[Mageia-dev] Problem with urpmq ??

2012-12-26 Thread Robert Fox
[root@mainfox rfox]# urpmq ssh
No package named ssh
[root@mainfox rfox]# urpmq sshd
No package named sshd
[root@mainfox rfox]# urpmq kernel
No package named kernel
[root@mainfox rfox]# urpmq kde
No package named kde

Doesn't seem to work anymore . . .

Merry XMas -
R.Fox



Re: [Mageia-dev] Problem with urpmq ??

2012-12-26 Thread Sander Lepik
26.12.2012 16:33, Robert Fox kirjutas:
 [root@mainfox rfox]# urpmq ssh
 No package named ssh
 [root@mainfox rfox]# urpmq sshd
 No package named sshd
 [root@mainfox rfox]# urpmq kernel
 No package named kernel
 [root@mainfox rfox]# urpmq kde
 No package named kde

 Doesn't seem to work anymore . . .

 Merry XMas -
 R.Fox

I think you have to use urpmq -y ssh
Or --fuzzy if you like the long version.

--
Sander



Re: [Mageia-dev] Problem with urpmq ??

2012-12-26 Thread Pascal Terjan
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Sander Lepik sander.le...@eesti.ee wrote:
 26.12.2012 16:33, Robert Fox kirjutas:
 [root@mainfox rfox]# urpmq ssh
 No package named ssh
 [root@mainfox rfox]# urpmq sshd
 No package named sshd
 [root@mainfox rfox]# urpmq kernel
 No package named kernel
 [root@mainfox rfox]# urpmq kde
 No package named kde

 Doesn't seem to work anymore . . .

 Merry XMas -
 R.Fox

 I think you have to use urpmq -y ssh
 Or --fuzzy if you like the long version.

Yes it seems the default has changed, I noticed it recently...


Re: [Mageia-dev] Problem with urpmq ??

2012-12-26 Thread Eatdirt

On 12/26/2012 04:29 PM, Pascal Terjan wrote:


I think you have to use urpmq -y ssh
Or --fuzzy if you like the long version.


Yes it seems the default has changed, I noticed it recently...



So do I, I was also wondering why?

In particular, any usage of
urpmq blabla
has now a high probability to return
No package named blabla

:-/

Cheers,
Chris.



Re: [Mageia-dev] Problem with urpmq ??

2012-12-26 Thread Thierry Vignaud
On 26 December 2012 22:53, Eatdirt dirt...@gmail.com wrote:
 I think you have to use urpmq -y ssh
 Or --fuzzy if you like the long version.

 Yes it seems the default has changed, I noticed it recently...

 So do I, I was also wondering why?

people were complaining there was no exact mode in urpmq.
Also not performing substring matching is a huge speedup for
everything (urpmi/urpmq)

* Tue Dec 04 2012 tv tv 7.13-1.mga3
+ Revision: 326599
- library speedups when looking up packages:
  o do not attempt fuzzy matching if not requested
- urpmq:
  o do not allow substring matching with --fuzzy (mga#2953)

 In particular, any usage of
 urpmq blabla
 has now a high probability to return
 No package named blabla


Re: [Mageia-dev] Problem with urpmq ??

2012-12-26 Thread AL13N
Op woensdag 26 december 2012 23:18:22 schreef Thierry Vignaud:
 On 26 December 2012 22:53, Eatdirt dirt...@gmail.com wrote:
  I think you have to use urpmq -y ssh
  Or --fuzzy if you like the long version.
  
  Yes it seems the default has changed, I noticed it recently...
  
  So do I, I was also wondering why?
 
 people were complaining there was no exact mode in urpmq.
 Also not performing substring matching is a huge speedup for
 everything (urpmi/urpmq)
 
 * Tue Dec 04 2012 tv tv 7.13-1.mga3
 + Revision: 326599
 - library speedups when looking up packages:
   o do not attempt fuzzy matching if not requested
 - urpmq:
   o do not allow substring matching with --fuzzy (mga#2953)
 
  In particular, any usage of
  urpmq blabla
  has now a high probability to return
  No package named blabla

i think this is fine, escpecially considering there's scripts that could use 
this, so exact match is much better as default.

there's nothing worse than mistyping and a different package is installed 
because it matched...


Re: [Mageia-dev] Problem with urpmq ??

2012-12-26 Thread Eatdirt

On 12/26/2012 11:42 PM, AL13N wrote:


i think this is fine, escpecially considering there's scripts that could use
this, so exact match is much better as default.

there's nothing worse than mistyping and a different package is installed
because it matched...




Ok, but the behaviour and man of urpmq -a is now a bit 
counter-intuitive, why not defaulting -y into -a?


Cheers,
Chris.