Re: [MlMt] Export attachments to folder?
On 16 Feb 2016, at 21:26, Phill Coxon wrote: In the Smart Mailbox configuration screen there is an option to “Export to Folder”. Is someone able to confirm that this will only export an email to the folder? It can’t be used to export attachments? That's not quite true. I would like to process incoming emails and if they have attachments which meet a certain criteria (name, subject contains…, from email address etc) have the attachments automatically saved in Dropbox. The strange “All Message Subparts” mailbox (under “All Messages”) can be used to do this, but it's tricky. You'll need to first create a smart mailbox matching the emails you need. Then create another smart mailbox based on “All Messages Subparts” which matches any parts for which the root part is in the first smart mailbox. It looks like this:  You can add other conditions here, especially with regard to the Content-Type, e.g., only those matching `image` or `application/pdf`. Finally, add a rule to export to the second smart mailbox. I think you need the latest beta in order to get proper filenames for these files. If the “Export to Folder” is only for email can anyone advise another way to achieve this? I'm afraid there is no easier way to do this now. -- Benny ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
Re: [MlMt] Rules and HTML parts
On 18 Feb 2016, at 14:49, Eric A. Meyer wrote: Is there a good introductory tutorial to creating and using rules? I'm afraid not. I have some idea of how they work, but it'd be nice to learn from someone with experience. That said, is there a way to have a rule set the display part that should be preferred for a given message? I “Prefer plain text” in my preferences because it works better for me in 98% of cases, but there are a few addresses that always send mangled (or utterly useless) plain-text parts, so I always have to flip to the HTML part to make any sense of what they're sending. I'd love to have a rule Just Do That™ for me before I even open the messages. Hmm, this is not currently possible. The preference (when switching manually) is actually saved in a virtual header which means that **if** there was a rule action to set virtual headers (or just this one header) then it would be possible to do something like the above. Combined with a smart mailbox matching such messages and the use of the “is in” comparison method then you might not even need to create more than 1 rule. So, all I can offer you is to keep in mind that it would be useful to be able to set this virtual header using a rule action. -- Benny ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
Re: [MlMt] Rules on Inbox - Generic
On 16 Feb 2016, at 11:15, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote: On 12 Feb 2016, at 17:59, Marc DR wrote: example: [From] [is in] [Info ▸ Marketing_Confirmed] [From] [Move to Mailbox] [Info ▸ Marketing_Auto] Please do note that I do not move to the Mailbox_Source because this allows me to see what has been add recently. I think I could achieve an identical result by tagging the "fresh" mails before moving and untagging them after verification ( or vice versa ), which is "easier" for you to implement. :-)) I think that would also be a nicer way to handle that. I think GUI-wise the "new-move" version could look like this [From] [is in] [Mailbox/SmartMailbox] [From] [Generic Move to first matched Source Mailbox of] [Mailbox/SmartMailbox] or [Dynamic Move to first matched Source of] [Mailbox/SmartMailbox] or [Fuzzy Move to Source of] [Mailbox/SmartMailbox] Just some ideas and have a nice WE, I think this illustrates that it's hard to make such a feature intuitive. A better (and cleaner) approach would be to make the action independent of the conditions. The action could then be something like: Move to Related Mailbox based on [Header] in [Mailbox] Benny, When [Header] means the actual functionality we have for filtering on “header contained info” then this will be a great feature. The “Mailbox” could be any smart or IMAP mailbox/account. It would trigger MailMate to look for the first message in Mailbox with the same header value. When found, the new message would be moved to the same IMAP mailbox as the found message. It would be like an IMAP mailbox variant of the Submailboxes feature for smart mailboxes. This would allow a worst case near-linear running time if a large number of messages are “moved” (linear in terms of the size of the mailbox used in the action). Note that in this case there would be no need for a condition for the rule except for maybe limiting the messages triggering the action. A somewhat related feature would allow simply creating IMAP mailboxes based on a header value: Move to Submailbox of [IMAP Mailbox/Account] based on [Header] This would be a nice to have, and I already see some use for it. From a “what I like to have first” point-of-view this is last on my list. Thanks Marc ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
[MlMt] Correct default contextual from behavior
In a few (unfortunately very common) cases, MailMate has learned the wrong “From” address to use with certain contacts. I email cli...@example.com 10-20 times/day. emails to cli...@example.com should always come from m...@thismail.com, but whenever I add cli...@example.com to the “To” field, it changes the “From” to h...@thatmail.com. Is there any way to reprogram the default sender for a particular To address? Thanks, Michael ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
Re: [MlMt] Correct default contextual from behavior
As I learned when I asked the question, it's looking at what's in your Sent folder. Remove all messages in it that have the wrong From line. On 19 Feb 2016, at 13:41, temjeito wrote: In a few (unfortunately very common) cases, MailMate has learned the wrong “From” address to use with certain contacts. I email cli...@example.com 10-20 times/day. emails to cli...@example.com should always come from m...@thismail.com, but whenever I add cli...@example.com to the “To” field, it changes the “From” to h...@thatmail.com. Is there any way to reprogram the default sender for a particular To address? Thanks, Michael ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
Re: [MlMt] another travel, another need to restart mailmate ;)
On 18 Feb 2016, at 18:43, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: On 11 Feb 2016, at 15:14, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote: I think I should travel more just to be able to track down this bug ;) Or stay offline long enough and close your laptops lid between writing emails ? :) I'll see if I can get into the habit of doing that :-) -- Benny ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
[MlMt] Tag conflict scenario?
Hi, I just thought of something: I was creating setting up a new tag, but accidentally misspelled the gmail label first. I realized that the following scenario might happen: I apply the tag to a message which means that it will receive a new gmail label (since I misspelled it). When I realize that I have misspelled the gmail label, I correct it. Given the right circumstances something like the following could be the result (right?): I have the following two tags: displayflaggmail #tag1 #tag1 label1 #tag2 #tag2 label2 What will MailMate do if it find a message with the flag `#tag1` with the gmail label `label2` (since MailMate tries to some corrections when it sees a discrepancy?)? have a good weekend everybody, /jody___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
Re: [MlMt] Rule Condition to Limit to a Source Mailbox
On 19 Feb 2016, at 13:24, Fredrik Jonsson wrote: Gary Hull 2016-02-19 12:52 wrote: there are two cases that I'd like to automate with a rule to mark them as seen: 1. Stuff that I've glanced at for a fraction of a second and then clicked the Archive button. The time viewed is not sufficient to mark them as Seen 2. Junk mail marked as junk by one of the mail providers I use, but which SpamSieve hasn't marked as junk. I have a rule attached to the "Junk" folder that sets the tag "Seen" on all mail that comes in to Junk. You can do this on the "Archive" folder as well of course. O.K., I tried this on the Archive folder. In looking closer at the junk problem I realize that my problem is that Runbox creates a Spam folder and MailMate/SpamSieve use a Junk folder, so all Runbox accounts have two folders for spam, and the default Junk folder doesn't pick up Runboxes Spam folders. Runbox must not be marking these mails with whatever spam header that MailMate is looking at. Looking at the Edit Mailbox dialog for Junk I don't see any conditions, so I'm assuming that Junk is hardwired somehow. If I knew what the problem was, I could contact Runbox and maybe get a fix from their end. For now I went to all the Runbox Spam folders and set a rule to mark as seen. ___ mailmate mailing list mailmate@lists.freron.com http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
