Re: [mantisbt-help] Category becomes Category_id? (John Reese) (David Hicks)

[Jon Hardcastle]

Hi,

Thanks for your help. I am probably being abit special here but we are
tailoring the csv export using 'csv_columns' in the 'Database Configuration'
section.

How would I call category_get_name()?

(abit) like this (this is an old one)

array(id, custom_Client Name, reporter_id, handler_id, date_submitted,
custom_Call Priority, category, reproducibility, status, last_updated,
summary, resolution) -> complex

etc etc


Message: 2
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 19:10:43 +1000
From: David Hicks 
Subject: Re: [mantisbt-help] Category becomes Category_id? (John
   Reese)
To: mantisbt-help@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID: <1305623454.16980.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 09:09 +0100, Jon Hardcastle wrote:
> We aren't generating reports in code. But we have tailored some of the
> view screens and the csv export etc.
>
> How/what should one do for category in these cases?

If I understand your question correctly, you're likely going to want to
use the category_get_name() function from category_api. You may also
want to use category_get_id_by_name() - although beware that this is
prone to abuse... you *should* be using category IDs internally within
your code instead of category names. The only time you should ever have
to deal with category names is when you're doing something related to
the user interface (showing category names), category management
(checking duplicate names when adding categories) and perhaps importing
and exporting as well.

Regards,

David
--
What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know!
Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its 
next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran 
developers boost performance applications - including clusters. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay___
mantisbt-help mailing list
mantisbt-help@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mantisbt-help

[mantisbt-help] Product Build?

[Jon Hardcastle]

Hi,

We have migrated recently from 1.1.7 to 1.2.4 and I have noticed that the
heavily used 'Product build' field has gone?

How can we get this back?

Thanks!
--
What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know!
Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its 
next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran 
developers boost performance applications - including clusters. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay___
mantisbt-help mailing list
mantisbt-help@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mantisbt-help

Re: [mantisbt-help] Product Build?

[Roland Becker]

Add the following line to file config_inc.php
$g_enable_product_build = ON;

- original Nachricht 

Betreff: [mantisbt-help] Product Build?
Gesendet: Do, 19. Mai 2011
Von: Jon Hardcastle

Hi,

We have migrated recently from 1.1.7 to 1.2.4 and I have noticed that the 
heavily used 'Product build' field has gone?

How can we get this back?

Thanks!


--- original Nachricht Ende 
--
What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know!
Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its 
next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran 
developers boost performance applications - including clusters. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay___
mantisbt-help mailing list
mantisbt-help@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mantisbt-help

Re: [mantisbt-help] Product Build?

[Jon Hardcastle]

Hi,


thanks for getting back to me.

that added it back to the issues, but we can't filter on the field anymore?
Save when there is only 1 project selected?

Is there anyway to use this field as it was before?

Thanks.

On 19 May 2011 12:20, Roland Becker  wrote:

> Add the following line to file config_inc.php
> $g_enable_product_build = ON;
>
> - original Nachricht 
>
> Betreff: [mantisbt-help] Product Build?
> Gesendet: Do, 19. Mai 2011
> Von: Jon Hardcastle
>
> Hi,
>
> We have migrated recently from 1.1.7 to 1.2.4 and I have noticed that the
> heavily used 'Product build' field has gone?
>
> How can we get this back?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> --- original Nachricht Ende 
>
--
What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know!
Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its 
next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran 
developers boost performance applications - including clusters. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay___
mantisbt-help mailing list
mantisbt-help@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mantisbt-help

[mantisbt-help] Undeliverable: Re: Product Build?

[KBQLKJGXLFMZ]

Delivery has failed to these recipients or distribution lists:

kbqlkjgxl...@spammotel.com
Your message wasn't delivered because of security policies. Microsoft Exchange 
will not try to redeliver this message for you. Please provide the following 
diagnostic text to your system administrator.


Sent by Microsoft Exchange Server 2007






Diagnostic information for administrators:

Generating server: cb.intra.lutron.com

kbqlkjgxl...@spammotel.com
#550 5.7.1 RESOLVER.RST.NotAuthorized; not authorized ##

Original message headers:

Received: from p02c12m086.mxlogic.net (208.65.145.245) by
 ls187.cb.intra.lutron.com (8.14.172.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id
 8.3.137.0; Thu, 19 May 2011 08:13:00 -0400
Received: from unknown [209.190.47.10] (EHLO spammotel.com) by
 p02c12m086.mxlogic.net(mxl_mta-6.10.0-1)   with ESMTP id
 f5905dd4.0.718840.00-2221.925348.p02c12m086.mxlogic.net (envelope-from
 ); Thu, 19 May 2011 06:13:19 -0600 (MDT)
Received: by spammotel.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id 8B66A6DD57B; Thu, 19
 May 2011 07:27:01 -0400 (EDT)
Old-Return-Path: 
X-Original-To: kbqlkjgxl...@spammotel.com
Delivered-To: spammotel+KBQLKJGXLFMZ@localhost
Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.34.181.88])
by spammotel.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5CD86DD578   for
 ; Thu, 19 May 2011 07:20:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)  
(envelope-from
 ) id 1QN1HR-0007WB-1E; Thu, 19
 May 2011 11:20:37 +
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com 
with esmtp (Exim
 4.76)  (envelope-from ) id 1QN1HO-0007W5-Qz   for
 mantisbt-help@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 19 May 2011 11:20:34 +
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from em-p00-ob.rzone.de ([81.169.146.225])by
 sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)(Exim
 4.76) id 1QN1HN-ob-CE  for mantisbt-help@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 19
 May 2011 11:20:34 +
X-RZG-AUTH: :PmMIdE6sW/5pdU+p5dMcqnfoJNQ9V6DN/WbCrZhcUa0CdeXv+A==
X-RZG-CLASS-ID: em00
Received: from post.webmailer.de (put.store [192.168.40.126])   by
 snori-em-03.store (RZmta 25.18) with ESMTP id 20531dn4J9BSxu ; Thu, 19 May
 2011 13:20:26 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from httpd@localhost)by post.webmailer.de (8.13.7/8.13.6) id
 p4JBKQRM006289;Thu, 19 May 2011 13:20:26 +0200 (MEST)
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 13:20:26 +0200
Message-ID: <201105191120.p4jbkqrm006...@post.webmailer.de>
To: Jon Hardcastle ,

From: Roland Becker 
X-Priority: 3
X-Abuse: 12982 / 87.166.117.242
X-RZG-MBID: 00lWvT8TzZbOVptcSqqiyo/oP342zJ2FM9yB
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
low trust [81.169.146.225 listed in list.dnswl.org]
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE   BODY: HTML included in message
X-Headers-End: 1QN1HN-ob-CE
Old-Subject: Re: [mantisbt-help] Product Build?
X-BeenThere: mantisbt-help@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Old-Reply-To: Help with Mantis 
List-Id: Help with Mantis 
List-Unsubscribe: ,

List-Archive: 

List-Post: 
List-Help: 
List-Subscribe: ,

Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="===9093879652496968229=="
Errors-To: mantisbt-help-boun...@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: **MBT: Re: [mantisbt-help] Product Build?
Reply-To: 
X-Spam: [F=0.20; B=0.500(0); STSI=0.500(-12); STSM=0.500(8); CM=0.500; 
MH=0.500(2011051914); S=0.200(2010122901); SC=none]
X-MAIL-FROM: 
X-SOURCE-IP: [209.190.47.10]
X-AnalysisOut: [v=1.0 c=1 a=iT1lGA9kc78A:10 a=FFuBkCitvbMA:10 a=Y2ClkDGDOA]
X-AnalysisOut: [wA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=wPDyFdB5xvgA:10 a=m07EnBT+tZ6AK6]
X-AnalysisOut: [iSG7TWoA==:17 a=dktTq5uX:8 a=FP58Ms26:8 a=AbZCDtEP]
X-AnalysisOut: [:8 a=evH3nb4btqG21omdR_sA:9 a=Gw30YfJkL4ObHOWSXpQA:7 a]
X-AnalysisOut: [=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=w6DSEMnIAqUA:10 a=52dZ-evEQ9kA:10 a=8L_]
X-AnalysisOut: [BRCrAI2QA:10 a=gHRdaO81w0aHbOTY:21 a=eVUtWx6GosQmVtsk:21 a]
X-AnalysisOut: [=w6-VChgfKkbxC-A6tlUA:9 a=2z1OXlWF:8 a=OYhXCxzb4fu8YSL]
X-AnalysisOut: [CVCsA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=TjdTsdntBRec40u70TIA:9]
Return-Path: re.vuqc6mlugx...@spammotel.com

Repor

[mantisbt-help] Undeliverable: Re: Product Build?

[KBQLKJGXLFMZ]

Delivery has failed to these recipients or distribution lists:

kbqlkjgxl...@spammotel.com
Your message wasn't delivered because of security policies. Microsoft Exchange 
will not try to redeliver this message for you. Please provide the following 
diagnostic text to your system administrator.


Sent by Microsoft Exchange Server 2007






Diagnostic information for administrators:

Generating server: cb.intra.lutron.com

kbqlkjgxl...@spammotel.com
#550 5.7.1 RESOLVER.RST.NotAuthorized; not authorized ##

Original message headers:

Received: from p02c12m062.mxlogic.net (208.65.145.245) by
 ls187.cb.intra.lutron.com (8.14.172.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id
 8.3.137.0; Thu, 19 May 2011 08:51:31 -0400
Received: from unknown [209.190.47.10] (EHLO spammotel.com) by
 p02c12m062.mxlogic.net(mxl_mta-6.10.0-1)   with ESMTP id
 76215dd4.0.657067.00-2312.846466.p02c12m062.mxlogic.net (envelope-from
 ); Thu, 19 May 2011 06:51:51 -0600 (MDT)
Received: by spammotel.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id AC5B88E0366; Thu, 19
 May 2011 07:50:41 -0400 (EDT)
Old-Return-Path: 
X-Original-To: kbqlkjgxl...@spammotel.com
Delivered-To: spammotel+KBQLKJGXLFMZ@localhost
Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.34.181.88])
by spammotel.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4974C6DDECF   for
 ; Thu, 19 May 2011 07:48:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)  
(envelope-from
 ) id 1QN1hu-dF-9p; Thu, 19
 May 2011 11:47:58 +
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com 
with esmtp (Exim
 4.76)  (envelope-from ) id 1QN1ht-d8-8W 
for
 mantisbt-help@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 19 May 2011 11:47:57 +
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.216.47 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.216.47;
envelope-from=jonathan.hardcas...@gmail.com;
helo=mail-qw0-f47.google.com;
Received: from mail-qw0-f47.google.com ([209.85.216.47])by
 sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)   (Exim 
4.76)
 id 1QN1hs-Xq-Jyfor mantisbt-help@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 19 May 
2011
 11:47:57 +
Received: by qwh5 with SMTP id 5so1822466qwh.34 for
 ; Thu, 19 May 2011 04:47:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.114.77 with SMTP id d13mr2277645qcq.219.1305805671204;
Thu, 19 May 2011 04:47:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.26.134 with HTTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 04:47:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201105191120.p4jbkqrm006...@post.webmailer.de>
References: <201105191120.p4jbkqrm006...@post.webmailer.de>
From: Jon Hardcastle 
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 12:47:31 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 74o02FuXbVti6jymv1dqPqoeIIk
Message-ID: 
To: Roland Becker 
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM  Sender email is freemail
(jonathan.hardcastle[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS   SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE   BODY: HTML included in message
0.1 DKIM_SIGNEDMessage has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
0.0 RFC_ABUSE_POST Both abuse and postmaster missing on sender domain
0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Headers-End: 1QN1hs-Xq-Jy
CC: 
Old-Subject: Re: [mantisbt-help] Product Build?
X-BeenThere: mantisbt-help@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Old-Reply-To: Help with Mantis 
List-Id: Help with Mantis 
List-Unsubscribe: ,

List-Archive: 

List-Post: 
List-Help: 
List-Subscribe: ,

Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="===7215041246565212679=="
Errors-To: mantisbt-help-boun...@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: **MBT: Re: [mantisbt-help] Product Build?
Reply-To: 
X-Spam: [F=0.20; B=0.500(0); STSI=0.500(-12); STSM=0.500(8); CM=0.500; 
MH=0.500(2011051917); S=0.200(2010122901); SC=none]
X-MAIL-FROM: 
X-SOURCE-IP: [209.190.47.10]
X-AnalysisOut: [v=1.0 c=1 a=iT1lGA9kc7

[mantisbt-help] Undeliverable: Product Build?

[KBQLKJGXLFMZ]

Delivery has failed to these recipients or distribution lists:

kbqlkjgxl...@spammotel.com
Your message wasn't delivered because of security policies. Microsoft Exchange 
will not try to redeliver this message for you. Please provide the following 
diagnostic text to your system administrator.


Sent by Microsoft Exchange Server 2007






Diagnostic information for administrators:

Generating server: cb.intra.lutron.com

kbqlkjgxl...@spammotel.com
#550 5.7.1 RESOLVER.RST.NotAuthorized; not authorized ##

Original message headers:

Received: from p02c12m083.mxlogic.net (208.65.145.245) by
 ls186.cb.intra.lutron.com (8.14.172.44) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id
 8.3.137.0; Thu, 19 May 2011 09:56:27 -0400
Received: from unknown [209.190.47.10] (EHLO spammotel.com) by
 p02c12m083.mxlogic.net(mxl_mta-6.10.0-1)   with ESMTP id
 f9125dd4.0.715984.00-2228.923947.p02c12m083.mxlogic.net (envelope-from
 ); Thu, 19 May 2011 07:56:47 -0600 (MDT)
Received: by spammotel.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id E90706DC7E6; Thu, 19
 May 2011 04:50:06 -0400 (EDT)
Old-Return-Path: 
X-Original-To: kbqlkjgxl...@spammotel.com
Delivered-To: spammotel+KBQLKJGXLFMZ@localhost
Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.34.181.88])
by spammotel.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E4B26DDE66   for
 ; Thu, 19 May 2011 04:44:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com)
by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)  
(envelope-from
 ) id 1QMypm-0003ZL-Ay; Thu, 19
 May 2011 08:43:54 +
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com 
with esmtp (Exim
 4.76)  (envelope-from ) id 1QMypl-0003Ym-1V 
for
 mantisbt-help@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 19 May 2011 08:43:53 +
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.216.175 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.216.175;
envelope-from=jonathan.hardcas...@gmail.com;
helo=mail-qy0-f175.google.com;
Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com ([209.85.216.175])  by
 sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)   (Exim 
4.76)
 id 1QMypk-0004x4-7Efor mantisbt-help@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 19 May 
2011
 08:43:52 +
Received: by qyk35 with SMTP id 35so3793030qyk.13   for
 ; Thu, 19 May 2011 01:43:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.189.71 with SMTP id dd7mr2272302qab.179.1305794626400;
Thu, 19 May 2011 01:43:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.26.134 with HTTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 01:43:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jon Hardcastle 
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 09:43:26 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: mO00Y_oL_MXYW1_Fu-vp9NAGrTA
Message-ID: 
To: 
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM  Sender email is freemail
(jonathan.hardcastle[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS   SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE   BODY: HTML included in message
0.1 DKIM_SIGNEDMessage has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
0.0 RFC_ABUSE_POST Both abuse and postmaster missing on sender domain
0.0 T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
-0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Headers-End: 1QMypk-0004x4-7E
Old-Subject: [mantisbt-help] Product Build?
X-BeenThere: mantisbt-help@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Old-Reply-To: Help with Mantis 
List-Id: Help with Mantis 
List-Unsubscribe: ,

List-Archive: 

List-Post: 
List-Help: 
List-Subscribe: ,

Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="===6125229287856646816=="
Errors-To: mantisbt-help-boun...@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: **MBT: [mantisbt-help] Product Build?
Reply-To: 
X-Spam: [F=0.20; B=0.500(0); STSI=0.500(-12); STSM=0.500(8); CM=0.500; 
MH=0.500(2011051918); S=0.200(2010122901); SC=none]
X-MAIL-FROM: 
X-SOURCE-IP: [209.190.47.10]
X-AnalysisOut: [v=1.0 c=1 a=_IutgecnIZ8A:10 a=D-oQZgGZFS0A:10 a=Y2ClkDGDOA]
X-AnalysisOut: [wA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10