Re: [Mageia-dev] [RPM] cauldron core/release unknown-horizons-2011-1.mga2
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com wrote: On 13 July 2011 13:53, Balcaen John mik...@mageia.org wrote: On Wednesday 13 July 2011 09:49:01 Samuel Verschelde wrote: [...] The group Amusements/Games/Strategy/Real Time doesn't exist in Mageia. 3 different packagers haven't seen this ? :) Maybe we should check it via rpmlint on package upload ? s/upload/submit/. yes this would prevent to build for nothing
Re: [Mageia-dev] [Mageia 2 specifications] Systemd or not systemd
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Eugeni Dodonov eug...@dodonov.net wrote: On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 09:11, Anne nicolas enn...@mageia.org wrote: Hi there Following discussion about technical specifications, here is an interesting item: systemd Bug report to follow discussion and history: https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2120 We need points of view, the way we could integrate it if we decide to go, planning (I guess it would need to start now to be full ready for final release) Comments, proposals, shout ? If nobody objects, I could help with that. Mandriva certainly gave a large experience on how to integrate systemd into the system without killing traditional sysvinit alternative. It would also be extremely interested to have native systemd services which use most of systemd features (like sound and alsa scripts, which we discussed with Colin and Andrey Borzenkov some months ago but never got to implement properly). -- Eugeni Dodonov http://eugeni.dodonov.net/ If you can soon that would be awesome that way we will have plenty of time to test before our first alpha ( and because we will have to rebuild packages with systemd switch to on thanks for you help
Re: [Mageia-dev] [RPM] cauldron core/release firefox-l10n-5.0.1-1.mga2
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Sander Lepik sander.le...@eesti.ee wrote: 12.07.2011 10:54, Mageia Team kirjutas: Description : Localizations for Firefox web browser. fwangfwang 5.0.1-1.mga2: + Revision: 123010 - new version 5.0.1 I think cauldron should already have Firefox 6 (to test it for next stable release on mga1). And there is still no Firefox 5 for mga1.. secteam? This is not up to sec team yet. I hope to finish to prepare FF 5.0.1 for mga1 this week
Re: [Mageia-dev] Repository question: where do we put non-free+tainted RPMs?
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:20 PM, Thomas Backlund t...@mageia.org wrote: andre999 skrev 12.7.2011 23:48: So we could eliminate the tainted repos, to facilitate putting packages in core or non-free as appropriate. There may have to be a few adjustments to show (or not) the packages tagged tainted, but that shouldn't be difficult. Wouldn't that be easier ? (At the same time, we could choose a name that doesn't indicate that there is something intrinsically wrong with the package.) NO. The decision to have a separated repo for tainted software is not up for debate... It has already been discussed and decided long ago. as for the question that started this thread: Repository question: where do we put non-free+tainted RPMs? It's simple, and even outlined in the mirrors_policy: http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=mirrors_policy If there is a package that otherwise matches core or nonfree repos, but has a possible patent issue it ends up in tainted. As for splitting up tainted in tainted-core/tainted-nonfree, I dont think it's really worth it, and no-one really argued for it when we discussed the mirror layout... -- Thomas i can't agree more with you thomas.
Re: [Mageia-dev] [RFC] Update to gnome 31
2011/7/11 JA Magallón jamagal...@ono.com: On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 14:50:43 +0200, Dexter Morgan dmorga...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/7/1 JA Magallón jamagal...@ono.com: On 2011.07.01, at 14:42, Dexter Morgan wrote: Hello, As gnome 3.2 will be available on october ( and in mageia 2 ) we will start to update now to gnome 3.1 to be able to report as many issues as possible upstream. Nice!! I have some questions in my queue, but will wait till new packages are there so they get solved automagically ;) i hope so :) Well, I had no luck... Some things that crash, I will try to find info and submit proper bug reports: - gdm crashed if I push down the power menu on the right top. Just press the icon, see the menu down and wait for the crash... - gnome-settings-daemon crashes both for gdm and for the normal user - the (in) famous BSOD (Oh, no! Something has gone wrong), that I relate to: one:~ grep register .xses*rs gnome-session[15939]: WARNING: Application 'gnome-shell.desktop' failed to register before timeout I can post full .xsession-errors if you find usefoull. yes i would appreciate your .xsession-errors please .
Re: [Mageia-dev] Standardising the virtual Provides in -devel packages
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 6:37 AM, Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello.
I've had a rather vague idea about standardising the virtual provides
in the distro, there should be:
Provides: %{name}-devel
Provides: lib%{name}-devel
either both of them in _all_ packages, or one of them in _all_
packages, so that we don't have to check urpmq --provides all the
time. Personally, I am more inclined on having them both, so as not to
break already working specs.
For example:
$ urpmq --provides lib64gudev1.0-devel-166-5.mga1.x86_64
libgudev-devel[== 166-5.mga1]
pkgconfig(gudev-1.0)[== 166]
devel(libgudev-1.0(64bit))
lib64gudev1.0-devel[== 166-5.mga1]
lib64gudev1.0-devel(x86-64)[== 166-5.mga1]
only libgudev-devel, so if I put BR gudev-devel in a spec it won't
work, whereas I'd expect it to work since some other packages have
such similar provides:
$ urpmq --provides lib64dbus-1-devel
libdbus-1-devel[== 1.4.1-3.mga1]
libdbus-devel[== 1.4.1-3.mga1]
dbus-devel[== 1.4.1-3.mga1]
[...]
WDYT?
(If we agree to go one way or the other, will just fix them gradually
over time).
--
Ahmad Samir
for me this is a +1 w/o hesitation
Re: [Mageia-dev] Introducing several rpm macro
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Funda Wang fundaw...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I would like to introduce several rpm autoprovs, such as mimehandler, fontconfig, the same as fedora, opensuse and mandriva. So that we could eventually doing something like 'urpmi font(:lang=jp) mimehandler(audio/x-mp3). WDYT? And, will we cooperate with mandriva with urpmi backend for packagekit? we already have the fontconfig macro since mga 1
Re: [Mageia-dev] Introducing several rpm macro
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Funda Wang fundaw...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/7/5 Dexter Morgan dmorga...@gmail.com: On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Funda Wang fundaw...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I would like to introduce several rpm autoprovs, such as mimehandler, fontconfig, the same as fedora, opensuse and mandriva. So that we could eventually doing something like 'urpmi font(:lang=jp) mimehandler(audio/x-mp3). WDYT? And, will we cooperate with mandriva with urpmi backend for packagekit? we already have the fontconfig macro since mga 1 Then maybe we should rebuild those packages? $ rpm -qp --provides fonts-ttf-wqy-microhei-0.2.0-5.mga1.noarch.rpm fonts-ttf-wqy-microhei = 0.2.0-5.mga1 yes it needs a rebuild to give the correct provides. some fonts have been introduced before we add this provide script so some fonts may not have the good provides and need a rebuild
Re: [Mageia-dev] How to add package into backports_testing
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Maarten Vanraes maarten.vanr...@gmail.com wrote: But skype was available for PWP, which i have. read again what misc wrote : - a package was present in Mandriva 2010.1/2 ( and only in Mandriva, not in 3rd party repository, not cooker ) skype wasn't in main nor contrib
Re: [Mageia-dev] How to add package into backports_testing
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Anssi Hannula anssi.hann...@iki.fi wrote: On 02.07.2011 13:00, Sander Lepik wrote: Hey, i'm having some trouble with adding get-skype into backports_testing. blino told me to cp get-skype into updates/1 as i can't submit it from cauldron. So i did. updates/1 is meant for updates, not backports. -- Anssi Hannula But as there was no get-skype for mageia 1 iirc we can push it on testing_updates
Re: [Mageia-dev] [117096] rebuild
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 8:31 AM, r...@mageia.org wrote: Revision 117096 Author fwang Date 2011-07-01 08:31:34 +0200 (Fri, 01 Jul 2011) Log Message rebuild Please do not use only rebuild as log message. We really should speak about a pre commit hook blocking this simple commit log
[Mageia-dev] [RFC] Update to gnome 31
Hello, As gnome 3.2 will be available on october ( and in mageia 2 ) we will start to update now to gnome 3.1 to be able to report as many issues as possible upstream.
Re: [Mageia-dev] [RFC] Update to gnome 31
2011/7/1 JA Magallón jamagal...@ono.com: On 2011.07.01, at 14:42, Dexter Morgan wrote: Hello, As gnome 3.2 will be available on october ( and in mageia 2 ) we will start to update now to gnome 3.1 to be able to report as many issues as possible upstream. Nice!! I have some questions in my queue, but will wait till new packages are there so they get solved automagically ;) i hope so :)
Re: [Mageia-dev] Suggestion: revert tcl and tk into stable 8.5
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Funda Wang fundaw...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I'm in favor of reverting tcl and tk into stable series 8.5 rather than current 8.6 beta1. 8.6b1 is released almost 2.5 years ago, and it seems that there is no plan pushing it into 8.6b2 or final stable release. Mandriva and Mageia are the only distros shipping 8.6b1. I don't think it is doable for a common distro. Any negative ideas? with all the elements you gave i think you are right and that we should revert too. So for me this is a +1
Re: [Mageia-dev] [116308]
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:38 AM, r...@mageia.org wrote:
Revision 116308 Author ze Date 2011-06-30 08:38:32 +0200 (Thu, 30 Jun 2011)
Log Message
- add missing files
- fix minor errors
- list dirs so that can be removed in uninstall
Modified Paths
cauldron/kdenetwork4/current/SPECS/kdenetwork4.spec
Modified: cauldron/kdenetwork4/current/SPECS/kdenetwork4.spec
===
--- cauldron/kdenetwork4/current/SPECS/kdenetwork4.spec 2011-06-30
06:13:28
UTC (rev 116307)
+++ cauldron/kdenetwork4/current/SPECS/kdenetwork4.spec 2011-06-30
06:38:32
UTC (rev 116308)
@@ -95,15 +95,11 @@
%files -n kde4-filesharing
%defattr(-,root,root)
-%_kde_libdir/kde4/fileshare_propsdlgplugin.so
-%_kde_libdir/kde4/kcm_fileshare.so
-%_kde_libdir/kde4/kcm_kcmsambaconf.so
-%_kde_services/fileshare.desktop
-%_kde_services/fileshare_propsdlgplugin.desktop
-%_kde_services/kcmsambaconf.desktop
+%_kde_libdir/kde4/sambausershareplugin.so
+%_kde_services/sambausershareplugin.desktop
%_kde_services/ServiceMenus/smb2rdc.desktop
-%_kde_iconsdir/*/*/apps/kcmsambaconf.*
+
#-
%package -n kdnssd
Summary: DNS-SD Service Discovery Monitor
@@ -124,7 +120,7 @@
%_kde_services/zeroconf.protocol
#-
-%define libkgetcore %mklibname kgetcore %{%major}
+%define libkgetcore %mklibname kgetcore %{major}
%package -n %libkgetcore
Summary: Runtime library for KGET
@@ -135,7 +131,7 @@
%files -n %libkgetcore
%defattr(-,root,root)
-%_kde_libdir/libkgetcore.so.%{%major}*
+%_kde_libdir/libkgetcore.so.%{major}*
#-
%package -n kget
@@ -159,23 +155,28 @@
%defattr(-,root,root)
%_kde_bindir/kget
%_kde_appsdir/kget
+%_kde_applicationsdir/kget.desktop
%_kde_libdir/kde4/krunner_kget.so
%_kde_libdir/kde4/kget_*
%_kde_libdir/kde4/plasma_engine_kget.so
%_kde_libdir/kde4/kcm_kget_checksumsearchfactory.so
%_kde_libdir/kde4/kcm_kget_metalinkfactory.so
%_kde_services/plasma-engine-kget.desktop
-%_kde_datadir/applications/kde4/kget.desktop
%_kde_services/ServiceMenus/kget_download.desktop
%_kde_datadir/config.kcfg/kget*
%_kde_services/kget_*
%_kde_datadir/kde4/servicetypes/kget_*
+%dir %_kde_appsdir/dolphinpart/kpartplugins/
%_kde_appsdir/dolphinpart/kpartplugins/kget_plug_in.rc
%_kde_appsdir/dolphinpart/kpartplugins/kget_plug_in.desktop
+%dir %_kde_appsdir/khtml/kpartplugins/
Dirs must be owned by only one rpm. Do you think clever to own those
ones by kdenetwork4 ? i don't think.
I will revert and fix a better way
Re: [Mageia-dev] How is the obsoleted binaries be removed?
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org wrote:
Le jeudi 30 juin 2011 à 09:41 +0100, Colin Guthrie a écrit :
'Twas brillig, and Funda Wang at 30/06/11 00:11 did gyre and gimble:
2011/6/30 Dexter Morgan dmorga...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Zé mmode...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/6/27 Funda Wang fundaw...@gmail.com:
Hello,
How is the obsoleted binaries be removed currently in Mageia? Does the
maintainer need to call for this? If yes, please remove
lib{,64}devhelp-2_1 from cauldron.
Thanks.
whats current problem?
You can obsolete it through BS, add an entry in the spec about it.
our policy is to not obsolete libs.
Then the repository will contain a lot of orphan libs.
I think Dexter was just replying to Ze rather than yourself Funda.
Meaning we don't obsolete libs in the spec file (as was true in mdv), so
removing old libs no longer used internally is still a manual
(rpmctl-type) task.
I do not know if I proposed that already, but what about moving rpms
without source rpms after 2 weeks ( or 1 month ) ?
( and later remove the file after 1 month ). This let us the time to
rebuild everything, and provides automated cleaning ?
--
Michael Scherer
i agree with this and as they are on old/ we still can revive some if
needed ( like a rebuild not done, ... )
Re: [Mageia-dev] [116351]
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:24 AM, r...@mageia.org wrote: Revision 116351 Author ze Date 2011-06-30 11:24:58 +0200 (Thu, 30 Jun 2011) Log Message - set default files attibutes No this is useless, please remove them
Re: [Mageia-dev] [RPM] cauldron core/release libkdeedu-4.6.90-4.mga2
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Funda Wang fundaw...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/6/30 Balcaen John mik...@mageia.org: On Thursday 30 June 2011 04:45:15 Mageia Team wrote: Name : libkdeedu Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 4.6.90 Vendor: Mageia.Org Release : 4.mga2 Build Date: Thu Jun 30 04:40:17 2011 Install Date: (not installed) Build Host: ecosse Group : Graphical desktop/KDE Source RPM: (none) Size : 204136 License: GPLv2 Signature : (none) Packager : Mageia Team http://www.mageia.org URL : http://edu.kde.org Summary : Free Educational Software based on the KDE technologies Description : Runtime library for KDE Education Application fwang fwang 4.6.90-4.mga2: + Revision: 116239 - do not obsolete old packages I do understand that you don't wont to obsolete kdeedu,but without the obsolete kdeedu-core kdeedu-devel would have been stick for ever on the mirror until a sysadmin intervention. Agree. But such a task shouldn't be pushed into packaging, and we have already push needed conflicts so that it won't affect users. don't forget to tell to your lovely sysadmin team the packages you want to be removed ;)
[Mageia-dev] [RFC] Update to Gnome 3.1
Hello, i would like us to update to gnome 3.1 ( which will give gnome 3.2 ). Is there someone against ?
Re: [Mageia-dev] [RFC] Update to Gnome 3.1
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 12:41 AM, nicolas vigier bo...@mars-attacks.org wrote: On Thu, 30 Jun 2011, Dexter Morgan wrote: Hello, i would like us to update to gnome 3.1 ( which will give gnome 3.2 ). When is the release of gnome 3.2 planned ? in october so we will at least have gnome 3.2.x in mageia 2
Re: [Mageia-dev] How is the obsoleted binaries be removed?
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Zé mmode...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/6/27 Funda Wang fundaw...@gmail.com:
Hello,
How is the obsoleted binaries be removed currently in Mageia? Does the
maintainer need to call for this? If yes, please remove
lib{,64}devhelp-2_1 from cauldron.
Thanks.
whats current problem?
You can obsolete it through BS, add an entry in the spec about it.
our policy is to not obsolete libs.
Re: [Mageia-dev] How is the obsoleted binaries be removed?
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Funda Wang fundaw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
How is the obsoleted binaries be removed currently in Mageia? Does the
maintainer need to call for this? If yes, please remove
lib{,64}devhelp-2_1 from cauldron.
Thanks.
hi,
i will look if this have been done, if no i will remove them
Re: [Mageia-dev] KDE 4.7?
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Funda Wang fundaw...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Is it the time we go with kde 4.7 (rc currently) within cauldron? Regards. mikala is currenlty packaging it. Should land in cauldron in the next few days
Re: [Mageia-dev] KDE 4.7?
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Funda Wang fundaw...@gmail.com wrote: I would say we need to add a lot of conflicts and obsoletes for upgrading. mikala worked on it already from what he told me.
Re: [Mageia-dev] [RPM] cauldron core/release scourge-data-0.21.1-2.mga2
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Pascal Terjan pter...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:24, Mageia Team buildsystem-dae...@mageia.org wrote: Name : scourge-data Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 0.21.1 Vendor: Mageia.Org Release : 2.mga2 Build Date: Wed Jun 22 10:14:40 2011 Install Date: (not installed) Build Host: ecosse Group : Games/Adventure Source RPM: (none) Size : 127698329 License: GPLv2+ Signature : (none) Packager : Mageia Team http://www.mageia.org URL : http://scourgeweb.org/ Summary : Data files for Scourge roguelike game Description : Data files for Scourge roguelike game. zezinho zezinho 0.21.1-2.mga2: + Revision: 111772 - imported package scourge-data This package requires scourge, which is not in the repository yes but it doesn't buidld see : http://pkgsubmit.mageia.org/uploads/failure/cauldron/core/release/20110625200829.dmorgan.valstar.19853/log/scourge-0.21.1-2.mga2/build.0.20110625200903.log
Re: [Mageia-dev] [114150] downgrade to Version: 1
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 9:15 PM, r...@mageia.org wrote: Revision 114150 Author spuhler Date 2011-06-26 21:14:59 +0200 (Sun, 26 Jun 2011) Log Message downgrade to Version: 1 add subrel 1 for mga 1 updates why do you add subrel in cauldron ?
Re: [Mageia-dev] [114173] added define subrel 1 to submit to Mageia1 updates
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 9:34 PM, r...@mageia.org wrote: Revision 114173 Author spuhler Date 2011-06-26 21:34:20 +0200 (Sun, 26 Jun 2011) Log Message added define subrel 1 to submit to Mageia1 updates Please modify in the update/1 tree for updates not in the cauldron one
Re: [Mageia-dev] Updates process is now available
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Thomas Spuhler tho...@btspuhler.com wrote: On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 09:57:22 am Damien Lallement wrote: Hello all, security, qa and sysadmin team worked on the qa/updates process to provide updates as soon as possible. All is now ready (boklm is finalizing a scrip to move updates from testing to updates). This script will be uses by security team members and a few QA people to push updates. You can now read: - http://www.mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=updates_policy - http://www.mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=qa_updates A new ML has been created: qa-b...@ml.mageia.org. It will receive all the updates requests and will be the main QA contact for bugzilla. You can join it if you want to be part of the QA people working on updates (security or not). A saved search has been added to bugzilla to catch all updates waiting for QA validation: https://bugs.mageia.org/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamednamedcmd=Updates%20wai ting%20for%20QA For more info, please ask here on on #mageia-dev or #mageia-qa Let's go to work on updates! This seems not to be working for me. I am getting an error: error: command failed: ssh pkgsubmit.mageia.org /usr/local/bin/submit_package -t 1 --define sid=9ed21bb1-462a-4c5b-9fa3-78e433ccc363 --define section=core/updates_testing -r 114150 svn+ssh://svn.mageia.org/svn/packages/cauldron/kolab-webadmin error: svn+ssh://svn.mageia.org/svn/packages/cauldron/kolab-webadmin is not allowed for this target (BTW on the web page it shows as -define section = instead of --define section) -- Thomas because you need to modify on the update branch of the SVN mgarepo -d 1 kolab-webadmin
Re: [Mageia-dev] [114173] added define subrel 1 to submit to Mageia1 updates
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:59 AM, Thomas Spuhler tho...@btspuhler.com wrote: On Sunday, June 26, 2011 12:37:29 pm Dexter Morgan wrote: On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 9:34 PM, r...@mageia.org wrote: Revision 114173 Author spuhler Date 2011-06-26 21:34:20 +0200 (Sun, 26 Jun 2011) Log Message added define subrel 1 to submit to Mageia1 updates Please modify in the update/1 tree for updates not in the cauldron one Did I do better now? -- Thomas now this is perfect :) ( btw have you removed subrel from the cauldron tree ? )
Re: [Mageia-dev] Proposal of a backporting process
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Wolfgang Bornath molc...@googlemail.com wrote: The Request Backport Button could be a solution for non-english speakers. They can not use Bugzilla because they can not write in English to make their request understood, but they can find the package name in a database and understand the function of a button which reads Backport. -- wobo well used i think this can be really good.
Re: [Mageia-dev] Firefox 5
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com wrote: On 23 June 2011 07:58, Dexter Morgan dmorga...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Thierry Vignaud thierry.vign...@gmail.com wrote: On 22 June 2011 19:41, Florian Hubold doktor5...@arcor.de wrote: Well, it's quite possible that we have to include that in Mageia 1 as well, as this will be security update for Firefox 4. If we don't want to patch every CVE then we have to include it into Mageia 1 as well.. Would be nice to know, if this is planned? I have rebuild FF5 here locally for Mageia 1, and the only addons that i lost is Linkification, but that is merely due to it's developers who already messed up with FF4. They don't offer the proper update on Firefox Addons site. So, please, what about Firefox 5 for Mageia 1 as an update (backport?) Humm, MGA is stricter than MDV and refuses to backport packages directly from cauldron: mgarepo submit --define section=core/backports -t 1 /dev/null Submitting xulrunner at revision 110647 URL: svn+ssh://svn.mageia.org/svn/packages/cauldron/xulrunner error: command failed: ssh pkgsubmit.mageia.org /usr/local/bin/submit_package -t 1 --define sid=4845bffd-7f94-4c8c-931e-cfb746d01a0d --define section=core/backports -r 110647 svn+ssh://svn.mageia.org/svn/packages/cauldron/xulrunner error: svn+ssh://svn.mageia.org/svn/packages/cauldron/xulrunner is not allowed for this target yes it needs to go to backports_testing before iirc Got a link to a thread on -dev ML / irc meeting log / insert your favourite communication method here, where this was decided? i told iirc so this is something i recall not something i tell it must be done. i think the most important part of my sentence is the last part but maybe you didn't read it ... But i think sec team need to speak of FF5 first because i think this will be a candidate for updates regarding new firefox upstream policy -- Ahmad Samir
Re: [Mageia-dev] Update of mesa to git version
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Balcaen John mik...@mageia.org wrote: Le mercredi 22 juin 2011 15:16:23, Thierry Vignaud a écrit : [...] We would need to test GLUT a little bit As for gallium, I'm regularly testing r300 from git but I'ven't tested neither r600 nor nouveau (though my experience with nouveau on FC is that it regress quite a lot and is heavily dependant on the kernel/libdrm/mesa triplet). r300g is alreay the default in incoming mesa-7.11 (I think this was already the case on 7.10). r600g will be the default in 7.12 No bugs are accepted on r300c anymore (don't remember for r600c) As for nouveau, well we've no alternatives. As for swrast, the LLVM gallium driver is said to be faster but I'ven't tested it. Beware of the fact that freeglut is not a buildrequire nor a require for some rpms (their spec file need to be modified and they need to be rebuilt with freeglut instead of mesaglut) Indeed Should i push it to cauldron/updates_testing then ? start rebuilding all packages against freeglut in core/release? i think we should put it directly in core/release and upload freeglut at the same time wdyt ?
Re: [Mageia-dev] Firefox 5
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Thierry Vignaud thierry.vign...@gmail.com wrote: On 22 June 2011 19:41, Florian Hubold doktor5...@arcor.de wrote: Well, it's quite possible that we have to include that in Mageia 1 as well, as this will be security update for Firefox 4. If we don't want to patch every CVE then we have to include it into Mageia 1 as well.. Would be nice to know, if this is planned? I have rebuild FF5 here locally for Mageia 1, and the only addons that i lost is Linkification, but that is merely due to it's developers who already messed up with FF4. They don't offer the proper update on Firefox Addons site. So, please, what about Firefox 5 for Mageia 1 as an update (backport?) Humm, MGA is stricter than MDV and refuses to backport packages directly from cauldron: mgarepo submit --define section=core/backports -t 1 /dev/null Submitting xulrunner at revision 110647 URL: svn+ssh://svn.mageia.org/svn/packages/cauldron/xulrunner error: command failed: ssh pkgsubmit.mageia.org /usr/local/bin/submit_package -t 1 --define sid=4845bffd-7f94-4c8c-931e-cfb746d01a0d --define section=core/backports -r 110647 svn+ssh://svn.mageia.org/svn/packages/cauldron/xulrunner error: svn+ssh://svn.mageia.org/svn/packages/cauldron/xulrunner is not allowed for this target yes it needs to go to backports_testing before iirc But i think sec team need to speak of FF5 first because i think this will be a candidate for updates regarding new firefox upstream policy
Re: [Mageia-dev] [RPM] cauldron core/release yelp-3.0.3-1.mga2
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Dick Gevers dvgev...@xs4all.nl wrote: On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 00:31:17 +0200 (CEST), Mageia Team wrote about [RPM] cauldron core/release yelp-3.0.3-1.mga2: jonund Group : Graphical desktop/GNOME Source RPM: (none) Size : 1271166 License: GPLv2+ Signature : (none) Packager : Mageia Team http://www.mageia.org URL : http://live.gnome.org/Yelp Summary : GNOME 2 help browser Description : Help browser for GNOME 2 which supports docbook documents, info and man. dmorgan dmorgan 3.0.3-1.mga2: + Revision: 110795 Methinks it's GNOME 3 ? HTH Cheers! =Dick Gevers= good catch :)
[Mageia-dev] new webkit in cauldron
hi, new webkit is on the BS and will land in cauldron soon. we will need to rebuild packages because of a change of major. I will do it but if ppl wants to help you are welcome. $ urpmq --whatrequires lib64webkitgtk1.0_2 anjuta banshee cairo-dock-weblets claws-mail-fancy-plugin eclipse-rcp eclipse-swt empathy epiphany epiphany-extensions gimp gmpc-wikipedia gnucash google-gadgets-gtk gtkpod handbrake lib64devhelp-2_1 lib64ggadget-webkitjs0 lib64peas0 lib64seed0 lib64webkitgtk1.0-devel lib64webkitgtk1.0_2 libproxy-webkit liferea midori miro perl-Gtk2-WebKit pino python-webkitgtk shotwell webkit webkit-gtklauncher webkit-sharp webkit1.0 yelp
[Mageia-dev] rpm policy : Spec file cleaning
hello, A new day a new tip :) If in you specfile the %defattr is only %defattr(-,root,root) you can omit it, rpm will handle it automatically. Do not worry about compatibility for old rpms except if you want to support distros with a rpm from 2004 ;)
Re: [Mageia-dev] new webkit in cauldron
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Funda Wang fundaw...@gmail.com wrote: some of them need love from webkitgtk3, i think. if you can help, you're more than welcome :)
Re: [Mageia-dev] Problems with Gnome 3
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Thorsten van Lil tv...@gmx.de wrote: Am 16.06.2011 08:46, schrieb Wolfgang Bornath: 2011/6/16 Thorsten van Liltv...@gmx.de: Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 02:47:16 schrieb Wolfgang Bornath: Btw: after latest updates I don't have the nice blue background in Gnome, it is somehow distorted (blue but with lighter blue stripes, You mean like this? http://galleries.stefan-horning.de/d/7704-2/GNOME3-Info-o.png Yes, exactly! Yeah, that's one of the default Gnome backgrounds. Yes we lack customizations for mageia. This and rediffing some patches will come as soon as gnome3 will be on good shape
Re: [Mageia-dev] Problems with Gnome 3
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Wolfgang Bornath molc...@googlemail.com wrote: I know what you mean. I feel the very same. * You get the a somelike systray, if you move the mouse to the bottom-right corner (at least networkmanager and mgaonline is there). * virtual desktops are now known as Activities. If a window is already open, go to the top-left corner (like when you want to open new apps). There you find on the right an extra panel, which enlarges if you hover the mouse. Thx, I think I will make a list first and then try to find a how-to-use-the-gnome-desktop. -- wobo so for you it doesn't crash anymore ?
Re: [Mageia-dev] Problems with Gnome 3
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Wolfgang Bornath molc...@googlemail.com wrote: 2011/6/16 Dexter Morgan dmorga...@gmail.com: On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Wolfgang Bornath molc...@googlemail.com wrote: I know what you mean. I feel the very same. * You get the a somelike systray, if you move the mouse to the bottom-right corner (at least networkmanager and mgaonline is there). * virtual desktops are now known as Activities. If a window is already open, go to the top-left corner (like when you want to open new apps). There you find on the right an extra panel, which enlarges if you hover the mouse. Thx, I think I will make a list first and then try to find a how-to-use-the-gnome-desktop. -- wobo so for you it doesn't crash anymore ? Any more is not the correct expression here. I still get the full screen error message telling me to logout because of an error (nothing changed there), but closing this message with Alt+F4 lets me go on without problems - but it could well be that this was possible from the start. ok like me then :) i am investigating now as i reproduce since this morning on a brand new install
Re: [Mageia-dev] [RPM] cauldron core/release task-gnome-2-0.3.mga2
2011/6/17 JA Magallón jamagal...@ono.com: On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:38:10 +0200 (CEST), Mageia Team buildsystem-dae...@mageia.org wrote: Name : task-gnome Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 2 Vendor: Mageia.Org Release : 0.3.mga2 Build Date: Thu Jun 16 21:37:15 2011 Install Date: (not installed) Build Host: jonund Group : Graphical desktop/GNOME Source RPM: (none) Size : 7141 License: GPLv2+ Signature : (none) Packager : Mageia Team http://www.mageia.org Summary : Metapackage for GNOME desktop environment Description : This package is a meta-package, meaning that its purpose is to contain dependencies for running the GNOME2. dmorgan dmorgan 1:2-0.3.mga2: + Revision: 108331 - Update requires If this is fot accountsservice, should not this (and perhaps others) go to task-gnome-minimal ? this is already in task-gnome-minimal
Re: [Mageia-dev] Problems with Gnome 3
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:03 AM, Frank Griffin f...@roadrunner.com wrote: On 06/14/2011 06:40 PM, Dexter Morgan wrote: Do you have gnome-control-center installed I have the same situation, and gnome-control-center is installed. I think it's time for you to actually test the reproducible cases we've given you. Unless you have first-hand knowledge that your packages actually work in some scenario, the indication is that they don't work at all, anywhere. So please either fix them, or withdraw them until they are functional. i will install a mageia 1 on the new machine i just received .
[Mageia-dev] Broken BS
Hi, sorry the update of gnome keyring broke the BS. I am fixing it .
[Mageia-dev] Lib policy change needed ?
hello the last BS breakage makes me thing that we should adjust our packaging policy and add only one lib per lib package. On our last BS breakage we had as error : A requested package cannot be installed: seahorse-2.32.0-2.mga1.x86_64 (due to unsatisfied libgp11.so.0()(64bit)) because libgp11.so.0 was in libgcr0 but disappeared. if it was on libgp11_0 we would have been able to rebuilde seahorse against new libgcr-devel and the remove libgp11_0 when not needed anymore . WDYT about this new policy ?
Re: [Mageia-dev] Lib policy change needed ?
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Colin Guthrie mag...@colin.guthr.ie wrote: 'Twas brillig, and Dexter Morgan at 15/06/11 09:26 did gyre and gimble: hello the last BS breakage makes me thing that we should adjust our packaging policy and add only one lib per lib package. On our last BS breakage we had as error : A requested package cannot be installed: seahorse-2.32.0-2.mga1.x86_64 (due to unsatisfied libgp11.so.0()(64bit)) because libgp11.so.0 was in libgcr0 but disappeared. if it was on libgp11_0 we would have been able to rebuilde seahorse against new libgcr-devel and the remove libgp11_0 when not needed anymore . WDYT about this new policy ? I'm not 100% sure it's all that different anyway. The same issue would be true of sticking two libs into one lib package when they happen to have the same major, but they later diverge and one of them changes major before the other... Yes this is why i think we should enforce one lib per package. I guess it's just good practice to keep things separated out and I'm not sure the current lib policy actively encourages the opposite. I'd say this is more of clarification of the policy :) Maybe but clarification is always good :D
Re: [Mageia-dev] Problems with Gnome 3
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Wolfgang Bornath molc...@googlemail.com wrote: 2011/6/15 Dexter Morgan dmorga...@gmail.com: On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Wolfgang Bornath molc...@googlemail.com wrote: 2011/6/15 Frank Griffin f...@roadrunner.com: On 06/14/2011 06:40 PM, Dexter Morgan wrote: Do you have gnome-control-center installed I have the same situation, and gnome-control-center is installed. Confirmed, same problem. Just switched a Mageia 1 to Cauldron via urpmi, installed task-gnome, no errors. After reboot and selecting Gnome3 the desktop builds nicely but as soon as I start any application after a couple of seconds I get the same error message, pressing OK does a restart of the xserver and I'm back at login. Do you have errors in your .xsession-errors ? Yes. lots of them! Many things are missing: - Theme Adwaita can't be loaded, file not found - JS ERROR about NetworkManager - gnome-session WARNING: Application 'gnome-shell.desktop' failed to register before timeout - failed to play sound: file or data not found ... and more Last section of errors is: --- (gnome-shell:5091): Clutter-CRITICAL **: clutter_actor_queue_relayout: assertion 'CLUTTER_IS_ACTOR (self) failed Cannot open /dev/input/eventX: permission denied ## this was repeated 15 times (gnome-shell:5091): Clutter-CRITICAL **: clutter_actor_queue_relayout: assertion 'CLUTTER_IS_ACTOR (self) failed --EOF- -- wobo ok tks, this is mor ethan task-gnome miss them. I will fix task-gnome and push it really quickly
Re: [Mageia-dev] Broken BS
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Dexter Morgan dmorga...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, sorry the update of gnome keyring broke the BS. I am fixing it . The BS is now fixed .
Re: [Mageia-dev] [RPM] cauldron core/release networkmanager-0.8.9997-0.1.1.mga2
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Mageia Team buildsystem-dae...@mageia.org wrote: Name : networkmanager Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 0.8.9997 Vendor: Mageia.Org Release : 0.1.1.mga2 Build Date: Tue Jun 14 20:07:17 2011 Install Date: (not installed) Build Host: ecosse Group : System/Base Source RPM: (none) Size : 1554806 License: GPLv2+ Signature : (none) Packager : Mageia Team http://www.mageia.org URL : http://www.gnome.org/projects/NetworkManager/ Summary : Network connection manager and user applications Description : NetworkManager attempts to keep an active network connection available at all times. It is intended only for the desktop use-case, and is not intended for usage on servers. The point of NetworkManager is to make networking configuration and setup as painless and automatic as possible. If using DHCP, NetworkManager is _intended_ to replace default routes, obtain IP addresses from a DHCP server, and change nameservers whenever it sees fit. dmorgan dmorgan 0.8.9997-0.1.1.mga2: + Revision: 106192 - Use autogen.sh - New version 0.8.9997 Yes i added a comment on the spec file telling this need to be rediffed.
Re: [Mageia-dev] [RPM] cauldron core/release task-gnome-2-0.1.mga2
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Thierry Vignaud thierry.vign...@gmail.com wrote: On 15 June 2011 12:07, Mageia Team buildsystem-dae...@mageia.org wrote: dmorgan dmorgan 1:2-0.1.mga2: + Revision: 106759 - Add some more requires for gnome3 - Remove buildroot Remove old obsoletes Shouldn't we have task-gnome3? Or do we plan to just have gnome3 in Mga2? See you in fact i named it task-gnome because this is supposed to be 'main gnome but i see no pb to rename it to task-gnom3 , just that i think it will add useless provides/obsoletes
[Mageia-dev] Firefox 5
Hello, do we wait firefox 5 rc or we can start to update to firefox 5 soon ?
Re: [Mageia-dev] GNOME3 ?
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Frank Griffin f...@roadrunner.com wrote: On 06/13/2011 06:45 PM, JA Magallón wrote: On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:33:20 -0400, Frank Griffinf...@roadrunner.com wrote: On 06/13/2011 04:12 PM, Frank Griffin wrote: Ahh. Correction with the latest updates: now the ID previously using GNOME 2.32 doesn't get past the blue background either. Two kind of problems: - dependecies: make sure you have 'gtk+3.0' and 'gnome-themes-standard' (latest will pick some themes and fonts...) You should see a striped blue bg after login. You're right, gnome-themes-standard was never pulled in by the base packages. i will add it on task-gnome Adding it, now I get a blue striped background instead of plain blue. But still no Activities date Username at the top of the screen as I used to. - in my case I get kicked off because gnome-settings-daemon hangs on libnsl (from glibc). I am thinkin on how to debug it (how to launch g-s-d on a gdb shell and dump the output somewhere...) Check if you have something like this in your dmesg: gnome-settings-[2556]: segfault at 7fb8612fb1d0 ip 7fb8612fb1d0 sp 7fff830282d8 error 14 in libnsl-2.12.1.so[7fb8639dc000+15000] gnome-settings-[3257]: segfault at 7fae815011d0 ip 7fae815011d0 sp 7fff72cc8b58 error 14 in libnsl-2.12.1.so[7fae83be2000+15000] gnome-settings-[3723]: segfault at 7f42989871d0 ip 7f42989871d0 sp 7fffa8d55858 error 14 in libnsl-2.12.1.so[7f429b068000+15000] If yes, at least I'm not the only one :). I get exactly that, thanks for the tip. Also, I've found that most of the GNOME3 packages have to be forced on because of file conflicts with 2.32 versions. if you can provide the urpmi logs i would be glad to fix this as quickly as possible
Re: [Mageia-dev] GNOME3 ?
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Frank Griffin f...@roadrunner.com wrote: On 06/14/2011 08:56 AM, Dexter Morgan wrote: if you can provide the urpmi logs i would be glad to fix this as quickly as possible I didn't keep the stdout, although the fact that the package is installed is logged in /var/log/messages, the conflict errors are not. However, the last ones I noticed were gnome-themes-standard 3.0 conflicting with gnome-themes-standard 2.32 (many, many files). You can probably reproduce this fairly easily by doing a fresh install of MGA 1 and then doing an --auto-select with the Cauldron repositories. Conflicts should be fixed now.
Re: [Mageia-dev] GNOME3 ?
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Frank Griffin f...@roadrunner.com wrote: On 06/14/2011 09:27 AM, Dexter Morgan wrote: Conflicts should be fixed now. In order to separate the upgrade issues, I just did a fresh Cauldron GNOME install in a VBox VM, and tried to log in. I get the flat (not striped) blue background, probably because your dependency fix hasn't come through yet, and I see the Activity Date Username flash briefly at the top of the screen and then disappear. If you leave it that way, every 5 or 10 seconds the Oops, something went wrong screen flashes and disappears. If I try to install gnome-themes-standard, I get conflicts with gnome-themes-2.32, which has been pulled in by epiphany-2.32. Removing gnome-themes-2.32 (along with epiphany) allows gnome-themes-standard to install cleanly, at which point I get exactly the same behavior but with a blue striped background. do you have urpmi log this time ? The only error I can find is in /var/log/messages, and says gnome-session: Warning - application gnome-shell.desktop failed to register before timeout. There is no mention in dmesg of libnsl or gnome. do you have the logs from ~/.xsession-errors when the session fails please ? In short, the libnsl issue seems to be upgrade-related, but everything else is just broken out-of-the-box. If you try to reproduce this, you have to use 128K video memory and enable 3D acceleration in VBox, otherwise you get fallback mode, which appears to work fine.
Re: [Mageia-dev] Problems with Gnome 3
2011/6/9 JA Magallón magal...@unizar.es: Hi all... I have a problem with this first big change in Cauldron... I have a couple test boxes in which I have updated everything, and I can't get Gnome 3 to work properly. I suppose it is still work in progress, but as other people sent messages telling this or that application doesn't work... I can't even get an application to launch. I log in, get gnome-shell running, but: - no applet is shown in the bar. and they are there, i can press moue button on right menu, hover it over there and the volume bubble pops, but I see no icon on the bar. - if I select System settings o launch firefox, immediately I get a fullscreen error about something went wrong, plz logout and in again Do you have gnome-control-center installed ?
Re: [Mageia-dev] Problems with Gnome 3
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Wolfgang Bornath molc...@googlemail.com wrote: 2011/6/15 Frank Griffin f...@roadrunner.com: On 06/14/2011 06:40 PM, Dexter Morgan wrote: Do you have gnome-control-center installed I have the same situation, and gnome-control-center is installed. Confirmed, same problem. Just switched a Mageia 1 to Cauldron via urpmi, installed task-gnome, no errors. After reboot and selecting Gnome3 the desktop builds nicely but as soon as I start any application after a couple of seconds I get the same error message, pressing OK does a restart of the xserver and I'm back at login. Do you have errors in your .xsession-errors ?
[Mageia-dev] Some news regarding rpm packaging rules : %clean section
Hello, i will regurlarly mail this list when things change regarding packaging rules in rpm itself. First change, since rpm 4.8.0 you don't need to add the %clean section, if none is on the spec file, a default one will be used .
Re: [Mageia-dev] GNOME3 ?
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Dick Gevers dvgev...@xs4all.nl wrote: On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:49:15 -0400, Frank Griffin wrote about [Mageia-dev] GNOME3 ?: Is the GNOME3 upload complete to the point where bug reports will be useful ? I doubt it: # rpm -qa |grep me-des gnome-desktop-2.32.1-1.mga1 gnome-desktop3-3.0.2-3.mga2 lib64gnome-desktop-3_0-3.0.2-3.mga2 # rpm -ev gnome-desktop error: Failed dependencies: gnome-desktop is needed by (installed) gnome-panel-3.0.2-2.mga2.x86_64 Cheers, =Dick Gevers= nice i fix this one
Re: [Mageia-dev] GNOME3 ?
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Dick Gevers dvgev...@xs4all.nl wrote: On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:49:15 -0400, Frank Griffin wrote about [Mageia-dev] GNOME3 ?: Is the GNOME3 upload complete to the point where bug reports will be useful ? I doubt it: # rpm -qa |grep me-des gnome-desktop-2.32.1-1.mga1 gnome-desktop3-3.0.2-3.mga2 lib64gnome-desktop-3_0-3.0.2-3.mga2 # rpm -ev gnome-desktop error: Failed dependencies: gnome-desktop is needed by (installed) gnome-panel-3.0.2-2.mga2.x86_64 Cheers, =Dick Gevers= Should be fixed in next gnome-panel
Re: [Mageia-dev] [105941] imported package rake
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:14 PM, r...@mageia.org wrote: Revision 105941 Author kharec Date 2011-06-13 23:14:01 +0200 (Mon, 13 Jun 2011) Log Message imported package rake already exist in mageia in ruby-rake
Re: [Mageia-dev] [105941] imported package rake
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:21 PM, Cazzaniga Sandro cazzaniga.san...@gmail.com wrote: Le 13/06/2011 23:20, Dexter Morgan a écrit : already exist in mageia in ruby-rake oops, why name it ruby-rake? for policy reason, like python and perl packages
Re: [Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org wrote: Hi, so , with a little bit delay due to various things ( like everybody asking stuff to us on irc on a hourly fashion ( people will I hope recognize themselves )), Anne and I have reviewed the various proposals made through years during the early period of the distribution, and before at Mandriva. We took in account the feedback of people on forum, on ml, nd those we have seen during events. We also discussed with others distributions developers we know from Opensuse, Fedora, Debian, Ubuntu about their release cycle, the choices they made and their reasons. Before going to the proposal, a few point of vocabulary : Release cycle mean the time between 2 releases. Hello, i would be in favor of proposal 2. For not beeing in sync with upstream projects ( gnome, kde, ... ) this is for me a false problem because we won't provide the first release ( like gnome 3.2 or kde 4.7 ) but we will be able to release a bugfix release ( gnome 3.2.x , kde 4.7.5 ) which means less work for QA team during stable release. This proposal allow us to do more long term projects too. I think that with proposition 3 we will have less visibility because ppl will have real news of us only once per year.
Re: [Mageia-dev] update of compiz
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 9:39 PM, julien mjulie...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I would like to update compiz to v0.8.8. any objection ? regards julien Hello, fedora uses compiz 0.9.4 do you think we can directly go to this version ? Btw, glad to see someone taking compiz maintainership, congrats.
Re: [Mageia-dev] Mageia 2 - Improving educational programs
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Angelo Naselli anase...@linux.it wrote: WDYT? I'd add that this task could be a good start for padawans, well i could try to mentor someone here :) ... easier if we're going to be a team in this task (if dmorgan agrees and joins me/us :p ) Yes of course :)
Re: [Mageia-dev] Problems with Gnome 3
2011/6/10 Kira elegant.pega...@gmail.com: 在 Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:20:41 +0800, Frank Griffin f...@roadrunner.com寫道: On 06/10/2011 06:46 AM, Michael Scherer wrote: While I have no issue with gnome-shell, I have read enough reports of people not happy with it to know we would head to a 2nd kde 4.0 story. So maybe we could start to learn from the past and discuss with users to explain the update, see why they do not want etc, instead of being purely focused on it is cauldron, let's update everything. +1 3 is rumored to have a lot of ideological change, and probably the usual GNOME removal of working stuff that people expect to be there (GDM config). It would be very nice to have a tool to switch back and forth for experimentation, at least a minimal list of things from each release that can be removed via rpm --nodeps prior to reinstalling the other release, so that urpmi doesn't try to remove the world to make the change. In the past time, there's KDE3 and KDE4 co-exist together in the repository, maybe we can do it again? maybe 1 wait to have gnome 3 and then speak about gnome2
Re: [Mageia-dev] [RFC] Removing .la files
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote: On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:41:46PM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote: Le vendredi 10 juin 2011 à 03:47 +0300, Ahmad Samir a écrit : On 9 June 2011 19:35, Dexter Morgan dmorga...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, as other distributions we started to remove .la files from mageia during mageia 1 development. Could you explain the rational of removing them ? AFAIK, the .la removal was not discussed, so starting by saying we remove them now because last time, we didn't discussed and it broke lots of thing is a little bit weird. https://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/RemovingLaFiles Seems some distributions misunderstand the need and changed the wiki page. Removing .la files is needed however, otherwise you'll quickly mix distribution installed libraries and self-compiled libraries. Difficulty is that this only works when you remove *all* .la files. If only one is left compilation is broken. -- Regards, Olav i will try a new way to remove them and btw we maybe should add a rpmlint reject to reject packages with la files inside . but not yet as we may need to still build some the time of the transition.
Re: [Mageia-dev] Problems with Gnome 3
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote: On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 02:59:58PM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote: My main issue is more that not everything is finished ( like I miss the timezone clock stuff to see when to call on USAs and rest of Europa ) That's planned for 3.2 btw. -- Regards, Olav which is planned for october iirc no ? so good for mageia 2 :)
Re: [Mageia-dev] Problems with Gnome 3
2011/6/11 JA Magallón jamagal...@ono.com: On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:45:03 +0200, JA Magallón jamagal...@ono.com wrote: Hi all... I have a problem with this first big change in Cauldron... I have a couple test boxes in which I have updated everything, and I can't get Gnome 3 to work properly. I suppose it is still work in progress, but as other people sent messages telling this or that application doesn't work... I can't even get an application to launch. I log in, get gnome-shell running, but: - no applet is shown in the bar. and they are there, i can press moue button on right menu, hover it over there and the volume bubble pops, but I see no icon on the bar. - if I select System settings o launch firefox, immediately I get a fullscreen error about something went wrong, plz logout and in again I suppose probably I miss some depdency not correctly handled, but I can not guess what. Any ideas ? TIA Well, after latest updates I can see things in gnome-shell, launch apps, see preferences, but suddenly I get kicked out, and I think this is the problem: gnome-settings-[2556]: segfault at 7fb8612fb1d0 ip 7fb8612fb1d0 sp 7fff830282d8 error 14 in libnsl-2.12.1.so[7fb8639dc000+15000] gnome-settings-[3257]: segfault at 7fae815011d0 ip 7fae815011d0 sp 7fff72cc8b58 error 14 in libnsl-2.12.1.so[7fae83be2000+15000] gnome-settings-[3723]: segfault at 7f42989871d0 ip 7f42989871d0 sp 7fffa8d55858 error 14 in libnsl-2.12.1.so[7f429b068000+15000] (from dmesg) Sometines it lasts longer, other less, but I get the error fullscreen message all the time. And perhaps it's because the session loses connection to gnome-settings-daemon. Any idea ? -- J.A. Magallon jamagallon()ono!com \ Winter is coming... i think that it can be interesting to start gnome-settings inside gdb to have some infos about the crash
Re: [Mageia-dev] Problems with Gnome 3
2011/6/9 JA Magallón jamagal...@ono.com: Hi all... I have a problem with this first big change in Cauldron... I have a couple test boxes in which I have updated everything, and I can't get Gnome 3 to work properly. I suppose it is still work in progress, but as other people sent messages telling this or that application doesn't work... I can't even get an application to launch. I log in, get gnome-shell running, but: - no applet is shown in the bar. and they are there, i can press moue button on right menu, hover it over there and the volume bubble pops, but I see no icon on the bar. - if I select System settings o launch firefox, immediately I get a fullscreen error about something went wrong, plz logout and in again I suppose probably I miss some depdency not correctly handled, but I can not guess what. Any ideas ? Hi, sorry i forgot to tell that it was in WIP :/ so first accept my apologize. Then, yes there is still missing pieces, i try to get them today. can you give the exact error messages please ? have you tried to install gnome-shell and in kdm/gdm to choose Gnome3 ?
[Mageia-dev] Change for clutter-gtk package
Hi dear packagers, clutter-gtk will be a gtk3 app today. To keep the compatibility with gtk2 apps we will still have the gtk2 clutter-gtk it will be clutter-gtk010. So don't forget to use this one if you want to use it with a gtk2 app. thanks.
[Mageia-dev] Go to gnome 3
Hi, as a misunderstanding i started to update to gnome 3 as it seemed agreed to go this way ( at least i and some ppl understood as i read that some ppl planned to update to it too ) What do we plan ? i can revert to the previous rpms or continue to update. sorry again.
Re: [Mageia-dev] Problems with Gnome 3
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote: On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 11:20:10AM +0200, JA Magallón wrote: This is .xsession-errors: Window manager warning: Failed to load theme Adwaita: Failed to find a valid file for theme Adwaita needs gnome-themes-standard thanks a lot for all your inputs, so i think all will be better when i will finish updating gnome. For policykit i will update too today then thanks again :)
Re: [Mageia-dev] Problems with Gnome 3
2011/6/9 JA Magallón jamagal...@ono.com: On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 10:49:18 +0100, Colin Guthrie mag...@colin.guthr.ie wrote: 'Twas brillig, and Wolfgang Bornath at 09/06/11 10:25 did gyre and gimble: 2011/6/9 JA Magallón jamagal...@ono.com: No need, Cauldron is Cauldron. The only strange thing is that I had heard on other threads that update to Gnome 3 was being discussed, but never realized it had finally agreed on. Same here, I'm a bit surprised. We're on the next cycle now. Quite frankly I'd be stunned (and hugely disappointed) if we *didn't* have Gnome 3! Providing a Gnome2 environment or not is likely the point that need discussion :D +1 One question: xps:/etc/X11/wmsession.d# ll total 16 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 131 2011.06.08 11:00 02GNOME -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 116 2011.03.25 00:36 06Xfce -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 177 2011.06.08 11:31 11GNOME3 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 118 2011.02.07 22:12 29drak3d xps:/etc/X11/wmsession.d# rpm -qf * gnome-session-3.0.1-1.mga2 xfce-utils-4.8.1-5.mga1 gnome-shell-3.0.2-1.mga2 drak3d-1.30-1.mga1 What is the difference between bot gnomes ? IE, gnome-session and gnome-shell-session ? Now we don't have gnome 2 (gnome 3 uninstalled almost everything), so ? can you do a rpm -qf for 02GNOME please ?
[Mageia-dev] [RFC] Update of Gnome
Hello to all, as we say, better late than never :) so i announce that cauldron is in WIP for the update to gnome3 I hope to finish tomorrow for the complete gnome. For now you can have an half working gnome so don't report bugreports for the moment, i will mail back when ready. thanks for all.
Re: [Mageia-dev] Missing packages in Mageia 1. How to backport?
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Colin Guthrie mag...@colin.guthr.ie wrote: 'Twas brillig, and Christiaan Welvaart at 09/06/11 10:40 did gyre and gimble: On Thu, 9 Jun 2011, Maarten Vanraes wrote: otoh, perhaps a missing package is also a bugfix... maybe we could file bug reports for missing packages and go through the updates route... Filing bug reports is not a bad idea, even if the new package will go to backports. Just explain a little why it is important (to fix this in a stable release). We probably need a new version in bugzilla because mga1+backports is basically a new distro. A bug in backports shouldn't be filed against 1 IMHO. As I said in my original mail I really don't think backports is the right approach. I'd prefer to have a 3rd party repo than abuse backports to get the missing packages. I think updates would be the right place. Please no 3rd repo :) But i agree with you for updates for new packages ( no new versions ;) )
[Mageia-dev] [RFC] Removing .la files
Hello, as other distributions we started to remove .la files from mageia during mageia 1 development. Unfortunatly we didn't had enough time to finish this. I restarted this task today. Please tell me if a build fails because of a missing la file.
Re: [Mageia-dev] glib commit problems
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Zé mmode...@gmail.com wrote: I have got glib from mandriva and did the necessary changes for mageia, since its a package needed by others, but when i tried to import it into mageia i got this error output: srpms]$ mgarepo submit glib Fetching revision... URL: svn+ssh://svn.mageia.org/svn/packages/cauldron/glib Commit: 102067 | ze | imported package glib Implicit target: cauldron error: command failed: ssh pkgsubmit.mageia.org /usr/local/bin/submit_package -t cauldron --define sid=005a19f9-7c5c-4db1-a847-43d2f1b7774b -r 102067 svn+ssh://svn.mageia.org/svn/packages/cauldron/glib A /var/lib/schedbot/repsys/tmp/tmpmT6I4j/SOURCES-bin error: Failed to upload svn+ssh://svn.mageia.org/svn/packages/cauldron/glib: Executing perl -I/usr/share/mga-youri-submit/lib /usr/share/mga-youri-submit/bin/youri-submit --config /etc/youri/submit-todo.conf --define user=ze --define sid=005a19f9-7c5c-4db1-a847-43d2f1b7774b cauldron /var/lib/schedbot/repsys/srpms/@102067:glib-1.2.10-25.mga2.src.rpm (sudo_user ze) Warning: Can't guess destination: section missing, defaulting to core/release Deprecated method, use as_string now at /usr/share/mga-youri-submit/lib/Youri/Submit/Check/ACL.pm line 32 Deprecated method, use as_file() now at /usr/share/mga-youri-submit/lib/Youri/Submit/Check/Host.pm line 32 Initializing repository Warning: Looking for any section with a package glib of any version error: File /var/lib/schedbot/rpmbuild/SOURCES/glib-1.2.10-isowarning.patch: No such file or directory error: File /var/lib/schedbot/rpmbuild/SOURCES/glib-1.2.10-multilib.patch: No such file or directory error: File /var/lib/schedbot/rpmbuild/SOURCES/glib-1.2.10-gcc34.patch: No such file or directory error: File /var/lib/schedbot/rpmbuild/SOURCES/glib-1.2.10-underquoted.patch: No such file or directory error: File /var/lib/schedbot/rpmbuild/SOURCES/glib-1.2.10-libtool.patch: No such file or directory error: File /var/lib/schedbot/rpmbuild/SOURCES/glib-1.2.10-underlinking.patch: No such file or directory error: File /var/lib/schedbot/rpmbuild/SOURCES/glib-1.2.10-format_not_a_string_literal_and_no_format_arguments.diff: No such file or directory error: File /var/lib/schedbot/rpmbuild/SOURCES/glib_divert.patch: No such file or directory Deprecated method, use as_string now at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.1/Youri/Repository/Mageia.pm line 457 Submission errors, aborting: - glib-1.2.10-25.mga2.src: - ze is not authorized to upload packages belonging to glib in section core/release (authorized persons: ^blacklisted$) could anyone check this? or mail me that ill provide the glib src.rpm publicly so it can be imported into mageia. TIA, -- Zé For what do you need glib ? glib is on the same list as gtk1 and Qt3, = Apps we want to get rid of.
Re: [Mageia-dev] glib commit problems
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Zé mmode...@gmail.com wrote: xmms needs ORbit, that needs glib, and AFAIK these are still maintained apps, and xmms is still a needed buildrequire needed by kdenetwork (its optional but still exists), so i dont understand the hurry to drop these applications. You don't want to add xmms as a dep of kdenetwork4 w/o asking to mikala.
Re: [Mageia-dev] Cauldron?
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 3:07 AM, David dgbo...@gmail.com wrote: When will Cauldron reopen? -- David It should reopen really soon ( see yesterday mail on mageia-sysadm ML ).
Re: [Mageia-dev] protobuf package problem
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Pascal Terjan pter...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 16:05, Colin Guthrie mag...@colin.guthr.ie wrote: 'Twas brillig, and Dexter Morgan at 20/05/11 14:21 did gyre and gimble: On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Dexter Morgan dmorga...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Colin Guthrie mag...@colin.guthr.ie wrote: 'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 20/05/11 11:22 did gyre and gimble: To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed: Package Version Release Arch (medium CoreRelease-64) protobuf 2.3.0 10.mga1 x86_64 protobuf-compiler 2.3.0 10.mga1 x86_64 1.6MB of additional disk space will be used. 473KB of packages will be retrieved. Proceed with the installation of the 2 packages? (Y/n) can you test new packages please ? Got it. Seems to work great. Thanks :D Is it intended that most subpackages no longer exist and were not obsoleted (all the -10) ? /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-vim-2.3.0-11.mga1.x86_64.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-java-2.3.0-11.mga1.x86_64.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-devel-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-devel-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-static-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-static-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-compiler-2.3.0-11.mga1.x86_64.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-javadoc-2.3.0-11.mga1.x86_64.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/debug/core/release/protobuf-debug-2.3.0-11.mga1.x86_64.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/SRPMS/core/release/protobuf-2.3.0-11.mga1.src.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-vim-2.3.0-11.mga1.i586.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-devel-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-static-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-static-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-devel-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-compiler-2.3.0-11.mga1.i586.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-java-2.3.0-11.mga1.i586.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-javadoc-2.3.0-11.mga1.i586.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/debug/core/release/protobuf-debug-2.3.0-11.mga1.i586.rpm As this was a cauldron only issue i though this wasn't needed, do you prefer them to be obsoleted ? i can do it right now if needed.
Re: [Mageia-dev] protobuf package problem
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Pascal Terjan pter...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 23:30, Dexter Morgan dmorga...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Pascal Terjan pter...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 16:05, Colin Guthrie mag...@colin.guthr.ie wrote: 'Twas brillig, and Dexter Morgan at 20/05/11 14:21 did gyre and gimble: On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Dexter Morgan dmorga...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Colin Guthrie mag...@colin.guthr.ie wrote: 'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 20/05/11 11:22 did gyre and gimble: To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed: Package Version Release Arch (medium CoreRelease-64) protobuf 2.3.0 10.mga1 x86_64 protobuf-compiler 2.3.0 10.mga1 x86_64 1.6MB of additional disk space will be used. 473KB of packages will be retrieved. Proceed with the installation of the 2 packages? (Y/n) can you test new packages please ? Got it. Seems to work great. Thanks :D Is it intended that most subpackages no longer exist and were not obsoleted (all the -10) ? /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-vim-2.3.0-11.mga1.x86_64.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-java-2.3.0-11.mga1.x86_64.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-devel-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-devel-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-static-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-static-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-compiler-2.3.0-11.mga1.x86_64.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-javadoc-2.3.0-11.mga1.x86_64.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/debug/core/release/protobuf-debug-2.3.0-11.mga1.x86_64.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/SRPMS/core/release/protobuf-2.3.0-11.mga1.src.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-vim-2.3.0-11.mga1.i586.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-devel-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-static-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-static-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-devel-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-compiler-2.3.0-11.mga1.i586.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-java-2.3.0-11.mga1.i586.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-javadoc-2.3.0-11.mga1.i586.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/debug/core/release/protobuf-debug-2.3.0-11.mga1.i586.rpm As this was a cauldron only issue i though this wasn't needed, do you prefer them to be obsoleted ? i can do it right now if needed. No but I won't remove them from mirrors if this is not normal, that's why I asked if it was intended Yes they need to be removed, just that i forgotten ( lazyness who knows :) ). Thanks for spotting this issue.
[Mageia-dev] Push Request: freemind
Hi, Please push freemind, this add a change in the classpath as explained in bug 1398, and thus, this allow the software to start.
Re: [Mageia-dev] Freeze push: drakx-installer-rescue
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 7:41 AM, Cazzaniga Sandro cazzaniga.san...@gmail.com wrote: Can someone push it, please? The old sources was removed (they were useless) and the spec was *a little* cleaned for allow a commit. - remove buildroot def - remove Name, Version, Release from the top of spec - remove clean buildroot at %install thanks Hi, Why this need a push ? this doesn't fix anything for cauldron. Why do you have removed clean buildroot at %install ?
Re: [Mageia-dev] Change default asian font of libreoffice writer?
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 4:30 AM, You-Cheng Hsieh yochenhs...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, The current default asian font of libreoffice writer is 'Droid Sans'. Unfortunately, it cannot display any asian font characters. And libreoffice does not use any system font for fallback while the used font does not have characters of wanted language[note]. I would like to suggest if we could change it to 'Droid Sans fallback', which would be able to display asian characters correctly. The default western and asian fonts of libreoffice writer can be changed in libreoffice options manually. Though it would be better if the default font setting just does it right. note: The wanted font fallback behavior is explained with more detail in bug 751: https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751 Thanks, You-Cheng Hsieh Hi, on the bugreport i don't see how to change the font, can you explain how to fix the fonts for asian locales please ? i agree that i would like to see this bug fixed too.
Re: [Mageia-dev] Push Request: freemind
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Thomas Backlund t...@mageia.org wrote: mån 2011-05-23 klockan 10:23 +0300 skrev Thomas Backlund: mån 2011-05-23 klockan 09:33 +0300 skrev Dexter Morgan: Hi, Please push freemind, this add a change in the classpath as explained in bug 1398, and thus, this allow the software to start. Done. Or not... http://pkgsubmit.mageia.org/uploads/failure/cauldron/core/release/20110523072325.tmb.valstar.18313/log/freemind-0.9.0-2.mga1/build.0.20110523072401.log Please repush it ( it needed to be adapted to log4j split )
Re: [Mageia-dev] Freeze push: drakx-installer-rescue
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Cazzaniga Sandro cazzaniga.san...@gmail.com wrote: Le 23/05/2011 08:55, Dexter Morgan a écrit : Hi, Why this need a push ? this doesn't fix anything for cauldron. Why do you have removed clean buildroot at %install ? It's no longer needed, isn't it? %install clean automatically? don't mess up with rpm5 and rpm.org please and readd the rm -fr %buildroot
[Mageia-dev] Freeze push request: log4j
Hi, please push log4j this helps to update from mandriva.
[Mageia-dev] Push request : python
Hi, Please push python, this address CVE-2011-1521
Re: [Mageia-dev] Push request : python
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Thomas Backlund t...@mageia.org wrote: sön 2011-05-22 klockan 16:26 +0300 skrev Dexter Morgan: Hi, Please push python, this address CVE-2011-1521 Done. Also mysql-connector-python is pushed. -- Thomas thanks a lot
Re: [Mageia-dev] Freeze push request: list of packages included
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Bruno Cornec bruno.cor...@hp.com wrote: Anne nicolas said on Sat, May 21, 2011 at 08:41:55AM +0200: all done except dpkg that failed FYI it is building on Mdv 2010.2. this wasn't building because of a patch that wasn't rediffed. I saw someone removed it because it was merged upstream. Can someone repush it please ?
Re: [Mageia-dev] protobuf package problem
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Colin Guthrie mag...@colin.guthr.ie wrote: 'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 20/05/11 11:22 did gyre and gimble: To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed: Package Version Release Arch (medium CoreRelease-64) protobuf 2.3.0 10.mga1 x86_64 protobuf-compiler 2.3.0 10.mga1 x86_64 1.6MB of additional disk space will be used. 473KB of packages will be retrieved. Proceed with the installation of the 2 packages? (Y/n) installing protobuf-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm protobuf-compiler-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm from /var/cache/urpmi/rpms Preparing... # Installation failed: file /usr/lib64/libprotobuf.so.6.0.0 from install of protobuf-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package lib64protobuf6-2.3.0-2.mga1.x86_64 file /usr/lib64/libprotoc.so.6.0.0 from install of protobuf-compiler-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package lib64protoc6-2.3.0-2.mga1.x86_64 Was the lib really moved out of a libified package into a main package? The old package policy seems correct to me... What is even stranger is that the earliest date in subversion is April 26, but the package I have installed is from a month earlier: Name : lib64protobuf6 Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 2.3.0 Vendor: Mageia.Org Release : 2.mga1 Build Date: Mon 28 Mar 2011 14:17:59 BST Install Date: Wed 30 Mar 2011 19:35:32 BST Build Host: jonund Group : System/Libraries Source RPM: protobuf-2.3.0-2.mga1.src.rpm Was the protobuf spec perhaps reimported without properly libification and overwrote the old version? Col i take a look now.
[Mageia-dev] Push request: apr
Hi, please push apr it fixes CVE-2011-1928 .
[Mageia-dev] push requested mysql-workbench
Hi, please push mysql-workbench, it obsoletes mysql-gui-tools to allow updates from mandriva.
[Mageia-dev] Push requres : Pure-ftpd
Hi, Please push pure-ftpd on cauldron, this adress CVE-2011-0418
Re: [Mageia-dev] Push requres : Pure-ftpd
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Thomas Backlund t...@mageia.org wrote: Thomas Backlund skrev 20.5.2011 08:44: Dexter Morgan skrev 20.5.2011 08:30: Hi, Please push pure-ftpd on cauldron, this adress CVE-2011-0418 Done Or not... http://pkgsubmit.mageia.org/uploads/failure/cauldron/core/release/20110520054329.tmb.valstar.27495/log/pure-ftpd-1.0.32-1.mga1/build.0.20110520054402.log -- Thomas sorry, please push again.
[Mageia-dev] push request: Postfix 2.7.4
Hi, Please push postfix this fixes CVE ( see https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1232 )
[Mageia-dev] Freeze Push : apr
Hi, fix please push apr this fixes a CVE ( see bug https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1280 and commit http://svnweb.mageia.org/packages/cauldron/apr/?pathrev=98877 ) thank you.
Re: [Mageia-dev] add new package kvirc to freeze
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Zé mmode...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/5/11 Balcaen John mik...@mageia.org: Could you please answer under the mail next time ? I think this is relative to how the user prefers... Le mercredi 11 mai 2011 08:45:51, Zé a écrit : I thought already had all needed permissions to submit packages but seams Michael Scherer have forgot to set some group since when i try to import the package it gives error. If i'm not wrong you should only have the permissions to commit on svn since you're supposed to be an apprentice so far In aprentice mode i would be able to commit in svn, but seams so far im not even able to do that, but ill wait that i can resolve this with misc. -- Zé How do you try to import on the SVN?
Re: [Mageia-dev] package drop request: alexandria
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Remy CLOUARD shikam...@mageia.org wrote: Hi, Could you please drop alexandria please ? 1) Alexandria is not maintained upstream anymore http://alexandria.rubyforge.org/ “New features and future development are being carried out in a separate project called Palatina. It’s a complete re-write, and is currently at an early stage of functionality. If you’re intersted in helping the project, or following it’s progress, you can subscribe to the palatina-devel mailing-list or check out the wiki.” 2) There’s a rewrite of it, but it’s not active since last september. see git clone git://code.gnostai.org/git/palatina.git 3) Alexandria uses ruby-libglade2, which is not part of ruby-gnome2 anymore since version 0.90.6 (we have 0.90.8) see http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/980605 To make a long story short, I don’t think it’s worth keeping it. We would have an unmaintained software, based on unmaintained libraries, so I’m in favor of dropping alexandria. Regards, I take care of removing it
Re: [Mageia-dev] package drop request: alexandria
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Dexter Morgan dmorga...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Remy CLOUARD shikam...@mageia.org wrote: Hi, Could you please drop alexandria please ? 1) Alexandria is not maintained upstream anymore http://alexandria.rubyforge.org/ “New features and future development are being carried out in a separate project called Palatina. It’s a complete re-write, and is currently at an early stage of functionality. If you’re intersted in helping the project, or following it’s progress, you can subscribe to the palatina-devel mailing-list or check out the wiki.” 2) There’s a rewrite of it, but it’s not active since last september. see git clone git://code.gnostai.org/git/palatina.git 3) Alexandria uses ruby-libglade2, which is not part of ruby-gnome2 anymore since version 0.90.6 (we have 0.90.8) see http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/980605 To make a long story short, I don’t think it’s worth keeping it. We would have an unmaintained software, based on unmaintained libraries, so I’m in favor of dropping alexandria. Regards, I take care of removing it Done
Re: [Mageia-dev] Re-import libreoffice from Mandriva?
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 9:12 AM, You-Cheng Hsieh yochenhs...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, There are some asian font related bugs that only exist in libreoffice of Mageia, but not in Mandriva. https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751 https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=815 I've been thinking that maybe some options or patches that might cause different results. Is it possible to re-import libreoffice from Mandriva, and test if it resolves any bugs present in Mageia? It can be temporally placed in the 'testing' repository. Thanks, You-Cheng Hsieh hi, no way we won't import mandriva package, debugging our rpm ( which is fedora one ) is the way to go. i will see the differences this week if possible.
