Re: [Mailman-Users] Virtual hosts
Mark --
Hi. The list's host_name on the web page does reflect the desired virtual
host name. I've tried the add_virtualhost as
add_virtualhost('dom2.ain', 'dom2.ain')
both with and without:
add_virtualhost(DEFAULT_URL_HOST, DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST)
but did not see any difference in the system response.
I've spent the weekend reading up on postfix, but can not see where postfix is
rewriting the header (I'm not saying that it isn't doing this, just that with
my limited knowledge, I don't see it).
The local_header_rewrite_clients in canonical is commented out (as is every
line in the file).
The alias_database and local_recipient_maps are commented out in main.cf
The relocated and generic files also contains just comments
The masquerade* and virtual commands in main.cf are:
masquerade_exceptions = root
masquerade_classes = envelope_sender, header_sender, header_recipient
masquerade_domains =
virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual,
hash:/var/lib/mailman/data/virtual-mailman,
hash:/var/lib/mailman/data/virt-mailman2
virtual_alias_domains = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual
virtual_mailbox_domains = dom2.ain
virtual_uid_maps = static:1001
virtual_gid_maps = static:1050
virtual_mailbox_base = /var/spool/virtual_mailboxes
Interestingly, the lists from dom2.ain appear in both
/var/lib/mailman/data/aliases as well as in
/var/lib/mailman/data/virtual-mailman, for example, for the list nine:
aliases:nine-request: |/usr/lib/mailman/mail/mailman request nine
virtual-mailman:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nine-request
I tried /usr/sbin/sendmail -bv [EMAIL PROTECTED] and saw the following
Enclosed is the mail delivery report that you requested.
The Postfix program
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (expanded from [EMAIL PROTECTED]): delivery
via local: delivers to command: /usr/lib/mailman/mail/mailman post nine
Any suggestions as to which postfix parameters to change would be greatly
appreciated.
Thanks
--Ira
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4/6/2007 1:51 PM
Ira Goldstein wrote:
Is there a way that mail to lists on dom2.ain appears as if it comes from
dom2.ain, while keeping mail to lists at dom1.ain appearing as if it comes
from dom1.ain?
If the list's host_name attributes on the General Options page (Host
name this list prefers for email. near the bottom of the page)
reflect the correct virtual domain, then the issue is that your
outgoing MTA is rewriting the domain.
If the host_name attributes are not correct, then you need to look at
your add_virtualhost() directives and perhaps run fix_url (Mailman's
bin/fix_url.py).
--
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
X-GWTYPE:USER
FN:Ira Goldstein
EMAIL;WORK;PREF:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TEL;WORK:518-862-5393
ORG:NERIC;e-Tech
TEL;PREF;FAX:518-862-5305
N:Goldstein;Ira
TITLE:Manager
ADR;INTL;WORK;PARCEL;POSTAL:;;1031 Watervliet Shaker Road;Albany;NY;12205;USA
LABEL;INTL;WORK;PARCEL;POSTAL;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:Ira Goldstein=0A=
1031 Watervliet Shaker Road=0A=
Albany, NY 12205=0A=
USA
LABEL;DOM;WORK;PARCEL;POSTAL;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:Ira Goldstein=0A=
1031 Watervliet Shaker Road=0A=
Albany, NY 12205
TEL;CELL:178*6111*16
TEL;PREF:518-862-5305
X-GWUSERID:igoldste
X-GWDOMAIN:crb5
X-GWPO:neric5
UID:9749B070-3410--BE83-0060080443B7
X-GWIDOMAIN:gw.neric.org
AOL:aim:ijg57
END:VCARD
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
Security Policy:
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp
[Mailman-Users] message archiving problem
I have a couple of lists that I send a weekly message to. This message has sections that I separate using a line of 60 hyphens. When the message gets archived the sections are archived separately but only the first has the correct subject line and the others show 'No Subject'. Why is this happening? -- Government should be concerned with anti-social conduct, not with utterances. -- Justice William Orville Douglas Rick Pasotto[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.niof.net -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp
Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with Installing Mailman 2.1.9 on Solaris
The esteemed David Devereaux-Weber, P.E. has said: Hank, I'm still not succeeding in building Mailman. I'd like to follow another path. Can you explain why Tcl/TK don't build? The Python make install command fatals there, and doesn't complete copying some of the modules into the right places. Dave You're running into problems I haven't encountered, if you can't install Python without tcl and ssl. I'd suggest clearing the build and install directories, doing a fresh unpack of the Python sources, and running through the build process again. My recollection is that both Python and Mailman will build with the gcc 3.4.2 that is in the Solaris 10 distribution /usr/sfw directory tree, but that you have to do some jiggery-pokery with LD_RUN_PATH, LD_LIBRARY_PATH, or crle to get the builds to find the GNU libraries. My installations were built with the Sun development system (Studio 11, installs in /opt/SUNWspro), so I haven't explored the implications of running with a GNU build on Solaris 10 very far. Why Python won't build with the extensions in Solaris is that the build process doesn't look in /opt/sfw. I've done enough porting exploration to see that a fix involves adding a search to those directories in setup.py (in the Python build base directory), but haven't explored everything I need to know to assure that I've got an appropriate fix. Some queries to the Python users and Python developers mail lists didn't produce meaningful results, and I'm left with the feeling that yer on yer own with Python reliability. What I can tell you is that my builds of Python 2.4.4 and 2.5, using the Sun devsys, and without doing any porting work, install and support Mailman on my systems. I'd suggest capturing the outputs of the configure and make steps and reviewing them. Also, the various log, makefile, and status files that configure generates. I'm not really prepared to wear a Python developer hat and try to work Python-on-Solaris problems beyond getting a Python that will support Mailman. Hank -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp
Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with Installing Mailman 2.1.9 on Solaris
Hank, I finally succeeded in getting python and mailman to build and install. There were a series of issues. I had an error in the path for the root user, and I had an error in PYTHONHOME for my user. Since I was using the standard location for python, I removed PYTHONHOME, and I fixed the path for root (used for make install for python). Thanks for your patience! Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp
Re: [Mailman-Users] Virtual hosts
Ira Goldstein wrote:
Hi. The list's host_name on the web page does reflect the desired
virtual host name.
Then this is an issue with the outgoing MTA. I can't tell you what you
need to do to fix it, but I can tell you that Mailman is already using
the host_name attribute as the domain in list email addresses.
I've tried the add_virtualhost as
add_virtualhost('dom2.ain', 'dom2.ain')
both with and without:
add_virtualhost(DEFAULT_URL_HOST, DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST)
but did not see any difference in the system response.
If DEFAULT_URL_HOST and DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST are correct in Defaults.py,
then
add_virtualhost(DEFAULT_URL_HOST, DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST)
in mm_cfg.py would be redundant and make no difference, but
add_virtualhost('dom2.ain', 'dom2.ain')
is required in mm_cfg.py, but it only affects newly created lists
unless you run fix_url. See
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showfile=faq04.069.htp.
I've spent the weekend reading up on postfix, but can not see where
postfix is rewriting the header (I'm not saying that it isn't doing this,
just that with my limited knowledge, I don't see it).
I'm sorry, but I probably know less about Postfix than you. Perhaps
someone else on this list can help, but the best resource for this
issue is probably one dedicated to Postfix.
--
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
Security Policy:
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp
Re: [Mailman-Users] content filtering problem
Rick Pasotto wrote: Today I received a message that had been rejected by the content filtering system and I'm not sure why. The sections of the message were: I 1 no description [text/plain, 7bit, us-ascii, 0.2K] I 2 Toastmaster Meeting for Tmrw[message/rfc822, 7bit, 26K] I 3 no description[multipa/related, 7bit, 24K] I 4 no description [multipa/alternativ, 7bit, 3.7K] I 5 no description[text/plain, quoted, us-ascii, 0.5K] I 6 no description [text/html, quoted, us-ascii, 2.9K] I 7 NewCiscoLogo.jpg [image/jpeg, base64, 20K] In the pass_mime_types I have: multipart/mixed multipart/alternative text/plain Was the message rejected because the text/plain was quoted? No. You have two problems. What is the overall message type in the main message headers? I suspect it was not multipart/mixed or multipart/alternative; possibly multipart/related or some such which would cause all of its sub-parts to be skipped because multipart/whatever is not accepted. Further, even if the main message is multipart/mixed, you don't accept the message/rfc822 part so the only thing left would be the initial 0.2K text/plain part. You need to accept every multipart/ type that could possibly contain a sub-part of interest. A better choice for pass_mime_types is multipart message/rfc822 text/plain In your example above, this would pass all the multipart types regardless of sub-type as well as the message/rfc822 part. This doesn't mean the entire message will be passed. It just means that the various sub-parts of those parts will be examined and the text/plain parts accepted. Even though the above seems very liberal, it ultimately only accepts text/plain and elemental message/rfc822 parts, in this case only the two text/plain parts. -- Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp
Re: [Mailman-Users] Virtual hosts
At 5:08 PM -0700 4/9/07, Mark Sapiro wrote: Then this is an issue with the outgoing MTA. I can't tell you what you need to do to fix it, but I can tell you that Mailman is already using the host_name attribute as the domain in list email addresses. Most likely the desired virtual host name is a CNAME alias for the real canonical name. The RFCs require that all CNAME aliases be resolved into their true canonical names, before delivering the message. The solution is to remove the CNAME records and have the desired virtual host name resolve directly to an IP address record (either an IPv4 A record, or an IPv6 record). I believe that all this is documented in the FAQ. I've spent the weekend reading up on postfix, but can not see where postfix is rewriting the header (I'm not saying that it isn't doing this, just that with my limited knowledge, I don't see it). I'm sorry, but I probably know less about Postfix than you. Perhaps someone else on this list can help, but the best resource for this issue is probably one dedicated to Postfix. It's not just postfix. Sendmail does this too. As does Exim. And all other MTAs that are operating correctly according to the RFCs on this subject. -- Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED], Consultant Author LinkedIn Profile: http://tinyurl.com/y8kpxu Slides from Invited Talks: http://tinyurl.com/tj6q4 -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp
Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman web interface does not save changes
At 11:03 AM -0300 4/9/07, Fernando Barros wrote: I've search Mailman FAQ and find a related issue (http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=all#4.45) which points that the access to the site via redirect is tossing away the POST changes. The workaround would be to capture the POST data from the original request, convert it to a GET and redirect to that. Can anybody show me how to configure that ? You don't. You eliminate the redirect instead. See all the other FAQ entries and linked archive articles from the mailman-users list. -- Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED], Consultant Author LinkedIn Profile: http://tinyurl.com/y8kpxu Slides from Invited Talks: http://tinyurl.com/tj6q4 -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp
Re: [Mailman-Users] content filtering problem
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 05:24:13PM -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote: Rick Pasotto wrote: Today I received a message that had been rejected by the content filtering system and I'm not sure why. The sections of the message were: I 1 no description [text/plain, 7bit, us-ascii, 0.2K] I 2 Toastmaster Meeting for Tmrw[message/rfc822, 7bit, 26K] I 3 no description[multipa/related, 7bit, 24K] I 4 no description [multipa/alternativ, 7bit, 3.7K] I 5 no description[text/plain, quoted, us-ascii, 0.5K] I 6 no description [text/html, quoted, us-ascii, 2.9K] I 7 NewCiscoLogo.jpg [image/jpeg, base64, 20K] In the pass_mime_types I have: multipart/mixed multipart/alternative text/plain Was the message rejected because the text/plain was quoted? No. You have two problems. What is the overall message type in the main message headers? I suspect it was not multipart/mixed or multipart/alternative; possibly multipart/related or some such which would cause all of its sub-parts to be skipped because multipart/whatever is not accepted. I can see that I was insufficiently clear. What I posted above is the sections of the reject message that Mailman sent me. The 'message/rfc822' appears to be Mailman's encapsulation of the original message. From your explanation I see that the problem was that the original message was 'multipart/related'. Further, even if the main message is multipart/mixed, you don't accept the message/rfc822 part so the only thing left would be the initial 0.2K text/plain part. You need to accept every multipart/ type that could possibly contain a sub-part of interest. A better choice for pass_mime_types is multipart message/rfc822 text/plain In your example above, this would pass all the multipart types regardless of sub-type as well as the message/rfc822 part. This doesn't mean the entire message will be passed. It just means that the various sub-parts of those parts will be examined and the text/plain parts accepted. Even though the above seems very liberal, it ultimately only accepts text/plain and elemental message/rfc822 parts, in this case only the two text/plain parts. Excellent. This is what I want. Thanks. -- Only one thing can conquer war - that attitude of mind which can see nothing in war but destruction and annihilation -- Ludwig von Mises Rick Pasotto[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.niof.net -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp
