Re: [Mailman-Users] Failures after Sendmail upgrade

2003-03-03 Thread Ashley M. Kirchner 
Bob Sully wrote:

Ashley:  Nice thought, but no go.  Plus. /etc/smrsh already contained 
the link.  I followed your steps below; no joy.
 

   Hrm, something in your sendmail installation is messed up.  I've 
always installed it from source (from sendmail.org) and never had a 
problem.  I dunno what to suggest anymore.

--
W | I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere.
 +
 Ashley M. Kirchner    .   303.442.6410 x130
 IT Director / SysAdmin / WebSmith . 800.441.3873 x130
 Photo Craft Laboratories, Inc.. 3550 Arapahoe Ave. #6
 http://www.pcraft.com . .  ..   Boulder, CO 80303, U.S.A.




--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
This message was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe or change your options at
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Re: [Mailman-Users] Failures after Sendmail upgrade

2003-03-01 Thread Bob Sully 

Ashley:  Nice thought, but no go.  Plus. /etc/smrsh already contained 
the link.  I followed your steps below; no joy.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: /etc/mail]$ lsl /etc/smrsh/
total 92
drwxr-xr-x2 root root 1024 Feb  9 18:36 ./
drwxr-xr-x   77 root root 7168 Mar  1 20:00 ../
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   19 Dec 24  1999 slocal -> 
/usr/lib/nmh/slocal*
-rwxrwxr-x1 mailman  mailman 84127 Jan  4  2002 demime*
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   30 Feb  9 18:36 wrapper -> 
../../var/mailman/mail/wrapper*

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: /etc/mail]$ lsl /usr/adm/sm.bin/
total 2
drwxrwxr-x2 root root 1024 Mar  1 20:41 ./
drwxrwxr-x3 root root 1024 Mar  1 20:41 ../
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   25 Mar  1 20:41 wrapper -> 
/var/mailman/mail/wrapper*

-- Bob --


On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:

> Bob Sully wrote:
> 
>  >   - Transcript of session follows -
>  >smrsh: "wrapper" not available for sendmail programs (stat failed)
>  >554 5.0.0 Service unavailable
>  >
>  # mkdir /usr/adm/sm.bin
>  # cd /usr/adm/sm.bin
>  # ln -sf /usr/local/mailman/mail/wrapper ./
>  NOTE: replace the above path with the path of your MM installation
> 
> 
>  smrsh will need to have mailman's wrapper in it's directory and last
> I checked, sendmail (be it rpm or tarball) doesn't create that directory.
> 
> 

-- 

Bob Sully - Simi Valley, California, USA
http://www.malibyte.net

"The waiting is the hardest part." - T. Petty



--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/

This message was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe or change your options at
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Re: [Mailman-Users] Failures after Sendmail upgrade

2003-03-01 Thread Ashley M. Kirchner 
Bob Sully wrote:

>   - Transcript of session follows -
>smrsh: "wrapper" not available for sendmail programs (stat failed)
>554 5.0.0 Service unavailable
>
# mkdir /usr/adm/sm.bin
# cd /usr/adm/sm.bin
# ln -sf /usr/local/mailman/mail/wrapper ./
NOTE: replace the above path with the path of your MM installation
smrsh will need to have mailman's wrapper in it's directory and last
I checked, sendmail (be it rpm or tarball) doesn't create that directory.
--
M | I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere.
  +
  Ashley M. Kirchner    .   303.442.6410 x130
  IT Director / SysAdmin / WebSmith . 800.441.3873 x130
  Photo Craft Laboratories, Inc.. 3550 Arapahoe Ave. #6
  http://www.pcraft.com . .  ..   Boulder, CO 80303, U.S.A.




--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
This message was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe or change your options at
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Re: [Mailman-Users] Failures after Sendmail upgrade

2003-03-01 Thread Bob Sully 

Jon:
I upgraded via the 8.12.7 tarball, not rpm; the old 8.12.3 version was 
rpm'd.

Nope...that wasn't it.  There's no directory sm.bin anywhere on the 
server.

I was able to get working by disabling smrsh altogether (removing the 
line enabling it in sendmail.mc, then recreating sendmail.cf); the 
mailing lists are now functioning as they were before.  However, 
I'd like to find a better fix than this, if possible; smrsh does serve 
a security function, I suppose!  Thanks again.

-- Bob --


On 1 Mar 2003, Jon Carnes wrote:

> Depending on how you upgraded, it might be checking the wrong directory
> for smrsh information.  There is a note in the Archives discussing this.
> 
> === From Keith Steward ===
> When CMDDIR is not defined by the OS, then in smrsh.c it defaults to
> /usr/adm/sm.bin/ .  Even though RedHat7.2 already has an /etc/smrsh/
> directory (including a link entry there for slocal), the Sendmail (at
> least the 8.11.6 version I downloaded and installed) was not using that
> directory.  Instead, it was looking for the default /usr/adm/sm.bin/. 
> The /etc/smrsh/ directory was a red herring!  Once I created the
> /usr/adm/sm.bin, and chmod 755 (recommended by the smrsch/README within
> Sendmail), and then set up the symbolic link in there:
> mailman -> /usr/local/mailman/mail/mailman
> the problem disappeared.
> ===
> 
> HtH - Jon Carnes
> 
> On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 20:57, Bob Sully wrote:
> > 
> > Just upgraded to Mailman 2.0.13 from 2.0.8 a couple of weeks ago.  Last 
> > week I upgraded Sendmail from 8.12.3 to 8.12.7.  I got a bunch of these 
> > back today (after the monthly reminders were sent out).  Is this a 
> > Mailman issue or sendmail?
> > 
> > 
> > The original message was received at Sat, 1 Mar 2003 05:00:14 -0800
> > from cust.64-52-19.058.ip.ebrb.net [64.52.19.58]
> > with id h21D0E40020264
> > 
> >- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
> > "| /var/mailman/mail/wrapper mailowner samohi74" 
> > (reason: Service unavailable)
> > (expanded from: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
> > 
> >- Transcript of session follows -
> > smrsh: "wrapper" not available for sendmail programs (stat failed)
> > 554 5.0.0 Service unavailable
> > 
> > 
> > It seems that smrsh is the culprit.
> > 
> > All was working well until these upgrades were done.
> > 
> > Any help with this would be appreciated...
-- 

Bob Sully - Simi Valley, California, USA
http://www.malibyte.net

"The waiting is the hardest part." - T. Petty




--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/

This message was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe or change your options at
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Re: [Mailman-Users] Failures after Sendmail upgrade

2003-03-01 Thread Jon Carnes 
Depending on how you upgraded, it might be checking the wrong directory
for smrsh information.  There is a note in the Archives discussing this.

=== From Keith Steward ===
When CMDDIR is not defined by the OS, then in smrsh.c it defaults to
/usr/adm/sm.bin/ .  Even though RedHat7.2 already has an /etc/smrsh/
directory (including a link entry there for slocal), the Sendmail (at
least the 8.11.6 version I downloaded and installed) was not using that
directory.  Instead, it was looking for the default /usr/adm/sm.bin/. 
The /etc/smrsh/ directory was a red herring!  Once I created the
/usr/adm/sm.bin, and chmod 755 (recommended by the smrsch/README within
Sendmail), and then set up the symbolic link in there:
mailman -> /usr/local/mailman/mail/mailman
the problem disappeared.
===

HtH - Jon Carnes

On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 20:57, Bob Sully wrote:
> 
> Just upgraded to Mailman 2.0.13 from 2.0.8 a couple of weeks ago.  Last 
> week I upgraded Sendmail from 8.12.3 to 8.12.7.  I got a bunch of these 
> back today (after the monthly reminders were sent out).  Is this a 
> Mailman issue or sendmail?
> 
> 
> The original message was received at Sat, 1 Mar 2003 05:00:14 -0800
> from cust.64-52-19.058.ip.ebrb.net [64.52.19.58]
> with id h21D0E40020264
> 
>- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
> "| /var/mailman/mail/wrapper mailowner samohi74" 
> (reason: Service unavailable)
> (expanded from: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
> 
>- Transcript of session follows -
> smrsh: "wrapper" not available for sendmail programs (stat failed)
> 554 5.0.0 Service unavailable
> 
> 
> It seems that smrsh is the culprit.
> 
> All was working well until these upgrades were done.
> 
> Any help with this would be appreciated...
> 
> 
> -- Bob -- 
> 
> Bob Sully - Simi Valley, California, USA
> http://www.malibyte.net
> 
> "The waiting is the hardest part." - T. Petty
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Mailman-Users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
> Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
> Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
> 
> This message was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Unsubscribe or change your options at
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/jonc%40nc.rr.com



--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/

This message was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe or change your options at
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

[Mailman-Users] Failures after Sendmail upgrade

2003-03-01 Thread Bob Sully 

Just upgraded to Mailman 2.0.13 from 2.0.8 a couple of weeks ago.  Last 
week I upgraded Sendmail from 8.12.3 to 8.12.7.  I got a bunch of these 
back today (after the monthly reminders were sent out).  Is this a 
Mailman issue or sendmail?


The original message was received at Sat, 1 Mar 2003 05:00:14 -0800
from cust.64-52-19.058.ip.ebrb.net [64.52.19.58]
with id h21D0E40020264

   - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
"| /var/mailman/mail/wrapper mailowner samohi74" 
(reason: Service unavailable)
(expanded from: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)

   - Transcript of session follows -
smrsh: "wrapper" not available for sendmail programs (stat failed)
554 5.0.0 Service unavailable


It seems that smrsh is the culprit.

All was working well until these upgrades were done.

Any help with this would be appreciated...


-- Bob -- 

Bob Sully - Simi Valley, California, USA
http://www.malibyte.net

"The waiting is the hardest part." - T. Petty






--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/

This message was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe or change your options at
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org