Re: Maemo Official Platform Bug Jar 2010.09
Thanks for the listing, but to be honest, it's rather difficult to follow if you send it to the mailing list. I would prefer to read it them @ http://www.octofish.net/bugjar/ and the only thing missing there is the maemo.org Website Bug Jar so could someone add this? -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Maemo-Official-Platform-Bug-Jar-2010-09-tp4652439p4652701.html Sent from the maemo-developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: UK Maemo firmware location = Rapidshare??!
> Someone has been using Rapidshare as a "usable" file host. > http://rapidshare.com/files/346892600/RX-51_2009SE_2.2009.51-1.203.2_PR_F5_203_ARM.bin > which is meant to allow one to download the latest UK generic firmware > won't allow me to download the relevant file due to rapidshare being > completely unhelpful and fail and wanting me to pay to download from it. I'm pretty sure Rapidshare is free and does not require you to pay to download. AFAIK you have to wait a minute or two when downloading. Rapidshare was used as a temporally option. Chris Pitchford has offered to provide hosting for UK firmwares. The main point being, MD5/SHA1 information should be available for all firmware versions/variants in tablets-dev not just the one currently listed in there, so for those firmwares Nokia 'refuse' to put/host in tablets-dev they can be mirrored elsewhere + when tablets-dev is down, tablets-dev has been down for several occasions. See https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6878 for discussion. Cheers -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/UK-Maemo-firmware-location-Rapidshare-tp4628086p4628377.html Sent from the maemo-developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Maemo 5 PR1.2 and Extras
> You do not need to update any apps in Legacy. Apps in Legacy remains the > same and does not get any further development work. Hmm sorry for the confusion, I should say if apps in Legacy are getting updates, they'll be move to Extras. It's not exactly what Niels's proposing, but just my suggestion. -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Maemo-5-PR1-2-and-Extras-tp4625110p4626893.html Sent from the maemo-developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Maemo 5 PR1.2 and Extras
> They will fragment the Maemo 5 community unless the auto-builder will > build across both repos, as I will not be updating my apps on a "Legacy" > repo if one is created. > > The way you propose makes it seem like Nokia is releasing a whole new > Maemo version (Maemo 5 -> Maemo 5.99), which is not what should be > visible to the end-user. Maemo 5 should continue being Maemo 5. It's such a big change that we're discussing about it right now. You do not need to update any apps in Legacy. Apps in Legacy remains the same and does not get any further development work. It's there so: 1. Users can browse pre-PR1.2 apps that are already working (apps without needing to update to work with PR1.2) 2. Apps in Legacy repo not working in PR1.2 gets updated and put into the new Extras & get removed from Legacy repo too Post-PR1.2, all development effort should be put into updating apps for the new Extras. I hope it's abit clearer now. Cheers -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Maemo-5-PR1-2-and-Extras-tp4625110p4626768.html Sent from the maemo-developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Maemo 5 PR1.2 and Extras
>> This will effectively mean that the 'old' Extras will not get any updates. >> New versions of applications will go to fremantle-1.2 Extras. >> Extras-devel >> and Extras-testing will not be changed, as they are expected to run the >> latest and greatest anyway. > >What happens to apps (especially those with Qt dependencies) _currently_ in >Extras, i.e., how will they get to the fremantle1.2 Extras repo ? Why not have 2 repos for Extras 1 called Extras Legacy (aka current Extras) 1 called Extras (aka fremantle-1.2 Extras) The only inconvenience I can think of is users have an addtional repo on the list, shouldn't do any harm! Cheers -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Maemo-5-PR1-2-and-Extras-tp4625110p4626546.html Sent from the maemo-developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
