Re: [mailop] Low Volume Senders

[Bernardo Reino via mailop]

On Mon, 20 Sep 2021, Brielle via mailop wrote:

On Sep 20, 2021, at 9:05 AM, Florian Effenberger via mailop 
 wrote:


seems rspamd supports this: https://rspamd.com/doc/modules/dmarc.html (see 
"Reporting" section). Didn't try it myself though, I don't send reports yet.


Hah, that makes it easy doesn’t it.  I love rspamd - so glad I took the time 
to change over a few years ago.


I’ll try it out and report back.


I can confirm that rspamd does a fine job sending the DMARC reports :)

You just have to take care of running "rspamdadm dmarc_report" with the 
frequency you need (I do it daily with a cronjob, but my server is really low 
volume..)___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] Low Volume Senders

[Zach Rose via mailop]

There's a number of them on github.

https://github.com/topics/dmarc-reports


*Zach RoseEmail Deliverability Manager*
[image: SharpSpring Marketing Automation] 
Partner Support: 1-888-428-9605, option 1 E: zach...@sharpspring.com W:
www.sharpspring.com
  
 


On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 10:53 AM Brielle via mailop 
wrote:

> On 9/12/21 9:59 AM, Alessandro Vesely via mailop wrote:
> > On Fri 10/Sep/2021 16:53:35 +0200 Mike Hammett wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm sending from a single IP. It's just a low-volume server. Maybe 10
> >> - 20 messages a day?
> >
> >
> > You could increase that volume by sending DMARC aggregate reports.
>
>
> Is there any (preferably free / open source) tools to make generating
> these aggregate reports easy enough?
>
>
> --
> Brielle Bruns
> The Summit Open Source Development Group
> http://www.sosdg.org/ http://www.ahbl.org
>
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
>
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] Low Volume Senders

[Brielle via mailop]

> On Sep 20, 2021, at 9:05 AM, Florian Effenberger via mailop 
>  wrote:
> 
> seems rspamd supports this: https://rspamd.com/doc/modules/dmarc.html (see 
> "Reporting" section). Didn't try it myself though, I don't send reports yet.

Hah, that makes it easy doesn’t it.  I love rspamd - so glad I took the time to 
change over a few years ago.

I’ll try it out and report back.
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] Low Volume Senders

[Florian Effenberger via mailop]

Hi,

Brielle via mailop wrote on 20.09.21 at 16:33:


You could increase that volume by sending DMARC aggregate reports.


Is there any (preferably free / open source) tools to make generating 
these aggregate reports easy enough?


seems rspamd supports this: https://rspamd.com/doc/modules/dmarc.html 
(see "Reporting" section). Didn't try it myself though, I don't send 
reports yet.


Florian
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] Low Volume Senders

[Brielle via mailop]

On 9/12/21 9:59 AM, Alessandro Vesely via mailop wrote:

On Fri 10/Sep/2021 16:53:35 +0200 Mike Hammett wrote:


I'm sending from a single IP. It's just a low-volume server. Maybe 10 
- 20 messages a day?



You could increase that volume by sending DMARC aggregate reports.



Is there any (preferably free / open source) tools to make generating 
these aggregate reports easy enough?



--
Brielle Bruns
The Summit Open Source Development Group
http://www.sosdg.org/ http://www.ahbl.org

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] Low Volume Senders

[Alessandro Vesely via mailop]

On Tue 14/Sep/2021 22:36:19 +0200 Mike Hammett wrote:

Would that have a meaningful impact on the underlying problem?




It could move from 10 - 20 messages per day to 200 - 400, if you also send 
complaints.


BTW, complaining against, for example, random login attempts rather than spam 
doesn't require attaching message headers.  That's the same difference between 
DMARC aggregate and failure reports.



Best
Ale
--


On Fri 10/Sep/2021 16:53:35 +0200 Mike Hammett wrote:
 >
 > I'm sending from a single IP. It's just a low-volume server. Maybe 10 - 20
 > messages a day?


You could increase that volume by sending DMARC aggregate reports.


Best
Ale
--










___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop


___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop


___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] Low Volume Senders

[Mike Hammett via mailop]

Has anyone had any success complaining to the FTC about oligopolistic behaviors 
from the large mail providers? 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 

- Original Message -

From: "Mike Hammett via mailop"  
To: mailop@mailop.org 
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2021 8:30:04 AM 
Subject: [mailop] Low Volume Senders 


Poking around their support pages, portals, etc. doesn't give me what I'm 
looking for, so I thought I would ask. 




Have Google and Microsoft done anything to resolve their inability for 
low-volume senders to get out of the blocklists? 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 


___ 
mailop mailing list 
mailop@mailop.org 
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop 

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] Low Volume Senders

[Mike Hammett via mailop]

Would that have a meaningful impact on the underlying problem? 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 

- Original Message -

From: "Alessandro Vesely via mailop"  
To: mailop@mailop.org 
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2021 10:59:02 AM 
Subject: Re: [mailop] Low Volume Senders 

On Fri 10/Sep/2021 16:53:35 +0200 Mike Hammett wrote: 
> 
> I'm sending from a single IP. It's just a low-volume server. Maybe 10 - 20 
> messages a day? 


You could increase that volume by sending DMARC aggregate reports. 


Best 
Ale 
-- 










___ 
mailop mailing list 
mailop@mailop.org 
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop 

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] Low Volume Senders

[Alessandro Vesely via mailop]

On Fri 10/Sep/2021 16:53:35 +0200 Mike Hammett wrote:


I'm sending from a single IP. It's just a low-volume server. Maybe 10 - 20 
messages a day?



You could increase that volume by sending DMARC aggregate reports.


Best
Ale
--










___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] Low Volume Senders

[Mike Hammett via mailop]

*nods* 

I'm sending from a single IP. It's just a low-volume server. Maybe 10 - 20 
messages a day? 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 

- Original Message -

From: "Jarland Donnell via mailop"  
To: mailop@mailop.org 
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2021 9:43:54 AM 
Subject: Re: [mailop] Low Volume Senders 

When I cut my sending infrastructure back from a /22 to a /24, I noticed 
reputation improvements pretty well across the board. That mainly being 
because with a /22, no single IP sent enough email to be noteworthy. 
This is fairly recent for me, and seems to be based on the same theory. 

On 2021-09-10 08:30, Mike Hammett via mailop wrote: 
> Poking around their support pages, portals, etc. doesn't give me what 
> I'm looking for, so I thought I would ask. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Have Google and Microsoft done anything to resolve their inability for 
> low-volume senders to get out of the blocklists? 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> - 
> Mike Hammett 
> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
> 
> Midwest Internet Exchange 
> 
> The Brothers WISP 
> 
> 
> ___ 
> mailop mailing list 
> mailop@mailop.org 
> https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop 
___ 
mailop mailing list 
mailop@mailop.org 
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop 

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] Low Volume Senders

[Jarland Donnell via mailop]

When I cut my sending infrastructure back from a /22 to a /24, I noticed 
reputation improvements pretty well across the board. That mainly being 
because with a /22, no single IP sent enough email to be noteworthy. 
This is fairly recent for me, and seems to be based on the same theory.


On 2021-09-10 08:30, Mike Hammett via mailop wrote:

Poking around their support pages, portals, etc. doesn't give me what
I'm looking for, so I thought I would ask.




Have Google and Microsoft done anything to resolve their inability for
low-volume senders to get out of the blocklists?




-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions

Midwest Internet Exchange

The Brothers WISP


___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

[mailop] Low Volume Senders

[Mike Hammett via mailop]

Poking around their support pages, portals, etc. doesn't give me what I'm 
looking for, so I thought I would ask. 




Have Google and Microsoft done anything to resolve their inability for 
low-volume senders to get out of the blocklists? 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop