Re: [mailop] Debt Collection Client Email Servers
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 03:47:11PM +, Michael Irvine via mailop wrote: > The problem I am trying to fix is that these are legal emails and I > need a way to signal that to the providers. With many states and USA > government stating that email is a legal form of communication, how > can we guarantee it to the inbox if many of the users mark it as SPAM > and potentially blocks other communication. You can't. If you want to make sure they receive an important legal communication, send them a recorded delivery letter. At least then you have evidence of its delivery (or lack of). B. ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
Re: [mailop] R: Contact in Microsoft 365 Defender for Outlook?
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 09:18:31AM +, Rodolfo Saccani via mailop wrote: > > I wander what the review process looks like. They'll recommend that you use their URL checking service instead. B. ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
Re: [mailop] Authentication Bounces by Gmail
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 08:20:32PM -0700, Brandon Long via mailop wrote: > I'm sure I've had a long explanation on here in the past year, but the > short answer is if the message is not DKIM valid and you're forwarding, you > should rewrite > the MAIL FROM to a domain you own that will SPF authn the message... and > try not to forward spam. Might be convinced with this if it weren't for gmail being the source of ~40% of the spam we receive. B. ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
Re: [mailop] Dear Sendinblue (IBM)... please stop.
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 06:30:57PM +0200, Simon Bressier via mailop wrote: > > I'm really sorry to hear that you are receiving such crap from our > platform, could you please provide me more details offlist regarding such > sending ? I gave up reporting abuse to Sendinblue 18 months ago. It was getting too much. A rare thing happened: everything from Sendinblue is refused for every customer. There have been no complaints. B. ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
Re: [mailop] OVH Strasbourg suffers major fire
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 09:51:20AM +, Andrew C Aitchison via mailop wrote: > On Wed, 10 Mar 2021, Rob Kendrick via mailop wrote: > >I'm glad that everyone is safe, but I retract my normal opinion that OVH > >should get in the sea, as that might extinguish the fire. > > Are you confusing them with Digital Ocean ? I am able to hold this view on multiple hosts simultaneously, thinking it of one does not exclude others from my ire. B. ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
Re: [mailop] OVH Strasbourg suffers major fire
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 07:40:26AM +, Graeme Fowler via mailop wrote: > From a mailop perspective, whilst this may seem a bit dark, I’d be interested > to see whether this creates a (however brief!) downturn in hostility, spam > and scams. Surely everyone drops every packet from OVH long before it reaches their MTA, so one hopes nobody notices any difference. I'm glad that everyone is safe, but I retract my normal opinion that OVH should get in the sea, as that might extinguish the fire. B. ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
Re: [mailop] New server email being treated as spam by Google
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 11:21:19AM +, Paul Waring via mailop wrote: > Before I change any more settings, I was wondering if there was a time > period during which Google treats a new server that it hasn't seen > before as a spam source? If this is something that will go away after a > few more days then there's not much point in me tweaking further. Ignoring for a moment that Gmail is not internet mail and that any ability to send internet mail to Gmail is a happy accident, did you carefully wind-down the TTLs on your SPF etc DNS records? B. ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
