Re: [Mageia-dev] rescue has mount.nfs, but no statd
Op vrijdag 23 maart 2012 10:34:55 schreef Thierry Vignaud: > On 22 March 2012 20:33, Maarten Vanraes wrote: > >> nfs was available, so we wanted to mount > >> > >> but the mount failed, because nfs module wasn't modprobed, and drvinst > >> didn't fix that (maybe it should modprobe nfs as well) > >> > >> or maybe mount.nfs should try to modprobe nfs if needed. > >> > >> however, statd wasn't there and it complained that it needed that for > >> locking > >> > >> atm we're doing -o nolock and that works... but... statd would be quite > >> usefull here... > > > > perhaps i should rephrase... > > > > can i fix this by adding statd on the rescue? or would this take too much > > space? > > it's simpler to use "mount -o nolock" instead... it's what i did at the time, but would it be alot of work/space to include statd? when doing backup of files to somewhere else, you kind of want to know it's not gonna get mushed if someone just goes around opening some files or something... would it just be running statd? or would it also require portmapper etc... etc... ? if it's too much work, or too complex, it's not needed, but if it's not too much space and just having statd, then it's good
Re: [Mageia-dev] rescue has mount.nfs, but no statd
On 22 March 2012 20:33, Maarten Vanraes wrote: >> nfs was available, so we wanted to mount >> >> but the mount failed, because nfs module wasn't modprobed, and drvinst >> didn't fix that (maybe it should modprobe nfs as well) >> >> or maybe mount.nfs should try to modprobe nfs if needed. >> >> however, statd wasn't there and it complained that it needed that for >> locking >> >> atm we're doing -o nolock and that works... but... statd would be quite >> usefull here... > > perhaps i should rephrase... > > can i fix this by adding statd on the rescue? or would this take too much > space? it's simpler to use "mount -o nolock" instead...
Re: [Mageia-dev] rescue has mount.nfs, but no statd
Op donderdag 22 maart 2012 10:14:27 schreef Maarten Vanraes: > at $dayjob, we're testing out the rescue. > > so at first we're doing an rsync, but we need to do it on a network disk. > > cifs was not available, but that's not a big issue. > > nfs was available, so we wanted to mount > > but the mount failed, because nfs module wasn't modprobed, and drvinst > didn't fix that (maybe it should modprobe nfs as well) > > or maybe mount.nfs should try to modprobe nfs if needed. > > however, statd wasn't there and it complained that it needed that for > locking > > atm we're doing -o nolock and that works... but... statd would be quite > usefull here... perhaps i should rephrase... can i fix this by adding statd on the rescue? or would this take too much space? plz advise...
[Mageia-dev] rescue has mount.nfs, but no statd
at $dayjob, we're testing out the rescue. so at first we're doing an rsync, but we need to do it on a network disk. cifs was not available, but that's not a big issue. nfs was available, so we wanted to mount but the mount failed, because nfs module wasn't modprobed, and drvinst didn't fix that (maybe it should modprobe nfs as well) or maybe mount.nfs should try to modprobe nfs if needed. however, statd wasn't there and it complained that it needed that for locking atm we're doing -o nolock and that works... but... statd would be quite usefull here...
