> On 25 Mar 2015, at 15:55, Franck Martin <fmar...@linkedin.com> wrote: > > > On Mar 25, 2015, at 8:24 AM, Howard F. Cunningham <howa...@macrollc.com> > wrote: >> >> I was told that the problem was that there was a rule in their filters that >> delete, without notice, all emails that have php links in the emails? >> >> Has anyone ever heard of deleting emails with php links in a spam filter? > > A bit drastic, the message should have been bounced during the SMTP > transaction.
I prefer the term "rejected" or "denied". To me, "bounced" implies the sending of a non-delivery notification: you can’t be sure that will happen unless you generate the notification yourself. I think that’s the sense in which the terms are used in the SMTP RFCs. > It does not surprise me someone would want to block such emails, considering > the number of compromised wordpress installation (that uses php). However it > is likely to have significant collateral damage. Too true. -- Ian Eiloart Postmaster, University of Sussex +44 (0) 1273 87-3148 _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop