Re: Changes in bugs.maemo.org
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 14:23 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: > By the end of this year, I plan to close all those products in > bugs.maemo.org for new bug entry that are in the classifications > "Official Maemo applications" and "Official Maemo platform" as it seems > that Nokia has not been very interested in this lately. > The bugs.maemo.org frontpage will also reflect this: > https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12517 > > So from 2012 on bugs.maemo.org will exist only for reporting issues > about the maemo.org website and its related services, plus for Maemo > Extras (community applications). This has been done now. andre -- Andre Klapper (maemo.org bugmaster) http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ ___ maemo-users mailing list maemo-users@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users
Re: Changes in bugs.maemo.org
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 21:35 +, James Brown wrote: > If the Nokia don't want to support their proprietary soft maybe we can > demand them to make it open? This has been discussed several times before on Maemo mailing lists, bugs.maemo.org and talk.maemo.org and I don't see any advantages (or potential new arguments) by discussing it again. I assume that http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p=784443&postcount=32 still describes it well. andre -- Andre Klapper (maemo.org bugmaster) http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ ___ maemo-users mailing list maemo-users@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users
Re: Changes in bugs.maemo.org
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 23:54 +0100, Neal H. Walfield wrote: > Sure, Nokia may no longer be interested in Maemo 5, but there is the > CSSU. I think a good approach would be to direct people who want to > file reports against Maemo 5 to the CSSU and to tell them that if that > doesn't already include a fix for their problem, they should file a > bug report against the CSSU component. I disagree as I doubt that CSSU folks really want to get all those enhancement requests dumped into their product in bugs.maemo.org, keeping very limited manpower in mind, plus missing knowledge of an average reporter whether affected components are not closed source. Did you talk to the CSSU folks about their opinion? andre -- Andre Klapper (maemo.org bugmaster) http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ ___ maemo-users mailing list maemo-users@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users
Re: Changes in bugs.maemo.org
On 14.12.2011 13:23, Andre Klapper wrote: > Yo! > > By the end of this year, I plan to close all those products in > bugs.maemo.org for new bug entry that are in the classifications > "Official Maemo applications" and "Official Maemo platform" as it seems > that Nokia has not been very interested in this lately. > The bugs.maemo.org frontpage will also reflect this: > https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12517 > > Only thing I am afraid of is that users will report to some random > (still open) products just to get their reports submitted, however with > the current low amount of incoming issues that sounds unlikely to become > a problem. Plus there are always some folks that don't read (we received > a few MeeGo/N950 reports in bugs.maemo.org though the frontpage clearly > says where to go for this) but that's life. > > So from 2012 on bugs.maemo.org will exist only for reporting issues > about the maemo.org website and its related services, plus for Maemo > Extras (community applications). > > andre If the Nokia don't want to support their proprietary soft maybe we can demand them to make it open? Is it possible by law of some European countries to lodge action against the Nokia for their stoppage of supporting their products and offer them to conclude peaceful agreement on such basis (opening their propietary soft for N900)? ___ maemo-users mailing list maemo-users@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users
Re: Changes in bugs.maemo.org
Hi, Sure, Nokia may no longer be interested in Maemo 5, but there is the CSSU. I think a good approach would be to direct people who want to file reports against Maemo 5 to the CSSU and to tell them that if that doesn't already include a fix for their problem, they should file a bug report against the CSSU component. Thanks, Neal ___ maemo-users mailing list maemo-users@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users
Changes in bugs.maemo.org
Yo! By the end of this year, I plan to close all those products in bugs.maemo.org for new bug entry that are in the classifications "Official Maemo applications" and "Official Maemo platform" as it seems that Nokia has not been very interested in this lately. The bugs.maemo.org frontpage will also reflect this: https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12517 Only thing I am afraid of is that users will report to some random (still open) products just to get their reports submitted, however with the current low amount of incoming issues that sounds unlikely to become a problem. Plus there are always some folks that don't read (we received a few MeeGo/N950 reports in bugs.maemo.org though the frontpage clearly says where to go for this) but that's life. So from 2012 on bugs.maemo.org will exist only for reporting issues about the maemo.org website and its related services, plus for Maemo Extras (community applications). andre -- Andre Klapper (maemo.org bugmaster) http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ | http://www.openismus.com ___ maemo-users mailing list maemo-users@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users
