Re: [Mageia-dev] protobuf package problem
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Pascal Terjan wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 23:30, Dexter Morgan wrote: >> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Pascal Terjan wrote: >>> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 16:05, Colin Guthrie wrote: 'Twas brillig, and Dexter Morgan at 20/05/11 14:21 did gyre and gimble: > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Dexter Morgan > wrote: >> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Colin Guthrie >> wrote: >>> 'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 20/05/11 11:22 did gyre and gimble: To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed: Package Version Release Arch (medium "CoreRelease-64") protobuf 2.3.0 10.mga1 x86_64 protobuf-compiler 2.3.0 10.mga1 x86_64 1.6MB of additional disk space will be used. 473KB of packages will be retrieved. Proceed with the installation of the 2 packages? (Y/n) > > can you test new packages please ? Got it. Seems to work great. Thanks :D >>> >>> Is it intended that most subpackages no longer exist and were not >>> obsoleted (all the -10) ? >>> >>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-vim-2.3.0-11.mga1.x86_64.rpm >>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-java-2.3.0-11.mga1.x86_64.rpm >>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-devel-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm >>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm >>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm >>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-devel-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm >>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-static-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm >>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-static-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm >>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-compiler-2.3.0-11.mga1.x86_64.rpm >>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-javadoc-2.3.0-11.mga1.x86_64.rpm >>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/debug/core/release/protobuf-debug-2.3.0-11.mga1.x86_64.rpm >>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/SRPMS/core/release/protobuf-2.3.0-11.mga1.src.rpm >>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-vim-2.3.0-11.mga1.i586.rpm >>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-devel-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm >>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm >>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-static-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm >>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-static-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm >>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm >>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-devel-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm >>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-compiler-2.3.0-11.mga1.i586.rpm >>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-java-2.3.0-11.mga1.i586.rpm >>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-javadoc-2.3.0-11.mga1.i586.rpm >>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/debug/core/release/protobuf-debug-2.3.0-11.mga1.i586.rpm >>> >> >> As this was a cauldron only issue i though this wasn't needed, do you >> prefer them to be obsoleted ? >> i can do it right now if needed. > > No but I won't remove them from mirrors if this is not normal, that's > why I asked if it was intended > Yes they need to be removed, just that i forgotten ( lazyness who knows :) ). Thanks for spotting this issue.
Re: [Mageia-dev] protobuf package problem
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 23:30, Dexter Morgan wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Pascal Terjan wrote: >> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 16:05, Colin Guthrie wrote: >>> 'Twas brillig, and Dexter Morgan at 20/05/11 14:21 did gyre and gimble: On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Dexter Morgan wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Colin Guthrie > wrote: >> 'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 20/05/11 11:22 did gyre and gimble: >>> To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be >>> installed: >>> Package Version Release Arch >>> (medium "CoreRelease-64") >>> protobuf 2.3.0 10.mga1 x86_64 >>> protobuf-compiler 2.3.0 10.mga1 x86_64 >>> 1.6MB of additional disk space will be used. >>> 473KB of packages will be retrieved. >>> Proceed with the installation of the 2 packages? (Y/n) can you test new packages please ? >>> >>> Got it. Seems to work great. Thanks :D >>> >> >> Is it intended that most subpackages no longer exist and were not >> obsoleted (all the -10) ? >> >> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-vim-2.3.0-11.mga1.x86_64.rpm >> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-java-2.3.0-11.mga1.x86_64.rpm >> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-devel-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm >> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm >> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm >> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-devel-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm >> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-static-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm >> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-static-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm >> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-compiler-2.3.0-11.mga1.x86_64.rpm >> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-javadoc-2.3.0-11.mga1.x86_64.rpm >> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/debug/core/release/protobuf-debug-2.3.0-11.mga1.x86_64.rpm >> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/SRPMS/core/release/protobuf-2.3.0-11.mga1.src.rpm >> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-vim-2.3.0-11.mga1.i586.rpm >> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-devel-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm >> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm >> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-static-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm >> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-static-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm >> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm >> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-devel-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm >> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-compiler-2.3.0-11.mga1.i586.rpm >> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-java-2.3.0-11.mga1.i586.rpm >> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-javadoc-2.3.0-11.mga1.i586.rpm >> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/debug/core/release/protobuf-debug-2.3.0-11.mga1.i586.rpm >> > > As this was a cauldron only issue i though this wasn't needed, do you > prefer them to be obsoleted ? > i can do it right now if needed. No but I won't remove them from mirrors if this is not normal, that's why I asked if it was intended
Re: [Mageia-dev] protobuf package problem
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Pascal Terjan wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 16:05, Colin Guthrie wrote: >> 'Twas brillig, and Dexter Morgan at 20/05/11 14:21 did gyre and gimble: >>> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Dexter Morgan wrote: On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote: > 'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 20/05/11 11:22 did gyre and gimble: >> To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be >> installed: >> Package Version Release Arch >> (medium "CoreRelease-64") >> protobuf 2.3.0 10.mga1 x86_64 >> protobuf-compiler 2.3.0 10.mga1 x86_64 >> 1.6MB of additional disk space will be used. >> 473KB of packages will be retrieved. >> Proceed with the installation of the 2 packages? (Y/n) >>> >>> can you test new packages please ? >> >> Got it. Seems to work great. Thanks :D >> > > Is it intended that most subpackages no longer exist and were not > obsoleted (all the -10) ? > > /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-vim-2.3.0-11.mga1.x86_64.rpm > /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-java-2.3.0-11.mga1.x86_64.rpm > /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-devel-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm > /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm > /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm > /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-devel-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm > /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-static-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm > /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-static-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm > /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-compiler-2.3.0-11.mga1.x86_64.rpm > /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-javadoc-2.3.0-11.mga1.x86_64.rpm > /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/debug/core/release/protobuf-debug-2.3.0-11.mga1.x86_64.rpm > /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/SRPMS/core/release/protobuf-2.3.0-11.mga1.src.rpm > /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-vim-2.3.0-11.mga1.i586.rpm > /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-devel-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm > /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm > /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-static-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm > /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-static-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm > /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm > /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-devel-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm > /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-compiler-2.3.0-11.mga1.i586.rpm > /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-java-2.3.0-11.mga1.i586.rpm > /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-javadoc-2.3.0-11.mga1.i586.rpm > /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/debug/core/release/protobuf-debug-2.3.0-11.mga1.i586.rpm > As this was a cauldron only issue i though this wasn't needed, do you prefer them to be obsoleted ? i can do it right now if needed.
Re: [Mageia-dev] protobuf package problem
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 16:05, Colin Guthrie wrote: > 'Twas brillig, and Dexter Morgan at 20/05/11 14:21 did gyre and gimble: >> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Dexter Morgan wrote: >>> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Colin Guthrie >>> wrote: 'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 20/05/11 11:22 did gyre and gimble: > To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed: > Package Version Release Arch > (medium "CoreRelease-64") > protobuf 2.3.0 10.mga1 x86_64 > protobuf-compiler 2.3.0 10.mga1 x86_64 > 1.6MB of additional disk space will be used. > 473KB of packages will be retrieved. > Proceed with the installation of the 2 packages? (Y/n) >> >> can you test new packages please ? > > Got it. Seems to work great. Thanks :D > Is it intended that most subpackages no longer exist and were not obsoleted (all the -10) ? /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-vim-2.3.0-11.mga1.x86_64.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-java-2.3.0-11.mga1.x86_64.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-devel-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-devel-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-static-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-static-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-compiler-2.3.0-11.mga1.x86_64.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-javadoc-2.3.0-11.mga1.x86_64.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/debug/core/release/protobuf-debug-2.3.0-11.mga1.x86_64.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/SRPMS/core/release/protobuf-2.3.0-11.mga1.src.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-vim-2.3.0-11.mga1.i586.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-devel-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-static-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-static-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-devel-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-compiler-2.3.0-11.mga1.i586.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-java-2.3.0-11.mga1.i586.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-javadoc-2.3.0-11.mga1.i586.rpm /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/debug/core/release/protobuf-debug-2.3.0-11.mga1.i586.rpm
Re: [Mageia-dev] protobuf package problem
'Twas brillig, and Dexter Morgan at 20/05/11 14:21 did gyre and gimble: > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Dexter Morgan wrote: >> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Colin Guthrie >> wrote: >>> 'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 20/05/11 11:22 did gyre and gimble: To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed: PackageVersion Release Arch (medium "CoreRelease-64") protobuf 2.3.010.mga1 x86_64 protobuf-compiler 2.3.010.mga1 x86_64 1.6MB of additional disk space will be used. 473KB of packages will be retrieved. Proceed with the installation of the 2 packages? (Y/n) > > can you test new packages please ? Got it. Seems to work great. Thanks :D Col -- Colin Guthrie mageia(at)colin.guthr.ie http://colin.guthr.ie/ Day Job: Tribalogic Limited [http://www.tribalogic.net/] Open Source: Mageia Contributor [http://www.mageia.org/] PulseAudio Hacker [http://www.pulseaudio.org/] Trac Hacker [http://trac.edgewall.org/]
Re: [Mageia-dev] protobuf package problem
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote: > 'Twas brillig, and Dexter Morgan at 20/05/11 14:21 did gyre and gimble: >> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Dexter Morgan wrote: >>> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Colin Guthrie >>> wrote: 'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 20/05/11 11:22 did gyre and gimble: > To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed: > Package Version Release Arch > (medium "CoreRelease-64") > protobuf 2.3.0 10.mga1 x86_64 > protobuf-compiler 2.3.0 10.mga1 x86_64 > 1.6MB of additional disk space will be used. > 473KB of packages will be retrieved. > Proceed with the installation of the 2 packages? (Y/n) >> >> can you test new packages please ? > > Hmm, not super easily no. > > Do you have an (x86_64) build handy? > > > [colin@jimmy protobuf]$ mybm -bb > error: Failed build dependencies: > maven2 is needed by protobuf-2.3.0-11.csg1.x86_64 > maven-compiler-plugin is needed by protobuf-2.3.0-11.csg1.x86_64 > maven-install-plugin is needed by protobuf-2.3.0-11.csg1.x86_64 > maven-jar-plugin is needed by protobuf-2.3.0-11.csg1.x86_64 > maven-javadoc-plugin is needed by protobuf-2.3.0-11.csg1.x86_64 > maven-resources-plugin is needed by protobuf-2.3.0-11.csg1.x86_64 > maven-surefire-plugin is needed by protobuf-2.3.0-11.csg1.x86_64 > maven-antrun-plugin is needed by protobuf-2.3.0-11.csg1.x86_64 > maven-doxia is needed by protobuf-2.3.0-11.csg1.x86_64 > maven-doxia-sitetools is needed by protobuf-2.3.0-11.csg1.x86_64 > [colin@jimmy protobuf]$ sudo urpmi maven2 maven-compiler-plugin > maven-install-plugin maven-jar-plugin maven-javadoc-plugin > maven-resources-plugin maven-surefire-plugin maven-antrun-plugin > maven-doxia maven-doxia-sitetools > Some requested packages cannot be installed: > maven-antrun-plugin-1.6-4.mga1.noarch (due to conflicts with > netty-3.2.3-4.mga1.noarch, due to conflicts with netty-3.2.3-4.mga1.noarch) > maven-compiler-plugin-2.3.2-3.mga1.noarch (due to conflicts with > netty-3.2.3-4.mga1.noarch, due to conflicts with netty-3.2.3-4.mga1.noarch) > maven-doxia-1.1.4-4.mga1.noarch (due to conflicts with > netty-3.2.3-4.mga1.noarch, due to conflicts with netty-3.2.3-4.mga1.noarch) > maven-doxia-sitetools-1.1.3-5.mga1.noarch (due to conflicts with > netty-3.2.3-4.mga1.noarch, due to conflicts with netty-3.2.3-4.mga1.noarch) > maven-install-plugin-2.3.1-3.mga1.noarch (due to conflicts with > netty-3.2.3-4.mga1.noarch, due to conflicts with netty-3.2.3-4.mga1.noarch) > maven-jar-plugin-2.3.1-3.mga1.noarch (due to conflicts with > netty-3.2.3-4.mga1.noarch, due to conflicts with netty-3.2.3-4.mga1.noarch) > maven-javadoc-plugin-2.7-5.mga1.noarch (due to conflicts with > netty-3.2.3-4.mga1.noarch, due to conflicts with netty-3.2.3-4.mga1.noarch) > maven-resources-plugin-2.4.3-3.mga1.noarch (due to conflicts with > netty-3.2.3-4.mga1.noarch, due to conflicts with netty-3.2.3-4.mga1.noarch) > maven-surefire-plugin-2.8-2.mga1.noarch (due to conflicts with > netty-3.2.3-4.mga1.noarch, due to conflicts with netty-3.2.3-4.mga1.noarch) > netty-3.2.3-4.mga1.noarch (due to unsatisfied protobuf-java) > Continue installation anyway? (Y/n) n > > > > > > -- > > Colin Guthrie > mageia(at)colin.guthr.ie > http://colin.guthr.ie/ > > Day Job: > Tribalogic Limited [http://www.tribalogic.net/] > Open Source: > Mageia Contributor [http://www.mageia.org/] > PulseAudio Hacker [http://www.pulseaudio.org/] > Trac Hacker [http://trac.edgewall.org/] > available here ftp://distrib-coffee.ipsl.jussieu.fr/pub/linux/Mageia/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/
Re: [Mageia-dev] protobuf package problem
'Twas brillig, and Dexter Morgan at 20/05/11 14:21 did gyre and gimble: > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Dexter Morgan wrote: >> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Colin Guthrie >> wrote: >>> 'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 20/05/11 11:22 did gyre and gimble: To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed: PackageVersion Release Arch (medium "CoreRelease-64") protobuf 2.3.010.mga1 x86_64 protobuf-compiler 2.3.010.mga1 x86_64 1.6MB of additional disk space will be used. 473KB of packages will be retrieved. Proceed with the installation of the 2 packages? (Y/n) > > can you test new packages please ? Hmm, not super easily no. Do you have an (x86_64) build handy? [colin@jimmy protobuf]$ mybm -bb error: Failed build dependencies: maven2 is needed by protobuf-2.3.0-11.csg1.x86_64 maven-compiler-plugin is needed by protobuf-2.3.0-11.csg1.x86_64 maven-install-plugin is needed by protobuf-2.3.0-11.csg1.x86_64 maven-jar-plugin is needed by protobuf-2.3.0-11.csg1.x86_64 maven-javadoc-plugin is needed by protobuf-2.3.0-11.csg1.x86_64 maven-resources-plugin is needed by protobuf-2.3.0-11.csg1.x86_64 maven-surefire-plugin is needed by protobuf-2.3.0-11.csg1.x86_64 maven-antrun-plugin is needed by protobuf-2.3.0-11.csg1.x86_64 maven-doxia is needed by protobuf-2.3.0-11.csg1.x86_64 maven-doxia-sitetools is needed by protobuf-2.3.0-11.csg1.x86_64 [colin@jimmy protobuf]$ sudo urpmi maven2 maven-compiler-plugin maven-install-plugin maven-jar-plugin maven-javadoc-plugin maven-resources-plugin maven-surefire-plugin maven-antrun-plugin maven-doxia maven-doxia-sitetools Some requested packages cannot be installed: maven-antrun-plugin-1.6-4.mga1.noarch (due to conflicts with netty-3.2.3-4.mga1.noarch, due to conflicts with netty-3.2.3-4.mga1.noarch) maven-compiler-plugin-2.3.2-3.mga1.noarch (due to conflicts with netty-3.2.3-4.mga1.noarch, due to conflicts with netty-3.2.3-4.mga1.noarch) maven-doxia-1.1.4-4.mga1.noarch (due to conflicts with netty-3.2.3-4.mga1.noarch, due to conflicts with netty-3.2.3-4.mga1.noarch) maven-doxia-sitetools-1.1.3-5.mga1.noarch (due to conflicts with netty-3.2.3-4.mga1.noarch, due to conflicts with netty-3.2.3-4.mga1.noarch) maven-install-plugin-2.3.1-3.mga1.noarch (due to conflicts with netty-3.2.3-4.mga1.noarch, due to conflicts with netty-3.2.3-4.mga1.noarch) maven-jar-plugin-2.3.1-3.mga1.noarch (due to conflicts with netty-3.2.3-4.mga1.noarch, due to conflicts with netty-3.2.3-4.mga1.noarch) maven-javadoc-plugin-2.7-5.mga1.noarch (due to conflicts with netty-3.2.3-4.mga1.noarch, due to conflicts with netty-3.2.3-4.mga1.noarch) maven-resources-plugin-2.4.3-3.mga1.noarch (due to conflicts with netty-3.2.3-4.mga1.noarch, due to conflicts with netty-3.2.3-4.mga1.noarch) maven-surefire-plugin-2.8-2.mga1.noarch (due to conflicts with netty-3.2.3-4.mga1.noarch, due to conflicts with netty-3.2.3-4.mga1.noarch) netty-3.2.3-4.mga1.noarch (due to unsatisfied protobuf-java) Continue installation anyway? (Y/n) n -- Colin Guthrie mageia(at)colin.guthr.ie http://colin.guthr.ie/ Day Job: Tribalogic Limited [http://www.tribalogic.net/] Open Source: Mageia Contributor [http://www.mageia.org/] PulseAudio Hacker [http://www.pulseaudio.org/] Trac Hacker [http://trac.edgewall.org/]
Re: [Mageia-dev] protobuf package problem
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Dexter Morgan wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote: >> 'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 20/05/11 11:22 did gyre and gimble: >>> To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed: >>> Package Version Release Arch >>> (medium "CoreRelease-64") >>> protobuf 2.3.0 10.mga1 x86_64 >>> protobuf-compiler 2.3.0 10.mga1 x86_64 >>> 1.6MB of additional disk space will be used. >>> 473KB of packages will be retrieved. >>> Proceed with the installation of the 2 packages? (Y/n) can you test new packages please ?
Re: [Mageia-dev] protobuf package problem
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote: > 'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 20/05/11 11:22 did gyre and gimble: >> To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed: >> Package Version Release Arch >> (medium "CoreRelease-64") >> protobuf 2.3.0 10.mga1 x86_64 >> protobuf-compiler 2.3.0 10.mga1 x86_64 >> 1.6MB of additional disk space will be used. >> 473KB of packages will be retrieved. >> Proceed with the installation of the 2 packages? (Y/n) >> >> >> installing protobuf-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm >> protobuf-compiler-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm from /var/cache/urpmi/rpms >> Preparing... >> # >> Installation failed: file /usr/lib64/libprotobuf.so.6.0.0 from install >> of protobuf-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package >> lib64protobuf6-2.3.0-2.mga1.x86_64 >> file /usr/lib64/libprotoc.so.6.0.0 from install of >> protobuf-compiler-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package >> lib64protoc6-2.3.0-2.mga1.x86_64 >> >> >> Was the lib really moved out of a libified package into a main package? >> The old package policy seems correct to me... > > What is even stranger is that the earliest date in subversion is April > 26, but the package I have installed is from a month earlier: > > > Name : lib64protobuf6 Relocations: (not relocatable) > Version : 2.3.0 Vendor: Mageia.Org > Release : 2.mga1 Build Date: Mon 28 Mar 2011 > 14:17:59 BST > Install Date: Wed 30 Mar 2011 19:35:32 BST Build Host: jonund > Group : System/Libraries Source RPM: > protobuf-2.3.0-2.mga1.src.rpm > > > Was the protobuf spec perhaps reimported without properly libification > and overwrote the old version? > > Col > i take a look now.
Re: [Mageia-dev] protobuf package problem
'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 20/05/11 11:22 did gyre and gimble: > To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed: >PackageVersion Release Arch > (medium "CoreRelease-64") > protobuf 2.3.010.mga1 x86_64 > protobuf-compiler 2.3.010.mga1 x86_64 > 1.6MB of additional disk space will be used. > 473KB of packages will be retrieved. > Proceed with the installation of the 2 packages? (Y/n) > > > installing protobuf-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm > protobuf-compiler-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm from /var/cache/urpmi/rpms > Preparing... > # > Installation failed: file /usr/lib64/libprotobuf.so.6.0.0 from install > of protobuf-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package > lib64protobuf6-2.3.0-2.mga1.x86_64 > file /usr/lib64/libprotoc.so.6.0.0 from install of > protobuf-compiler-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package > lib64protoc6-2.3.0-2.mga1.x86_64 > > > Was the lib really moved out of a libified package into a main package? > The old package policy seems correct to me... What is even stranger is that the earliest date in subversion is April 26, but the package I have installed is from a month earlier: Name: lib64protobuf6 Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 2.3.0 Vendor: Mageia.Org Release : 2.mga1Build Date: Mon 28 Mar 2011 14:17:59 BST Install Date: Wed 30 Mar 2011 19:35:32 BST Build Host: jonund Group : System/Libraries Source RPM: protobuf-2.3.0-2.mga1.src.rpm Was the protobuf spec perhaps reimported without properly libification and overwrote the old version? Col -- Colin Guthrie mageia(at)colin.guthr.ie http://colin.guthr.ie/ Day Job: Tribalogic Limited [http://www.tribalogic.net/] Open Source: Mageia Contributor [http://www.mageia.org/] PulseAudio Hacker [http://www.pulseaudio.org/] Trac Hacker [http://trac.edgewall.org/]
