[Marketing] Re: fedoramagazine article

[Ryan Lerch]

Thanks gnokii!

I will edit it right now.

cheers,
ryanlerch

On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 3:34 PM, S.Kemter  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> The graphics with the chosen wallpapers is in the article now, so it can
> be published.
>
> br gnokii
>
> 2016-04-21 22:50 GMT+07:00 Justin W. Flory :
>
>> On 04/21/2016 11:15 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:25:00AM +0700, S.Kemter wrote:
>>>
 Hi,

 I have added another article, as the voting for the supplemental
 wallpaper
 ends tomorrow and after it the results get published.

 https://fedoramagazine.org/introducing-extra-wallpapers-fedora-24/

 I have to wait for adding the picture with the winners, I dont know if I
 can do it right after the closing. As it is quit late then here.

 But it should be done on saturday, so the article could go out monday

>>>
>>> Awesome Sirko -- we'll make sure to put this on the publishing schedule.
>>>
>>>
>> I think this could be a great one to slide out Monday. I'll make sure we
>> cover it in tonight's meeting.
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Justin W. Flory
>> jflo...@gmail.com
>>
>>
>> --
>> marketing mailing list
>> marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>
>> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> make me rich, buy my Inkscape book http://is.gd/yq5OD0 ;)
>
> --
> marketing mailing list
> marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
--
marketing mailing list
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Marketing] Re: fedoramagazine article

[S.Kemter]

Hi,

The graphics with the chosen wallpapers is in the article now, so it can be
published.

br gnokii

2016-04-21 22:50 GMT+07:00 Justin W. Flory :

> On 04/21/2016 11:15 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:25:00AM +0700, S.Kemter wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have added another article, as the voting for the supplemental
>>> wallpaper
>>> ends tomorrow and after it the results get published.
>>>
>>> https://fedoramagazine.org/introducing-extra-wallpapers-fedora-24/
>>>
>>> I have to wait for adding the picture with the winners, I dont know if I
>>> can do it right after the closing. As it is quit late then here.
>>>
>>> But it should be done on saturday, so the article could go out monday
>>>
>>
>> Awesome Sirko -- we'll make sure to put this on the publishing schedule.
>>
>>
> I think this could be a great one to slide out Monday. I'll make sure we
> cover it in tonight's meeting.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Justin W. Flory
> jflo...@gmail.com
>
>
> --
> marketing mailing list
> marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
>



-- 
make me rich, buy my Inkscape book http://is.gd/yq5OD0 ;)
--
marketing mailing list
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Marketing] Re: PROPOSED Re: Re: [MAGAZINE PROPOSAL] Fwd: [DRAFT] Why we're retiring 32-bit Images

[Sylvia Sánchez]

+1

On Friday, 22 April 2016, Joe Brockmeier  wrote:

> On 04/22/2016 11:58 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > * I will expect Joe B from the Cloud WG to tell us authoritatively
> >   through the *marketing* list exactly what should happen next, since
> >   he (correctly) raised the issue of ensuring zero confusion over
> >   publishing these articles.
> >
> > Ideally this should have been settled between Cloud WG and rel-eng
> > before an article was proposed.  But failing that, we shouldn't
> > schedule any Magazine post about changes in deliverables without
> > clearly knowing it's decided.  (To be fair, that seemed to be the case
> > for at least a week, until dgilmore raised an objection.)  Better
> > communication will fix similar problems in the future.
>
> Correct. This *was* decided, and then a question was raised. I don't
> want to second-guess the second-guessing, because it was
> well-intentioned and we're all communicating in like 15 different venues
> and ... ugh. Communication is hard, kids.
>
> I agree with Dusty's post earlier, I think we should stick with the
> message that we are doing away with 32-bit cloud images irrespective of
> other 32-bit images/etc. We don't at the moment have the resources, or
> frankly interest, in doing much with 32-bit x86 cloud images.
>
> I'm CC'ing Dennis directly in case cloud@ and marketing@ are not on his
> "read immediately" list. :-)
>
> WG folks: Please respond with a +1 or -1. Other votes welcome too.
>
> Alternate proposals welcomed, but we should move quickly. Happy Friday.
>
>
> --
> Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS
> j...@redhat.com  | http://community.redhat.com/
> Twitter: @jzb  | http://dissociatedpress.net/
>
>
--
marketing mailing list
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Marketing] PROPOSED Re: Re: [MAGAZINE PROPOSAL] Fwd: [DRAFT] Why we're retiring 32-bit Images

[Joe Brockmeier]

On 04/22/2016 11:58 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> * I will expect Joe B from the Cloud WG to tell us authoritatively
>   through the *marketing* list exactly what should happen next, since
>   he (correctly) raised the issue of ensuring zero confusion over
>   publishing these articles.
> 
> Ideally this should have been settled between Cloud WG and rel-eng
> before an article was proposed.  But failing that, we shouldn't
> schedule any Magazine post about changes in deliverables without
> clearly knowing it's decided.  (To be fair, that seemed to be the case
> for at least a week, until dgilmore raised an objection.)  Better
> communication will fix similar problems in the future.

Correct. This *was* decided, and then a question was raised. I don't
want to second-guess the second-guessing, because it was
well-intentioned and we're all communicating in like 15 different venues
and ... ugh. Communication is hard, kids.

I agree with Dusty's post earlier, I think we should stick with the
message that we are doing away with 32-bit cloud images irrespective of
other 32-bit images/etc. We don't at the moment have the resources, or
frankly interest, in doing much with 32-bit x86 cloud images.

I'm CC'ing Dennis directly in case cloud@ and marketing@ are not on his
"read immediately" list. :-)

WG folks: Please respond with a +1 or -1. Other votes welcome too.

Alternate proposals welcomed, but we should move quickly. Happy Friday.


-- 
Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS
j...@redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/
Twitter: @jzb  | http://dissociatedpress.net/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
marketing mailing list
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Marketing] Re: Marketing-trac: #223: Create Social Media Accounts for Fedora on Diaspora and GNU Social

[Marketing Team]

#223: Create Social Media Accounts for Fedora on Diaspora and GNU Social
---+
  Reporter:  dhanvi|  Owner:  bproffit
  Type:  enhancement   | Status:  assigned
  Priority:  normal|  Milestone:  Open
 Component:  Social media  |   Severity:  not urgent
Resolution:|   Keywords:  meeting
Blocked By:|   Blocking:
---+

Comment (by dhanvi):

 Replying to [comment:1 duffy]:
 > How about ello.co?

 I would say ello is cool but it's proprietary :( and centralized (so you
 really don't have control over your own data) so I have not added it to
 the list

 If you think that it would help us in the marketing then we can discuss
 about it in the mailing list and create a new ticket about the same

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Marketing Team 
The Trac site for the Fedora Project Marketing team. This Trac serves as a 
place to list out tasks, define objectives, and work on monitoring our progress 
with key tasks and goals.
--
marketing mailing list
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Marketing] Re: [MAGAZINE PROPOSAL] Fwd: [DRAFT] Why we're retiring 32-bit Images (was Re: Retiring 32-bit images)

[Stephen John Smoogen]

On 22 April 2016 at 09:52, Paul W. Frields  wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 09:59:40AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Somehow despite me sending this last night - this was published. How can
>> we prevent communication breakdowns like this in the future?
>>
>> This was sent prior to or during the magazine meeting, if I'm not mistaken.
>>
>> If there's *any* uncertainty around something like this, it should not
>> be published.
>
> Agreed, and it's incumbent on whoever schedules a post to confirm it's
> meant to go out.  The bar is higher for articles about what we
> deliver, as opposed to helpful how-to articles.  It's hard to see how
> a premature article like that would cause any issues, but clearly this
> one could.
>

From past experience on these sorts of things.. please spell out that
this is 32-bit i386 and doesn't cover arm32 (not sure if there are
cloud arm32 but people seem to freak out when the architecture is not
mentioned).

> Also, this was picked up by at least one venue that checks our feeds
> for reportable news:
> https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Fedora-Cloud-32-bit-Dead
>
> Does someone have a contact with Phoronix so we could explain the
> snafu here?
>
> --
> Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
>   gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
>   http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
> The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com
> --
> marketing mailing list
> marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
--
marketing mailing list
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Marketing] Re: [MAGAZINE PROPOSAL] Fwd: [DRAFT] Why we're retiring 32-bit Images (was Re: Retiring 32-bit images)

[Paul W. Frields]

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 09:59:40AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Somehow despite me sending this last night - this was published. How can
> we prevent communication breakdowns like this in the future?
> 
> This was sent prior to or during the magazine meeting, if I'm not mistaken.
> 
> If there's *any* uncertainty around something like this, it should not
> be published.

Agreed, and it's incumbent on whoever schedules a post to confirm it's
meant to go out.  The bar is higher for articles about what we
deliver, as opposed to helpful how-to articles.  It's hard to see how
a premature article like that would cause any issues, but clearly this
one could.

Also, this was picked up by at least one venue that checks our feeds
for reportable news:
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Fedora-Cloud-32-bit-Dead

Does someone have a contact with Phoronix so we could explain the
snafu here?

-- 
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com
--
marketing mailing list
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Marketing] Content for 'Learn More' in UI upgrade

[Jiri Eischmann]

Hi,
as you may know Fedora 24 Workstation will introduce an upgrade
mechanism that in integrated to GNOME Software. There will be a banner
informing about availability of new release of Fedora. See [1]. We need
to provide content for the 'Learn More' button. Because it's
Workstation-only thing, we should have something that has highlights in
Workstation. Something like [2]. An article at Fedora Magazine would be
just fine, but 1) we need to know the URL before F24 is released and 2)
we need to make sure the article is published once F24 is out.

Anyone up for the task? ;)

Jiri

[1] https://plus.google.com/u/0/photos/107928060492923463788/albums/627
5723538330122529/6275723537050052866
[2] https://fedoramagazine.org/whats-new-in-fedora-23-workstation/

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
marketing mailing list
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Marketing] Re: [MAGAZINE PROPOSAL] Fwd: [DRAFT] Why we're retiring 32-bit Images

[Justin W. Flory]

On 04/22/2016 10:22 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:

On 04/22/2016 09:44 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:

The article apparently was left in Scheduled status -- I moved it back
to Pending Review status, and Patrick Uiterwijk kindly stripped it
from the Fedora Planet so it wouldn't confuse anyone.  It was out
there for a few hours, though, FYI.


I got at least one ping on Twitter asking if we meant F24 and not F23,
so it was read by a few folks. (On the positive side, we know people are
reading!)

I'm on PTO Monday & Tuesday, but I hope we can finish this discussion
about 32-bit and publish *after* the cloud wg meeting on Wednesday.

Best,

jzb



Sorry, this was my mistake… I didn't realize it was in Scheduled status. 
With the F24 Wallpapers article on Monday and Ryan's screencast article 
on Wednesday, this would be a good topper for the week on Friday. Just 
let us know when it's ready and we'll get it out!


Thanks Paul and Patrick for fixing this up quickly, I appreciate it… 
I'll be sure to do a double-check next time before logging off for the 
night.


--
Cheers,
Justin W. Flory
jflo...@gmail.com



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
marketing mailing list
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Marketing] Re: [MAGAZINE PROPOSAL] Fwd: [DRAFT] Why we're retiring 32-bit Images

[Joe Brockmeier]

On 04/22/2016 09:44 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> The article apparently was left in Scheduled status -- I moved it back
> to Pending Review status, and Patrick Uiterwijk kindly stripped it
> from the Fedora Planet so it wouldn't confuse anyone.  It was out
> there for a few hours, though, FYI.

I got at least one ping on Twitter asking if we meant F24 and not F23,
so it was read by a few folks. (On the positive side, we know people are
reading!)

I'm on PTO Monday & Tuesday, but I hope we can finish this discussion
about 32-bit and publish *after* the cloud wg meeting on Wednesday.

Best,

jzb
-- 
Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS
j...@redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/
Twitter: @jzb  | http://dissociatedpress.net/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
marketing mailing list
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Marketing] OSAS All-Company Call: Exploring Community Metrics

[Brian Proffitt]

Interested in community? Join OSAS for our next open call!


April 27, 2016 1100 EDT (1500 UTC)

Exploring Community Metrics



Determining the value of community activity is never simple, and there are
many ways to explore the metrics your community generates to discover that
value. Newly minted Red Hat Technology Evangelist James Falkner will share
his real-world community management experiences, including

   - Avoiding vanity metrics
   - Developing metrics based on goals, instead of arbitrarily picking them
   - Thinking about (and planning for) what happens when metrics go "bad"


Meeting Info:



We're using *Blue Jeans* for our OSAS All-Company calls.You can join by
video or audio. Please note if you are using Blue Jeans for the first time;

1. If you plan to join by browser, you will need to download a plug and
enable it before you join.

2. If you join and participate via video please use headphones or your
system will create feedback and distort the call audio.

3. Effective September 10th, we've added new capacity! If you're not among
the first one hundred people joining video by browser, join by audio
instead via intercall



To join the Meeting:

https://bluejeans.com/15748675309/




To join via Browser:

https://bluejeans.com/15748675309/




To join with Lync:

https://bluejeans.com/15748675309/

lync




To join via Room System:

Video Conferencing System: bjn.vc -or- 199.48.152.152

Meeting ID: 15748675309



To join via Phone:

1) Dial:

  +18004518679

  +12127295016

  (see all numbers -
https://www.intercallonline.com/listNumbersByCode.action?confCode=15748675309

)

2) Enter Conference ID: 15748675309



*IRC*: #osas

-- 
Brian Proffitt
Principal Community Analyst
Open Source and Standards
@TheTechScribe
574.383.9BKP
--
marketing mailing list
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Marketing] Re: [MAGAZINE PROPOSAL] Fwd: [DRAFT] Why we're retiring 32-bit Images (was Re: Retiring 32-bit images)

[Joe Brockmeier]

Hi all,

Somehow despite me sending this last night - this was published. How can
we prevent communication breakdowns like this in the future?

This was sent prior to or during the magazine meeting, if I'm not mistaken.

If there's *any* uncertainty around something like this, it should not
be published.

Best,

jzb

On 04/21/2016 05:10 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On 04/21/2016 05:04 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>> I can't make tonight's Magazine meeting, but I'm +1 to get this out
>> ASAP.  I've moved this article to Pending Review, but I already
>> reviewed it and it looks fine.  I added a couple additional links for
>> SEO power.
>>
>> Anything Justin OK's for schedule for this is fine by me, assume
>> +1. :-) And I'll be happy to help with social media, just please leave
>> me an email or IRC message to do so and I'll catch it in the morning.
> 
> I'd like to put this up too, but I don't think we've settled the
> question on 32-bit that Dennis raised. Will check again.
> 


-- 
Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS
j...@redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/
Twitter: @jzb  | http://dissociatedpress.net/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
marketing mailing list
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Marketing] Re: [MAGAZINE PROPOSAL] Fwd: [DRAFT] Why we're retiring 32-bit Images

[Paul W. Frields]

On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 06:14:05PM -0400, Justin W. Flory wrote:
> On 04/21/2016 05:10 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> >On 04/21/2016 05:04 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> >>I can't make tonight's Magazine meeting, but I'm +1 to get this out
> >>ASAP.  I've moved this article to Pending Review, but I already
> >>reviewed it and it looks fine.  I added a couple additional links for
> >>SEO power.
> >>
> >>Anything Justin OK's for schedule for this is fine by me, assume
> >>+1. :-) And I'll be happy to help with social media, just please leave
> >>me an email or IRC message to do so and I'll catch it in the morning.
> >
> >I'd like to put this up too, but I don't think we've settled the
> >question on 32-bit that Dennis raised. Will check again.
> >
> 
> Do we still want to aim for publishing this tomorrow? In the meeting, we
> agreed to publish it Friday, but if it's not ready or the questionable part
> can't be edited out, let's definitely hold on this.

The article apparently was left in Scheduled status -- I moved it back
to Pending Review status, and Patrick Uiterwijk kindly stripped it
from the Fedora Planet so it wouldn't confuse anyone.  It was out
there for a few hours, though, FYI.

-- 
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com
--
marketing mailing list
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org