Re: Why can't Nokia/Maemo release consistent versions for an upgrade?
Thanks again for fixing this. I'm did an apt-get update from scratchbox and am getting the new version (through apt-get source, not manually downloading). On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 2:28 AM, Soumya Bijjal soumya.3.bij...@nokia.com wrote: Hi, The bluez-utils sources is pointing to version 3.28-0osso6 now. Regards, Soumya Bijjal Soumya.3 (Nokia-D/Helsinki) wrote: Hello! bluez-utils 3.28-0osso7 in the SDK repository is a costly mistake. We sincerely apologize for the pain this has caused. We have tried to rectify it on Friday. But apparently, its source is still not pointing to osso6 version. As soon as this is fixed, I will post here again. Regards, Soumya -Original Message- From: maemo-developers-boun...@maemo.org on behalf of ext tz Sent: Sat 12/20/2008 4:53 PM To: maemo-developers@maemo.org Subject: Re: Why can't Nokia/Maemo release consistent versions for an upgrade? Thank You to Nokia. Bluez-utils 3.28-osso6 appeared on Friday and I'm doing the required fixes to my packaging now. (apt-get update doesn't see it so the Packages.gz generator probably hasn't seen it or something is still cached as apt-get source still pulls osso4). ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Why can't Nokia/Maemo release consistent versions for an upgrade?
Hi, The bluez-utils sources is pointing to version 3.28-0osso6 now. Regards, Soumya Bijjal Soumya.3 (Nokia-D/Helsinki) wrote: Hello! bluez-utils 3.28-0osso7 in the SDK repository is a costly mistake. We sincerely apologize for the pain this has caused. We have tried to rectify it on Friday. But apparently, its source is still not pointing to osso6 version. As soon as this is fixed, I will post here again. Regards, Soumya -Original Message- From: maemo-developers-boun...@maemo.org on behalf of ext tz Sent: Sat 12/20/2008 4:53 PM To: maemo-developers@maemo.org Subject: Re: Why can't Nokia/Maemo release consistent versions for an upgrade? Thank You to Nokia. Bluez-utils 3.28-osso6 appeared on Friday and I'm doing the required fixes to my packaging now. (apt-get update doesn't see it so the Packages.gz generator probably hasn't seen it or something is still cached as apt-get source still pulls osso4). ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Why can't Nokia/Maemo release consistent versions for an upgrade?
Thank you - it seemed to take some time for the package.gz spiders to find things, but everything seems in sync with osso6 and my package is updating properly (from extras-devel - now there is a dichotomy with pre-5.2008 needing osso4 and post needing osso6, but after the upgrade becomes common I can promote it to extras). The biggest annoyance is before the correction there was no history or link or whatever I could use to fix it myself (without causing worse evils than I'm trying to solve). When I tried my own upgrade I had a problem with the SSU and had to reflash my Wimax n810 (the metalayer crawler bug https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3938 which I traced because it happened again with supld and added a long comment explaining where the fix for that needs to be - it affects any /etc/init.d entry). On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 12:13 PM, soumya.3.bij...@nokia.com wrote: Hello! bluez-utils 3.28-0osso7 in the SDK repository is a costly mistake. We sincerely apologize for the pain this has caused. We have tried to rectify it on Friday. But apparently, its source is still not pointing to osso6 version. As soon as this is fixed, I will post here again. Regards, Soumya ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Why can't Nokia/Maemo release consistent versions for an upgrade?
Thank You to Nokia. Bluez-utils 3.28-osso6 appeared on Friday and I'm doing the required fixes to my packaging now. (apt-get update doesn't see it so the Packages.gz generator probably hasn't seen it or something is still cached as apt-get source still pulls osso4). ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
RE: Why can't Nokia/Maemo release consistent versions for an upgrade?
Hello! bluez-utils 3.28-0osso7 in the SDK repository is a costly mistake. We sincerely apologize for the pain this has caused. We have tried to rectify it on Friday. But apparently, its source is still not pointing to osso6 version. As soon as this is fixed, I will post here again. Regards, Soumya -Original Message- From: maemo-developers-boun...@maemo.org on behalf of ext tz Sent: Sat 12/20/2008 4:53 PM To: maemo-developers@maemo.org Subject: Re: Why can't Nokia/Maemo release consistent versions for an upgrade? Thank You to Nokia. Bluez-utils 3.28-osso6 appeared on Friday and I'm doing the required fixes to my packaging now. (apt-get update doesn't see it so the Packages.gz generator probably hasn't seen it or something is still cached as apt-get source still pulls osso4). ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Why can't Nokia/Maemo release consistent versions for an upgrade?
Over the past few months I've been asking to the point of annoyance what to do about bluez-utils-test since it is Maemo supported, therefore has dependencies on the official version. So with the most recent upgrade my application is now completely uninstallable. On the tablet after the upgrade is: bluez-utils-3.28-0osso6. The only thing in any repository (including source) is labeled osso7! If only for the GPL, where is the exact source corresponding to osso6? I can't (without falsifying versions) build an osso6 version of bluez-utils-test. Upgrading bluez-utils to osso7 breaks osso-software-version-rx44 (which is dependent on osso6). Perhaps this is OK, but I'd rather not force all users to have to uninstall this metapackage (does it happen automatically)? I'm also having problems with the SDK - I can't even do apt-get source to get anything but osso4 there - I have to download the components manually. Worse, no one can install the most recent version of my program since for some reason application manager can't resolve the dependencies. The program is only available as a deb (at http://www.zdez.org), but it sits there and lists python2.5-gnome and python2.5-bluez in the Problems tabs. They aren't user so can't be installed manually/separately, but are in extras. apt-get install will work from the command line, but application manager won't. Is there any way Nokia might release an upgrade of such magnitude to a -devel area first so we can test it and undo any breakage BEFORE the users upgrade and break everything? Is there a reason they aren't providing source to the GPL components of the upgrade? Only older or newer ones (the latter for the sdk)? I am really trying hard to play by the rules, but it seems futile since Nokia comes out of the bluez with upgrades that break everything I'm doing and aren't easily fixed. ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
