Re: [maemo-developers] Scratchbox rpm scriptlet failure
On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 08:49 +1000, Colin Charles wrote: > even when: > cat /proc/sys/kernel/exec-shield > 0 > So the real solution to those running FC-4 is to make sure you do: echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/vdso exec-shield can remain at 1, that's fine, its just vdso that needs to be turned off. Virtual .so (vdso) in FC-4 seems to be the issue Regards -- Colin Charles, http://www.bytebot.net/ FUDCon II @ LinuxTag June 24-25, 2005 in Karlsruhe, Germany http://fedoraproject.com/fudcon/ ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] Scratchbox rpm scriptlet failure
On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 08:49 +1000, Colin Charles wrote: > On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 07:24 -0700, Colin Charles wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 09:14 +0200, Niels wrote: > > > Are you using the (not yet releast due to problems, but expected > > > 13.june) FC4, or are you using a test 3 FC4 ? > > > > The only real problem was the lack of naming ;-) > > > > I am using the not-yet-publically-released FC-4 (admitedly, that'd be > > kernel revision 1369, fwiw)... > > And now, after FC-4 is released publically, with > > uname -r > 2.6.11-1.1369_FC4 > > I still get: > ./run_me_first.sh > Inconsistency detected by ld.so: rtld.c: 1192: dl_main: Assertion `(void > *) ph->p_vaddr == _rtld_local._dl_sysinfo_dso' failed! > > even when: > cat /proc/sys/kernel/exec-shield > 0 > > So this is most certainly not working with FC-4. However, with FC-2, > I've managed to get this going without any issue > > (and I've tried both with the RPM and just untarring into /scratchbox as > per the instructions) > > Thanks Hi. Could you report the error with exact version numbers at Scratchbox bugzilla: http://bugzilla.scratchbox.org/ Thanks, Toni ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] Scratchbox rpm scriptlet failure
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 07:24 -0700, Colin Charles wrote: > On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 09:14 +0200, Niels wrote: > > Are you using the (not yet releast due to problems, but expected > > 13.june) FC4, or are you using a test 3 FC4 ? > > The only real problem was the lack of naming ;-) > > I am using the not-yet-publically-released FC-4 (admitedly, that'd be > kernel revision 1369, fwiw)... And now, after FC-4 is released publically, with uname -r 2.6.11-1.1369_FC4 I still get: ./run_me_first.sh Inconsistency detected by ld.so: rtld.c: 1192: dl_main: Assertion `(void *) ph->p_vaddr == _rtld_local._dl_sysinfo_dso' failed! even when: cat /proc/sys/kernel/exec-shield 0 So this is most certainly not working with FC-4. However, with FC-2, I've managed to get this going without any issue (and I've tried both with the RPM and just untarring into /scratchbox as per the instructions) Thanks -- Colin Charles, http://www.bytebot.net/ FUDCon II @ LinuxTag June 24-25, 2005 in Karlsruhe, Germany http://fedoraproject.com/fudcon/ ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] Scratchbox rpm scriptlet failure
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 09:14 +0200, Niels wrote: > Are you using the (not yet releast due to problems, but expected > 13.june) FC4, or are you using a test 3 FC4 ? The only real problem was the lack of naming ;-) I am using the not-yet-publically-released FC-4 (admitedly, that'd be kernel revision 1369, fwiw)... -- Colin Charles, http://www.bytebot.net/ FUDCon II @ LinuxTag June 24-25, 2005 in Karlsruhe, Germany http://fedoraproject.com/fudcon/ ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] Scratchbox rpm scriptlet failure
Colin Charles wrote: On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 17:48 +0300, Timo Savola wrote: ./run_me_first.sh Inconsistency detected by ld.so: rtld.c: 1192: dl_main: Assertion `(void *) ph->p_vaddr == _rtld_local._dl_sysinfo_dso' failed! Anyone else seen this? Take a look at these mails: http://lists.scratchbox.org/pipermail/scratchbox-users/2004-August/ Performed: echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/exec-shield [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cat /proc/sys/kernel/exec-shield 0 ./run_me_first.sh Inconsistency detected by ld.so: rtld.c: 1192: dl_main: Assertion `(void *) ph->p_vaddr == _rtld_local._dl_sysinfo_dso' failed! This time I tried it with tarballs too... 2.6.11-1.1363_FC4 is the kernel version. I'd gladly provide more information if required... Are you using the (not yet releast due to problems, but expected 13.june) FC4, or are you using a test 3 FC4 ? - niels ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] Scratchbox rpm scriptlet failure
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 17:48 +0300, Timo Savola wrote: > > ./run_me_first.sh > > Inconsistency detected by ld.so: rtld.c: 1192: dl_main: Assertion > `(void > > *) ph->p_vaddr == _rtld_local._dl_sysinfo_dso' failed! > > > > Anyone else seen this? > > Take a look at these mails: > http://lists.scratchbox.org/pipermail/scratchbox-users/2004-August/ Performed: echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/exec-shield [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cat /proc/sys/kernel/exec-shield 0 ./run_me_first.sh Inconsistency detected by ld.so: rtld.c: 1192: dl_main: Assertion `(void *) ph->p_vaddr == _rtld_local._dl_sysinfo_dso' failed! This time I tried it with tarballs too... 2.6.11-1.1363_FC4 is the kernel version. I'd gladly provide more information if required... -- Colin Charles, http://www.bytebot.net/ ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] Scratchbox rpm scriptlet failure
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 16:24 -0700, Colin Charles wrote: > ./run_me_first.sh > Inconsistency detected by ld.so: rtld.c: 1192: dl_main: Assertion `(void > *) ph->p_vaddr == _rtld_local._dl_sysinfo_dso' failed! > > Anyone else seen this? Take a look at these mails: http://lists.scratchbox.org/pipermail/scratchbox-users/2004-August/ timo ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
[maemo-developers] Scratchbox rpm scriptlet failure
So, anyone go around and install the scratchbox rpms? I got this: 2:scratchbox-core### [100%] Inconsistency detected by ld.so: rtld.c: 1192: dl_main: Assertion `(void *) ph->p_vaddr == _rtld_local._dl_sysinfo_dso' failed! error: %post(scratchbox-core-0.9.8.4-1.i386) scriptlet failed, exit status 127 System is Fedora Core 4, with SELinux enabled. Then when I go on to /scratchbox to perform run_me_first.sh, I get the same error: ./run_me_first.sh Inconsistency detected by ld.so: rtld.c: 1192: dl_main: Assertion `(void *) ph->p_vaddr == _rtld_local._dl_sysinfo_dso' failed! Anyone else seen this? Regards -- Colin Charles, http://www.bytebot.net/ ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
