[MlMt] A better search UI
MailMate has a very powerful search system. I like it but I hope there will be some improvement to make MailMate better. My suggestion is: 1. Complete Breadcrumb navigation MailMate already uses a breadcrumb like navigation to show the search term. But you can only come back to the first search condition. You can't go to root(All emails) directly in the navigation bar. Press Esc or hit back button or hit mailbox is not clear for people. Why not add All Mails as the root search condition. For example: All Mails - Subject is abc - Date is - ... 2. A google like search textbox I can search almost everything in MailMate search UI. But I must use mouse to select item of listbox. I can't use keyboard!! I hope there will be a single textbox like google. You can input any search format string in it. For example: I input #date is 2013-12-2, it will search today's emails for me. 3. Custom search MailMate can save custom search. But custom search converted to a smart mailbox. I can't use custom search directly in the search UI. It is better MailMate show custom search in a listbox or somewhere easy to catch. MailMate can put such search near save button. (I can mock an UI but I don't know how to publish images in mail list).___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
Re: [MlMt] Hash Function Parameter? What Am I Missing Here?
On 30 Nov 2013, at 18:48, Scott Blystone wrote: The release notes of the latest developer build contained the following text: Revision 3872 (Friday, November 29, 2013) The following can be used to change the hash function used for OpenPGP messages: defaults write com.freron.MailMate MmOpenPGPHashFunction -string sha256 Do not use this if you do not know what you are doing. What am I missing here? I have many years encryption experience but I do not understand the purpose of this parameter.The digest and hash functions are determined when the actual key itself is generated and not by the mail client! First, I'm certainly no security expert and I welcome any comments/corrections to the following. For OpenPGP the hash function is not set in stone, but you can set a list of preferred hash functions, e.g., one of my keys has the following list: Digest: SHA256, SHA1, SHA384, SHA512, SHA224 Unfortunately (embarrassingly) MailMate ignores this setting. It simply enforces the use of SHA1 to make sure that the “Content-Type” of a message shows the correct hash function in the so-called `micalg` parameter. I have it on my ToDo to improve this. The setting above was a quick fix for a user with a key which could not be used with SHA1 at all. For S/MIME in MailMate, it's kind of worse, and it's partly because I'm not 100% sure how it works for S/MIME certificates. MailMate doesn't (and maybe cannot?) enforce a particular hash function, but MailMate also doesn't try to find out which hash algorithm is used. The `micalg` parameter is simply set to `sha1` even if it's not true. It's actually my impression that this parameter is ignored most of the time, but I would of course like it to be correct. So far, I've figured out how to read the “Signature Algorithm” of a certificate and I've found so-called OIDs for various popular hashing functions. (I cannot seem to find any Apple API to do this more easily.) For example, * sha1WithRSAEncryption: http://www.oid-info.com/get/1.2.840.113549.1.1.5 * sha256WithRSAEncryption: http://www.oid-info.com/get/1.2.840.113549.1.1.11 Documentation is scarce and I'm not sure this is the right way to go. For example, I just tried signing a message with Apple Mail using a certificate with a Signature Algorithm of “SHA-256 with RSA Encryption”, but the `micalg` parameter was still `sha1`. Obviously, I need to do more testing to understand this :-) -- Benny ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
[MlMt] Page Up and Down Behavior / Next message direction
I use an extended keyboard and used key binding to change the forward delete to Archive instead of delete, as I'm a Gmail user. I'm noticing if you focus on the message panel, you can use page up and down to scroll through long emails. When at the end, page down changes to 'go to next message' which is fine for me, but page up doesn't map to go to previous message. Next thought, message selection direction. As I archive/delete emails, there is only one direction that selection goes with MM. In Mail.app it picks up from where I've come from, so selection of next message after archive/delete goes in either direction (next earlier dated message or next later dated message). Makes it smart so to speak. Can this behavior following be added to MM as well? - Jacques via Mac signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
[MlMt] Sticky settings
I use MM in Wide mode, full screen. Full screen choice doesn't stick between launches, always have to select it again to go back. Can you let this choice be sticky? Also, in my wide settings certain columns I grow (From, Subject) and others I shrink to very small (SpamSieve, Raw Flags). In between sessions however, my choices don't stick here either. Can this be changed? - Jacques via Mac signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
[MlMt] Keyboard shortcut/binding to search for string within Common Headers or Body?
I'd like to have a quick, keyboard-centric way to perform a search for an email using the Common Headers or Body search... I'm successfully using the keyboard binding for searchAllMessages: but it doesn't look like there is a way to fine-tune the search any further using a keyboard binding... Is that correct? Any plans for more keyboard-centric control in this realm with a future release? Overall, I'm loving this keyboard binding feature!... ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
Re: [MlMt] Keyboard shortcut/binding to search for string within Common Headers or Body?
My understanding is that the very first time it is done, it must be done with a mouse, but after that it can always be keyboard only. Invoke a search, and select Common Headers or Body (either with mouse or Shift-Tab plus arrow-keys and spacebar). From the MailMate Menubar with your mouse, select Edit-Find-Use as Default Search. From that moment on, every time you invoke a search of all messages, it will come up as a search of all messages by Common Headers or Body. For me, typing \ brings up a search of all messages by Common Headers or Body. If fact the is, is not, contains or does not contain can also be made default in the same way. A better explanation is located at: http://www.macdrifter.com/2013/11/redefine-the-mailmate-default-search.html Hoping that I interpreted your question correctly. Ed On 2 Dec 2013, at 13:41, Yuvi Zalkow wrote: I'd like to have a quick, keyboard-centric way to perform a search for an email using the Common Headers or Body search... I'm successfully using the keyboard binding for searchAllMessages: but it doesn't look like there is a way to fine-tune the search any further using a keyboard binding... Is that correct? Any plans for more keyboard-centric control in this realm with a future release? Overall, I'm loving this keyboard binding feature!... ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
[MlMt] Deleting a thread
Is there a way to create a key macro to select all of a thread and then delete it? e.g. ``Command-Control-A Delete`` Actually, what I'd really like is the one new feature in Mavericks Mail that I rather liked---the way it handled threads, where deleting the thread would delete everything in the thread that's in the current mailbox, but not the rest---but that doesn't really work for smart mailbox rules. At the very least, it shouldn't delete stuff that's in the ``Sent`` folder. ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
[MlMt] Delete with Prejudice?
Hello! I'm wondering if there exists a (key-bindable?) command to flat-out delete a message. Not just to move the message to the trash, but to immediately damn it to the ether, removing it from the computer, server, and universe in general without even bothering with the the trash can. This, as well as keyboard-based search, is the last thing I miss from Mutt. Thanks, Will signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
Re: [MlMt] Delete with Prejudice?
``Option-Delete`` does a Delete Now, which I think is what you're looking for. On 2 Dec 2013, at 22:42, Will Styler wrote: Hello! I'm wondering if there exists a (key-bindable?) command to flat-out delete a message. Not just to move the message to the trash, but to immediately damn it to the ether, removing it from the computer, server, and universe in general without even bothering with the the trash can. This, as well as keyboard-based search, is the last thing I miss from Mutt. Thanks, Will___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
Re: [MlMt] Deleting a thread
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013, at 06:12 PM, Kee Hinckley wrote: Is there a way to create a key macro to select all of a thread and then delete it? e.g. ``Command-Control-A Delete`` If you enable thread/conversation view in preferences (I don't remember what it's called, and I'm not near my Mac), you should be able to expand/collapse a thread with a key binding. If the thread is collapsed, deleting it will delete the entire thread. -- Jeffrey Horn j...@jrhorn.me http://hello.jrhorn.me/ ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
