Re: Inactivity

[Karl Wettin]

I've been trying to set up the Maven dist thingy. It's working out  
pretty good but I didn't manage to finish it up this weekend. I'll  
keep working on it during the week and hope for a release candidate by  
friday.


   karl

9 jan 2009 kl. 20.33 skrev Grant Ingersoll:

Me too.I've been swamped lately, too, but it is good to see  
Isabel and Jeff contributing some code.   I think I will have some  
cycles soon, hopefully, and would like to get 0.1 out.  I would like  
to resolve the whole Ant/Maven thing, too.


I feel really comfortable at this point using Maven plus the ANT  
plugin, when needed.  I think this resolves my concerns about the  
last 10% of Maven that is needed for customization that Ant is  
really good at, while allowing for the other 90% to just work, as in  
Maven.


-Grant

On Jan 9, 2009, at 1:59 PM, Sean Owen wrote:


Nothing from my perspective. Would definitely like to get 0.1 out!

On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Karl Wettin   
wrote:

Hello Mahout,

sorry about my lack of activity, I've been extremely busy with  
life and work

as of the last months, prioritizing Lucene Java only.. I hope you
understand.

Isabel has been in touch with me and asked what happened with the
0.1-release. I sort of got lost when my first attempt got too much  
feedback
but feel like I could give it a new try next weekend. I have to  
read up on
the posts regarding what has happend with the Ant-Maven discusion,  
et c.
Most important, are there any reason to why not to create a new  
release

candiate of the current trunk?

Re: Inactivity

[Sean Owen]

I'm fine with it. I don't know enough about maven to do it properly. I
would be happy to get used to whatever system is set up.

The only concern I have is that some bits in my taste-build file may
not translate into maven, right? Don't delete it, at least. Is this
where you end up having an Ant build file and integrating into maven
somehow -- that is, is it possible we will retain Ant files anyway for
special tasks? That would be fine by me for sure. If not, as long as
we can leave it, that's fine too.

Sean

On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Grant Ingersoll  wrote:
> How about we move to Maven and then try producing an RC with it?
>
> The job would be:
> Get everything working w/ Maven, including building the necessary WAR, etc.
>  Make sure all tests pass, etc.   I believe Karl has done a lot of this
> already.
> Remove the Ant files (or at least mark them as deprecated somehow by moving
> them to build-deprecated.xml so that we can still refer to them if we need
> to quickly remember something)
> Create an RC
>
> I will help where I can.
>
> -Grant

Re: Inactivity

[Grant Ingersoll]

How about we move to Maven and then try producing an RC with it?

The job would be:
Get everything working w/ Maven, including building the necessary WAR,  
etc.  Make sure all tests pass, etc.   I believe Karl has done a lot  
of this already.
Remove the Ant files (or at least mark them as deprecated somehow by  
moving them to build-deprecated.xml so that we can still refer to them  
if we need to quickly remember something)

Create an RC

I will help where I can.

-Grant


On Jan 12, 2009, at 1:37 PM, Isabel Drost wrote:


On Friday 09 January 2009, Grant Ingersoll wrote:

I feel really comfortable at this point using Maven plus the ANT
plugin, when needed.  I think this resolves my concerns about the  
last

10% of Maven that is needed for customization that Ant is really good
at, while allowing for the other 90% to just work, as in Maven.


I am fine with Maven as well.



On Jan 9, 2009, at 1:59 PM, Sean Owen wrote:

Nothing from my perspective. Would definitely like to get 0.1 out!


+1 Karl, if you need any help, just tell me.

Isabel

--
The secret of happiness is total disregard of everybody.
 |\  _,,,---,,_   Web:   
 /,`.-'`'-.  ;-;;,_
|,4-  ) )-,_..;\ (  `'-'
'---''(_/--'  `-'\_) (fL)  IM:  

Re: Inactivity

[Isabel Drost]

On Friday 09 January 2009, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> I feel really comfortable at this point using Maven plus the ANT
> plugin, when needed.  I think this resolves my concerns about the last
> 10% of Maven that is needed for customization that Ant is really good
> at, while allowing for the other 90% to just work, as in Maven.

I am fine with Maven as well.


> On Jan 9, 2009, at 1:59 PM, Sean Owen wrote:
> > Nothing from my perspective. Would definitely like to get 0.1 out!

+1 Karl, if you need any help, just tell me. 

Isabel

-- 
The secret of happiness is total disregard of everybody.
  |\  _,,,---,,_   Web:   
  /,`.-'`'-.  ;-;;,_
 |,4-  ) )-,_..;\ (  `'-'
'---''(_/--'  `-'\_) (fL)  IM:  


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Inactivity

[Sean Owen]

Done, I am not all that concerned about the duplication.

On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
 wrote:
> I'd go for 1) and open a JIRA that reminds us to figure out to refactor to 
> remove or minimize code duplication.
> With 2) this boolean-optimized option will be forgotten by others (other than 
> by others)

Re: Inactivity

[Otis Gospodnetic]

I'd go for 1) and open a JIRA that reminds us to figure out to refactor to 
remove or minimize code duplication.
With 2) this boolean-optimized option will be forgotten by others (other than 
by others)

Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch



- Original Message 
> From: Sean Owen 
> To: mahout-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, January 9, 2009 5:54:15 PM
> Subject: Re: Inactivity
> 
> They're kinda ugly and duplicate some code... more of a rough proof of
> concept. What do you think, should I...
> 
> 1) just commit it after doing whatever light cleanup I can, or
> 2) turn it over to you, to take this code into your project rather
> than put it in the core
> 3) farm it out to examples/ as an illustration of extending the basic 
> framework?
> 
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
> wrote:
> > Sean,
> >
> > Do you think it would make sense to try and get those Boolean* versions of 
> various Taste classes in?
> >
> > 2371  12-31-49 16:00   BooleanPrefUser.java
> > 5790  12-31-49 16:00   BooleanUserGenericDataModel.java
> > 9809  12-31-49 16:00   BooleanPrefUserFileDataModel.java
> > 3345  12-31-49 16:00   BooleanTanimotoCoefficientSimilarity.java
> >10501  12-31-49 16:00   BooleanUserGenericUserBasedRecommender.java
> > 7237  12-31-49 16:00   FastSet.jav
> >
> >
> > I'm using them in pre-production environment and they work well!

Re: Inactivity

[Sean Owen]

They're kinda ugly and duplicate some code... more of a rough proof of
concept. What do you think, should I...

1) just commit it after doing whatever light cleanup I can, or
2) turn it over to you, to take this code into your project rather
than put it in the core
3) farm it out to examples/ as an illustration of extending the basic framework?

On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
 wrote:
> Sean,
>
> Do you think it would make sense to try and get those Boolean* versions of 
> various Taste classes in?
>
> 2371  12-31-49 16:00   BooleanPrefUser.java
> 5790  12-31-49 16:00   BooleanUserGenericDataModel.java
> 9809  12-31-49 16:00   BooleanPrefUserFileDataModel.java
> 3345  12-31-49 16:00   BooleanTanimotoCoefficientSimilarity.java
>10501  12-31-49 16:00   BooleanUserGenericUserBasedRecommender.java
> 7237  12-31-49 16:00   FastSet.jav
>
>
> I'm using them in pre-production environment and they work well!

Re: Inactivity

[Otis Gospodnetic]

Sean,

Do you think it would make sense to try and get those Boolean* versions of 
various Taste classes in?

 2371  12-31-49 16:00   BooleanPrefUser.java
 5790  12-31-49 16:00   BooleanUserGenericDataModel.java
 9809  12-31-49 16:00   BooleanPrefUserFileDataModel.java
 3345  12-31-49 16:00   BooleanTanimotoCoefficientSimilarity.java
10501  12-31-49 16:00   BooleanUserGenericUserBasedRecommender.java
 7237  12-31-49 16:00   FastSet.jav


I'm using them in pre-production environment and they work well!

Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch



- Original Message 
> From: Sean Owen 
> To: mahout-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, January 9, 2009 1:59:38 PM
> Subject: Re: Inactivity
> 
> Nothing from my perspective. Would definitely like to get 0.1 out!
> 
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Karl Wettin wrote:
> > Hello Mahout,
> >
> > sorry about my lack of activity, I've been extremely busy with life and work
> > as of the last months, prioritizing Lucene Java only.. I hope you
> > understand.
> >
> > Isabel has been in touch with me and asked what happened with the
> > 0.1-release. I sort of got lost when my first attempt got too much feedback
> > but feel like I could give it a new try next weekend. I have to read up on
> > the posts regarding what has happend with the Ant-Maven discusion, et c.
> > Most important, are there any reason to why not to create a new release
> > candiate of the current trunk?

Re: Inactivity

[Kay Kay]

Just my 2 cents. How about ivy, that provides automatic dependency 
management while still co-existing in the Ant.


Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Me too.I've been swamped lately, too, but it is good to see Isabel 
and Jeff contributing some code.   I think I will have some cycles 
soon, hopefully, and would like to get 0.1 out.  I would like to 
resolve the whole Ant/Maven thing, too.


I feel really comfortable at this point using Maven plus the ANT 
plugin, when needed.  I think this resolves my concerns about the last 
10% of Maven that is needed for customization that Ant is really good 
at, while allowing for the other 90% to just work, as in Maven.


-Grant

On Jan 9, 2009, at 1:59 PM, Sean Owen wrote:


Nothing from my perspective. Would definitely like to get 0.1 out!

On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Karl Wettin  
wrote:

Hello Mahout,

sorry about my lack of activity, I've been extremely busy with life 
and work

as of the last months, prioritizing Lucene Java only.. I hope you
understand.

Isabel has been in touch with me and asked what happened with the
0.1-release. I sort of got lost when my first attempt got too much 
feedback
but feel like I could give it a new try next weekend. I have to read 
up on
the posts regarding what has happend with the Ant-Maven discusion, 
et c.

Most important, are there any reason to why not to create a new release
candiate of the current trunk?

Re: Inactivity

[Grant Ingersoll]

Me too.I've been swamped lately, too, but it is good to see Isabel  
and Jeff contributing some code.   I think I will have some cycles  
soon, hopefully, and would like to get 0.1 out.  I would like to  
resolve the whole Ant/Maven thing, too.


I feel really comfortable at this point using Maven plus the ANT  
plugin, when needed.  I think this resolves my concerns about the last  
10% of Maven that is needed for customization that Ant is really good  
at, while allowing for the other 90% to just work, as in Maven.


-Grant

On Jan 9, 2009, at 1:59 PM, Sean Owen wrote:


Nothing from my perspective. Would definitely like to get 0.1 out!

On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Karl Wettin   
wrote:

Hello Mahout,

sorry about my lack of activity, I've been extremely busy with life  
and work

as of the last months, prioritizing Lucene Java only.. I hope you
understand.

Isabel has been in touch with me and asked what happened with the
0.1-release. I sort of got lost when my first attempt got too much  
feedback
but feel like I could give it a new try next weekend. I have to  
read up on
the posts regarding what has happend with the Ant-Maven discusion,  
et c.
Most important, are there any reason to why not to create a new  
release

candiate of the current trunk?

Re: Inactivity

[Sean Owen]

Nothing from my perspective. Would definitely like to get 0.1 out!

On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Karl Wettin  wrote:
> Hello Mahout,
>
> sorry about my lack of activity, I've been extremely busy with life and work
> as of the last months, prioritizing Lucene Java only.. I hope you
> understand.
>
> Isabel has been in touch with me and asked what happened with the
> 0.1-release. I sort of got lost when my first attempt got too much feedback
> but feel like I could give it a new try next weekend. I have to read up on
> the posts regarding what has happend with the Ant-Maven discusion, et c.
> Most important, are there any reason to why not to create a new release
> candiate of the current trunk?

Inactivity

[Karl Wettin]

Hello Mahout,

sorry about my lack of activity, I've been extremely busy with life  
and work as of the last months, prioritizing Lucene Java only.. I hope  
you understand.


Isabel has been in touch with me and asked what happened with the 0.1- 
release. I sort of got lost when my first attempt got too much  
feedback but feel like I could give it a new try next weekend. I have  
to read up on the posts regarding what has happend with the Ant-Maven  
discusion, et c. Most important, are there any reason to why not to  
create a new release candiate of the current trunk?



 karl