Re: [MlMt] Trouble with signatures based on history

2019-07-09 Thread Adam Liter

Hi Benny,

I've just realized what the difference is. On the one computer where the 
feature works as intended, there was a period of time where I had no 
signatures configured, so I think MailMate treated my default signature 
as "No signature" because of that.


On my newer computer, where I've always had signatures configured, 
MailMate was *always* trying to insert a signature, despite the fact 
that there were many previous emails where I had not used a signature 
*on that computer*.


And so I was expecting the default to be "No signature", in accordance 
with the documentation that you linked to:


In MailMate, the choice of default signature is based on the main 
recipient of the email rather than the account/identity used. MailMate 
looks for the most recent email to the same recipient and reuses the 
choice of signature.


However, I realized that the problem is that I never actually select "No 
signature" from the dropdown "Signature" menu in the composer. Instead, 
I usually just delete the signature manually, and so it seems that 
MailMate does not actually register that as sending an email with no 
signature, so future emails are still populated with a default 
signature, even though I have sent many emails without a signature to 
that recipient on that computer.


I'm not sure if this is the intended behavior? I'm not sure how hard it 
would be to detect if the user has manually deleted the signature rather 
than selecting "No signature" from the dropdown menu.


Anyway, thanks for the response and for the great email client!

-- Adam

On 24 Jun 2019, at 4:44, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:


On 12 Jun 2019, at 9:54, leo wrote:

I have similar problems with signatures: I set up signatures with 
defined addresses, but — particularly when I reply — to one of 
those addresses, the signature doesn’t seem to be inserted.


If you mean the address-option (for each signature) in the Signatures 
preferences pane then you have misunderstood the feature. This list of 
addresses can be used to lock a signature to specific identities (your 
identities), e.g., to make sure that a business signature is only used 
(available in the composer) when sending from your business email 
address.


Clarification on how automagical insertion of signatures is ought to 
work would be greatly appreciated…


It is described here, but it was written before the “addresses” 
feature was added: https://manual.mailmate-app.com/compose#signatures



On 12 Jun 2019, at 6:06, Adam Liter wrote:

However, MailMate tries to sign every email that I write, even if 
I've not used a signature for that recipient in the past.


As described in the manual, the fallback is MailMate trying to 
determine what you most often do when an explicit choice does not 
exist. The reason it might give a different result on two different 
machines is that MailMate can only look at the previous choices done 
on the same machine (since the choice is currently only saved 
locally).



Any recommendations of how to debug this or what to do to fix it?


If you need a clean start then you can always use “Reset Usage 
History” in the Signatures preferences pane.


--
Benny
https://freron.com/become_a_mailmate_patron/
___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate


[MlMt] Trouble with signatures based on history

2019-06-11 Thread Adam Liter
I'm having an issue with signing emails with signatures based on 
history. MailMate doesn't seem to respect my settings.


I have "Signature based on history:" set to "New Messages and Replies" 
and "Default signature:" set to "All Messages".


However, MailMate tries to sign every email that I write, even if I've 
not used a signature for that recipient in the past.


I have the exact same settings on another computer, and the behavior on 
that computer is as expected. Both computers are running MailMate r6135, 
so I'm not sure why the behavior is different from one computer to the 
next.


I do share the same signatures across machines, so I have the 
Signatures.plist file under version control in my home directory, so the 
file ~/Libray/Application Support/MailMate/Signature.plist is a symlink 
on both machines.


Any recommendations of how to debug this or what to do to fix it?

Thanks!

-- Adam Liter
___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate


Re: [MlMt] Using brew gpg?

2018-09-24 Thread Adam Liter

Hi Steve,

I think this has come up on the list before. Does the following link 
help: https://lists.freron.com/mailmate/2018-July/010082.html


You can just symlink the Homebrew installation to the place where 
MailMate looks. If you'd rather not do this, I'm honestly not sure if 
there's a hidden preference you can change.


-- Adam Liter

On 24 Sep 2018, at 12:11, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:

Is there any hidden preference to make MailMate look for gpg other 
than in  /usr/local/MacGPG2/bin/? I (obviously!) don't need the 
Mail.app integration from gpgtools.



--Steve Bellovin, https://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb


___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate

___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate


Re: [MlMt] Use GPG from Homebrew?

2018-07-24 Thread Adam Liter

A very belated response to this:

Okay, now I have two installations of GPG on my system, which kind of 
sucks, but oh, well.


I don't think you need to have two separate installations. You can just 
symlink /usr/local/MacGPG2/bin/gpg2 to /usr/local/bin/gpg (or wherever 
you have GPG installed).


The only further thing you need to do, I think, is to ensure you have a 
GUI pinentry program. You can install such a program with:


brew install pinentry-mac

And then just set the "pinentry-program" in ~/.gnupg/gpg-agent.conf to 
/usr/local/bin/pinentry-mac.


As far as I can tell, that all works fine for me.

Of course, be careful using GPG with email, given the recent EFAIL 
vulnerability.


-- Adam

On 2 Sep 2015, at 16:07, Kai Großjohann wrote:


On 2 Sep 2015, at 9:55, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:


On 2 Sep 2015, at 9:25, Giovanni Lanzani wrote:


On 1 Sep 2015, at 21:50, Kai Großjohann wrote:

is it possible to have MailMate use GPG from Homebrew?  Right now, 
Homebrew complains it can't update GPG because there is a 
non-Homebrew link in `/usr/local/bin`...


MailMate is currently hardcoded to use `/usr/local/MacGPG2/bin/gpg2`.


So actually the symlink in `/usr/local/bin` isn't needed!  So I can 
tell HomeBrew to overwrite that symlink.


Okay, now I have two installations of GPG on my system, which kind of 
sucks, but oh, well.


Kai




___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate


Re: [MlMt] Possible bug: UUID temporarily showing up in rendering of styled code blocks

2017-09-30 Thread Adam Liter

Sounds good. Thanks, Benny!

On 30 Sep 2017, at 2:36, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:


On 29 Sep 2017, at 20:18, Adam Liter wrote:


It renders as, for example:

```
2AE883AA-33F3-4330-A544-A3B12C62146 x <- c(1,2)
```

The UUID eventually goes away after I start typing other things in 
the email, but it is a bit distracting. I'm wondering if this is a 
bug?


It's a display bug related to a hack I use to scroll the preview. It 
doesn't affect what is actually sent because at that point the hack is 
not in use.


I'll note to see if I can fix it.

--
Benny
___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate


[MlMt] Possible bug: UUID temporarily showing up in rendering of styled code blocks

2017-09-29 Thread Adam Liter

Hi,

I just updated to r6092, and I now seem to get a UUID showing up in the 
rendering of styled code blocks. For example, without code highlighting, 
the following seems to render just fine:


```
x <- c(1,2)
```

That is, it renders as:

```
x <- c(1,2)
```

However, when I try to type the following:

```r
x <- c(1,2)
```

It renders as, for example:

```
2AE883AA-33F3-4330-A544-A3B12C621468 x <- c(1,2)
```

The UUID eventually goes away after I start typing other things in the 
email, but it is a bit distracting. I'm wondering if this is a bug?


Thanks!

___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate


Re: [MlMt] DIME?

2017-08-28 Thread Adam Liter
That's a bit old and doesn't seem to describe how they define DMAP. I 
couldn't find anything newer though. I was just interested in seeing 
how much it differs from regular IMAP.


Ah, sorry, I didn't realize it was old. But that isn't that surprising. 
This has been in the works for a while (there was a kickstarter back in 
2013: 
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/ladar/lavabits-dark-mail-initiative/updates), 
and it seems like development is going really slowly.



I can only promise to keep an eye on it.


Thanks! :)

-Adam
___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate


[MlMt] DIME?

2017-08-24 Thread Adam Liter

Hi Benny,

As you might know, Lavabit announced that they are relaunching 
(https://www.theverge.com/2017/1/22/14350496/secure-email-service-lavabit-relaunches).


Part of the relaunch plan includes the development and open sourcing of 
DIME (Dark Internet Mail Environment), and two associated protocols: 
DMAP and DMTP.


There's a bit of information on this page: 
https://lavabit.com/security.html.


There's a spec here: 
https://darkmail.info/downloads/dark-internet-mail-environment-march-2015.pdf.


And the GitHub repository is here: https://github.com/lavabit/libdime.

I was just curious if this was on your radar at all, and, if so, whether 
it's something you think you'd support in MailMate.


It looks like the protocols are still in development, so things might be 
still way too new for you to be able to say one way or the other. I 
definitely understand if you don't know at this point. I was just 
curious!


Thanks again for a great email client!

-Adam
___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate


Re: [MlMt] Updating account information made MailMate (re)download *all* email

2016-09-14 Thread Adam Liter
Now, it looks like this should be ok with FastMail, but then it seems 
something else happened. The redownloading of emails indicate that 
the `UIDVALIDITY` value changed of each mailbox. Each email is 
uniquely identified using the `UIDVALIDITY` of the mailbox and the 
`UID` of the message. If the `UIDVALIDITY` value of a mailbox changes 
then MailMate MUST delete its local cache of emails and then fetch 
the “new” messages of the mailbox. There is no way to tell 
MailMate to ignore `UIDVALIDITY` changes.


Hmm, MailMate should also warn you when the latter happens which 
makes me think that this might be a MailMate bug after all. I have a 
FastMail test account and I'll note to test what happens when I do as 
you describe. Sorry about the inconvenience if this turns out to be a 
bug.




I did not see any other warnings besides that first one.


For what it's worth (probably not much), this just happened to me with 
iOS Mail. I updated to iOS 10 last night. So perhaps it is more of a 
FastMail problem, rather than a MailMate problem? Note that I haven't 
set up 2FA with FastMail, however. So I'm not really sure how 
helpful/relevant this anecdote is.


-Adam
___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate


Re: [MlMt] Gmail source is unavailable

2016-05-12 Thread Adam Liter
Hi,
 
After taking Steve's advice to explicitly specify port 993, I am unable
to reproduce the error. If I go back to *not* overtly specifying a port,
everything seems to work fine, even without updating to the release that
you mentioned in this email, Benny.
 
-Adam
 
 
 
On Wed, May 11, 2016, at 04:08, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
> On 9 May 2016, at 21:10, Adam Liter wrote:
>> ...
>> Nonetheless, MailMate on my (other) desktop computer with my Gmail
>> account still works just fine. It's just MailMate on my laptop, and
>> this has only been a problem since connecting to that wifi network at
>> the hotel that I was at.
>> ...
>> Does anybody have any ideas about what might be going on? This only
>> seems to be a problem with Gmail. A different IMAP account is working
>> with MailMate on my laptop.
> Sounds like it's a MailMate bug. I suspect it might be related to the
> OAuth2 authentication used for Gmail accounts, but that's just a wild
> guess. Two things to try:


>  * Try this release[1] of MailMate. I changed a few things regarding
>OAuth2 authentication. This is just in case it makes a difference.
>  * Open the Activity Viewer (⌥⌘0), take the account offline/online,
>wait for it to go unavailable, and then use “Help ▸ Send Server
>Logs”. I'll review the logs.
> Sorry about the late response!
> --
>  Benny
> _
> mailmate mailing list
> mailmate@lists.freron.com
> https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
 

Links:

  1. https://updates.mailmate-app.com/archives/MailMate_r5244.tbz
___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate


Re: [MlMt] Gmail source is unavailable

2016-05-09 Thread Adam Liter
Hmm, doing openssl s_client -connect imap.gmail.com:imaps seems to work
just fine.

I did also try your suggestion of explicitly specifying port 993, and that
seems to fix the problem. I'm not sure why I now need to specify it since
I've never had to do so in the past.

Thanks for the suggestion!

-Adam

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 10:15 PM, Steven M. Bellovin <s...@cs.columbia.edu>
wrote:

> If you're doing 'telnet imap.gmail.com imap' you're trying for the
> unencrypted IMAP port. I don't think Google supports that. Asking
> for 993 or the imaps protocol gets the encrypted version -- but you
> can't comprehensibly talk to that port via telnet. Try
> openssl s_client -connect imap.gmail.com:imaps
> instead.
> For your underlying problem, you may want to go to "Edit IMAP Account"
> and explicitly specify port 993. You shouldn't have to, but...
> On 9 May 2016, at 21:55, Adam Liter wrote:
>
> Sorry for sending a couple of emails in a row, but it seems that this is
> actually the behavior that I'm seeing:
>
> $ telnet imap.gmail.com 993
> Trying 2607:f8b0:4001:c08::6c...
> Connected to gmail-imap.l.google.com.
> Escape character is '^]'.
> Connection closed by foreign host.
>
> So, unlike I said in the previous email, telnet imap.gmail.com 993 does
> not seem to be working either.
>
> Running telnet imap.gmail.com imap still just seems to hang and never
> gets to a point where a foreign host can close the connection.
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Adam Liter
>
>
> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 9:44 PM, Adam Liter <adam.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Actually, it seems that telnet imap.gmail.com 993 actually works for me
>> to connect, whereas telnet imap.gmail.com imap just hangs. So perhaps
>> the port forwarding on my laptop has somehow been messed up for just Gmail?
>>
>> I don't know much about this, so I'd appreciate any suggestions.
>>
>> Thanks again!
>>
>> -Adam Liter
>>
>> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 9:41 PM, Adam Liter <adam.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hmm, interesting. With telnet imap.gmail.com imap everything just seems
>>> to hang, but when I try, for example, telnet mail.riseup.net imap
>>> everything seems to work fine.
>>>
>>> Thanks for this initial suggestion for help with debugging. Do you have
>>> any further idea what the problem might be?
>>>
>>> -Adam Liter
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 9:34 PM, Gary Hull <yh82d7...@yandex.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 10 May 2016, at 4:10, Adam Liter wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Since getting home and since connecting to a few other networks, I have
>>>>> continued to be unable to get MailMate to access Gmail via IMAP. It
>>>>> continually says that it is unavailable.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You can use telnet via a terminal window or telnet app to test IMAP.
>>>> For instance:
>>>>
>>>> https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd789687(v=exchg.80).aspx
>>>>
>>>> That will at least eliminate one possibility.
>>>> ___
>>>> mailmate mailing list
>>>> mailmate@lists.freron.com
>>>> https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> ___
> mailmate mailing list
> mailmate@lists.freron.com
> https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
>
> --Steve Bellovin, https://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
>
> ___
> mailmate mailing list
> mailmate@lists.freron.com
> https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
>
>
___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate


Re: [MlMt] Gmail source is unavailable

2016-05-09 Thread Adam Liter
Sorry for sending a couple of emails in a row, but it seems that this is
actually the behavior that I'm seeing:

$ telnet imap.gmail.com 993
Trying 2607:f8b0:4001:c08::6c...
Connected to gmail-imap.l.google.com.
Escape character is '^]'.
Connection closed by foreign host.

So, unlike I said in the previous email, telnet imap.gmail.com 993 does not
seem to be working either.

Running telnet imap.gmail.com imap still just seems to hang and never gets
to a point where a foreign host can close the connection.

Thanks.

-Adam Liter


On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 9:44 PM, Adam Liter <adam.li...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Actually, it seems that telnet imap.gmail.com 993 actually works for me
> to connect, whereas telnet imap.gmail.com imap just hangs. So perhaps the
> port forwarding on my laptop has somehow been messed up for just Gmail?
>
> I don't know much about this, so I'd appreciate any suggestions.
>
> Thanks again!
>
> -Adam Liter
>
> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 9:41 PM, Adam Liter <adam.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hmm, interesting. With telnet imap.gmail.com imap everything just seems
>> to hang, but when I try, for example, telnet mail.riseup.net imap
>> everything seems to work fine.
>>
>> Thanks for this initial suggestion for help with debugging. Do you have
>> any further idea what the problem might be?
>>
>> -Adam Liter
>>
>> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 9:34 PM, Gary Hull <yh82d7...@yandex.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 10 May 2016, at 4:10, Adam Liter wrote:
>>>
>>> Since getting home and since connecting to a few other networks, I have
>>>> continued to be unable to get MailMate to access Gmail via IMAP. It
>>>> continually says that it is unavailable.
>>>>
>>>
>>> You can use telnet via a terminal window or telnet app to test IMAP. For
>>> instance:
>>>
>>> https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd789687(v=exchg.80).aspx
>>>
>>> That will at least eliminate one possibility.
>>> ___
>>> mailmate mailing list
>>> mailmate@lists.freron.com
>>> https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
>>>
>>
>>
>
___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate


Re: [MlMt] Gmail source is unavailable

2016-05-09 Thread Adam Liter
Actually, it seems that telnet imap.gmail.com 993 actually works for me to
connect, whereas telnet imap.gmail.com imap just hangs. So perhaps the port
forwarding on my laptop has somehow been messed up for just Gmail?

I don't know much about this, so I'd appreciate any suggestions.

Thanks again!

-Adam Liter

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 9:41 PM, Adam Liter <adam.li...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hmm, interesting. With telnet imap.gmail.com imap everything just seems
> to hang, but when I try, for example, telnet mail.riseup.net imap
> everything seems to work fine.
>
> Thanks for this initial suggestion for help with debugging. Do you have
> any further idea what the problem might be?
>
> -Adam Liter
>
> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 9:34 PM, Gary Hull <yh82d7...@yandex.com> wrote:
>
>> On 10 May 2016, at 4:10, Adam Liter wrote:
>>
>> Since getting home and since connecting to a few other networks, I have
>>> continued to be unable to get MailMate to access Gmail via IMAP. It
>>> continually says that it is unavailable.
>>>
>>
>> You can use telnet via a terminal window or telnet app to test IMAP. For
>> instance:
>>
>> https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd789687(v=exchg.80).aspx
>>
>> That will at least eliminate one possibility.
>> ___
>> mailmate mailing list
>> mailmate@lists.freron.com
>> https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
>>
>
>
___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate


Re: [MlMt] Gmail source is unavailable

2016-05-09 Thread Adam Liter
Hmm, interesting. With telnet imap.gmail.com imap everything just seems to
hang, but when I try, for example, telnet mail.riseup.net imap everything
seems to work fine.

Thanks for this initial suggestion for help with debugging. Do you have any
further idea what the problem might be?

-Adam Liter

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 9:34 PM, Gary Hull <yh82d7...@yandex.com> wrote:

> On 10 May 2016, at 4:10, Adam Liter wrote:
>
> Since getting home and since connecting to a few other networks, I have
>> continued to be unable to get MailMate to access Gmail via IMAP. It
>> continually says that it is unavailable.
>>
>
> You can use telnet via a terminal window or telnet app to test IMAP. For
> instance:
>
> https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd789687(v=exchg.80).aspx
>
> That will at least eliminate one possibility.
> ___
> mailmate mailing list
> mailmate@lists.freron.com
> https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
>
___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate


[MlMt] Gmail source is unavailable

2016-05-09 Thread Adam Liter
Hello,

I was recently out of the country, and the hotel that I was at had a very
restrictive internet connection. They more or less blocked everything
except HTTP(S), so I was not able to  use MailMate with IMAP.

Since getting home and since connecting to a few other networks, I have
continued to be unable to get MailMate to access Gmail via IMAP. It
continually says that it is unavailable.

Nonetheless, MailMate on my (other) desktop computer with my Gmail account
still works just fine. It's just MailMate on my laptop, and this has only
been a problem since connecting to that wifi network at the hotel that I
was at.

I've tried restarting MailMate, restarting my computer, and taking the
Gmail account offline and back online again, but nothing has fixed the
problem.

Does anybody have any ideas about what might be going on? This only seems
to be a problem with Gmail. A different IMAP account is working with
MailMate on my laptop.

Thanks!

-Adam Liter
___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate


Re: [MlMt] SideBar organisational tabs/menus

2016-04-28 Thread Adam Liter
Thanks for sharing these layouts. They're great! However, one problem I 
noticed is that the MailMate dialogue about marking things as not junk 
and blocking external references does not come up when using any of 
these layouts. Any idea how to fix this?


Here are screen shots that describe what I mean, which you can view on 
Dropbox:


- Widescreen layout with blocked external references: 
https://www.dropbox.com/s/moneyjgh6drwylc/Screen%20Shot%202016-04-27%20at%206.54.29%20PM.png?dl=0
- Widescreen: Thread + Corr layout with missing blocked external 
references: 
https://www.dropbox.com/s/h6sqejg49j7zn5x/Screen%20Shot%202016-04-27%20at%206.54.35%20PM.png?dl=0
- Vertical: Thread + Corr layout with missing blocked external 
references: 
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ksr4akd5ei8kzxb/Screen%20Shot%202016-04-27%20at%206.56.40%20PM.png?dl=0


-Adam

On 26 Apr 2016, at 23:33, Jody Foo wrote:

The thread arc panel never really worked out for me as I found that 
they didn't provide me with any guidance on what would happen when I 
pressed each circle. Sort of like clicking on a message without 
knowing what it is about. That was sort of the starting point of why I 
added the thread panel to my layout in the first place ;)


On 27 Apr 2016, at 4:07, Gary Hull wrote:

Have you thought of adding a message thread arc panel to these? Why 
not go for everything, including the kitchen sink!


On 26 Apr 2016, at 18:53, Jody Foo wrote:

Hi all, just chipping in here. I've done quite a bit of 
modifications to my sidebar layout, so here are two images just an 
example use case (the images below link to larger versions).


[![](http://box.fnurl.se/mailmate/mm-vertical-thread-corr_mini.png)](http://box.fnurl.se/mailmate/mm-vertical-thread-corr.png)

[![](http://box.fnurl.se/mailmate/mm-widescreen-thread-corr_mini.png)](http://box.fnurl.se/mailmate/mm-widescreen-thread-corr.png)


If anybody is interested, here is also a link to the two layouts I'm 
using.


- 
http://box.fnurl.se/mailmate/wide+vertical_thread-corr_mmlayouts.zip


I am quite happy with them. The middle *thread panel* shows all 
messages that belong to the selected message of the *correspondence 
panel*. The selection in the *correspondence panel* follows the 
selection in the thread panel if it changes.


Also, the messages listed in the correspondence panel include all 
messages where both the sender and the recipient are mentioned in 
any field, not where the sender and recipient switch places as this 
is more in line with my own intuition of correspondence (sacrificing 
a bit of precision for better recall).


In the zip-file, there are also versions with the bottom 
correspondence pane exchanged for a "messages with the same tag" 
pane which shows messages with the same tag (any I hope) as the 
selected message in the main message outline (top).


cheers,

Jody

On 27 Feb 2016, at 22:18, Marc ARC wrote:


Benny,

Sound great !!

Marc



On 26 Feb 2016, at 10:37, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:


On 25 Feb 2016, at 16:01, Marc ARC wrote:

For me it would be handy to have an additional MyMailboxes 
menu/tab in the sidebar where I can put the SmartMailboxes I use.

Could this also benefit other users ?
Or is there an other elegant way to have similar presentation.


You already got various ideas in the thread. I just want to add 
that my future ambition is to make the mailbox list “simpler”. 
I want to remove the MAILBOXES and SOURCES groups allowing users 
to order it any way they like. At the same time I would like the 
universal mailboxes to be optional (also allowing the creation of 
other universal mailboxes).


But I haven't written a single line of code for this which means 
that I make *no promises*.


--
Benny
___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate

___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate

___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate

___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate

___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate


Re: [MlMt] Syntax highlighting wraps everything on one line

2016-03-28 Thread Adam Liter

Hi Kee and David,

Thanks for your responses. Kee, how do you switch to the builtin 
markdown processor?


And David, that's interesting because I more or less followed those same 
instructions.


The only difference is that I installed `pygments` with `pip` rather 
than with `easy_install`.


Here's a picture of what I see:

![](cid:41550D23-5CA5-4A20-AD26-297F5C287B00@gmail.com 
"PastedImage.png")


What version of Pygments do you have? I have 2.1.3.

You can check with:

python -c "import pygments; print pygments.__version__"

Thanks!

-Adam

On 28 Mar 2016, at 13:05, David Green wrote:

Renders correctly for me (including what you sent included here as 
image):


![](cid:30FD931D-9416-4FE7-9248-CCFB3D4BAD4A@gmail.com 
"_MlMt__Syntax_highlighting_wraps_everything_on_one_line_—_Inbox__89_messages_.png")


I have things configured to use markdown for new messages and replies. 
 I think I used this


https://freron.lighthouseapp.com/projects/58672/tickets/1066-syntax-highlighting-for-code-regions 
as setup advice.


Dave

On 28 Mar 2016, at 9:39, Adam Liter wrote:


Hi,

I think the code styling feature that was introduced 
[here](https://lists.freron.com/mailmate/2015-August/004701.html) is 
still experimental, but I was just wondering if anyone else was 
having this same problem. Whenever I try to use syntax highlighting, 
everything is wrapped onto one line.


For example, if I type:

```bash

if [ -f $HOME/.profile ]; then
source $HOME/.profile
fi


if [ -f $HOME/.bashrc ]; then
source $HOME/.bashrc
fi

```

Then I get the following (with everything on one line):

```bash

if [ -f $HOME/.profile ]; then
source $HOME/.profile
fi


if [ -f $HOME/.bashrc ]; then
source $HOME/.bashrc
fi

```

Is anyone else having this problem?

Thanks!

-Adam Liter___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate

___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate


[MlMt] Syntax highlighting wraps everything on one line

2016-03-28 Thread Adam Liter

Hi,

I think the code styling feature that was introduced 
[here](https://lists.freron.com/mailmate/2015-August/004701.html) is 
still experimental, but I was just wondering if anyone else was having 
this same problem. Whenever I try to use syntax highlighting, everything 
is wrapped onto one line.


For example, if I type:

```bash

if [ -f $HOME/.profile ]; then
source $HOME/.profile
fi


if [ -f $HOME/.bashrc ]; then
source $HOME/.bashrc
fi

```

Then I get the following (with everything on one line):

```bash

if [ -f $HOME/.profile ]; then
source $HOME/.profile
fi


if [ -f $HOME/.bashrc ]; then
source $HOME/.bashrc
fi

```

Is anyone else having this problem?

Thanks!

-Adam Liter___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate