPorts bugs re mozjs102 page >> there's a big red 'X' near the Sonoma version. >> >> Any plans for an update? >> >> >> Nobody maintains this port. Somebody has to volunteer to investigate and >> fix the problem. This is the bug report: >> >> https://trac.macports.org/ticket/68511 >> >> mozjs115 does build on Sonoma so perhaps a fix already exists that can be >> backported to mozjs102. >> >> And/or maybe the ports that depend on mozjs102 (currently only gjs and >> gjs-devel) can switch to mozjs115. >> >>
Re: mozjs102
i was never able to get gjs to work (at least when included in GIMP. It did compile, at least when I last tried (which was at least a year ago). On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 at 12:23, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Mar 6, 2024, at 06:13, Gregory Dodwell wrote: > > > > Will there ever be a mozjs102 port for the Sonoma version of MacPorts > 2.9.1? > > I can't install Glade without it. On the MacPorts bugs re mozjs102 page > there's a big red 'X' near the Sonoma version. > > Any plans for an update? > > > Nobody maintains this port. Somebody has to volunteer to investigate and > fix the problem. This is the bug report: > > https://trac.macports.org/ticket/68511 > > mozjs115 does build on Sonoma so perhaps a fix already exists that can be > backported to mozjs102. > > And/or maybe the ports that depend on mozjs102 (currently only gjs and > gjs-devel) can switch to mozjs115. > >
Re: mozjs102
On Mar 6, 2024, at 06:13, Gregory Dodwell wrote: > > > Will there ever be a mozjs102 port for the Sonoma version of MacPorts 2.9.1? > > I can't install Glade without it. On the MacPorts bugs re mozjs102 page > there's a big red 'X' near the Sonoma version. > > Any plans for an update? Nobody maintains this port. Somebody has to volunteer to investigate and fix the problem. This is the bug report: https://trac.macports.org/ticket/68511 mozjs115 does build on Sonoma so perhaps a fix already exists that can be backported to mozjs102. And/or maybe the ports that depend on mozjs102 (currently only gjs and gjs-devel) can switch to mozjs115.
mozjs102
Will there ever be a mozjs102 port for the Sonoma version of MacPorts 2.9.1? I can't install Glade without it. On the MacPorts bugs re mozjs102 page there's a big red 'X' near the Sonoma version. Any plans for an update? Greg./
