Re: [VOTE] Release 0.2

[Isabel Drost]

On Monday 16 November 2009 19:44:38 Ted Dunning wrote:
> Congrats.  

Congratulations from me as well!

Isabel

-- 
  |\  _,,,---,,_   Web:   
  /,`.-'`'-.  ;-;;,_  
 |,4-  ) )-,_..;\ (  `'-' 
'---''(_/--'  `-'\_) (fL)  IM:  



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.2

[Ted Dunning]

Congrats.  This was a rocky one which make the relief of completion all the
more sweet.


On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:

> Yep, will do this afternoon, will send the release announcement tomorrow.
>
> On Nov 16, 2009, at 10:17 AM, Sean Owen wrote:
>
> > That looks like a quorum -- 3 days, +4, no objections. I say push it out.
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Grant Ingersoll 
> wrote:
> >> +1 from me.
>
>
>


-- 
Ted Dunning, CTO
DeepDyve

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.2

[Grant Ingersoll]

Yep, will do this afternoon, will send the release announcement tomorrow.

On Nov 16, 2009, at 10:17 AM, Sean Owen wrote:

> That looks like a quorum -- 3 days, +4, no objections. I say push it out.
> 
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Grant Ingersoll  wrote:
>> +1 from me.

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.2

[Sean Owen]

That looks like a quorum -- 3 days, +4, no objections. I say push it out.

On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Grant Ingersoll  wrote:
> +1 from me.

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.2

[Grant Ingersoll]

+1 from me.


On Nov 12, 2009, at 4:58 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:

> Please vote on releasing the artifacts at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-002/org/apache/mahout/
> 
> KEYS file is in the Mahout root trunk.
> 
> Things to do before voting:
> 
> 1. Download and verify signatures on all the artifacts.
> 2. Try out the tests, examples, etc.
> 3. Try it out in any apps that you have.
> 4. See the Apache pages on releases and see what else I'm missing.
> 5. Others?

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.2

[Drew Farris]

On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Grant Ingersoll  wrote:
>
> On Nov 15, 2009, at 11:03 PM, Drew Farris wrote:
>
>> It should be a matter of adding an execution to the top level assembly
>> plugin in the release profile to build binary artifacts, but I'm a bit
>> rusty with the setting up binary assemblies for multi-module projects.
>> It is likely that it needs a custom assembly descriptor to put
>> everything in its proper place, but the 0.1 binary release can be used
>> as a template.
>>
>> If something like this isn't covered elsewhere already, I can spend
>> some time with it over the next couple evenings.
>
> Yeah, I punted on it for 0.1, but now with the better Maven publishing we are 
> doing, I likely think we can revisit it since we don't have to install 
> anything ourselves.

+1 for me then.

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.2

[Grant Ingersoll]

On Nov 15, 2009, at 11:03 PM, Drew Farris wrote:

> It should be a matter of adding an execution to the top level assembly
> plugin in the release profile to build binary artifacts, but I'm a bit
> rusty with the setting up binary assemblies for multi-module projects.
> It is likely that it needs a custom assembly descriptor to put
> everything in its proper place, but the 0.1 binary release can be used
> as a template.
> 
> If something like this isn't covered elsewhere already, I can spend
> some time with it over the next couple evenings.

Yeah, I punted on it for 0.1, but now with the better Maven publishing we are 
doing, I likely think we can revisit it since we don't have to install anything 
ourselves.

-Grant

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.2

[Sean Owen]

Done, I agree this should not be a blocker. +1 again to release. Any
other votes?

On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Jukka Zitting  wrote:
>  core/pom.xml
>  core/src/main/java/overview.html
>  core/src/main/java/org/apache/mahout/df/data/DescriptorUtils.java
>  core/src/test/java/org/apache/mahout/df/mapred/partial/Step1MapperTest.java
>  core/src/test/java/org/apache/mahout/df/mapreduce/partial/Step1MapperTest.java
>  examples/pom.xml
>  examples/bin/lda.algorithm
>  examples/src/main/java/overview.html
>  examples/src/main/java/org/apache/mahout/cf/taste/example/TasteOptionParser.java
>  taste-web/pom.xml
>  taste-web/recommender.properties
>  utils/pom.xml
>
> Not a blocker for the release, just something to fix for future releases.

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.2

[Jukka Zitting]

Hi,

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Grant Ingersoll  wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the artifacts at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-002/org/apache/mahout/

+1 to release



> Things to do before voting:
>
> 1. Download and verify signatures on all the artifacts.

I verified the checksums and signature on mahout-0.2-project.tar.bz2
and a few other artifacts. I trust that the others are also OK.

> 2. Try out the tests, examples, etc.

Ran mvn install (Maven 2.2.1, Java 1.6.0, Linux) without problems.

> 3. Try it out in any apps that you have.

None yet. :-(

> 4. See the Apache pages on releases and see what else I'm missing.

The following files should probably come with the Apache license header:

  core/pom.xml
  core/src/main/java/overview.html
  core/src/main/java/org/apache/mahout/df/data/DescriptorUtils.java
  core/src/test/java/org/apache/mahout/df/mapred/partial/Step1MapperTest.java
  core/src/test/java/org/apache/mahout/df/mapreduce/partial/Step1MapperTest.java
  examples/pom.xml
  examples/bin/lda.algorithm
  examples/src/main/java/overview.html
  
examples/src/main/java/org/apache/mahout/cf/taste/example/TasteOptionParser.java
  taste-web/pom.xml
  taste-web/recommender.properties
  utils/pom.xml

Not a blocker for the release, just something to fix for future releases.

> 5. Others?

Verified that the mahout-0.2-project.tar.bz2 package matches the
contents of the mahout-0.2 tag in svn.

BR,

Jukka Zitting

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.2

[Drew Farris]

It should be a matter of adding an execution to the top level assembly
plugin in the release profile to build binary artifacts, but I'm a bit
rusty with the setting up binary assemblies for multi-module projects.
 It is likely that it needs a custom assembly descriptor to put
everything in its proper place, but the 0.1 binary release can be used
as a template.

If something like this isn't covered elsewhere already, I can spend
some time with it over the next couple evenings.

On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Sean Owen  wrote:
> I don't think it includes binary .jar files. You build them but I
> agree, would be much more convenient to provide them. Is this easy to
> do? I don't know.

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.2

[Sean Owen]

I don't think it includes binary .jar files. You build them but I
agree, would be much more convenient to provide them. Is this easy to
do? I don't know.

That said I am still +1 on the release as is. It has been 2 months
since we started trying to pull this together and think it's well in
good enough shape.

On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Drew Farris  wrote:
> For what it's worth I downloaded all of the artifacts and verified
> their signatures using gpg -- everything checked out.
>
> I'm curious about the binary release. I couldn't seem to find a binary
> tarball/zip in the repo anywhere. For example, I unrolled
> mahout-0.2-project.tar.gz and there were no jar files in there.
> (although I could build from that directory without a problem).
>
> Are binary releases staged elsewhere?
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Grant Ingersoll  wrote:
>> Please vote on releasing the artifacts at:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-002/org/apache/mahout/
>>
>> KEYS file is in the Mahout root trunk.
>>
>> Things to do before voting:
>>
>> 1. Download and verify signatures on all the artifacts.
>> 2. Try out the tests, examples, etc.
>> 3. Try it out in any apps that you have.
>> 4. See the Apache pages on releases and see what else I'm missing.
>> 5. Others?
>

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.2

[Drew Farris]

For what it's worth I downloaded all of the artifacts and verified
their signatures using gpg -- everything checked out.

I'm curious about the binary release. I couldn't seem to find a binary
tarball/zip in the repo anywhere. For example, I unrolled
mahout-0.2-project.tar.gz and there were no jar files in there.
(although I could build from that directory without a problem).

Are binary releases staged elsewhere?

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Grant Ingersoll  wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the artifacts at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-002/org/apache/mahout/
>
> KEYS file is in the Mahout root trunk.
>
> Things to do before voting:
>
> 1. Download and verify signatures on all the artifacts.
> 2. Try out the tests, examples, etc.
> 3. Try it out in any apps that you have.
> 4. See the Apache pages on releases and see what else I'm missing.
> 5. Others?

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.2

[Sean Owen]

That's all but identical to me. Not sure what's up. I use the 64-bit
JVM by default, maybe that's it?

Don't think you even need to reroll. It's not a code issue, at best a
test issue, and really not even that.

On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Grant Ingersoll  wrote:
> OK, check it and I'll reroll today.
>
> Here's mine:
>  mvn --version
> Apache Maven 2.2.1 (r801777; 2009-08-06 15:16:01-0400)
> Java version: 1.6.0_15
> Java home: /System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.6.0/Home
> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: MacRoman
> OS name: "mac os x" version: "10.6.2" arch: "x86_64" Family: "mac"
>
>
> And svn info reports:
> Path: .
> URL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/mahout/trunk
> Repository Root: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf
> Repository UUID: 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
> Revision: 835502
> Node Kind: directory
> Schedule: normal
> Last Changed Author: gsingers
> Last Changed Rev: 835391
> Last Changed Date: 2009-11-12 09:32:30 -0500 (Thu, 12 Nov 2009)
>
> And everything works.
>
>
> On Nov 13, 2009, at 4:05 AM, Sean Owen wrote:
>
>> Mac OS X 10.6.2, Java 6, Maven 2.2.1. The usual. It's consistently 
>> reproducible.
>>
>> My 'fix' can't really hurt and I committed it. This should already be
>> something the tests do anyway, so that a difference in the 17th
>> decimal place doesn't fail the test (except in some very special case
>> where it is significant of course, which is not the norm.)
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:52 AM, Ted Dunning  wrote:
>>>  And which mvn?
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>>>
 Hmm, I'm on a Mac and running on the command line.  What version of OS X
 and what JVM?
>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.2

[Grant Ingersoll]

OK, check it and I'll reroll today.

Here's mine:
 mvn --version
Apache Maven 2.2.1 (r801777; 2009-08-06 15:16:01-0400)
Java version: 1.6.0_15
Java home: /System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.6.0/Home
Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: MacRoman
OS name: "mac os x" version: "10.6.2" arch: "x86_64" Family: "mac"


And svn info reports:
Path: .
URL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/mahout/trunk
Repository Root: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf
Repository UUID: 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
Revision: 835502
Node Kind: directory
Schedule: normal
Last Changed Author: gsingers
Last Changed Rev: 835391
Last Changed Date: 2009-11-12 09:32:30 -0500 (Thu, 12 Nov 2009)

And everything works.


On Nov 13, 2009, at 4:05 AM, Sean Owen wrote:

> Mac OS X 10.6.2, Java 6, Maven 2.2.1. The usual. It's consistently 
> reproducible.
> 
> My 'fix' can't really hurt and I committed it. This should already be
> something the tests do anyway, so that a difference in the 17th
> decimal place doesn't fail the test (except in some very special case
> where it is significant of course, which is not the norm.)
> 
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:52 AM, Ted Dunning  wrote:
>>  And which mvn?
>> 
>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>> 
>>> Hmm, I'm on a Mac and running on the command line.  What version of OS X
>>> and what JVM?

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.2

[Sean Owen]

Mac OS X 10.6.2, Java 6, Maven 2.2.1. The usual. It's consistently reproducible.

My 'fix' can't really hurt and I committed it. This should already be
something the tests do anyway, so that a difference in the 17th
decimal place doesn't fail the test (except in some very special case
where it is significant of course, which is not the norm.)

On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:52 AM, Ted Dunning  wrote:
>  And which mvn?
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
>> Hmm, I'm on a Mac and running on the command line.  What version of OS X
>> and what JVM?

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.2

[Ted Dunning]

 And which mvn?

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:

> Hmm, I'm on a Mac and running on the command line.  What version of OS X
> and what JVM?
>
> On Nov 12, 2009, at 5:49 PM, Sean Owen wrote:
>
> > I still see that test failure I mentioned, but only happens on the
> > command line (and perhaps only on a Mac). It is to do with a double
> > value being compared for exact equality. I "fixed" it but it's hardly
> > a blocker. Otherwise +1
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Grant Ingersoll 
> wrote:
> >> Please vote on releasing the artifacts at:
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-002/org/apache/mahout/
> >>
> >> KEYS file is in the Mahout root trunk.
> >>
> >> Things to do before voting:
> >>
> >> 1. Download and verify signatures on all the artifacts.
> >> 2. Try out the tests, examples, etc.
> >> 3. Try it out in any apps that you have.
> >> 4. See the Apache pages on releases and see what else I'm missing.
> >> 5. Others?
>
>
>


-- 
Ted Dunning, CTO
DeepDyve

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.2

[Grant Ingersoll]

Hmm, I'm on a Mac and running on the command line.  What version of OS X and 
what JVM?

On Nov 12, 2009, at 5:49 PM, Sean Owen wrote:

> I still see that test failure I mentioned, but only happens on the
> command line (and perhaps only on a Mac). It is to do with a double
> value being compared for exact equality. I "fixed" it but it's hardly
> a blocker. Otherwise +1
> 
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Grant Ingersoll  wrote:
>> Please vote on releasing the artifacts at:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-002/org/apache/mahout/
>> 
>> KEYS file is in the Mahout root trunk.
>> 
>> Things to do before voting:
>> 
>> 1. Download and verify signatures on all the artifacts.
>> 2. Try out the tests, examples, etc.
>> 3. Try it out in any apps that you have.
>> 4. See the Apache pages on releases and see what else I'm missing.
>> 5. Others?

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.2

[Sean Owen]

I still see that test failure I mentioned, but only happens on the
command line (and perhaps only on a Mac). It is to do with a double
value being compared for exact equality. I "fixed" it but it's hardly
a blocker. Otherwise +1

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Grant Ingersoll  wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the artifacts at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-002/org/apache/mahout/
>
> KEYS file is in the Mahout root trunk.
>
> Things to do before voting:
>
> 1. Download and verify signatures on all the artifacts.
> 2. Try out the tests, examples, etc.
> 3. Try it out in any apps that you have.
> 4. See the Apache pages on releases and see what else I'm missing.
> 5. Others?

[VOTE] Release 0.2

[Grant Ingersoll]

Please vote on releasing the artifacts at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-002/org/apache/mahout/

KEYS file is in the Mahout root trunk.

Things to do before voting:

1. Download and verify signatures on all the artifacts.
2. Try out the tests, examples, etc.
3. Try it out in any apps that you have.
4. See the Apache pages on releases and see what else I'm missing.
5. Others?