Re: Promotion of packages depending on qtquickcompat is blocked

[Marcin Mielniczuk]

OK, but why is it blocked to promote packages depending on qtquickcompat?
Qt 4.7 namespace is deprecated!
--
Marcin



2012/9/27 Ивайло Димитров 

>
> qtquickcompat in CSSU is just a dummy package as CSSU comes with Qt 4.7.4
>
> https://gitorious.org/community-ssu/qtquickcompat
>
>
>
>  > Оригинално писмо 
>  >От:  Marcin Mielniczuk
>  >Относно: Promotion of packages depending on qtquickcompat is blocked
>  >До: maemo-developers@maemo.org
>  >Изпратено на: Сряда, 2012, Септември 26 21:53:01 EEST
>  >
>  >
>  >Hi,
>  >I created some Qt Quick apps and want to promote them to extras-testing.
> But it's blocked due to dependency on qtquickcompat. Why is it so, even
> when qtquickcompat is in cssu too?
>  >regards,--Marcin
>  >
>  >
>
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

Re: Promotion of packages depending on qtquickcompat is blocked

[Ивайло Димитров]

 
qtquickcompat in CSSU is just a dummy package as CSSU comes with Qt 4.7.4

https://gitorious.org/community-ssu/qtquickcompat



 > Оригинално писмо 
 >От:  Marcin Mielniczuk 
 >Относно: Promotion of packages depending on qtquickcompat is blocked
 >До: maemo-developers@maemo.org
 >Изпратено на: Сряда, 2012, Септември 26 21:53:01 EEST
 >
 >
 >Hi,
 >I created some Qt Quick apps and want to promote them to extras-testing. But 
 >it's blocked due to dependency on qtquickcompat. Why is it so, even when 
 >qtquickcompat is in cssu too?
 >regards,--Marcin
 >
 >
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

Re: promotion to extras

[Neal H. Walfield]

Hi,

There has been support for and no objections to the below proposal.
How do we go about implementing this?

Thanks,

Neal

At Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:00:54 +0100,
Neal H. Walfield wrote:
> 
> Thanks to everyone for the feedback.  I'm happy to learn that there is
> already infrastructure for differentiating super-testers from normal
> tesers.  I think promoting orphaned packages is a different discussion
> and I think this should be decided seperately.
> 
> My new proposal is:
> 
>  - quarantine for 10 days, promote after: 1 tester + 1 super-tester approve
>  - quarantine for 10 days, promote after: 3 testers approve
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Neal
> ___
> maemo-developers mailing list
> maemo-developers@maemo.org
> https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
> 
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

Re: promotion of orphaned packages

[Neal H. Walfield]

At Wed, 14 Dec 2011 13:32:47 +0100,
Nicolai Hess wrote:
> Yes, but who decides to transfer the maintainance? Can this only be done by
> the current
> maintainer?
> I doubt most maintainers of orphaned packages are listening to this
> request.

As I understand it, the maintainer gets an email.  If they ignore it
for, say, a week, I bet you could ask Niels Breet to authorize the
request.

Neal

___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

Re: promotion of orphaned packages

[Nicolai Hess]

2011/12/14 Neal H. Walfield 

> Hi Nicolai,
>
> > Is it possible to transfer the maintainance for orphaned packages to
> other,
> > still active, developers?
> > If so, I would volunteer myself for maintainance of some orphaned
> packages.
>
> If you look at the package's page (e.g.,
> http://maemo.org/packages/view/feedingit/), there is a "Request to be
> maintainer of this package" button.
>
> Neal
>

Yes, but who decides to transfer the maintainance? Can this only be done by
the current
maintainer?
I doubt most maintainers of orphaned packages are listening to this
request.
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

Re: promotion of orphaned packages

[Neal H. Walfield]

Hi Nicolai,

> Is it possible to transfer the maintainance for orphaned packages to other,
> still active, developers?
> If so, I would volunteer myself for maintainance of some orphaned packages.

If you look at the package's page (e.g.,
http://maemo.org/packages/view/feedingit/), there is a "Request to be
maintainer of this package" button.

Neal
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

Re: promotion of orphaned packages

[Nicolai Hess]

2011/12/14 Attila Csipa 

> On 14-Dec-11 03:00, Roberto Colistete Jr. wrote:
>
>> This have been talked about, but stopped at a question - do you really
>>> want orphaned packages published in Extras ? If a problem surfaces or a
>>> bug gets reported, there is nobody to take care of it, and removal can
>>> get really tricky (who gets final say as how broken it has to be to ask
>>> Niels to remove it, what if there are other packages depending on the
>>> orphaned one, etc).
>>>
>>
>> My opinion : if the orphaned package is in extras-testing for a long
>> time (1 month or more) and has a lot of positive votes (12, 2x the 6
>> needed to promotion), then it is reasonable that it is stable and well
>> tested. So it should be promoted to extras by some Maemo admin member.
>>
>
> Two problems:
>
> 1. The apps might have been tested on older versions of dependencies,
> which have been superseeded in the meantime. For example I have deprecated
> QtMobility 1.1, so it doesn't matter how well tested it was, that version
> of mobility is no longer available. Ditto for, say, things that depend on
> the kernel - it might work on one (old) version of the power kernel, but
> not another, etc.
>
> 2. It's not about promoting, it's about dealing with it when it's already
> in Extras and it goes wrong (and things do go wrong). If it's an orphaned
> package, there is a lack final authority who can (from a technical
> perspective) say what should be done, should it be a known issue, should it
> be removed, can someone take over, etc, etc. This is already a problem in
> Extras, it's just not too widespread (partially because the orphaned
> packages that could cause problem are stuck in testing) so we are in
> practice ignoring it.
>
> Best regards,
> Attila Csipa
>
> __**_
> maemo-developers mailing list
> maemo-developers@maemo.org
> https://lists.maemo.org/**mailman/listinfo/maemo-**developers
>


Is it possible to transfer the maintainance for orphaned packages to other,
still active, developers?
If so, I would volunteer myself for maintainance of some orphaned packages.

Nicolai
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

Re: promotion of orphaned packages

[Attila Csipa]

On 14-Dec-11 03:00, Roberto Colistete Jr. wrote:

This have been talked about, but stopped at a question - do you really
want orphaned packages published in Extras ? If a problem surfaces or a
bug gets reported, there is nobody to take care of it, and removal can
get really tricky (who gets final say as how broken it has to be to ask
Niels to remove it, what if there are other packages depending on the
orphaned one, etc).


My opinion : if the orphaned package is in extras-testing for a long
time (1 month or more) and has a lot of positive votes (12, 2x the 6
needed to promotion), then it is reasonable that it is stable and well
tested. So it should be promoted to extras by some Maemo admin member.


Two problems:

1. The apps might have been tested on older versions of dependencies, 
which have been superseeded in the meantime. For example I have 
deprecated QtMobility 1.1, so it doesn't matter how well tested it was, 
that version of mobility is no longer available. Ditto for, say, things 
that depend on the kernel - it might work on one (old) version of the 
power kernel, but not another, etc.


2. It's not about promoting, it's about dealing with it when it's 
already in Extras and it goes wrong (and things do go wrong). If it's an 
orphaned package, there is a lack final authority who can (from a 
technical perspective) say what should be done, should it be a known 
issue, should it be removed, can someone take over, etc, etc. This is 
already a problem in Extras, it's just not too widespread (partially 
because the orphaned packages that could cause problem are stuck in 
testing) so we are in practice ignoring it.


Best regards,
Attila Csipa
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

Re: promotion of orphaned packages

[Roberto Colistete Jr.]

On 12/12/2011 08:19 PM, emme750 at gmail.com wrote:

You should also solve the problem of those applications that are ready to be promoted, 
but the maintainer is no longer "alive".
For example, after one month of the release, the promotion may become 
automatic, or we should enable Supertester to do this.



This have been talked about, but stopped at a question - do you really
want orphaned packages published in Extras ? If a problem surfaces or a
bug gets reported, there is nobody to take care of it, and removal can
get really tricky (who gets final say as how broken it has to be to ask
Niels to remove it, what if there are other packages depending on the
orphaned one, etc).


Best regards,
Attila Csipa


   My opinion : if the orphaned package is in extras-testing for a long 
time (1 month or more) and has a lot of positive votes (12, 2x the 6 
needed to promotion), then it is reasonable that it is stable and well 
tested. So it should be promoted to extras by some Maemo admin member.


Best regards,

Roberto Colistete Jr.

___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

Re: promotion to extras

[Roberto Colistete Jr.]

Em 13-12-2011 11:00, Neal H. Walfield escreveu:

Thanks to everyone for the feedback.  I'm happy to learn that there is
already infrastructure for differentiating super-testers from normal
tesers.  I think promoting orphaned packages is a different discussion
and I think this should be decided seperately.

My new proposal is:

  - quarantine for 10 days, promote after: 1 tester + 1 super-tester approve
  - quarantine for 10 days, promote after: 3 testers approve

Thanks,

Neal


I second this suggestion. Maybe with one modification : 1 
super-tester should be enough.

___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

Re: promotion to extras

[Neal H. Walfield]

Thanks to everyone for the feedback.  I'm happy to learn that there is
already infrastructure for differentiating super-testers from normal
tesers.  I think promoting orphaned packages is a different discussion
and I think this should be decided seperately.

My new proposal is:

 - quarantine for 10 days, promote after: 1 tester + 1 super-tester approve
 - quarantine for 10 days, promote after: 3 testers approve

Thanks,

Neal
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

Re: promotion to extras

[Andrew Flegg]

On 12 December 2011 17:44, robert bauer  wrote:
>
> FWIW, the council (of which I am a member) suggested the idea of a limited
> number of "supertesters" to Nemein awhile ago.  The approval of a single
> supertester would, in the absence of any disapproval, be sufficient for
> promotion.  IMHO, there should be an open call for individuals to volunteer
> as supertesters but first crowdsource the qualifications so that we have an
> objective measure by which to select from the volunteers.

There are already "supertesters", of course. After 20 days quarantine,
a net of 3 supertester votes is enough to carry a package through. The
scope of supertesters, and the needed number of votes, may need to be
revisited.

Cheers,

Andrew

-- 
Andrew Flegg -- mailto:and...@bleb.org  |  http://www.bleb.org/
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

Re: promotion to extras

[robert bauer]

Hi Neal,

Thank you for taking the time to post this and to make a proposal.  In my
opinion, the testing of packages is an essential function of the community
and we should come up with a solution that accounts for the lesser volume
of active participants in maemo these days.

FWIW, the council (of which I am a member) suggested the idea of a limited
number of "supertesters" to Nemein awhile ago.  The approval of a single
supertester would, in the absence of any disapproval, be sufficient for
promotion.  IMHO, there should be an open call for individuals to volunteer
as supertesters but first crowdsource the qualifications so that we have an
objective measure by which to select from the volunteers.

Rob Bauer (SD69)

On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Neal H. Walfield wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm afraid that extras is dying due to a lack of interest in testing
> packages.
>
> Last month, I uploaded some Woodchuck-related packages to
> extras-devel.  I asked on #maemo a few times for people to test my
> packages.  I asked on this mailing list.  And, I asked on
> talk.maemo.org.  In the end, most of the testers were people who I
> know personally and asked to do me a favor and vote for my package.  I
> doubt that they actually tested it.  This is a waste of time: it
> doesn't improve the quality of packages and my time could be better
> spent working on my package.
>
> There is one person who appears to test packages: Harald Schmidt.  He
> has been designated a tester and appears to periodically check
> extras-testing for new packages.
>
> Given this, I propose that we use the following criteria for promoting
> to extras:
>
>  - 10 days incubation (unchanged)
>  - maintainer + 1 designated "testers" (e.g., Harald Schmidt) thumbs up
>   or maintainer + 3 non-testers
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Neal
>
> ___
> maemo-developers mailing list
> maemo-developers@maemo.org
> https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
>
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

Re: promotion to extras

[mohammad7410]

Hi,

I propose that since most devs are asking others to vote for them
we remove the whole testing requirement and make promoting to extras-testing 
something that's at the will of the developer.

--
Sent from my Nokia N950
Regards,
Mohammad Abu-Garbeyyeh


On 12/12/11 05:47 PM Neal H. Walfield wrote:

Hi,

I'm afraid that extras is dying due to a lack of interest in testing
packages.

Last month, I uploaded some Woodchuck-related packages to
extras-devel. I asked on #maemo a few times for people to test my
packages. I asked on this mailing list. And, I asked on
talk.maemo.org. In the end, most of the testers were people who I
know personally and asked to do me a favor and vote for my package. I
doubt that they actually tested it. This is a waste of time: it
doesn't improve the quality of packages and my time could be better
spent working on my package.

There is one person who appears to test packages: Harald Schmidt. He
has been designated a tester and appears to periodically check
extras-testing for new packages.

Given this, I propose that we use the following criteria for promoting
to extras:

- 10 days incubation (unchanged)
- maintainer + 1 designated "testers" (e.g., Harald Schmidt) thumbs up
or maintainer + 3 non-testers

Thoughts?

Neal

___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

Re: Promotion from extras-devel

[Aniello Del Sorbo]

Not sure if someone worked on this, but it is fine now.

Thanks!

anidel

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 14:25, Aniello Del Sorbo  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> few minutes ago I promoted (or better, tried to promote) Xournal to
> extras-testing for approval to Extras.
>
> After logging in and clicking on the Promote Package on the ARMEL
> version, the browser hung.
> Now, whenever I load the ARMEL package page:
>
> https://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-devel_free_armel/xournal/0.4.5-1fremantle13/
>
> I still see the "Promote package" link, but when I click it I get a
> SEVER ERROR 500 (uh uh!?) stating that the package has already been
> promoted:
>
> "Server Error
>
> Package has already been promoted.
> Error 500"
>
> My guess is that the process has been interrupted somehow?
> Could someone investigate please?
>
> Thank you.
> anidel
>
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

Re: Re: Promotion

[Martin Grimme]

Thanks a lot, Niels!

I can confirm that it's working fine, now. Allowing long lines was a
good choice IMHO, as it seems that quite a few packages have their
icons displayed now, which didn't show one before.


Martin


2010/4/7, George Kibardin :
>
> It works now! Thank you!
>
> 07.04.10, 15:07, "Niels Breet" :
>
>> On Sun, April 4, 2010 20:42, George Kibardin wrote:
>>  > Hi everybody,
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > It seems that I missed something. Suddenly I cannot promote the latest
>>  > version of my app from diablo extras-devel to diablo extras. I've read
>>  > this http://wiki.maemo.org/Uploading_to_Extras, tried this
>>  > https://garage.maemo.org/promoter/diablo and still no luck. I see my
>> app
>>  > in extras-devel, but there is nothing like "promote" button.
>>
>>
>>  The promote link is found on the armel version page of your application:
>>
>> http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/diablo_extras-devel_free_armel/feedcircuit/0.7.6-2/
>>
>>  The link doesn't show because you are not using one of the sections
>> listed
>>  in http://wiki.maemo.org/Package_Categories
>>  >
>>  > P.S. I see that for Fremantle promotion process is more complex, but I
>>  > still cannot get the idea - what to do to initiate promotion process?
>>
>>  Same thing. Go to the armel version of the package in fremantle
>>  extras-devel and click on promote.
>>
>>  >
>>  > Best,
>>  > George
>>
>>  --
>>  Niels Breet
>>  maemo.org webmaster
>>
>>
>>
>>
> ___
> maemo-developers mailing list
> maemo-developers@maemo.org
> https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
>
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

Re: Re: Promotion

[George Kibardin]

It works now! Thank you!

07.04.10, 15:07, "Niels Breet" :

> On Sun, April 4, 2010 20:42, George Kibardin wrote:
>  > Hi everybody,
>  >
>  >
>  > It seems that I missed something. Suddenly I cannot promote the latest
>  > version of my app from diablo extras-devel to diablo extras. I've read
>  > this http://wiki.maemo.org/Uploading_to_Extras, tried this
>  > https://garage.maemo.org/promoter/diablo and still no luck. I see my app
>  > in extras-devel, but there is nothing like "promote" button.
>  
>  
>  The promote link is found on the armel version page of your application:
>  
> http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/diablo_extras-devel_free_armel/feedcircuit/0.7.6-2/
>  
>  The link doesn't show because you are not using one of the sections listed
>  in http://wiki.maemo.org/Package_Categories
>  >
>  > P.S. I see that for Fremantle promotion process is more complex, but I
>  > still cannot get the idea - what to do to initiate promotion process?
>  
>  Same thing. Go to the armel version of the package in fremantle
>  extras-devel and click on promote.
>  
>  >
>  > Best,
>  > George
>  
>  --
>  Niels Breet
>  maemo.org webmaster
>  
>  
>  
>  
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

Re: Promotion

[Niels Breet]

On Sun, April 4, 2010 20:42, George Kibardin wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
>
> It seems that I missed something. Suddenly I cannot promote the latest
> version of my app from diablo extras-devel to diablo extras. I've read
> this http://wiki.maemo.org/Uploading_to_Extras, tried this
> https://garage.maemo.org/promoter/diablo and still no luck. I see my app
> in extras-devel, but there is nothing like "promote" button.


The promote link is found on the armel version page of your application:
http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/diablo_extras-devel_free_armel/feedcircuit/0.7.6-2/

The link doesn't show because you are not using one of the sections listed
in http://wiki.maemo.org/Package_Categories
>
> P.S. I see that for Fremantle promotion process is more complex, but I
> still cannot get the idea - what to do to initiate promotion process?

Same thing. Go to the armel version of the package in fremantle
extras-devel and click on promote.

>
> Best,
> George

--
Niels Breet
maemo.org webmaster


___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

Re: Promotion

[Niels Breet]

On Wed, April 7, 2010 10:06, Martin Grimme wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
>
> same here, so it might be a general problem with the Diablo promoter.
> Besides taking 9 days for the package interface to recognize that a
> package has been updated, and then complaining that the package didn't have
> a proper description (which it certainly has). The package icon is not
> imported, either. Please somebody look at the Diablo package interface to
> see what's going wrong. For information, my stuck Diablo package is
> 'fmradio-player 2010.03.20-2'.
>
You use long lines in your control file where 80 chars is recommended. The
importer didn't like that so it left the entries empty.

I've now changed the importer to import long lines too.

>
>
> Regards,
> Martin
>

--
Niels Breet
maemo.org webmaster


___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

Re: Promotion

[Martin Grimme]

Hi,

same here, so it might be a general problem with the Diablo promoter.
Besides taking 9 days for the package interface to recognize that a
package has been updated, and then complaining that the package didn't
have a proper description (which it certainly has). The package icon
is not imported, either.
Please somebody look at the Diablo package interface to see what's going wrong.
For information, my stuck Diablo package is 'fmradio-player 2010.03.20-2'.


Regards,
Martin


2010/4/4, George Kibardin :
> Hi everybody,
>
> It seems that I missed something. Suddenly I cannot promote the latest
> version of my app from diablo extras-devel to diablo extras. I've read this
> http://wiki.maemo.org/Uploading_to_Extras, tried this
> https://garage.maemo.org/promoter/diablo and still no luck. I see my app in
> extras-devel, but there is nothing like "promote" button.
>
> P.S. I see that for Fremantle promotion process is more complex, but I still
> cannot get the idea - what to do to initiate promotion process?
>
> Best,
> George
> ___
> maemo-developers mailing list
> maemo-developers@maemo.org
> https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
>
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

RE: Promotion to extras

[ds]

Am Dienstag, den 12.01.2010, 10:43 +0100 schrieb tero.k...@nokia.com: 
> It seems that the package entered testing 2010-01-03 20:26 UTC
> That is from the package event field on the page.
> 
> So you have about one day and ten hours of waiting left :-)
> 
Thanks a lot

would be nice, if there would be a short explanation as e.g. in
debian.

"This package can not be promoted yet, link:"check why"

especially if the QA process becomes more complicated in the
future!

Detlef 


> Tero
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: maemo-developers-boun...@maemo.org [mailto:maemo-developers-
> > boun...@maemo.org] On Behalf Of ext ds
> > Sent: 11 January, 2010 22:17
> > To: maemo-developers@maemo.org
> > Subject: Promotion to extras
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > some weeks ago I promoted to extras. I could not find any changes.
> > 
> > I have Karma 11 in extras testing: Why is there not promotion link now?
> > 
> > Last time it was.
> > 
> > http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-
> > testing_free_armel/vncviewer/0.6.4-fremantle2/
> > 
> > thanks a lot
> > 
> > Detlef
> > 
> > ___
> > maemo-developers mailing list
> > maemo-developers@maemo.org
> > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
> 


___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

RE: Promotion to extras

[tero.kojo]

It seems that the package entered testing 2010-01-03 20:26 UTC
That is from the package event field on the page.

So you have about one day and ten hours of waiting left :-)

Tero

> -Original Message-
> From: maemo-developers-boun...@maemo.org [mailto:maemo-developers-
> boun...@maemo.org] On Behalf Of ext ds
> Sent: 11 January, 2010 22:17
> To: maemo-developers@maemo.org
> Subject: Promotion to extras
> 
> Hello,
> 
> some weeks ago I promoted to extras. I could not find any changes.
> 
> I have Karma 11 in extras testing: Why is there not promotion link now?
> 
> Last time it was.
> 
> http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-
> testing_free_armel/vncviewer/0.6.4-fremantle2/
> 
> thanks a lot
> 
> Detlef
> 
> ___
> maemo-developers mailing list
> maemo-developers@maemo.org
> https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

Re: Promotion to extras

[ds]

Am Montag, den 11.01.2010, 23:02 +0200 schrieb Ed Bartosh: 
> 2010/1/11 Valerio Valerio :
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 8:17 PM, ds  wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> some weeks ago I promoted to extras. I could not find any changes.
> >>
> >> I have Karma 11 in extras testing: Why is there not promotion link now?
> >
> > The packages have to pass 10 days of quarantine[1] in testing before the
> > promotion link appears.
> >
> According to this: http://maemo.org/packages/view/vncviewer/ latest
> version of packages was not even promoted to testing.

I know. I first want the actual version final testet. Is this not
possible??

> 


___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

Re: Promotion to extras

[Ed Bartosh]

2010/1/11 Valerio Valerio :
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 8:17 PM, ds  wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> some weeks ago I promoted to extras. I could not find any changes.
>>
>> I have Karma 11 in extras testing: Why is there not promotion link now?
>
> The packages have to pass 10 days of quarantine[1] in testing before the
> promotion link appears.
>
According to this: http://maemo.org/packages/view/vncviewer/ latest
version of packages was not even promoted to testing.

-- 
BR,
Ed
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

Re: Promotion to extras

[Valerio Valerio]

Hi,

On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 8:17 PM, ds  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> some weeks ago I promoted to extras. I could not find any changes.
>
> I have Karma 11 in extras testing: Why is there not promotion link now?
>

The packages have to pass 10 days of quarantine[1] in testing before the
promotion link appears.

[1] - http://wiki.maemo.org/Extras-testing

Best regards,

-- 
Valério Valério

http://www.valeriovalerio.org

>
> Last time it was.
>
>
> http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/vncviewer/0.6.4-fremantle2/
>
> thanks a lot
>
> Detlef
>
> ___
> maemo-developers mailing list
> maemo-developers@maemo.org
> https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
>
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

Re: Promotion unlocked messages

[Niels Breet]

> Hi Niels,
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Niels Breet  wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> While implementing a new notification feature for the community QA
>> queue, a number of mails have been sent out to owners of packages in
>> extras-testing.
>
> I received a couple of these e-mails (although all of them are
> packages I help maintaining for the PyMaemo project). I have a couple of
> questions about it:
>
> * do we have to take some action after we receive this e-mail?

No, you should not have received them.

> * On the e-mail it says the package is "unlocked for promotion in
> extras-testing". What does that mean specifically? That the package can be
> promoted to extras? * What about packages that are automatically promoted
> to extras-testing because they are dependencies of other promoted package
> (as is with most PyMaemo packages)? Do we (the PyMaemo team) have to
> promote these packages ourselves or simply wait for some application using
> them to be promoted?

These messages will only be sent out to user/* section applications when
they have met the promotion criteria. They're just a reminder that the app
can be promoted from Extras-testing to Extras. (When everything is working
correctly ;)

In your case you don't have to do anything.

Sorry again, I messed up.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> --
> Anderson Lizardo
> OpenBossa Labs - INdT
> Manaus - Brazil
>

--
Niels Breet
maemo.org webmaster


___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

Re: Promotion unlocked messages

[Anderson Lizardo]

Hi Niels,

On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Niels Breet  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While implementing a new notification feature for the community QA queue,
> a number of mails have been sent out to owners of packages in
> extras-testing.

I received a couple of these e-mails (although all of them are
packages I help maintaining for the PyMaemo project). I have a couple
of questions about it:

* do we have to take some action after we receive this e-mail?
* On the e-mail it says the package is "unlocked for promotion in
extras-testing". What does that mean specifically? That the package
can be promoted to extras?
* What about packages that are automatically promoted to
extras-testing because they are dependencies of other promoted package
(as is with most PyMaemo packages)? Do we (the PyMaemo team) have to
promote these packages ourselves or simply wait for some application
using them to be promoted?

Thanks in advance,
-- 
Anderson Lizardo
OpenBossa Labs - INdT
Manaus - Brazil
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers