RE: MI Best GIS for dollar

2000-05-12 Thread Sinam Al-Khafaji



First  the disclaimer - I work for a MapInfo VAR 
and we have an ATC (Authorized Training Center).
 
With 
that said, whether ERSI, MapInfo, Maptitude, Mamifold, etc if you intend to 
be a power-user, or need a team of strong users,
it 
is essential to budget in training as well.  I've taken and taught 
training on both sides (MI & ESRI).  GIS, however convincing the 
marketing blush,
is a 
complex and difficult field for new users. Just understanding the concepts 
(and limitations) of geographic analysis takes time to 
digest.
 Its only user friendly if the user has a 
clue.  
 
Where 
time is money and a limited resource,  good training class can 
save you hours of wasted project time 
with 
an ever-approaching and unforgiving deadline. Even if you later switch 
products, a firm grasp of GIS concepts makes 
learning 
competitor software much easier.  Will any of us 
be using the same software in five years?  Doubtful.
Eventually the GIS user is powerful, and the software 
just a tool.
 
When 
budgeting for software, budget for GIS training as well.  It will 
pay for itself tenfold regardless of the final product 
choice.

  -Original Message-From: John Haynes 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 12, 2000 7:27 
  AMTo: Dick Hoskins; Berk Charlton; [Sinam]  Subject: 
  Re: MI Best GIS for dollar
  Dick,
   
  Perfectly put.  Very few of us use anywhere near the potential of 
  any software; we learn what is necessary to do our tasks and complete our 
  mission.  
   
  It is great to be innovative but a couple of old expressions sum up the 
  risk..."The first guy on the beach gets the bullet" and "The leading edge of 
  the sword has the most nicks."  
   
  I like to remember the lesson of Levi Strauss.  As thousands 
  gallumphed into the western horizon to grab the first chunk of gold, Levi 
  loaded his goods in a slow wagon team and followed to sell them the standard 
  commodities they would still need.
  
-Original Message-From: 
Dick Hoskins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: Berk 
Charlton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: 
Friday, May 12, 2000 12:10 AMSubject: Re: MI Best GIS for 
dollar
My cost of maintaining various editions of MI, with V 
Mapper and data versus Maptitude and Surfer 6 and 7 and both product's 
programming languages is 8 to 1. MI is around because my users had MI - 
although no longer - ESRI made them a deal they couldn't refuse. So maybe I 
won't upgrade. However if you have a job to do, saving money on software and 
upgrades can certainly be a false economy. It of course depends on the job. 

 
However, not every GIS user is a developer, or ever cares 
to make a GIS app beyond using the programming language to automate their 
own task to support. There are a lot of people who need almost industrial 
strength GIS tools to work on particular problems and get things done. 
Maptitude and Manifold could fill this void. What I hear from Manifold and 
Maptitude sure indicates that they are not exactly stuck ... new things are 
going to appear which I don't think ESRI or MI are capable of doing now 
because they are "stuck" in a GIS paradigm that won't be here in 5 years. 

 
Of courser, it depends on what you need to do, and I would 
submit that a whole lot of people are spending $1400 when they could be 
spending $400. Seems that MI is not exactly preparing for when folks figure 
that out. 
 
Dick Hoskins[EMAIL PROTECTED]GIS uses in public 
health summer course:http://healthlinks.washington.edu/inpho/gis/course.html
- Original Message - 
From: "Berk Charlton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2000 3:06 PM
Subject: RE: MI Best GIS for dollar
> For what it's worth -> > 
Overall, I have to agree that Maptitude is the best generic GIS value.  
Great> data set, good functionality, fabulous import/export 
capability, built in> routing, etc.> > But there are 
still plenty of reasons to go with other more expensive packages.> 
> A major factor in deciding which GIS use for many of us is the 3rd 
party tools> available.  Mapinfo and Arcview both have hundreds 
of free public domain> utilities and programs available, and dozens 
more for sale.  Practically any> vertical market need a user 
has, from site selection to watershed analysis, has> been covered by 
the third party developer and VAR channel.> > Maptitude is 
really deficient here, even though the package has a good> 
programming language.  Maptitude's sale price is so low that Caliper 
can't> afford to have a decent reseller program (nor have they ever 
tried hard to> cultivate one), which forces them to try to do 
everything in-house.  Hence, they> have a good generic package, 
but very little vertical market tools or> penetration. 

RE: MI Workspace Editing : DANGER DANGER

2000-02-03 Thread Sinam Al-Khafaji

For the future, I would suggest our Workspace Manager. Downloadable from our
website for a free time renewable version.

It can create a .worp file.  This in essence is a compressed workspace, that
when reopened, can reassign the data files to new directories.  You could
also archive old workspaces (perhaps those older than 1 year) as a .worp
file, then uncompress then in whatever location required.  It does require
space, as each file making up the workspace is copied and compressed.  You
can also use Workspace Manager to send whole workspaces to clients, either
via e-mail like a .zip or transferring the whole workspace to another
storage medium.  We often burn to CD or zip drive for easy transfer.  It can
also parcel the worp file
into e-mail bundles for size limit e-mail system.

www.empoergeo.com

http://www.empowergeo.com/authorized/workspace.htm

Here the basics from the readme.txt. 
 Features

Workspace Manager is designed to facilitate easy management and distribution
of a standard MapInfo Professional(r) Workspace file (.WOR extension).
Version 1.0 of Workspace Manager has been tested with MapInfo Professional
v4.5 and v5.0.  (and 5.5 - Sinam)

a)  Resolves missing/relocated .TAB files.
You can let Workspace Manager search drives for you automatically, or you
can specify a particular file replacement.

b)  Workspace Packages (.WORP) can be built to send a Workspace to another
user via disk, email or other electronic transport mechanism.
The Workspace Package can include any or all of the tables that are used in
the Workspace (within the Limitations listed in IIa).  The Packaged files
are compressed to reduce disk space and transmission time requirements.

c)  The recipient of a Workspace Package would use Workspace Manager to save
the enclosed Workspace and Tables to disk, and will assist in the location
of any tables not included in the distribution.

d)  Workspace Manager will default to extract only newer Tables from the
Package thus preserving your local copies as appropriate.  The user can
easily override this default on a Table by Table basis.

e)  There is no physical restriction on the number of Tables that can be
included in a Package or on their sizes (within available disk space
requirements for building or extracting them). 

-Original Message-
From: Mats Elfström [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2000 4:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Mapinfo List
Subject: Re: MI Workspace Editing : DANGER DANGER


Hi All!
Will Woodruff wrote as a tip for saving wrecked workspaces:
> What do I suggest you ask?  Replace the problem table with a known table
> that will open in both the Open Table section and the Map From section.
> Open your workspace.  Close the replacement table.  Save the workspace. 

Well, at first this seems as a splendid idea.
However, the replacing table cannot be any dummy table.
Consider the line
   Layer 5
Display Graphic
Zoom (0, 1500) Units "mi" 
Label Line Arrow Position Above Font ("Arial",0,9,0) Pen (1,2,0) 
  With Highway

Now, if Layer 5 does not contain the column name Highway - the workspace
will fail at this point.
In fact, it is almost impossible to recognize all references to a
missing table in the workspace file.

But if the case is a mislaid table, you can give MapInfo a hand in
searching:
Under Options > Preferences > Directories you can add up to 4 search
paths.
If you add the 4 most likely drives or trees, MapInfo will traverse each
one in turn until a Table with the wanted name is found. Be prepared
that this can take a while. 
Beware that MapInfo opens the first Table found a name that satisfies
the search condition. So if multiple tables exist with the same name (no
good practice but common nevertheless) another table than the original
may well be opened with possibly fatal results.

The obvious choice in the workspace opener should of course be an option
to skip and turn off all following references to a missing Table.

Regards, Mats.E
-- 
:::
:Email/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ#9517386   :
:-:
:Mail/ GISKRAFT, Mats Elfstroem, Vaepplingv 21, SE-227 38 LUND, SWEDEN:
:Phones: +46 46 145959, +46 70 595 3935   :
:::
--
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MI Empower Geographics Workspace Manager Updated

2000-01-04 Thread Sinam Al-Khafaji

Our site www.empowergeo.com has been updated, and timed expirations revamped
for the New Millennium.
Apologies for any inconvenience.  

Please download Workspace Manager from
http://www.empowergeo.com/authorized/workspace.htm .

Any problems, just e'm and I'll get on it.

Empower Geographics
Sinam Al-Khafaji - GIS
1000 Executive Way
Des Plaines, IL 60018-1502
847.299.6952 x315

--
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MI Super Workspace - Try Workspace Manager

1999-12-23 Thread Sinam Al-Khafaji

I work for Empower Geographics, a MapInfo VAR outside Chicago.
We put together a small program called Workspace Manager.
You can download it free off our website; empowergeo.com.

It has some nuances, but we are always open to suggestions, revisions,
upgrades, etc.

Here the basics from the readme.txt.  Good luck & Happy Holidays.

 Features

Workspace Manager is designed to facilitate easy management and distribution
of a standard MapInfo Professional(r) Workspace file (.WOR extension).
Version 1.0 of Workspace Manager has been tested with MapInfo Professional
v4.5 and v5.0.  (and 5.5 - Sinam)

a)  Resolves missing/relocated .TAB files.
You can let Workspace Manager search drives for you automatically, or you
can specify a particular file replacement.

b)  Workspace Packages (.WORP) can be built to send a Workspace to another
user via disk, email or other electronic transport mechanism.
The Workspace Package can include any or all of the tables that are used in
the Workspace (within the Limitations listed in IIa).  The Packaged files
are compressed to reduce disk space and transmission time requirements.

c)  The recipient of a Workspace Package would use Workspace Manager to save
the enclosed Workspace and Tables to disk, and will assist in the location
of any tables not included in the distribution.

d)  Workspace Manager will default to extract only newer Tables from the
Package thus preserving your local copies as appropriate.  The user can
easily override this default on a Table by Table basis.

e)  There is no physical restriction on the number of Tables that can be
included in a Package or on their sizes (within available disk space
requirements for building or extracting them). 

-Original Message-
From: Alistair Hart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 23, 1999 12:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: MI Super Workspace


Merry Christmas etc...

Has anyone had much experience with Super Workspace? Can anyone recommend a
similar (or otherwise) software package for the moving of workspaces?

I am looking at buying one and am looking for suggestions. I know the golden
rule is to make 'em where you want 'em but in this case I can't!

Thanks In Advance,

Alistair Hart
Dengue Action Response Team
Queensland Health
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Random quote of the moment
"I don't believe in mandates"
John Howard c.1987



--
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MI SUM Joining tables...

1999-10-01 Thread Sinam Al-Khafaji

Hate to agree with the 'Dark Side'... but I must concur - its much easier to
join in ArcView.  Although the other SQL and table management features in MI
Pro make up for this four-fold.

-Original Message-
From: Humphrey, Ben [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 01, 1999 11:37 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; MapInfo mailing list
Subject: RE: MI SUM Joining tables...


Okay try this:

1.  Open the two tables you wish to join in side by side windows in arcview
2.  Select the two common fields in each table with the mouse.
3.  Make sure the table you want the results to be stored in is highlighted
4.  Join the tables

I agree with peter 110%, Joining in Arcview is a *pinch*

> -Original Message-
> From: Mats Elfström [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 1999 10:44 PM
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]; MapInfo mailing list
> Subject:  Re: MI SUM Joining tables...
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > The combined suggestion was to use SQL Select dialogue. Place my two
> > tables that I want to join in the FROM section. In my Where category
> > set the two "key fields equal.
> > The result will be a query table. Should you want to keep this, Save
> > Copy As.
> > 
> > I think we would all agree that the ArcView join is much simpler.
> 
> No, we won't.
> At least not until you explain to the list the steps needed to obtain
> the *same* result in ArcView.
> 
> Mats.E
> -- 
> :::
> :Email/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ#9517386   :
> :-:
> :Mail/ GISKRAFT, Mats Elfstroem, Vaepplingv 21, SE-227 38 LUND, SWEDEN:
> :Phones: +46 46 145959, +46 70 595 3935   :
> :::
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
> "unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MI Basic US River & Lake layer

1999-09-21 Thread Sinam Al-Khafaji

Hello MI listers - 
I'm a new MapInfo user, originally trained on the 'Dark Side' products of
ESRI's Arc View.
I am looking for a basic water layer for the US; to include the 10 major US
rivers (Mississippi, Missouri, Colorado, etc),  large major lakes (all the
Great Lakes, Salt Lake, Lake Tahoe, etc.)
I have found very detailed state and county level data on StreetPro, Marker
Plus, etc. - but nothing easy to view and query on the national level.  Lake
surface area and total river length-all bordering states are important.

Since these are such obvious geographic features, I'm sure its out there.
But at the moment,
I'm still on my first cup of coffee - and am still somewhat of a newbie with
MapInfo data.  I am familiar with USGS streams and other hydro data., but
again this seems a bit cumbersome for a general US view.

Thanks in advance.

Sinam
--
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]