[mailop] Proofpoint some delivery issues ?

[Bressier Simon via mailop]

Hi folks,

Someone from PP could contact me to dig into a kind of random "closing
connection" issue ?

Thank you very much in advance !

Simon Bressier, head of deliv at Sendinblue
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

[mailop] Contact for BigPond - Telstra ?

[Bressier Simon via mailop]

Hey folks !

Could someone from BigPond contact me offlist, to dig an issue we are
facing at Sendinblue on Bigpond destination ?

Thank you very much guys !

Simon - Head of Deliverability at Sendinblue
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] Hotmail.tld DMARC record issue

[Bressier Simon via mailop]

at least icloud and Verizon destinations are bouncing, there's always
a difference between RFC & reality

Le jeu. 20 août 2020 à 15:33, Ken O'Driscoll via mailop
 a écrit :
>
> Well, whoever’s responsible for the change control process that allowed that 
> CR through should probably care. And whoever who is responsible for a 
> codebase that evaluates multiple records as anything other than no record 
> should also probably care. But the RFC clearly states that multiple records 
> are not to be evaluated so this shouldn’t cause much drama, but who really 
> knows…
>
>
>
> Ken.
>
>
>
> From: Bressier Simon 
> Sent: Thursday 20 August 2020 14:18
> To: Ken O'Driscoll 
> Cc: Mailop 
> Subject: Re: [mailop] Hotmail.tld DMARC record issue
>
>
>
> so, you mean nothing wrong and nobody should care ?
>
>
>
> Le jeu. 20 août 2020 à 15:12, Ken O'Driscoll via mailop  a 
> écrit :
>
> More than one DMARC record is functionally equivalent to having no DMARC 
> record so this isn’t going to cause problems outside of incompetently written 
> code.
>
>
>
> Ken.
>
>
>
> From: mailop  On Behalf Of Bressier Simon via 
> mailop
> Sent: Thursday 20 August 2020 13:24
> To: mailop 
> Subject: [mailop] Hotmail.tld DMARC record issue
>
>
>
> Hi folks, just forwarding an email received on DMARC ML here, to see if 
> someone from Microsoft could fix quickly:
>
>
>
> Anyone from Microsoft in the list?
>
>
>
> Our monitoring system reported last night that Hotmail changed its DMARC 
> record and in the process a duplicate entry was created which might cause 
> unpredictable behaviour.
>
>
>
> ; <<>> DiG 9.10.6 <<>> txt _dmarc.hotmail.com
>
> ;; global options: +cmd
>
> ;; Got answer:
>
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 23075
>
> ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
>
>
>
> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
>
> ;_dmarc.hotmail.com. IN TXT
>
>
>
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
>
> _dmarc.hotmail.com. 300 IN TXT "v=DMARC1; p=none; 
> rua=mailto:d...@rua.agari.com;ruf=mailto:d...@ruf.agari.com;fo=1:s:d";
>
> _dmarc.hotmail.com. 300 IN TXT "v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; 
> rua=mailto:d...@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:d...@ruf.agari.com; fo=1"
>
>
>
> This is the case for .com and all other TLDs.
>
>
>
> As I still have my 20-year-old Hotmail account I am an interested party :)
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Randal
>
>
>
> --
>
> Randal Pinto
>
> Founder & COO
>
> +447703108205
>
> @randalpinto
>
>
>
> Red Sift is the power behind OnDMARC and OnINBOX.
>
> You can find us at 21A Noel Street, 4th Floor, London, W1F 8GR.
>
>
>
> Red Sift is a limited company registered in England and Wales. Registered 
> number: 09240956. Registered office: Kemp House, 152 City Road, London, EC1V 
> 2NX.
>
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] Hotmail.tld DMARC record issue

[Bressier Simon via mailop]

so, you mean nothing wrong and nobody should care ?

Le jeu. 20 août 2020 à 15:12, Ken O'Driscoll via mailop 
a écrit :

> More than one DMARC record is functionally equivalent to having no DMARC
> record so this isn’t going to cause problems outside of incompetently
> written code.
>
>
>
> Ken.
>
>
>
> *From:* mailop  *On Behalf Of *Bressier Simon
> via mailop
> *Sent:* Thursday 20 August 2020 13:24
> *To:* mailop 
> *Subject:* [mailop] Hotmail.tld DMARC record issue
>
>
>
> Hi folks, just forwarding an email received on DMARC ML here, to see if
> someone from Microsoft could fix quickly:
>
>
>
> Anyone from Microsoft in the list?
>
>
>
> Our monitoring system reported last night that Hotmail changed its DMARC
> record and in the process a duplicate entry was created which might cause
> unpredictable behaviour.
>
>
>
> ; <<>> DiG 9.10.6 <<>> txt _dmarc.hotmail.com
>
> ;; global options: +cmd
>
> ;; Got answer:
>
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 23075
>
> ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
>
>
>
> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
>
> ;_dmarc.hotmail.com. IN TXT
>
>
>
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
>
> _dmarc.hotmail.com. 300 IN TXT "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:
> d...@rua.agari.com;ruf=mailto:d...@ruf.agari.com;fo=1:s:d";
>
> _dmarc.hotmail.com. 300 IN TXT "v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; rua=mailto:
> d...@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:d...@ruf.agari.com; fo=1"
>
>
>
> This is the case for .com and all other TLDs.
>
>
>
> As I still have my 20-year-old Hotmail account I am an interested party :)
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Randal
>
>
>
> --
>
> Randal Pinto
>
> Founder & COO
>
> +447703108205
>
> @randalpinto <https://twitter.com/randalpinto>
>
>
>
> Red Sift is the power behind OnDMARC and OnINBOX.
>
> You can find us at 21A Noel Street, 4th Floor, London, W1F 8GR.
>
>
>
> Red Sift is a limited company registered in England and Wales. Registered
> number: 09240956. Registered office: Kemp House, 152 City Road, London,
> EC1V 2NX.
>
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

[mailop] Hotmail.tld DMARC record issue

[Bressier Simon via mailop]

Hi folks, just forwarding an email received on DMARC ML here, to see if
someone from Microsoft could fix quickly:

Anyone from Microsoft in the list?
>
> Our monitoring system reported last night that Hotmail changed its DMARC
> record and in the process a duplicate entry was created which might cause
> unpredictable behaviour.
>
> ; <<>> DiG 9.10.6 <<>> txt _dmarc.hotmail.com
>
> ;; global options: +cmd
>
> ;; Got answer:
>
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 23075
>
> ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
>
>
> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
>
> ;_dmarc.hotmail.com. IN TXT
>
>
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
>
> _dmarc.hotmail.com. 300 IN TXT "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:
> d...@rua.agari.com;ruf=mailto:d...@ruf.agari.com;fo=1:s:d";
>
> _dmarc.hotmail.com. 300 IN TXT "v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; rua=mailto:
> d...@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:d...@ruf.agari.com; fo=1"
>
> This is the case for .com and all other TLDs.
>
> As I still have my 20-year-old Hotmail account I am an interested party :)
>
> Best,
> Randal
>
> --
> Randal Pinto
> Founder & COO
> +447703108205
> @randalpinto 
>
> Red Sift is the power behind OnDMARC and OnINBOX.
>
> You can find us at 21A Noel Street, 4th Floor, London, W1F 8GR.
>
>
> Red Sift is a limited company registered in England and Wales. Registered
> number: 09240956. Registered office: Kemp House, 152 City Road, London,
> EC1V 2NX.
>
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] [EXTERNAL] Re: Microsoft contact - JMRP issue

[Bressier Simon via mailop]

At least I have tried, thx Michael I will try to have that fixed somehow !

Le lun. 3 août 2020 à 20:32, Michael Wise via mailop
 a écrit :
>
>
>
> I'm really not in a position to assist with JMRP issues.
>
> You pretty much have to go thru the web-based resources.
>
>
>
> Aloha,
>
> Michael.
>
> --
>
> Michael J Wise
> Microsoft Corporation| Spam Analysis
>
> "Your Spam Specimen Has Been Processed."
>
> Open a ticket for Hotmail ?
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: mailop  On Behalf Of Bressier Simon via 
> mailop
> Sent: Monday, August 3, 2020 8:30 AM
> To: Al Iverson 
> Cc: mailop 
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [mailop] Microsoft contact - JMRP issue
>
>
>
> Hey,
>
>
>
> Yes the issue here is not the registration itself on JMRP for the /18, it 
> will be exploded indeed in /24. But the range is still partly enrolled on few 
> JMRP programs from the previous owner(s), and we can't enroll the range on 
> our own JMRP if that IPs are still on theirs.
>
> I've contacted the guys from that other companies... but dunno if I can 
> expect some help from them yet, or if that contact addresses are even still 
> in use.
>
>
>
> That's why it would be more efficient via a MS folk :)
>
>
>
>
>
> Le lun. 3 août 2020 à 17:12, Al Iverson  a écrit :
>
> >
>
> > If you want to learn from my past fumbling -- I register everything
>
> > with SNDS and JMRP as /24 (or smaller), nothing bigger. Once upon a
>
> > time I found that sometimes it seemed to treat a submission as though
>
> > it were only a /24 even though it was a larger range (/18 or /20).
>
> > That may/may not still be an issue, I have no idea, since long ago I
>
> > decided to treat every range as if it were /24 or smaller. Which means
>
> > you'd be entering it as 64 /24s instead of one /18, if I did my math
>
> > correctly. Fun? No. Does it work? Yes...I've not had any sort of issue
>
> > with JMRP for a long time.
>
> >
>
> > (Well, I've had two unrelated issues with JMRP periodically, not
>
> > related to this. One is, sometimes when we give a client access to
>
> > SNDS data, they try to modify the JRMP settings for a range. We warn
>
> > clients that we monitor for this and revoke access of anybody caught
>
> > doing this. Two, Proofpoint seemed to be eating new SNDS access
>
> > verification requests, but only for a new range in RIPE. Never figured
>
> > out why only those ranges were affected, but we were able to whitelist
>
> > around it.)
>
> >
>
> > You might have a hard time finding somebody at MS who can actually
>
> > assist with an SNDS/JMRP issue. Good luck!
>
> >
>
> > BTW, treating all your ranges as /24 makes doing IP allocation math
>
> > and feeding ranges to other services more simple, too. I now do it for
>
> > all ISP FBLs and registrations (CSA, WP.pl,. JMRP, Return Path
>
> > multi-FBL, etc.) and it means I no longer have to think about CIDR in
>
> > sizes other than /24 (and I don't have to worry about somebody else
>
> > being able to do the math, either).
>
> >
>
> > Cheers,
>
> > Al Iverson
>
> >
>
> > On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 5:38 AM Bressier Simon via mailop
>
> >  wrote:
>
> > >
>
> > > Hey Michael or any other MS folk,
>
> > >
>
> > > Could you please contact me off list for some help on a JMRP program for 
> > > a /18 registration?
>
> > >
>
> > > Thank you very much in advance,
>
> > >
>
> > > Simon, Head of Deliverability at Sendinblue
>
> > > ___
>
> > > mailop mailing list
>
> > > mailop@mailop.org
>
> > > https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fch
>
> > > illi.nosignal.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmailop&data=0
>
> > > 2%7C01%7Cmichael.wise%40microsoft.com%7C169cabe96aad409ec02c08d837c2
>
> > > ae88%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C0%7C0%7C637320656581702539
>
> > > &sdata=RKBx6s0r07%2BJztHpdLzjGRh2zDxCUIZJXNFb7FIstN0%3D&rese
>
> > > rved=0
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > --
>
> > Al Iverson // Wombatmail // Chicago
>
> > Song a day!
>
> > https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.
>
> > wombatmail.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cmichael.wise%40microsoft.com%7C16
>
> > 9cabe96aad409e

Re: [mailop] Microsoft contact - JMRP issue

[Bressier Simon via mailop]

Hey,

Yes the issue here is not the registration itself on JMRP for the /18,
it will be exploded indeed in /24. But the range is still partly
enrolled on few JMRP programs from the previous owner(s), and we can't
enroll the range on our own JMRP if that IPs are still on theirs.
I've contacted the guys from that other companies... but dunno if I
can expect some help from them yet, or if that contact addresses are
even still in use.

That's why it would be more efficient via a MS folk :)


Le lun. 3 août 2020 à 17:12, Al Iverson  a écrit :
>
> If you want to learn from my past fumbling -- I register everything
> with SNDS and JMRP as /24 (or smaller), nothing bigger. Once upon a
> time I found that sometimes it seemed to treat a submission as though
> it were only a /24 even though it was a larger range (/18 or /20).
> That may/may not still be an issue, I have no idea, since long ago I
> decided to treat every range as if it were /24 or smaller. Which means
> you'd be entering it as 64 /24s instead of one /18, if I did my math
> correctly. Fun? No. Does it work? Yes...I've not had any sort of issue
> with JMRP for a long time.
>
> (Well, I've had two unrelated issues with JMRP periodically, not
> related to this. One is, sometimes when we give a client access to
> SNDS data, they try to modify the JRMP settings for a range. We warn
> clients that we monitor for this and revoke access of anybody caught
> doing this. Two, Proofpoint seemed to be eating new SNDS access
> verification requests, but only for a new range in RIPE. Never figured
> out why only those ranges were affected, but we were able to whitelist
> around it.)
>
> You might have a hard time finding somebody at MS who can actually
> assist with an SNDS/JMRP issue. Good luck!
>
> BTW, treating all your ranges as /24 makes doing IP allocation math
> and feeding ranges to other services more simple, too. I now do it for
> all ISP FBLs and registrations (CSA, WP.pl,. JMRP, Return Path
> multi-FBL, etc.) and it means I no longer have to think about CIDR in
> sizes other than /24 (and I don't have to worry about somebody else
> being able to do the math, either).
>
> Cheers,
> Al Iverson
>
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 5:38 AM Bressier Simon via mailop
>  wrote:
> >
> > Hey Michael or any other MS folk,
> >
> > Could you please contact me off list for some help on a JMRP program for a 
> > /18 registration?
> >
> > Thank you very much in advance,
> >
> > Simon, Head of Deliverability at Sendinblue
> > ___
> > mailop mailing list
> > mailop@mailop.org
> > https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>
>
>
> --
> Al Iverson // Wombatmail // Chicago
> Song a day! https://www.wombatmail.com
> Deliverability! https://spamresource.com
> And DNS Tools too! https://xnnd.com

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

[mailop] Microsoft contact - JMRP issue

[Bressier Simon via mailop]

Hey Michael or any other MS folk,

Could you please contact me off list for some help on a JMRP program for a
/18 registration?

Thank you very much in advance,

Simon, Head of Deliverability at Sendinblue
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] SendInBlue Contact?

[Bressier Simon via mailop]

Hi Anne,

I answered you this morning on Linkedin, we can continue offlist here.

Simon

Le mar. 21 juil. 2020 à 16:33, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. via mailop <
mailop@mailop.org> a écrit :

> Does anyone have a contact at Send in Blue?
>
> Anne
>
> --
> Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law.
> Dean of Cyberlaw & Cybersecurity, Lincoln Law School
> CEO, SuretyMail Email Reputation Certification
> Advisor, Governor's Innovation Response Team Task Force
> Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-spam law)
> Legislative Consultant, GDPR, CCPA (CA) & CCDPA (CO) Compliance Consultant
> Board of Directors, Denver Internet Exchange
> Chair Emeritus, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop
> Former Counsel: Mail Abuse Prevention System (MAPS)
>
>
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] Urgently need contact at Facebook of Instagram and also Omegle

[Bressier Simon via mailop]

Hi Anne,

Not sure you are at the right place here, all the platforms you
mentioned have abuse forms for that kind of reports, and it will be much
more efficient than passing thru a mailing list related to email industry.

Le dim. 3 mai 2020 à 00:23, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. via mailop <
mailop@mailop.org> a écrit :

> There is a woman torturing animals on Omegle, she is advertising it on her
> Instagram account.  Need to get this in front of the right people to have
> her traced and shut down.
>
> Please let me know if you can provide a contact for either org.
>
> Anne
>
> ---
> Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law
> Dean of Cyberlaw & Cybersecurity, Lincoln Law School
> Advisor, Colorado Innovation Response Team Task Force
> CEO/President, SuretyMail Email Reputation Certification
> Policy Drafting and Review for Businesses
> Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-spam law)
> Legislative Consultant, GDPR, CCPA (CA) & CCDPA (CO) Compliance Consultant
> Board of Directors, Denver Internet Exchange
> Chair Emeritus, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop
> Legal Counsel: The CyberGreen Institute
> Former Counsel: Mail Abuse Prevention System (MAPS)
> Location: Boulder, Colorado
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] Suggestions for VPS providers in Europe?

[Bressier Simon via mailop]

Funny as well, almost 100% of the phishing emails sent against our Mailjet
customers are coming from Linode everyday, dmarc says.


Le mar. 3 déc. 2019 à 03:08, Steve Holdoway via mailop 
a écrit :

> Well, we did leave Amazon SES a couple of years ago, and I haven't used
> them since. Just like my views on KDE, it was crap at version 1, so I've
> never used since (:
>
> Steve
>
> December 3, 2019 2:45 PM, "Michael Peddemors via mailop" <
> mailop@mailop.org> wrote:
>
> > On 2019-12-02 4:53 p.m., Steve Holdoway via mailop wrote:
> >
> >> December 3, 2019 1:46 PM, "Luis E. Muñoz via mailop" 
> wrote:
> >> On 2 Dec 2019, at 15:59, John Levine via mailop wrote:
> >>>
> >>
> >> I warned a guy away from Hetzner and OVH if he wants to send mail so >
> he
> >> reasonably asked what VPS provider in Europe is better for sending >
> mail.
> >>
> >> Any suggestions?
> >>> I'm AWS (IPv4 and IPv6) with good results. I would go with AWS for
> Europe services. Months ago did
> >>> some tests from DigitalOcean ams2 VMs, but for other reasons ended up
> ditching it.
> >>>
> >>> Best regards
> >>>
> >>> -lem
> >>
> >> I use linode. Moved away from Amazon SES with their draconian
> disconnect policies. Alternatively
> >> stay where you are and use a 3rd party - Sendgrid is what we moved to.
> >> Steve
> >
> > Kind of funny, from your side Amazon SES has draconian disconnect, but a
> raging problem from EC2
> > IP(s) now and complaints about slow take downs, quite a disconnect
> between the two sides
> > approaches..
> >
> > But overall Linode is not bad as a suggestion, but often with hosting
> providers, when trying to
> > send email it's your neighbours which will affect your reputation..
> >
> > No matter who you choose, you should ensure that things like PTR/rDNS
> and 'rwhois' are provided so
> > you can be as transparent as possible with your identity, so you don't
> appear to be one of the fly
> > by nighters that often infest VPS networks..
> >
> > SendGrid used to have a great responsive abuse team, but things have
> degraded of late.. If you do
> > go SendGrid, go dedicated IP, and not shared services.. based on our
> reports of increased leakage..
> >
> > -- "Catch the Magic of Linux..."
> > 
> > Michael Peddemors, President/CEO LinuxMagic Inc.
> > Visit us at http://www.linuxmagic.com @linuxmagic
> > A Wizard IT Company - For More Info http://www.wizard.ca
> > "LinuxMagic" a Registered TradeMark of Wizard Tower TechnoServices Ltd.
> > 
> > 604-682-0300 Beautiful British Columbia, Canada
> >
> > This email and any electronic data contained are confidential and
> intended
> > solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are
> addressed.
> > Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely
> > those of the author and are not intended to represent those of the
> company.
> >
> > ___
> > mailop mailing list
> > mailop@mailop.org
> > https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] list bombing

[Bressier Simon via mailop]

Hello all,

Is there also any CMS, contact form plugin, massively used I think
obviously to WP and its plugins, Prestashop, Magento, and everything like
that systems you can find on free download), that implement that
header described years ago ? I've not seen that on my side. Implementing
controls on ESP/ISP side is a very good point, but if nobody except few
website are using it...

Le mar. 26 nov. 2019 à 18:13, Vytis Marciulionis via mailop <
mailop@mailop.org> a écrit :

> Hi everyone,
>
> Are there any mailbox providers out there that actually check this
> Form-Sub: header?
> I remember it being discussed few years ago and I do know that this draft
> is available but, is it used by mailbox providers? It being just a draft
> and all?
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 5:51 PM Matt Gilbert via mailop 
> wrote:
>
>> Hey Carl,
>>
>> Thanks for noticing that. We’re going to get that header included in the
>> signature shortly.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Matt Gilbert
>> --
>> Deliverability Engineer | Mailchimp
>> delivery.mailchimp.com
>>
>>
>> On Nov 25, 2019, at 9:50 PM, Carl Byington via mailop 
>> wrote:
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA512
>>
>> On Mon, 2019-11-25 at 10:32 -0800, Kurt Andersen (b) via mailop wrote:
>>
>> Are you seeing any significant portion of these messages bearing the
>> Form-Sub header? (documented in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-
>> levine-mailbomb-header-01)
>>
>>
>> On a low volume mail server, the only messages I see with that header
>> are also dkim signed by mail*.mcsignup.com. MailChimp are using
>>
>> h=From:Reply-To:To:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Subject:MIME-Version: Content-
>> Type;
>>
>> So their signature does not include the Form-Sub: header, contrary to
>> the recommendation in that draft.
>>
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
>> Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
>>
>> iEYEAREKAAYFAl3cksAACgkQL6j7milTFsG9zQCdE6YkaHRj+a4I+79b/quTXZrc
>> CsoAn1kB22Ss/Q34UIsR4zg7SIlheRC8
>> =LF9o
>> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> mailop mailing list
>> mailop@mailop.org
>> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>>
>>
>> ___
>> mailop mailing list
>> mailop@mailop.org
>> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>>
>
>
> --
> Pagarbiai,
> Vytis Marčiulionis
> +37064734475
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] Hey MailJet Admin's.. Targeted Phishing against your customers..

[Bressier Simon via mailop]

Hi Michael,

Thx for sending this, yes we got few waves of phishing against Mailjet
users, and we've seen that new one as well, I'll check that but I guess if
we change that picture into a "this is a scam" they'll just use one other
image.

Phishers...

We are working on that issues and aware of it, I'll just not detail here
what we are putting in place ;)

Thx again for your report,

Simon

Le mer. 21 août 2019 à 17:30, Michael Peddemors via mailop <
mailop@mailop.org> a écrit :

> Fake Account reactivation notices circulating..
>
> Return-Path:
> 
>
> Subject: Mailjet - Re-Activate your account
>
>
> They are hot linking to
>
> https://app.mailjet.com/images/email/transac/fb.png
>
> (Could always change that image to 'This is a Scam' ;)
>
> http://gtpx.mjt.lu/lnk
> https://farmforkitchen/m
>
> My wednesday bit of helpfulness..
>
>
> --
> "Catch the Magic of Linux..."
> 
> Michael Peddemors, President/CEO LinuxMagic Inc.
> Visit us at http://www.linuxmagic.com @linuxmagic
> A Wizard IT Company - For More Info http://www.wizard.ca
> "LinuxMagic" a Registered TradeMark of Wizard Tower TechnoServices Ltd.
> 
> 604-682-0300 Beautiful British Columbia, Canada
>
> This email and any electronic data contained are confidential and intended
> solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed.
> Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely
> those of the author and are not intended to represent those of the company.
>
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

[mailop] Sorbs - net manager registration

[Bressier Simon via mailop]

Hi Mailop !

Is there any Sorbs guy here to help offlist with our net manager
registration, stuck for some time ?

Thank you in advance !

Simon Bressier, Mailjet
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

[mailop] G postmaster issue since 13th ?

[Bressier Simon via mailop]

Hey guys !

We have no datas from Google Postmaster tools since 13th June, Brandon, do
you know if someone already aware/working on that ?

Thx !

Simon
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop