[Mageia-dev] urpmi searchmedia and 32-bit packages installation

2013-02-09 Thread Adrien Guichard
I am trying to install 32-bit packages using urpmi:
# urpmi --searchmedia distrib31 mesa
#

distrib31 media is 32-bit Core packages, is there a way to force
installation? (64-bit version is installed which I think prevent
32-bit installation)


Re: [Mageia-dev] [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release ivtv-utils-1.4.0-1.mga3

2013-02-09 Thread Thierry Vignaud
On 9 February 2013 00:47, tmb  wrote:
> tmb  1.4.0-1.mga3:
> + Revision: 397259
> - clean spec
> - fix string format (P0)
> - import from fedora

Care to add the proper line to rpmsrate, so that it get automatically
installed? eg:
DRIVER"ivtv" ivtv-utils

(providing ivtv is the driver seen by ldetect for that)


Re: [Mageia-dev] [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release xkeyboard-config-2.8-1.mga3

2013-02-09 Thread Thierry Vignaud
On 1 February 2013 17:44, guillomovitch  wrote:
> Name: xkeyboard-config Relocations: (not relocatable)
(...)
> Description :
> Xkeyboard-config provides consistent, well-structured, frequently released of 
> X
> keyboard configuration data (XKB) for various X Window System implementations.

Humm, btw we should stop "renaming" it, aka:
  %define old_name x11-data-xkbdata
  %files -f %{name}.lang -n %{old_name}
And just add the proper obsoletes/provides tags:
  %rename: x11-data-xkbdata

The description being bogus b/c of that name change.

> luigiwalser  1:2.8-1.mga3:
> + Revision: 393912
> - 2.8
> - rediff zapping patch
> - remove no longer needed pre script
> - add man page to files list


Re: [Mageia-dev] [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release libx11-1.5.0-4.mga3

2013-02-09 Thread Thierry Vignaud
On 9 February 2013 01:04, luigiwalser  wrote:
> luigiwalser  1.5.0-4.mga3:
> + Revision: 397145
> - remove obsolete pre script

BTW, thx for killing those years old obsolete scriptlets


Re: [Mageia-dev] [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release libx11-1.5.0-4.mga3

2013-02-09 Thread David Walser
--- On Sat, 2/9/13, Thierry Vignaud  wrote:
> From: Thierry Vignaud 
> Subject: Re: [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release libx11-1.5.0-4.mga3
> To: "Mageia development mailing-list" , "David Walser" 
> 
> Date: Saturday, February 9, 2013, 4:55 AM
> On 9 February 2013 01:04, luigiwalser
> 
> wrote:
> > luigiwalser  1.5.0-4.mga3:
> > + Revision: 397145
> > - remove obsolete pre script
> 
> BTW, thx for killing those years old obsolete scriptlets

You're quite welcome.  :o)  Thanks to you for helping find them.


Re: [Mageia-dev] [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release xkeyboard-config-2.8-1.mga3

2013-02-09 Thread David Walser
--- On Sat, 2/9/13, Thierry Vignaud  wrote:
> From: Thierry Vignaud 
> Subject: Re: [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release 
> xkeyboard-config-2.8-1.mga3
> To: "Mageia development mailing-list" , "David Walser" 
> 
> Date: Saturday, February 9, 2013, 4:54 AM
> On 1 February 2013 17:44,
> guillomovitch 
> wrote:
> > Name        :
> xkeyboard-config         
>    Relocations: (not relocatable)
> (...)
> > Description :
> > Xkeyboard-config provides consistent, well-structured,
> frequently released of X
> > keyboard configuration data (XKB) for various X Window
> System implementations.
> 
> Humm, btw we should stop "renaming" it, aka:
>   %define old_name x11-data-xkbdata
>   %files -f %{name}.lang -n %{old_name}
> And just add the proper obsoletes/provides tags:
>   %rename: x11-data-xkbdata
> 
> The description being bogus b/c of that name change.

That might make sense to have it match the upstream name, although since Fedora 
uses the same name as we do, it makes it easier to keep track of.  It appeared 
on the youri-check page, and that was how I knew it needed to be updated in the 
first place.  I'd say keep the Fedora name for now.


Re: [Mageia-dev] [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release xkeyboard-config-2.8-1.mga3

2013-02-09 Thread Guillaume Rousse

Le 09/02/2013 11:00, David Walser a écrit :

The description being bogus b/c of that name change.


That might make sense to have it match the upstream name, although since Fedora 
uses the same name as we do, it makes it easier to keep track of.  It appeared 
on the youri-check page, and that was how I knew it needed to be updated in the 
first place.  I'd say keep the Fedora name for now.
You don't need to rename package for this latest point, you just need to 
define aliases in your-icheck configuration.

--
BOFH excuse #364:

Sand fleas eating the Internet cables


Re: [Mageia-dev] freeze push: perl-URPM & urpmi

2013-02-09 Thread Thierry Vignaud
On 8 February 2013 23:26, Pascal Terjan  wrote:
> please let in perl-URPM & urpmi
> perl-URPM fixes a bug regarding installing delta rpm
> urpmi fixes counting erasures in progress bar.

 I think urpmi should probably not count erasures at all in the
 $cur/$total number, since IMHO the count should be for the packages
 installed instead of applied transactions, and package removal is
 usually much faster than installation.
>>>
>>>
>>> Try that on texlive-texmf :-)
>>>
>>> This does what you want, a separate counter for erasures
>>
>> Nice :)
>>
>> Probably should see if others agree with me or not before applying I
>> guess...
>>
>> Everyone, WDYT?
>
> I thought of requesting such change when I ran the new version but
> then decided it was not important :)

Should I wait for one more vote before dcommiting & releasing?


Re: [Mageia-dev] freeze push: perl-URPM & urpmi

2013-02-09 Thread Thomas Backlund

09.02.2013 12:23, Thierry Vignaud skrev:

On 8 February 2013 23:26, Pascal Terjan  wrote:

please let in perl-URPM & urpmi
perl-URPM fixes a bug regarding installing delta rpm
urpmi fixes counting erasures in progress bar.


I think urpmi should probably not count erasures at all in the
$cur/$total number, since IMHO the count should be for the packages
installed instead of applied transactions, and package removal is
usually much faster than installation.



Try that on texlive-texmf :-)

This does what you want, a separate counter for erasures


Nice :)

Probably should see if others agree with me or not before applying I
guess...

Everyone, WDYT?


I thought of requesting such change when I ran the new version but
then decided it was not important :)


Should I wait for one more vote before dcommiting & releasing?



Go ahead and add it, I liked it too :)

--
Thomas



[Mageia-dev] Huh? Urpmi package numbers . . .

2013-02-09 Thread Robert Fox
Since latest Cauldron updates - the urpmi process seems to be lying
about the number of packages -
In this example, it say "293" packages - but when it starts, it says
1/582 -??

Huh?

urpmi --auto-update -v

SNIP:
71MB of additional disk space will be used.
174MB of packages will be retrieved.
Proceed with the installation of the 293 packages? (Y/n) 

SNIP:
 2/582: lib64okteta1core1
##
3/582: lib64kasten2gui2
##
4/582: lib64okteta1gui1
##
5/582: lib64kasten2okteta1core1

##
6/582: lib64kasten2okteta1

Is this by design?

Cheers,
Robert



Re: [Mageia-dev] Huh? Urpmi package numbers . . .

2013-02-09 Thread Manuel Hiebel
Le 09/02/2013 12:58, Robert Fox a écrit :
> Since latest Cauldron updates - the urpmi process seems to be lying
> about the number of packages -
> In this example, it say "293" packages - but when it starts, it says
> 1/582 -??
>
> Huh?
>
> urpmi --auto-update -v
>
> SNIP:
> 71MB of additional disk space will be used.
> 174MB of packages will be retrieved.
> Proceed with the installation of the 293 packages? (Y/n) 
>
> SNIP:
>  2/582: lib64okteta1core1
> ##
> 3/582: lib64kasten2gui2
> ##
> 4/582: lib64okteta1gui1
> ##
> 5/582: lib64kasten2okteta1core1
>
> ##
> 6/582: lib64kasten2okteta1
>
> Is this by design?
>
> Cheers,
> Robert
>

See the other thread about urpmi



Re: [Mageia-dev] freeze push: perl-URPM & urpmi

2013-02-09 Thread Thierry Vignaud
On 9 February 2013 12:06, Thomas Backlund  wrote:
> Try that on texlive-texmf :-)
>
> This does what you want, a separate counter for erasures


 Nice :)

 Probably should see if others agree with me or not before applying I
 guess...

 Everyone, WDYT?
>>>
>>>
>>> I thought of requesting such change when I ran the new version but
>>> then decided it was not important :)
>>
>>
>> Should I wait for one more vote before dcommiting & releasing?
>>
>
> Go ahead and add it, I liked it too :)

then push it please


Re: [Mageia-dev] freeze push: perl-URPM & urpmi

2013-02-09 Thread Thomas Backlund

09.02.2013 14:22, Thierry Vignaud skrev:

On 9 February 2013 12:06, Thomas Backlund  wrote:

Try that on texlive-texmf :-)

This does what you want, a separate counter for erasures



Nice :)

Probably should see if others agree with me or not before applying I
guess...

Everyone, WDYT?



I thought of requesting such change when I ran the new version but
then decided it was not important :)



Should I wait for one more vote before dcommiting & releasing?



Go ahead and add it, I liked it too :)


then push it please



Submitted.

--
Thomas



Re: [Mageia-dev] urpmi searchmedia and 32-bit packages installation

2013-02-09 Thread Thierry Vignaud
On 9 February 2013 09:50, Adrien Guichard  wrote:
> I am trying to install 32-bit packages using urpmi:
> # urpmi --searchmedia distrib31 mesa
> #
>
> distrib31 media is 32-bit Core packages, is there a way to force
> installation? (64-bit version is installed which I think prevent
> 32-bit installation)

how about "urpmi libdri-drivers" ...


Re: [Mageia-dev] [RFC] rsyslog vs journalctl

2013-02-09 Thread eatdirt



Are you sure that there still is a problem? There were some bugs that
have been fixed months ago. Aside from that the memory usage could be
off as journal uses mmap.

But systemd always uses the journal (not runtime configurable IIRC), so
best to make it efficient. It should also somehow be low maintenance.
Meaning: maybe it will use less memory when there is less available
(guessing)?




I don't know about mmap, but that's what a top gives on the current cooker:

 326 root   1   0 1064m  37m  36m S0  1.9   0:14.73 systemd-journal

even though it is only virtual, that's sound crazy to go up 1GB.
rsyslog never goes above 1M.

Cheers,
Chris.



Re: [Mageia-dev] [RFC] rsyslog vs journalctl

2013-02-09 Thread Olav Vitters
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 04:18:32PM +0100, eatdirt wrote:
> 
> >Are you sure that there still is a problem? There were some bugs that
> >have been fixed months ago. Aside from that the memory usage could be
> >off as journal uses mmap.
> >
> >But systemd always uses the journal (not runtime configurable IIRC), so
> >best to make it efficient. It should also somehow be low maintenance.
> >Meaning: maybe it will use less memory when there is less available
> >(guessing)?
> >
> 
> 
> I don't know about mmap, but that's what a top gives on the current cooker:
> 
>  326 root   1   0 1064m  37m  36m S0  1.9   0:14.73 systemd-journal
> 
> even though it is only virtual, that's sound crazy to go up 1GB.
> rsyslog never goes above 1M.

I already mentioned the usage of mmap.

-- 
Regards,
Olav


Re: [Mageia-dev] urpmi searchmedia and 32-bit packages installation

2013-02-09 Thread Adrien Guichard
2013/2/9 Thierry Vignaud :
> On 9 February 2013 09:50, Adrien Guichard  wrote:
>> I am trying to install 32-bit packages using urpmi:
>> # urpmi --searchmedia distrib31 mesa
>> #
>>
>> distrib31 media is 32-bit Core packages, is there a way to force
>> installation? (64-bit version is installed which I think prevent
>> 32-bit installation)
>
> how about "urpmi libdri-drivers" ...
# LANGUAGE=C; urpmi libdri-drivers
To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed:
  PackageVersion  Release   Arch
(medium "Core 32bit Release (distrib31)")
  libdri-drivers 9.1.00.git2013020> i586
  libdricore19.1.00.git2013020> i586
  libdrm22.4.42   1.mga3i586
  libdrm_intel1  2.4.42   1.mga3i586
  libdrm_nouveau22.4.42   1.mga3i586
  libdrm_radeon1 2.4.42   1.mga3i586
  libexpat1  2.1.04.mga3i586
  libffi63.0.11   2.mga3i586
  libllvm3.2 3.2  4.mga3i586
  libllvmradeon9.1.0 9.1.00.git2013020> i586
  libpciaccess0  0.13.1   2.mga3i586
50MB of additional disk space will be used.
9.7MB of packages will be retrieved.
Proceed with the installation of the 11 packages? (Y/n)


[Mageia-dev] freeze push: perl-URPM-4.26 & urpmi-7.19

2013-02-09 Thread Thierry Vignaud
Hi

Please let in perl-URPM-4.26 & urpmi-7.19
I got rid of playing with rpm -Uvh --oldpackage foobar*rpm libfoobarX*rpm,
so I added basic support for --downgrade (mga#6655).

What's supported is eg:
- enabling updates_testing
- installing foobar from updates_testing
- disabling updates_testing
- running "urpmi --downgrade foobar" which will revert
  back to version from updates or release

Thx

eg:
# urpmi --downgrade null
The following package has to be removed for others to be upgraded:
null-9-22.mga3.x86_64
 (in order to install null-9-21.mga3.x86_64) (y/N) y
To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed:
  PackageVersion  Release   Arch
(medium "temp45")
  lib64null1 921.mga3   x86_64
  null   921.mga3   x86_64
0B of additional disk space will be used.
2.8KB of packages will be retrieved.
Proceed with the installation of the 2 packages? (Y/n) y


installing lib64null1-9-21.mga3.x86_64.rpm null-9-21.mga3.x86_64.rpm from /home1
Preparing... #
  1/2: lib64null1#
  2/2: null  #
csh sux
  1/1: removing null-1:9-22.mga3.x86_64
 #

# urpme --auto-orphans
writing /var/lib/rpm/installed-through-deps.list
To satisfy dependencies, the following package will be removed (0B):

(orphan package)
  lib64null2-9-22.mga3.x86_64
Remove 1 package? (y/N)


Re: [Mageia-dev] freeze push: perl-URPM-4.26 & urpmi-7.19

2013-02-09 Thread Thierry Vignaud
On 9 February 2013 22:35, Thierry Vignaud  wrote:
> Please let in perl-URPM-4.26 & urpmi-7.19
> I got rid of playing with rpm -Uvh --oldpackage foobar*rpm libfoobarX*rpm,
> so I added basic support for --downgrade (mga#6655).
>
> What's supported is eg:
> - enabling updates_testing
> - installing foobar from updates_testing
> - disabling updates_testing
> - running "urpmi --downgrade foobar" which will revert
>   back to version from updates or release

and of course both testsuites pass


Re: [Mageia-dev] freeze push: perl-URPM-4.26 & urpmi-7.19

2013-02-09 Thread AL13N
Op zaterdag 9 februari 2013 22:35:47 schreef Thierry Vignaud:
> Hi
> 
> Please let in perl-URPM-4.26 & urpmi-7.19
> I got rid of playing with rpm -Uvh --oldpackage foobar*rpm libfoobarX*rpm,
> so I added basic support for --downgrade (mga#6655).
[...]

ooh, this is nice!


Re: [Mageia-dev] Huh? Urpmi package numbers . . .

2013-02-09 Thread Barry Jackson

On 09/02/13 11:58, Robert Fox wrote:

Since latest Cauldron updates - the urpmi process seems to be lying
about the number of packages -
In this example, it say "293" packages - but when it starts, it says
1/582 -??

Huh?

urpmi --auto-update -v

SNIP:
71MB of additional disk space will be used.
174MB of packages will be retrieved.
Proceed with the installation of the 293 packages? (Y/n)

SNIP:
  2/582: lib64okteta1core1
##
 3/582: lib64kasten2gui2
##
 4/582: lib64okteta1gui1
##
 5/582: lib64kasten2okteta1core1

##
 6/582: lib64kasten2okteta1

Is this by design?

Cheers,
Robert


Yes a removal is now counted as well as an installation, so it's double 
- I don't see the point, I think it was better as it was :

\


Re: [Mageia-dev] bumblebee in mageia (and mentoring)

2013-02-09 Thread David Walser
Luca Olivetti wrote:
> Al 15/04/12 07:08, En/na simple w8 ha escrit:
> 
>>> I have revised the specs and here they are attached.
>>>
>>> Is anyone available that could help me in the mentoring proccess?
>> 
>> Well seams that last bumblebee spec missed the scriplets to handle
>> systemd services.
> 
> I've been given a laptop with optimus technology.
> I took the following SRPMS and rebuilt them for mageia 2:
> 
> bumblebee-3.0-11.mga3.src.rpm
> dkms-acpi_call-0.1-2.mga3.src.rpm
> dkms-bbswitch-0.4.2-1.mga3.src.rpm
> libbsd-0.4.1-1.mga3.src.rpm
> virtualgl-2.3.1-1.mga3.src.rpm
> 
> 
> I have two issues (just FYI):

Hi Luca,

I don't know if simple w8 is with us still, I haven't seen him active in a 
while.  Would you be interested in getting more directly involved, 
such that you could fix any issues yourself?  If so, see the information on the 
Mageia Wiki about packaging mentoring, and come see us on 
IRC.



Re: [Mageia-dev] freeze push: perl-URPM-4.26 & urpmi-7.19

2013-02-09 Thread Claire Robinson
On 09/02/13 21:35, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Please let in perl-URPM-4.26 & urpmi-7.19
> I got rid of playing with rpm -Uvh --oldpackage foobar*rpm libfoobarX*rpm,
> so I added basic support for --downgrade (mga#6655).
> 
> What's supported is eg:
> - enabling updates_testing
> - installing foobar from updates_testing
> - disabling updates_testing
> - running "urpmi --downgrade foobar" which will revert
>   back to version from updates or release
> 
> Thx
> 
> eg:
> # urpmi --downgrade null
> The following package has to be removed for others to be upgraded:
> null-9-22.mga3.x86_64
>  (in order to install null-9-21.mga3.x86_64) (y/N) y
> To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed:
>   PackageVersion  Release   Arch
> (medium "temp45")
>   lib64null1 921.mga3   x86_64
>   null   921.mga3   x86_64
> 0B of additional disk space will be used.
> 2.8KB of packages will be retrieved.
> Proceed with the installation of the 2 packages? (Y/n) y
> 
> 
> installing lib64null1-9-21.mga3.x86_64.rpm null-9-21.mga3.x86_64.rpm from 
> /home1
> Preparing... #
>   1/2: lib64null1#
>   2/2: null  #
> csh sux
>   1/1: removing null-1:9-22.mga3.x86_64
>  #
> 
> # urpme --auto-orphans
> writing /var/lib/rpm/installed-through-deps.list
> To satisfy dependencies, the following package will be removed (0B):
> 
> (orphan package)
>   lib64null2-9-22.mga3.x86_64
> Remove 1 package? (y/N)


That will be really useful, thanks for adding it Thierry

Claire


[Mageia-dev] GNOME apps

2013-02-09 Thread David Walser
tmb recently requested that the vinagre, vino, and eog apps (currently 
development 3.7 versions) be rolled back to the stable versions.

This sounds sensible to me, but what is the plan for GNOME for Mageia 3?  I had 
been under the impression that we would stick with 3.6, but 
Sebastian insisted on IRC that the Council had decided to go with 3.8.  I don't 
know how that would work as it would mean it would be updated 
at the last minute and not tested.

Whatever will be done, rolling back these three apps, or updating things, who 
will be responsible for this?

Just trying to get some clarity on this.  Thanks.

PS - if we do roll back vino, please be careful to include the security fix we 
recently pushed in Mageia 2 if relevant.



Re: [Mageia-dev] Beta32 and Broadcomm WiFi

2013-02-09 Thread David Walser
Maurice Batey wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:40:39 +, Maurice Batey wrote:
> 
>> it connects and works!
> 
>   Though Network Center still doesn't immediately change 'Connect' to
> 'Disconnect' after a successful connect...

https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3888