Apache Hadoop qbt Report: trunk+JDK8 on Linux/x86

2016-08-10 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
For more details, see 
https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86/129/

[Aug 9, 2016 7:42:29 AM] (Arun Suresh) YARN-5457. Refactor 
DistributedScheduling framework to pull out common
[Aug 9, 2016 10:34:09 AM] (vvasudev) YARN-5394. Remove bind-mount /etc/passwd 
for Docker containers.
[Aug 9, 2016 3:55:35 PM] (jlowe) MAPREDUCE-6741. Add MR support to redact job 
conf properties.
[Aug 9, 2016 4:56:21 PM] (kihwal) HDFS-10342. BlockManager#createLocatedBlocks 
should not check corrupt
[Aug 9, 2016 4:58:54 PM] (rohithsharmaks) YARN-5474. Typo mistake in 
AMRMClient#getRegisteredTimeineClient API.
[Aug 9, 2016 6:05:44 PM] (varunsaxena) MAPREDUCE-6750. Fix 
TestHSAdminServer#testRefreshSuperUserGroups (Kihwal
[Aug 9, 2016 7:33:15 PM] (kihwal) HADOOP-13473. Tracing in IPC Server is 
broken. Contributed by Daryn
[Aug 9, 2016 7:54:11 PM] (kihwal) HDFS-10738. Fix
[Aug 9, 2016 8:42:32 PM] (kasha) HADOOP-13299. JMXJsonServlet is vulnerable to 
TRACE. (Haibo Chen via
[Aug 9, 2016 10:51:19 PM] (lei) HDFS-10457. DataNode should not auto-format 
block pool directory if
[Aug 9, 2016 10:59:22 PM] (lei) HDFS-10681. DiskBalancer: query command should 
report Plan file path
[Aug 9, 2016 11:51:03 PM] (kasha) YARN-5343. 
TestContinuousScheduling#testSortedNodes fails
[Aug 10, 2016 1:11:34 AM] (weichiu) HDFS-8224. Schedule a block for scanning if 
its metadata file is




-1 overall


The following subsystems voted -1:
asflicense unit


The following subsystems voted -1 but
were configured to be filtered/ignored:
cc checkstyle javac javadoc pylint shellcheck shelldocs whitespace


The following subsystems are considered long running:
(runtime bigger than 1h  0m  0s)
unit


Specific tests:

Failed junit tests :

   hadoop.hdfs.TestRollingUpgrade 
   hadoop.yarn.logaggregation.TestAggregatedLogFormat 
   
hadoop.yarn.server.nodemanager.containermanager.queuing.TestQueuingContainerManager
 
   hadoop.yarn.server.applicationhistoryservice.webapp.TestAHSWebServices 
   hadoop.yarn.server.TestMiniYarnClusterNodeUtilization 
   hadoop.yarn.server.TestContainerManagerSecurity 
   hadoop.yarn.client.api.impl.TestYarnClient 

Timed out junit tests :

   org.apache.hadoop.http.TestHttpServerLifecycle 
  

   cc:

   
https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86/129/artifact/out/diff-compile-cc-root.txt
  [4.0K]

   javac:

   
https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86/129/artifact/out/diff-compile-javac-root.txt
  [172K]

   checkstyle:

   
https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86/129/artifact/out/diff-checkstyle-root.txt
  [16M]

   pylint:

   
https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86/129/artifact/out/diff-patch-pylint.txt
  [16K]

   shellcheck:

   
https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86/129/artifact/out/diff-patch-shellcheck.txt
  [20K]

   shelldocs:

   
https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86/129/artifact/out/diff-patch-shelldocs.txt
  [16K]

   whitespace:

   
https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86/129/artifact/out/whitespace-eol.txt
  [12M]
   
https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86/129/artifact/out/whitespace-tabs.txt
  [1.3M]

   javadoc:

   
https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86/129/artifact/out/diff-javadoc-javadoc-root.txt
  [2.2M]

   unit:

   
https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86/129/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-common-project_hadoop-common.txt
  [120K]
   
https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86/129/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt
  [148K]
   
https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86/129/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-yarn-project_hadoop-yarn_hadoop-yarn-common.txt
  [24K]
   
https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86/129/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-yarn-project_hadoop-yarn_hadoop-yarn-server_hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager.txt
  [36K]
   
https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86/129/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-yarn-project_hadoop-yarn_hadoop-yarn-server_hadoop-yarn-server-applicationhistoryservice.txt
  [12K]
   
https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86/129/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-yarn-project_hadoop-yarn_hadoop-yarn-server_hadoop-yarn-server-tests.txt
  [268K]
   
https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86/129/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-yarn-project_hadoop-yarn_hadoop-yarn-client.txt
  [12K]
   
https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86/129/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-mapreduce-project_hadoop-mapreduce-client_hadoop-mapreduce-client-nativetask.txt
  [124K]

   asflicense:

   
https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86/129/artifact/

Re: [Release thread] 2.6.5 release activities

2016-08-10 Thread Jason Lowe
Thanks for organizing this, Chris!
I don't believe HADOOP-13362 is needed since it's related to ContainerMetrics.  
ContainerMetrics weren't added until 2.7 by YARN-2984.
YARN-4794 looks applicable to 2.6.  The change drops right in except it has 
JDK7-isms (multi-catch clause), so it needs a slight change.

Jason

  From: Chris Trezzo 
 To: "common-...@hadoop.apache.org" ; 
hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; "mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org" 
; "yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org" 
 
 Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2016 7:32 PM
 Subject: [Release thread] 2.6.5 release activities
   
Based on the sentiment in the "[DISCUSS] 2.6.x line releases" thread, I
have moved forward with some of the initial effort in creating a 2.6.5
release. I am forking this thread so we have a dedicated 2.6.5 release
thread.

I have gone through the git logs and gathered a list of JIRAs that are in
branch-2.7 but are missing from branch-2.6. I limited the diff to issues
with a commit date after 1/26/2016. I did this because 2.6.4 was cut from
branch-2.6 around that date (http://markmail.org/message/xmy7ebs6l3643o5e)
and presumably issues that were committed to branch-2.7 before then were
already looked at as part of 2.6.4.

I have collected these issues in a spreadsheet and have given them an
initial triage on whether they are candidates for a backport to 2.6.5. The
spreadsheet is sorted by the status of the issues with the potential
backport candidates at the top. Here is a link to the spreadsheet:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lfG2CYQ7W4q3olWpOCo6EBAey1WYC8hTRUemHvYPPzY/edit?usp=sharing

As of now, I have identified 16 potential backport candidates. Please take
a look at the list and let me know if there are any that you think should
not be on the list, or ones that you think I have missed. This was just an
initial high-level triage, so there could definitely be issues that are
miss-labeled.

As a side note: we still need to look at the pre-commit build for 2.6 and
follow up with an addendum for HADOOP-12800.

Thanks everyone!
Chris Trezzo


  

Re: [Release thread] 2.6.5 release activities

2016-08-10 Thread Junping Du
Thanks Chris for bring up this discussion. 
Before we going to detail discussion of releasing 2.6.5, I have a quick 
question here: do we think it is necessary to continue to release branch-2.6, 
like 2.6.5, etc after 2.7 is out for more than 1 year. Any reason to not 
suggest users to upgrade to 2.7.3 releases for latest fixes which is in 
releasing now?
My major concern on more release efforts on legacy branches is the same with my 
comments on other release plan before - it seems too many releases trains get 
planned at the same time window (2.6.x, 2.7.x, 2.8, 3.0-alpha, 3.1-beta, etc.). 
Not only user could get confusing on this, but also I suspect we don't have so 
many bandwidth in community to push forward so these releases in high quality 
during the same time window - just like Chris Douglas mentioned in another 
email thread on committer activity and bandwidth. IMO, may be it is better to 
focus on limited number of releases and move them faster?

BTW, I agree with Jason that HADOOP-13362 is not needed for branch-2.6 unless 
we backport container metrics related patches there.


Thanks,

Junping

From: Jason Lowe 
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 4:14 PM
To: Chris Trezzo; common-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; 
mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Release thread] 2.6.5 release activities

Thanks for organizing this, Chris!
I don't believe HADOOP-13362 is needed since it's related to ContainerMetrics.  
ContainerMetrics weren't added until 2.7 by YARN-2984.
YARN-4794 looks applicable to 2.6.  The change drops right in except it has 
JDK7-isms (multi-catch clause), so it needs a slight change.

Jason

  From: Chris Trezzo 
 To: "common-...@hadoop.apache.org" ; 
hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; "mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org" 
; "yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org" 

 Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2016 7:32 PM
 Subject: [Release thread] 2.6.5 release activities

Based on the sentiment in the "[DISCUSS] 2.6.x line releases" thread, I
have moved forward with some of the initial effort in creating a 2.6.5
release. I am forking this thread so we have a dedicated 2.6.5 release
thread.

I have gone through the git logs and gathered a list of JIRAs that are in
branch-2.7 but are missing from branch-2.6. I limited the diff to issues
with a commit date after 1/26/2016. I did this because 2.6.4 was cut from
branch-2.6 around that date (http://markmail.org/message/xmy7ebs6l3643o5e)
and presumably issues that were committed to branch-2.7 before then were
already looked at as part of 2.6.4.

I have collected these issues in a spreadsheet and have given them an
initial triage on whether they are candidates for a backport to 2.6.5. The
spreadsheet is sorted by the status of the issues with the potential
backport candidates at the top. Here is a link to the spreadsheet:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lfG2CYQ7W4q3olWpOCo6EBAey1WYC8hTRUemHvYPPzY/edit?usp=sharing

As of now, I have identified 16 potential backport candidates. Please take
a look at the list and let me know if there are any that you think should
not be on the list, or ones that you think I have missed. This was just an
initial high-level triage, so there could definitely be issues that are
miss-labeled.

As a side note: we still need to look at the pre-commit build for 2.6 and
follow up with an addendum for HADOOP-12800.

Thanks everyone!
Chris Trezzo


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org



Re: [Release thread] 2.6.5 release activities

2016-08-10 Thread Chris Trezzo
Thanks Jason and Junping for the comments! I will update the spreadsheet
for HADOOP-13362 and YARN-4794.

As for continuing 2.6.x releases, please see the discussion in the "[DISCUSS]
2.6.x line releases" thread. Sean, Akira and Zhe all expressed interest in
additional 2.6.x releases. I started this thread based off of that
interest. I understand there is a burden to maintaining a large number of
branches. I am not sure what the community's end-of-life policy is, but
maybe we can issue a warning with the 2.6.5 release stating when we will
stop maintaining the release line. This at least gives users some time to
make migration plans to a newer version.

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Junping Du  wrote:

> Thanks Chris for bring up this discussion.
> Before we going to detail discussion of releasing 2.6.5, I have a quick
> question here: do we think it is necessary to continue to release
> branch-2.6, like 2.6.5, etc after 2.7 is out for more than 1 year. Any
> reason to not suggest users to upgrade to 2.7.3 releases for latest fixes
> which is in releasing now?
> My major concern on more release efforts on legacy branches is the same
> with my comments on other release plan before - it seems too many releases
> trains get planned at the same time window (2.6.x, 2.7.x, 2.8, 3.0-alpha,
> 3.1-beta, etc.). Not only user could get confusing on this, but also I
> suspect we don't have so many bandwidth in community to push forward so
> these releases in high quality during the same time window - just like
> Chris Douglas mentioned in another email thread on committer activity and
> bandwidth. IMO, may be it is better to focus on limited number of releases
> and move them faster?
>
> BTW, I agree with Jason that HADOOP-13362 is not needed for branch-2.6
> unless we backport container metrics related patches there.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Junping
> 
> From: Jason Lowe 
> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 4:14 PM
> To: Chris Trezzo; common-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org;
> mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Release thread] 2.6.5 release activities
>
> Thanks for organizing this, Chris!
> I don't believe HADOOP-13362 is needed since it's related to
> ContainerMetrics.  ContainerMetrics weren't added until 2.7 by YARN-2984.
> YARN-4794 looks applicable to 2.6.  The change drops right in except it
> has JDK7-isms (multi-catch clause), so it needs a slight change.
>
> Jason
>
>   From: Chris Trezzo 
>  To: "common-...@hadoop.apache.org" ;
> hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; "mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org" <
> mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org>; "yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org" <
> yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org>
>  Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2016 7:32 PM
>  Subject: [Release thread] 2.6.5 release activities
>
> Based on the sentiment in the "[DISCUSS] 2.6.x line releases" thread, I
> have moved forward with some of the initial effort in creating a 2.6.5
> release. I am forking this thread so we have a dedicated 2.6.5 release
> thread.
>
> I have gone through the git logs and gathered a list of JIRAs that are in
> branch-2.7 but are missing from branch-2.6. I limited the diff to issues
> with a commit date after 1/26/2016. I did this because 2.6.4 was cut from
> branch-2.6 around that date (http://markmail.org/message/xmy7ebs6l3643o5e)
> and presumably issues that were committed to branch-2.7 before then were
> already looked at as part of 2.6.4.
>
> I have collected these issues in a spreadsheet and have given them an
> initial triage on whether they are candidates for a backport to 2.6.5. The
> spreadsheet is sorted by the status of the issues with the potential
> backport candidates at the top. Here is a link to the spreadsheet:
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lfG2CYQ7W4q3olWpOCo6EBAey1WYC
> 8hTRUemHvYPPzY/edit?usp=sharing
>
> As of now, I have identified 16 potential backport candidates. Please take
> a look at the list and let me know if there are any that you think should
> not be on the list, or ones that you think I have missed. This was just an
> initial high-level triage, so there could definitely be issues that are
> miss-labeled.
>
> As a side note: we still need to look at the pre-commit build for 2.6 and
> follow up with an addendum for HADOOP-12800.
>
> Thanks everyone!
> Chris Trezzo
>
>


[jira] [Created] (MAPREDUCE-6751) Print a log message, when splitting is not possible because of an unsplittable compression

2016-08-10 Thread Peter Vary (JIRA)
Peter Vary created MAPREDUCE-6751:
-

 Summary: Print a log message, when splitting is not possible 
because of an unsplittable compression
 Key: MAPREDUCE-6751
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6751
 Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: client, mrv1, mrv2
Affects Versions: 2.6.4
Reporter: Peter Vary
Priority: Minor


There should be a message logged in case of the mapreduce will only spam one 
mapper since the source file is compressed with an unsplitable algorithm



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Created] (MAPREDUCE-6752) Inconsistent logging content and logging level

2016-08-10 Thread Nemo Chen (JIRA)
Nemo Chen created MAPREDUCE-6752:


 Summary: Inconsistent logging content and logging level
 Key: MAPREDUCE-6752
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6752
 Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: client
Affects Versions: 2.7.2
Reporter: Nemo Chen


Similar to previous issue HADOOP-3029, in the file:
hadoop-rel-release-2.7.2/hadoop-mapreduce-project/hadoop-mapreduce-client/hadoop-mapreduce-client-app/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapreduce/v2/app/speculate/DefaultSpeculator.java
line 253, the whole method is for debugging purpose, therefore the log:
{code:borderStyle=solid}
LOG.info("We got asked to run a debug speculation scan.");
{code}
should be set to debug level instead of info level to avoid redundant 
information.




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org