[Mageia-dev] Test day today

2011-02-26 Thread Remy CLOUARD
Hi, you may have or may not have seen it, we plan to do a test day today
for mageia alpha 1 iso.

The plan is to test both install and upgrade from mandriva 2010.1.

You can see all the details in the blog article there:
http://blog.mageia.org/?p=530

Thanks in advance for your participation !

Regards,
-- 
Rémy CLOUARD
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments


pgpc3JMB6vfYt.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [Mageia-dev] About panotools patent problem (and other problematic rpms)

2011-02-26 Thread Anssi Hannula
On 26.02.2011 07:35, andre999 wrote:
 Maarten Vanraes a écrit :

 Op donderdag 24 februari 2011 16:08:51 schreef Anne nicolas:
 2011/2/24 Thierry Vignaudthierry.vign...@gmail.com:
 On 24 February 2011 07:13, andre999and...@laposte.net  wrote:
 And if you discussed the issue and your POV wasn't adapted, what's
 the
 point re-emerging it now given that changing the new isn't easy now
 that the infra- is already in place.

 In 4+ months, a lot will be changed/corrected.
 In my mind, this inappropriate name will tarnish Mageia.
 We can surely find a much more appropriate name.
 Since the repositories in question are empty, and will never be very
 big, the cost of changing is minimal.

 Then what do you suggest?
 (Remember we already have that discussion)
 half free :-)
 maybe free
 free  maybe patent-free in your country/release
 not sure (special idiocraty for blinopterjan) (me slapping enael
 for having let those guys view that film)

 As a side note, let me protest against this. I was a victim and had to
 watch it 3 or 4 times

 i'm really curious about the movie now...
 
 me too :)
 
 actually, any of those suggestions would be an improvement ;)
 I did suggest contrained.
 Ubuntu uses restricted and/or multiverse (which include mostly
 non-free packages), and there were a lot of other suggestions.
 There was only ONE that seemed inappropriate.

Ubuntu's multiverse and restricted contain non-free packages only.
Packages in tainted are all free packages.

-- 
Anssi Hannula


Re: [Mageia-dev] About panotools patent problem (and other problematic rpms)

2011-02-26 Thread andre999

Anssi Hannula a écrit :


On 26.02.2011 07:35, andre999 wrote:

...

actually, any of those suggestions would be an improvement ;)
I did suggest contrained.
Ubuntu uses restricted and/or multiverse (which include mostly
non-free packages), and there were a lot of other suggestions.
There was only ONE that seemed inappropriate.


Ubuntu's multiverse and restricted contain non-free packages only.
Packages in tainted are all free packages.


ok
just the Ubuntu web site repository descriptions indicate that 
patent-threatened or legally restricted packages would go into these 
repositories, along with the usual non-free.

I have no idea what they do in practice.

do you mean that you consider that non-free packages should go into 
non-free, even if threatened by legal or patent constraints ?


--
André


Re: [Mageia-dev] About panotools patent problem (and other problematic rpms)

2011-02-26 Thread Anssi Hannula
On 26.02.2011 22:20, andre999 wrote:
 Anssi Hannula a écrit :

 On 26.02.2011 07:35, andre999 wrote:
 ...
 actually, any of those suggestions would be an improvement ;)
 I did suggest contrained.
 Ubuntu uses restricted and/or multiverse (which include mostly
 non-free packages), and there were a lot of other suggestions.
 There was only ONE that seemed inappropriate.

 Ubuntu's multiverse and restricted contain non-free packages only.
 Packages in tainted are all free packages.
 
 ok
 just the Ubuntu web site repository descriptions indicate that
 patent-threatened or legally restricted packages would go into these
 repositories, along with the usual non-free.
 I have no idea what they do in practice.

They have fully enabled ffmpeg in main, and mplayer,x264,lame in
universe. So patent-constrained pkgs do not appear to be put in multiverse.

 do you mean that you consider that non-free packages should go into
 non-free, even if threatened by legal or patent constraints ?

Well, those don't really belong to either, so I'm unsure what would be
done with those. However, I'm not aware of any such packages so it is a
moot point :)

-- 
Anssi Hannula