Re: [Mageia-dev] taking care of some packages not maintained in Mandriva

2011-01-14 Thread Maarten Vanraes
Op vrijdag 14 januari 2011 03:56:28 schreef Thomas Spuhler:
 On Thursday, January 13, 2011 12:07:43 pm Colin Guthrie wrote:
  'Twas brillig, and philippe makowski at 13/01/11 18:07 did gyre and 
gimble:
   Hello,
   
   looking at http://maint.mandriva.com/listpkgs.php?owner=1
   I saw  duplicity and python-reportlab
   since I don't see them yet on the svn, I'm ok too taking care of them
   
   I will certainly also add rubygems-fb for http://rubygems.org/gems/fb
   
   no objection ?
  
  I think it should be first come, first served for no maintainer pkgs.
  If a better maintainer steps up in the future and everyone agrees,
  then maintainership can be ceded later.
  
  Col
 
 I wonder if all packages that have a home in Mandriva will have a
 maintainer in Mageia.

i don't think this 'll be a problem.

Mandriva is planning on reducing packages from almost 14000 to 5000 ...

We just need more packagers and the problem goes away :-)


[Mageia-dev] taking care of some packages not maintained in Mandriva

2011-01-13 Thread philippe makowski
Hello,

looking at http://maint.mandriva.com/listpkgs.php?owner=1
I saw  duplicity and python-reportlab
since I don't see them yet on the svn, I'm ok too taking care of them

I will certainly also add rubygems-fb for http://rubygems.org/gems/fb

no objection ?


Re: [Mageia-dev] taking care of some packages not maintained in Mandriva

2011-01-13 Thread Thomas Spuhler
On Thursday, January 13, 2011 12:07:43 pm Colin Guthrie wrote:
 'Twas brillig, and philippe makowski at 13/01/11 18:07 did gyre and gimble:
  Hello,
  
  looking at http://maint.mandriva.com/listpkgs.php?owner=1
  I saw  duplicity and python-reportlab
  since I don't see them yet on the svn, I'm ok too taking care of them
  
  I will certainly also add rubygems-fb for http://rubygems.org/gems/fb
  
  no objection ?
 
 I think it should be first come, first served for no maintainer pkgs.
 If a better maintainer steps up in the future and everyone agrees,
 then maintainership can be ceded later.
 
 Col

I wonder if all packages that have a home in Mandriva will have a maintainer 
in Mageia.

-- 
Thomas


Re: [Mageia-dev] taking care of some packages not maintained in Mandriva

2011-01-13 Thread Motoko-chan

On 01/13/2011 02:17 PM, genomega wrote:



-Original Message-

From: Colin Guthriemag...@colin.guthr.ie
Sent: Jan 13, 2011 1:07 PM
To: Mageia development mailing-listmageia-dev@mageia.org
Subject: Re: [Mageia-dev] taking care of some packages not maintained in
Mandriva

'Twas brillig, and philippe makowski at 13/01/11 18:07 did gyre and gimble:

Hello,

looking at http://maint.mandriva.com/listpkgs.php?owner=1
I saw  duplicity and python-reportlab
since I don't see them yet on the svn, I'm ok too taking care of them

I will certainly also add rubygems-fb for http://rubygems.org/gems/fb

no objection ?


I think it should be first come, first served for no maintainer pkgs.
If a better maintainer steps up in the future and everyone agrees,
then maintainership can be ceded later.

Col

--

Colin Guthrie
mageia(at)colin.guthr.ie
http://colin.guthr.ie/

Day Job:
  Tribalogic Limited [http://www.tribalogic.net/]
Open Source:
  Mageia Contributor [http://www.mageia.org/]
  PulseAudio Hacker [http://www.pulseaudio.org/]
  Trac Hacker [http://trac.edgewall.org/]



I took a look at a few of the unmaintained packages and being a novice 
packager, they were way beyond my skill set at this time. Eclipse being one of 
them, it contains multiple rpm,s many zip files and many patches.

Being an Eclipse user, I'd love to try updating the Eclipse packages. 
Alas, that's one very complex build. Perhaps porting the spec from 
Fedora or another RPM-based distribution using a more modern Eclipse 
would be easier than trying to update what is already there.


Once my mentoring starts, I'd certainly be up for trying my hand at 
that, along with some of the other simpler unmaintained packages that I 
would personally use.


 - Michael