Re: [maemo-developers] sbox-config

2007-02-11 Thread Kalle Vahlman

2007/2/11, Piotr Pokora [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


Hi!

Is there any how-to, docs , whatever which describes how to replace
sbox-config with sb-conf for fundamental jobs like flashing?


Heh, that wording is pretty prone to misunderstandings :)

But for the actual issue, simply stating 'sb-conf' will give you the
syntax of that command. This won't naturally help since the howto
doesn't tell what it tries to do there, so a short run-through:

-ct ROOTFS (create target called ROOTFS)
-cn cs2005q3.2-glibc-arm (use the issued toolchain)
-cm qemu-arm (use qemu-arm as the CPU transparency method)
--devkits=debian (use the debian devkit)

The same command with sb-conf would be:

sb-conf setup ROOTFS -c cs2005q3.2-glibc-arm -d debian:cputransp -t
qemu-arm-0.8.1-sb

At least it seemed to create the target ok, didn't try to use it though...

--
Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Powered by http://movial.fi
Interesting stuff at http://syslog.movial.fi
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


[maemo-developers] Is this a bug in python-osso ? (osso rpc call with argument)

2007-02-11 Thread Pierre Amadio
Hi there.

As a followup of my previous message (problem using dbus rpc call with
argument in python) i decided to give rpc_async_run a try instead of
rpc_run.

Now, not only it 'does not work', but pyhton2.5 segfault as well.

I guess i did something wrong like not having an osso context properly
set or something like this, but i also feel it should be up to libosso
or python-osso to check the argument it use ar ok, shouldnt it ?

I have attached a test cased based on :
http://maemo.org/platform/docs/python-bora/python_maemo_howto.html#Introduction+to+LibOSSO

I also try to catch a backtrace, with 'gdb /usr/bin/python2.5  core' ,
but i m not that familiar with gdb, nor do i know where to get the
python-osso debug symbols.

Anyway, the begining of the backtrace looks like this:
#0  0xb72d068c in _python_to_rpc_t () from 
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/osso/rpc.so
#1  0xb72cfc61 in Context_rpc_run_with_defaults () from 
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/osso/rpc.so
#2  0xb79f09b9 in osso_rpc_run () from /usr/lib/libosso.so.1

Am i wrong in thinking there is something wrong in python-osso ?
I use python2.5-osso 0.2-1osso1.

_python_to_rpc_t is defined in python-osso/src/osso-helper.c, but this
is where i m stuck at, not understanding what may be wrong there (i
guess one of the 2 argument being sent has not the right type or size or
something, but that s about it).

Any help would be appreciated.

Pierre Amadio
Core was generated by `/usr/bin/python2.5 ./sender.py'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
#0  0xb72d068c in _python_to_rpc_t () from 
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/osso/rpc.so
(gdb) bt 
#0  0xb72d068c in _python_to_rpc_t () from 
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/osso/rpc.so
#1  0xb72cfc61 in Context_rpc_run_with_defaults () from 
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/osso/rpc.so
#2  0xb79f09b9 in osso_rpc_run () from /usr/lib/libosso.so.1
#3  0xb79b8c3f in dbus_pending_call_get_data () from /usr/lib/libdbus-1.so.2
#4  0xb79a74d9 in dbus_connection_has_messages_to_send () from 
/usr/lib/libdbus-1.so.2
#5  0xb79a9bf8 in dbus_connection_dispatch () from /usr/lib/libdbus-1.so.2
#6  0xb75d6f2d in dbus_g_message_get_message () from 
/usr/lib/libdbus-glib-1.so.2
#7  0xb79408e7 in g_main_context_dispatch () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#8  0xb7942285 in g_main_context_acquire () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#9  0xb79425aa in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#10 0xb774bb23 in gtk_main () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#11 0xb6f32d8b in init_gtkimpl () from 
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk/_gtkimpl.so
#12 0xb7e973c8 in PyEval_EvalFrameEx () from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
#13 0xb7e98c40 in PyEval_EvalCodeEx () from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
#14 0xb7e98c9b in PyEval_EvalCode () from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
#15 0xb7eabfe0 in PyErr_Display () from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
#16 0xb7eac4be in PyRun_FileExFlags () from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
#17 0xb7eacec7 in PyRun_SimpleFileExFlags () from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
#18 0xb7ead5b3 in PyRun_AnyFileExFlags () from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
#19 0xb7eb4985 in Py_Main () from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
#20 0x0804856e in main ()
[D-BUS Service]
Name=spam.eggs.osso_test_receiver
Exec=/home/melmoth/dev/rapier/receive.py

#!/usr/bin/python2.5
import osso
import gtk

def callback_func(interface, method, arguments, user_data):
print RPC received,user_data
print arg=,arguments
#osso_c = user_data
#osso_sysnote = osso.SystemNote(osso_c)
#osso_sysnote.system_note_infoprint(osso_test_receiver: Received a RPC to %s. % method)
return ok data has been processed

osso_c = osso.Context(osso_test_receiver, 0.0.1, False)
print osso_test_receiver started
osso_rpc = osso.Rpc(osso_c)
osso_rpc.set_rpc_callback(spam.eggs.osso_test_receiver,
  /spam/eggs/osso_test_receiver,
  spam.eggs.osso_test_receiver, callback_func, 'plop')

gtk.main()

#!/usr/bin/python2.5
import osso
import hildon
import gtk

def process_rpc_answer(retval):
print process_rpc_answer called:,retval
return True

def send_rpc(widget, osso_c):

Cf http://www.maemo.org/platform/docs/pymaemo/pyosso_context.html#rpc_run_with_defaults

osso_rpc = osso.Rpc(osso_c)

test=osso_rpc.rpc_async_run(spam.eggs.osso_test_receiver,
/spam/eggs/osso_test_receiver,
spam.eggs.osso_test_receiver,
do_something,
process_rpc_answer,
'some user data',
('argA','argB')
)

print test=,,test
print RPC sent

osso_c = osso.Context(osso_test_sender, 0.0.1, False)
window = hildon.Window()
window.connect(destroy, gtk.main_quit)
send_button = gtk.Button(Send RPC)
window.add(send_button)
send_button.connect(clicked, send_rpc, osso_c)

Re: [maemo-developers] sbox-config

2007-02-11 Thread Piotr Pokora

Hi!

 But for the actual issue, simply stating 'sb-conf' will give you the
 syntax of that command. This won't naturally help since the howto
 doesn't tell what it tries to do there, so a short run-through:

  -ct ROOTFS (create target called ROOTFS)
  -cn cs2005q3.2-glibc-arm (use the issued toolchain)
  -cm qemu-arm (use qemu-arm as the CPU transparency method)
  --devkits=debian (use the debian devkit)

 The same command with sb-conf would be:

 sb-conf setup ROOTFS -c cs2005q3.2-glibc-arm -d debian:cputransp -t
 qemu-arm-0.8.1-sb

OK. Thanks :)

 At least it seemed to create the target ok, didn't try to use it though...

What to do with recommended scripts like make_rootimage ?

./make_rootimage.sh: line 152: sbrsh: command not found
Resetting target SDK_X86
sbox-config is obsolete; it has been replaced by these commands:
(sb-conf and sb-menu here)

Should I read docs provided by maemo which leads to nothing?
Or should ask here about every single detail and try to hack everything
myself?

My point is that maemo.org makes me confused when I want to do anything ,
so I have no idea what should I follow there.

Piotras

___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


[maemo-developers] Dillo for N800/770

2007-02-11 Thread Anuj Verma (Kevin)
Hello list, 

I'll like to know if someone knows if there is a port for N800 or 770
available ? 

Refer: http://www.dillo.org/

Cheers,
Kevin

___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] sbox-config

2007-02-11 Thread Kalle Vahlman

2007/2/11, Piotr Pokora [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[snip]

What to do with recommended scripts like make_rootimage ?

./make_rootimage.sh: line 152: sbrsh: command not found
Resetting target SDK_X86
sbox-config is obsolete; it has been replaced by these commands:
(sb-conf and sb-menu here)

Should I read docs provided by maemo which leads to nothing?
Or should ask here about every single detail and try to hack everything
myself?

My point is that maemo.org makes me confused when I want to do anything ,
so I have no idea what should I follow there.


Well, I guess all you can do is ask/request here, file a bug in the
bugzilla doing the same and then wait and pray that someone at Nokia
or someone from the community picks it up and does an updated howto.

So far it's been quite obvious that the SDK is only meant for
application development on the provided libraries and infrastructure,
not as a do-it-yourself-kit for embedded environments.

The bad news is that not even the documents directed at the
application developers have been of remarkable quality (containing
errors and old information), so there's definitely room for
improvement for Nokia...

--
Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Powered by http://movial.fi
Interesting stuff at http://syslog.movial.fi
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] Can a USB modem be attached to N800?

2007-02-11 Thread Andrew J. Barr
On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 14:18 +0530, mayank jain wrote:
 On 2/11/07, Andrew J. Barr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 00:27 +0530, mayank jain wrote:
   Hi guys,
  
   I recently found that an ISP - Reliance Telecom here provides a USB
   modem, which uses CDMA technology for establishing a dial-up
   connection. This modem works perfectly with a Linux based machine.
  
   Device details at
   http://www.reliancecommunications.co.in/Communications/Netconnect/netconnect_hotnew.html
   Look for Reliance Netconnect USB Modem.
  
   Is it possible that this modem can be attached to N800  used for
   internet? Because if this is so, internet would be available to my
   device from almost anywhere - Wifi or no Wifi.
 
  You would want to find some kind of Bluetooth device for this. This
  works fine with the Nokia tablets.
 
  The 770 had limited support for USB host mode but AFAIK the N800 doesn't
  seem to have this feature. No one has tried it yet, at least ;)
 
 Oh,
 
 I just saw the thread mentioning 'injecting power into USB -  this
 modem needs 5V/500ma, from USB - So i dont think this would be
 possible...

It would be horribly unwieldy, you'd need a power injector device as
well as a USB hub (or at least some kind of adapter). It would defeat
the portable aspect of the Nokia tablets.

This is why Bluetooth is ideal for this kind of situation; you'd have
your cell phone in your pocket, your tablet in hand...pervasive Internet
access almost anywhere. This is what I do, at least.

What you describe I believe was at least possible on the 770, however.

 Right Andrew?
 
 :)
 Makuchaku
 http://www.makuchaku.info/blog
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


[maemo-developers] More missing source

2007-02-11 Thread Paul Brook
Where can I find the source for libgst0.10-dsp 0.63-1 
(http://repository.maemo.org/pool/bora/free/binary/libgst0.10-dsp_0.63-1_armel.deb)
 ?
The corresponding source repository only has the 0.62-1 source.

Also, this source package build-depends osso-dsp-headers-rx-34 (= 2006.40.1). 
Where can I find these?

Paul
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


[maemo-developers] Speed test with vfp (floating point) on N800

2007-02-11 Thread Klaus Rotter

Hi folks,

I was very interesseted in the floating point copro in the N800 cpu and 
did some tests with a progamm which calculates the mandelbrod set and 
outputs it via SDL. I put this program online on 
bomberman.garage.maemo.org. No installer, you have to run the benchmarks 
on xterm or via ssh (so did I).


// Results of Mandelbrot set on N800 800x480 pixels, 100 interations
// real -1 to 2
// imag -1.3 to 1.2

// dbl - uses doubles
// flt - uses floats
// vfp - compiled with -mfpu=vfp -mfloat-abi=softfp

// All binarys are compiled with -O2

// Results with full PixelDraw and SDL_Update every pixel
./mandel_armel_dbl.bin - Time: 178.284 seconds
./mandel_armel_dbl_vfp.bin - Time: 151.816 seconds
./mandel_armel_flt.bin - Time: 169.486 seconds
./mandel_armel_flt_vfp.bin - Time: 152.148 seconds

// Results with full PixelDraw and _NO_ SDL_Update.
./mandel_armel_dbl.bin - Time: 26.377 seconds
./mandel_armel_dbl_vfp.bin - Time: 1.808 seconds
./mandel_armel_flt.bin - Time: 19.813 seconds
./mandel_armel_flt_vfp.bin - Time: 1.709 seconds

// Results without any Drawing
./mandel_armel_dbl.bin - Time: 26.525 seconds
./mandel_armel_dbl_vfp.bin - Time: 1.672 seconds
./mandel_armel_flt.bin - Time: 19.647 seconds
./mandel_armel_flt_vfp.bin - Time: 1.601 seconds

// Results with full PixelDraw and SDL_Update only every column
./mandel_armel_dbl.bin - Time: 27.512 seconds
./mandel_armel_dbl_vfp.bin - Time: 2.447 seconds
./mandel_armel_flt.bin - Time: 20.689 seconds
./mandel_armel_flt_vfp.bin - Time: 2.451 seconds

What could that mean? First, SDL_Update is _very_ expensive. In the 
first try, I call SDL_Update just for every Pixel 
(SDL_Update(screen,x,y,1,1) and it slows down execution about six times, 
the vfp about 80 times. So I think there must be a kind of sync inside 
the SDL_Update function. If I update only every column, the speed loss 
is only about 80%.


Vfp float can give a speed increase about factor 10 and more. And there 
is not much difference between vfp float and double.


-Klaus

--
Klaus Rotter * klaus at rotters dot de * www.rotters.de
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] Dillo for N800/770

2007-02-11 Thread Klaus Rotter

Anuj Verma (Kevin) wrote:

I'll like to know if someone knows if there is a port for N800 or 770
available ? 


Dillo is (or at least the 0.8.6 source) GTK 1 based. There are some 
patches to get Dillo running on GTK2, but I think this is not stable yet.


But I agree that a small  lightweight HTML Browser would be nice.

--
Klaus Rotter * klaus at rotters dot de * www.rotters.de
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] Ogg Vorbis and the N800 - Theora encoding

2007-02-11 Thread Krischan Keitsch
After failing to combine theora and tremor I played with the n800 web cam.
Theora encoding can be done by (as example)

gst-launch-0.10 v4l2src ! 
ffmpegcolorspace ! video/x-raw-yuv,width=640,height=480,framerate=30/1 ! 
theoraenc bitrate=100 ! oggmux ! filesink location=target.ogg   

Well, playback is in fast forward mode then ;-) Do I need to add some kind of 
a 'timeoverlay' ?

Raw video encoding (I420) is done by

gst-launch-0.10 v4l2src ! 
ffmpegcolorspace ! video/x-raw-yuv,width=352,height=288,framerate=30/1 ! 
avimux ! filesink location=target.avi

Cpu usage is below 45%.

Regards Krischan



pgp08s1TStqMY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] Speed test with vfp (floating point) on N800

2007-02-11 Thread Visti Andresen
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 21:55:52 +0100
Klaus Rotter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi folks,
 
 I was very interesseted in the floating point copro in the N800 cpu and 
 did some tests with a progamm which calculates the mandelbrod set and 
 outputs it via SDL. I put this program online on 
 bomberman.garage.maemo.org. No installer, you have to run the benchmarks 
 on xterm or via ssh (so did I).

It might interest you to know that I have an integer implementation of the 
mandelbrot set.
It's not quite finished yet but, so its only available though subversion from 
the N770Demos project

 
 // Results of Mandelbrot set on N800 800x480 pixels, 100 interations
 // real -1 to 2
 // imag   -1.3 to 1.2
 
 // dbl - uses doubles
 // flt - uses floats
 // vfp - compiled with -mfpu=vfp -mfloat-abi=softfp
 
 // All binarys are compiled with -O2
 
 // Results with full PixelDraw and SDL_Update every pixel
 ./mandel_armel_dbl.bin - Time: 178.284 seconds
 ./mandel_armel_dbl_vfp.bin - Time: 151.816 seconds
 ./mandel_armel_flt.bin - Time: 169.486 seconds
 ./mandel_armel_flt_vfp.bin - Time: 152.148 seconds
 
 // Results with full PixelDraw and _NO_ SDL_Update.
 ./mandel_armel_dbl.bin - Time: 26.377 seconds
 ./mandel_armel_dbl_vfp.bin - Time: 1.808 seconds
 ./mandel_armel_flt.bin - Time: 19.813 seconds
 ./mandel_armel_flt_vfp.bin - Time: 1.709 seconds
 
 // Results without any Drawing
 ./mandel_armel_dbl.bin - Time: 26.525 seconds
 ./mandel_armel_dbl_vfp.bin - Time: 1.672 seconds
 ./mandel_armel_flt.bin - Time: 19.647 seconds
 ./mandel_armel_flt_vfp.bin - Time: 1.601 seconds
 
 // Results with full PixelDraw and SDL_Update only every column
 ./mandel_armel_dbl.bin - Time: 27.512 seconds
 ./mandel_armel_dbl_vfp.bin - Time: 2.447 seconds
 ./mandel_armel_flt.bin - Time: 20.689 seconds
 ./mandel_armel_flt_vfp.bin - Time: 2.451 seconds
 
 What could that mean? First, SDL_Update is _very_ expensive. In the 
 first try, I call SDL_Update just for every Pixel 
 (SDL_Update(screen,x,y,1,1) and it slows down execution about six times, 
 the vfp about 80 times. So I think there must be a kind of sync inside 
 the SDL_Update function. If I update only every column, the speed loss 
 is only about 80%.

When you do an update or flip the surface data is transferred to video memory 
(a slow and painful operation)
This is also true even if SDL tells you that you got a HW surface. 
Unfortunately there are no sync, to the vertical blank...
At least so have I been told. 

 
 Vfp float can give a speed increase about factor 10 and more. And there 
 is not much difference between vfp float and double.

Humm the N800 even has a floating point unit... and its quite fast.
I would say roughly as fast as an 770 using a long for the math.
Only timed by counting aloud, and with a different setup -1, 1 and -1, 1 with 
256 iterations.
(The current subversion code uses long long math for that extra resolution, and 
it costs quite some speed :)

 
 -Klaus
 
 -- 
 Klaus Rotter * klaus at rotters dot de * www.rotters.de
 ___
 maemo-developers mailing list
 maemo-developers@maemo.org
 https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


[maemo-developers] RFC 2833 (OOB DTMF tones) functionality (Nokia Devs please comment)

2007-02-11 Thread Michael Wiktowy

Quoting claw on the Gizmo forums thread:
We are limited by the platform in this respect. The Nokia 770/N800
operating system is currently not capable of sending RFC 2833 signals.
Nokia is aware of this shortcoming, but has not yet released an
operating system version that can do this.
(Sorry, but all we can do is ask Nokia to add this ability)
ref:
http://forum.gizmoproject.com/viewtopic.php?t=5451
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2833.html

This strikes me as kind of odd. The Maemo IM stack seems to allow for
mixed video/audio/text, why is it that the Gizmo devs seem to think
that the ITOS is incapable of this extra audio stream?

I tried to bypass this missing functionality by generating some DTMF
tones mp3s and playing them In-Band with the media player while Gizmo
was placing a call. Unfortunately, Gizmo blocked the media player from
playing the tones (while it did not block the little error tone that
accompanied the error message telling me that I couldn't play my
files). Even if it did work, I suspect that the iLBC codec would
distort the DTMF signal horribly (thus the need for RFC 2833).

Is it truly the situation that there is some missing link in the IM
infrastructure on the ITOS that won't allow OOB DTMF?

Is Gizmo or Media Player misusing the audio device such that they are
blocking each other?

I really think that this is important functionality for users as it
pretty much blocks anyone from retrieving voicemail or using automated
attendants.

Thanks
/Mike
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


[maemo-developers] Some Questions on the N800 OS Imageg

2007-02-11 Thread Acadia Secure Networks

All,

does the OS for the N800 have a configurable firewall included in the OS 
image (e.g. iptables?).


If so, are there any instructions on how to get it running? I am 
familiar with IPtables on Redhat LInux.


Also, has anyone written a dynamic dns client to run on the N800 along 
the lines of the following Microsoft Windows client:


http://www.dyndns.com/support/clients/

or the following Linux client:

   http://www.dyndns.com/support/clients/unix.html

?

The above Linux client is written in Perl and I wonder if it is 
worthwhile to translate the app to Python assuming that is possible?


Best Regards,

John Holmblad



___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] Some Questions on the N800 OS Imageg

2007-02-11 Thread Andrew J. Barr
On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 20:31 -0500, Acadia Secure Networks wrote:
 All,
 
 does the OS for the N800 have a configurable firewall included in the
 OS image (e.g. iptables?). 

iptables is _the_ firewall for modern Linux (e.g. 2.4 and later). There
isn't anything else that I am aware of.

 If so, are there any instructions on how to get it running? I am
 familiar with IPtables on Redhat LInux. 

If iptables isn't included in the Nokia kernel you can build your own
with IPtables. Custom kernels are documented on the Maemo wiki.

 Also, has anyone written a dynamic dns client to run on the N800 along
 the lines of the following Microsoft Windows client:
 
  http://www.dyndns.com/support/clients/
 
 or the following Linux client:
 
 http://www.dyndns.com/support/clients/unix.html
 
 ?
 
 The above Linux client is written in Perl and I wonder if it is
 worthwhile to translate the app to Python assuming that is possible?

If I were you I'd find a DynDNS client written in C. It would be more
easily portable. Any client written for Linux/POSIX in C should have no
trouble running on the N800. IIRC I use ez-ipupdate for my personal
server.

 Best Regards,
 
 John Holmblad
 
  
 
 
 ___
 maemo-developers mailing list
 maemo-developers@maemo.org
 https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: [maemo-developers] Ogg Vorbis and the N800 - Theora encoding

2007-02-11 Thread Kalle Vahlman

2007/2/11, Krischan Keitsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

After failing to combine theora and tremor I played with the n800 web cam.
Theora encoding can be done by (as example)

gst-launch-0.10 v4l2src !
ffmpegcolorspace ! video/x-raw-yuv,width=640,height=480,framerate=30/1 !
theoraenc bitrate=100 ! oggmux ! filesink location=target.ogg


You might want to limit the framerate, at least if you plan on playing
it back on the N800... ;)


Well, playback is in fast forward mode then ;-) Do I need to add some kind of
a 'timeoverlay' ?


My guess would be that at that size and framerate the encoding is not
keeping up with the stream. Do you see this with say [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Powered by http://movial.fi
Interesting stuff at http://syslog.movial.fi
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers