Re: [mailop] Many Google "social engineering content" false-positives

2019-01-09 Thread Brandon Long via mailop
So, the problem isn't strictly the CNAMEs, its the fact that the same page
with the same path is served on all of the domains on that server.

If you restricted serving of the link-tracking link to the domain it was
supposed to be for, it would only have affected that domain.

I've submitted your escalation, though often there's a faster response to
the automated systems and mechanisms.

Brandon

On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 2:11 PM Brandon Long  wrote:

> If you send me a list of affected domains, I can raise an internal
> escalation to the safe browsing team so they can see if the rules are
> working as expected or not.
>
> Brandon
>
> On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 10:48 AM Tim Starr  wrote:
>
>> We have a case of many clients' link-tracking domains being all flagged
>> for "social engineering content." I see that there's a case-by-case
>> security review request process, but is there any way to handle it for many
>> at once? This seems to have been due to many different domains all being
>> CNAMEd to one, then one client sending a campaign with a blacklisted domain
>> in it, getting all the domains with the same CNAME value flagged.
>>
>> Tim Starr
>> Senior Director, Deliverability
>> Maropost.com
>> ___
>> mailop mailing list
>> mailop@mailop.org
>> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>>
>
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop


Re: [mailop] Many Google "social engineering content" false-positives

2019-01-09 Thread Brandon Long via mailop
If you send me a list of affected domains, I can raise an internal
escalation to the safe browsing team so they can see if the rules are
working as expected or not.

Brandon

On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 10:48 AM Tim Starr  wrote:

> We have a case of many clients' link-tracking domains being all flagged
> for "social engineering content." I see that there's a case-by-case
> security review request process, but is there any way to handle it for many
> at once? This seems to have been due to many different domains all being
> CNAMEd to one, then one client sending a campaign with a blacklisted domain
> in it, getting all the domains with the same CNAME value flagged.
>
> Tim Starr
> Senior Director, Deliverability
> Maropost.com
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop


[mailop] Many Google "social engineering content" false-positives

2019-01-09 Thread Tim Starr
We have a case of many clients' link-tracking domains being all flagged for
"social engineering content." I see that there's a case-by-case security
review request process, but is there any way to handle it for many at once?
This seems to have been due to many different domains all being CNAMEd to
one, then one client sending a campaign with a blacklisted domain in it,
getting all the domains with the same CNAME value flagged.

Tim Starr
Senior Director, Deliverability
Maropost.com
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop