[Marketing] Re: Idea: Fedora Release Party

[Justin W. Flory]

On 07/04/2016 01:01 PM, Daniela Morais wrote:

Hi,


I'm ambassador in Brazil and recently happened a Release Party in Sao
Paulo.


A lot people joined us and this event was very important for brazilian
community. There's so much blog content about this day, I don't know if
I can submit the same content but I appreciate if anyone can repurpose
this content for Fedora Magazine

http://danielammorais.com/2016/07/04/fedora-24-release-party-in-sao-pau
lo/

http://athosribeiro.com/post/fedora24-rp-sp/


https://rimolive.github.io/aprendendo-cloud-computing/2016/07/fedora-24
-release-party

Thanks,



Hi Daniela, just seeing this email now. Were you planning on finishing 
the draft you had already started, or were you leaving it open for 
someone else to write? Let me know what you were planning on - thanks! :)


--
Cheers,
Justin W. Flory
jflo...@gmail.com



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Fedora Marketing mailing list
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Marketing] [Magazine] Editorial board meeting recap 2016-Jul-07

[Paul W. Frields]

Minutes: 
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-07-07/magazine.2016-07-07-21.00.html
Minutes (text): 
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-07-07/magazine.2016-07-07-21.00.txt
Log: 
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-07-07/magazine.2016-07-07-21.00.log.html

* * *
=
#fedora-meeting: Magazine editorial board
=


Meeting started by stickster at 21:00:00 UTC. The full logs are
available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-07-07/magazine.2016-07-07-21.00.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---
* Roll call  (stickster, 21:00:03)

* Recap of last week  (stickster, 21:04:22)
  * jetpack shows a pretty decent week, over 55K views with trailoff
from the release  (stickster, 21:05:11)
  * Month of June was *almost* to our record high, but didn't quite make
it... 259K+ vs 273K+ views  (stickster, 21:06:03)

* Pending review posts  (stickster, 21:06:29)
  * LINK:
https://fedoramagazine.org/wp-admin/edit.php?post_status=pending
(stickster, 21:07:25)
  * --- Vagrant/DO ---  (stickster, 21:09:05)
  * LINK: https://fedoramagazine.org/?p=13353&preview=true   (stickster,
21:09:09)
  * ACTION: jflory7 edit this Vagrant/DO article and push for Fri
2016-Jul-08  (stickster, 21:12:38)

* Drafts  (stickster, 21:13:26)
  * --- .deb to .rpm ---  (stickster, 21:13:40)
  * LINK: https://fedoramagazine.org/?p=13572&preview=true   (stickster,
21:14:10)
  * ACTION: stickster Contact author and ask for some explanation at
top, otherwise could probably just write it  (stickster, 21:17:11)
  * --- Using ssh to remote unlock Luks-LVM at boot ---  (stickster,
21:18:46)
  * LINK: https://fedoramagazine.org/?p=13584&preview=1&_ppp=18d34f9372
(stickster, 21:19:02)
  * ACTION: stickster include this article in gmh outreach to see if we
can re-focus it, and explicitly point out it's not recommended by
Fedora  (stickster, 21:30:36)
  * --- F24 release Sao Paulo ---  (stickster, 21:31:24)
  * LINK: https://fedoramagazine.org/?p=13666&preview=true   (stickster,
21:31:27)
  * ACTION: jflory7 move F24 Sao Paulo release party article to commblog
and inform author  (stickster, 21:32:45)
  * --- Seafile server on Security Lab ---  (stickster, 21:33:08)
  * LINK: https://fedoramagazine.org/?p=13603&preview=true   (stickster,
21:33:09)
  * LINK: https://fedoramagazine.org/?p=13603&preview=true   (stickster,
21:43:17)
  * ACTION: linuxmodder  to look over
https://fedoramagazine.org/?p=13603&preview=1&_ppp=4c1f622009 for
technical accuracy and report back to the team  (linuxmodder,
21:43:53)
  * --- OpenShift Origin on Fedora ---  (stickster, 21:44:42)
  * --- Developer mode for Atomic Host ---  (stickster, 21:44:52)
  * ACTION: stickster bug ryanlerch about these two articles, no reason
they can't be done post-release, just need content  (stickster,
21:45:18)

* All other business (AOB, open floor)  (stickster, 21:53:47)
  * --- Some future work endeavors ---  (stickster, 21:54:01)
  * LINK: https://www.google.com/trends/   (jflory7, 21:57:41)
  * AGREED: team to figure out search mechanism/tool and research some
good articles for lining up as pitches  (stickster, 22:00:38)

Meeting ended at 22:03:06 UTC.




Action Items

* jflory7 edit this Vagrant/DO article and push for Fri 2016-Jul-08
* stickster Contact author and ask for some explanation at top,
  otherwise could probably just write it
* stickster include this article in gmh outreach to see if we can
  re-focus it, and explicitly point out it's not recommended by Fedora
* jflory7 move F24 Sao Paulo release party article to commblog and
  inform author
* linuxmodder  to look over
  https://fedoramagazine.org/?p=13603&preview=1&_ppp=4c1f622009 for
  technical accuracy and report back to the team
* stickster bug ryanlerch about these two articles, no reason they can't
  be done post-release, just need content




Action Items, by person
---
* jflory7
  * jflory7 edit this Vagrant/DO article and push for Fri 2016-Jul-08
  * jflory7 move F24 Sao Paulo release party article to commblog and
inform author
* linuxmodder
  * linuxmodder  to look over
https://fedoramagazine.org/?p=13603&preview=1&_ppp=4c1f622009 for
technical accuracy and report back to the team
* stickster
  * stickster Contact author and ask for some explanation at top,
otherwise could probably just write it
  * stickster include this article in gmh outreach to see if we can
re-focus it, and explicitly point out it's not recommended by Fedora
  * stickster bug ryanlerch about these two articles, no reason they
can't be done post-release, just need content
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * (none)




People Present (lines said)
---
* stickster (113)
* jflory7 (62)
* puiterwijk (14)
* zodbot (13)
* linuxmodder (12)




Generated by `Meet

[Marketing] Re: Marketing-trac: #226: Screenshots for Fedora 24

[Marketing Team]

#226: Screenshots for Fedora 24
---+---
  Reporter:  jflory7   |  Owner:
  Type:  task  | Status:  closed
  Priority:  major |  Milestone:  Fedora 24
 Component:  Release deliverables  |   Severity:  urgent
Resolution:  completed |   Keywords:  meeting
Blocked By:|   Blocking:
---+---
Changes (by bproffit):

 * status:  new => closed
 * resolution:   => completed


-- 
Ticket URL: 
Marketing Team 
The Trac site for the Fedora Project Marketing team. This Trac serves as a 
place to list out tasks, define objectives, and work on monitoring our progress 
with key tasks and goals.
--
Fedora Marketing mailing list
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Marketing] Re: Marketing-trac: #226: Screenshots for Fedora 24

[Marketing Team]

#226: Screenshots for Fedora 24
---+---
  Reporter:  jflory7   |  Owner:
  Type:  task  | Status:  new
  Priority:  major |  Milestone:  Fedora 24
 Component:  Release deliverables  |   Severity:  urgent
Resolution:|   Keywords:  meeting
Blocked By:|   Blocking:
---+---

Comment (by bproffit):

 Added KDE and XFCE screenshots. Ticket closed.

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Marketing Team 
The Trac site for the Fedora Project Marketing team. This Trac serves as a 
place to list out tasks, define objectives, and work on monitoring our progress 
with key tasks and goals.
--
Fedora Marketing mailing list
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Marketing] Re: Marketing-trac: #229: Shared, secure password distribution

[Marketing Team]

#229: Shared, secure password distribution
--+
  Reporter:  jflory7  |  Owner:  jflory7
  Type:  enhancement  | Status:  assigned
  Priority:  normal   |  Milestone:  Fedora 24
 Component:  Internal operations  |   Severity:  not urgent
Resolution:   |   Keywords:  meeting
Blocked By:   |   Blocking:
--+

Comment (by jflory7):

 '''Discussed in [https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-
 meeting-1/2016-07-06/marketing.2016-07-06-21.00.html 2016-07-07
 meeting].'''

 Firstly, I should have updated this ticket immediately after the meeting
 last night, which was my mistake. Here's a quick summary of where we're at
 with this.

 = Why =

 To add context as to why we're doing this, I think it's important to look
 at how it's being done already. There seems to be some degree of password
 sharing already going on with the handful of people who have access to the
 accounts. I assume the passwords either are or were distributed in a
 secure manner between the two parties.

 Having a standardized method of storing these passwords and distributing
 them to trusted members ensures that the best practices are being followed
 with how these passwords are managed. By having a clearly communicated
 process behind this, it helps prevent less vectors from being exposed from
 however passwords are distributed now.

 Brian put forth three principle needs for defining a policy when it comes
 to password management and distribution:

 1. Transparency
 2. Continuity
 3. Capability of acting swiftly in the event of a breach

 The purpose for distributing passwords is so that we can log into the
 accounts to generate new content (that may not always be from a Fedora
 source, like the CommBlog and Magazine), engage with our audience, and
 help build a positive brand.

 It's worth noting that same platforms have ways to do this already
 (Facebook allows you to add accounts to a page, Google+ lets you add page
 managers). I don't know of a way to do this with Twitter, YouTube,
 diaspora, or some others. Ideally, storing as little data as possible in a
 hypothetical database / repository would be preferred.

 = Rattic =

 Looking at the current state of Rattic and the feedback from woohuiren and
 puiterwijk, we agreed this is probably not the best solution for us.

 = HootSuite / Socioboard =

 We recognize the benefits of not storing this data or coming up with
 alternative means to do so. Having a platform that we could assign a user
 account to, versus granting a password, would be simpler to manage and
 make it easy to revoke credentials from a user.

 '''HootSuite''': HootSuite is the most powerful and "best" tool for the
 job, but it is neither free as in freedom or as in beer. After a certain
 number of users added to an account, the pricing rises sharply to
 "enterprise" tier. However, it does meet all of the capabilities we'd need
 from software like it. I think using this comes more of a question about
 our project principles than anything.

 '''Socioboard''': I've spent a far bit of time looking at Socioboard today
 because it looked exciting and a potential solution to the problem, but
 there was a catch. There's a paid, "enterprise" version (socioboard.com)
 and a free, open source core platform (socioboard.org). Going through the
 FOSS version, it appears to just be the source for the client and server,
 with not a whole lot of instructions on how to use it. As far as I could
 tell, we would also have to set up an instance ourselves, as compared to
 using a hosted instance from the Socioboard team.

 With the FOSS version, I could not find such an option available. I left
 three issues [https://github.com/socioboard/socioboard-core/issues/36
 [1]][https://github.com/socioboard/socioboard-core/issues/37
 [2]][https://github.com/socioboard/socioboard-core/issues/38 [3]] open on
 their repository, but I don't know if this project is stable enough for
 our needs, unfortunately. :(

 = Using pass =

 pass seems like the best solution available given the context of the
 above. In our meeting, we had a few ideas how the technical side ''could''
 work, but some of the policy questions are still a little bit open.

 One idea we thought of to maintain a clear count of who has privileges and
 access is a git repository locked to members of a particular FAS group.
 The FAS group would essentially maintain a roster of who has access, and
 if I understand how some other repositories work, it could be view/write
 limited to only members of the FAS group.

 We also were unsure if using different keys for different directories was
 possible as linuxmodder mentioned, but he also said it was very difficult
 to use, so it might be easier to just use one pass repository.

-- 
Ticket URL: 

[Marketing] Re: Marketing-trac: #229: Shared, secure password distribution

[Marketing Team]

#229: Shared, secure password distribution
--+
  Reporter:  jflory7  |  Owner:  jflory7
  Type:  enhancement  | Status:  assigned
  Priority:  normal   |  Milestone:  Fedora 24
 Component:  Internal operations  |   Severity:  not urgent
Resolution:   |   Keywords:  meeting
Blocked By:   |   Blocking:
--+

Comment (by puiterwijk):

 Just inputting "Open source social media management" showed me
 http://socioboard.org/

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Marketing Team 
The Trac site for the Fedora Project Marketing team. This Trac serves as a 
place to list out tasks, define objectives, and work on monitoring our progress 
with key tasks and goals.
--
Fedora Marketing mailing list
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Marketing] Choose a new Marketing meeting time (poll)

[Justin W. Flory]

Hey all,

As was mentioned earlier on, we're going to try to select a better 
meeting time for more people to participate. Ideally, I was thinking it 
would be good if we could try to pick the new meeting time for two weeks 
from now, and then carry it into fall, winter, and beyond.


http://whenisgood.net/fedora/marketing/2016/fallmeeting

Please take a minute to paint the times you are available in normally in 
a week on this poll. Don't forget to select your time zone at the top 
before selecting times as well.


Thanks all!

--
Cheers,
Justin W. Flory
jflo...@gmail.com



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Fedora Marketing mailing list
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Marketing] [Social Media] Heroes of Fedora 23

[Justin W. Flory]

Hey all,

This post was published on the Community Blog this morning. Would be 
nice to post to the social media accounts too. :)


https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/heroes-of-fedora-hof-f23-final/


Facebook / Long-Form


Every release of Fedora, our community of contributors help test new 
versions software and run test cases. Learn more about the heroes of 
Fedora 23! 
https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/heroes-of-fedora-hof-f23-final/



Twitter / Short-Form


Every @Fedora release wouldn't be possible without the help of the 
testing heroes! 
https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/heroes-of-fedora-hof-f23-final/ 
#OpenSource #QualityAssured


--
Cheers,
Justin W. Flory
jflo...@gmail.com



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Fedora Marketing mailing list
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Marketing] Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Marketing IRC Meeting

[Justin W. Flory]

On 07/05/2016 01:13 PM, Gabriele Trombini wrote:

The timing is too late for me, and I'm really afraid about that.
I do want join the meeting but I can't.
Reading logs is not the same as been present.

Gabri



It's for these reasons that I think changing the meeting time would be a 
good decision. I'll be getting out the WhenIsGood poll shortly.


--
Cheers,
Justin W. Flory
jflo...@gmail.com



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Fedora Marketing mailing list
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Marketing] Re: Hosting Fedora Test Day [Review]

[Sumantro Mukherjee]

- Original Message -
> From: "Justin W. Flory" 
> To: "Fedora Marketing team" 
> Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 11:30:01 PM
> Subject: [Marketing] Re: Hosting Fedora Test Day [Review]
> 
> On 06/17/2016 04:41 AM, pravin@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 15 June 2016 at 14:08, Sumantro Mukherjee  > > wrote:
> >
> > Hey All,
> >
> > As we are coming closer to release , many of us will like to test
> > Fedora 25 and run test days . I have created a walk through of the
> > whole process which will be helpful to host one
> > https://fedoramagazine.org/hosting-fedora-testday/ ‎
> > Could someone review it?
> >
> >
> > I think communityblog [1] is right place for this article. Testing is
> > always welcome, though should go live around Alpha release of Fedora
> > development life cycle.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Pravin Satpute
> >
> > 1. http://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/
> 
> Sorry Sumantro, I totally forgot to follow up on this last night! I
> meant to reply back that we did have a chance to review your article,
> and we also came to the same conclusion that it would be best for the
> Fedora Community Blog. This article has a strong interest towards
> empowering contributors to put together their own Test Day, and the
> audience on the Community Blog would be a great fit for this content.
> 
> I ported your article over there last night, and it's currently there at
> the moment. I'm going to try to take a chance to edit and review it for
> publishing sometime next week.

Hey Justin

I have addressed your comments for the "Host your own Testday" article and I 
would like to know the status on the Fedora QA series too.

Thanks Justin for Following up with me!

Thanks
Sumantro 
> 
> Sorry for the super late update!
> 
> --
> Cheers,
> Justin W. Flory
> jflo...@gmail.com
> 
> 
> --
> Fedora Marketing mailing list
> marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
Fedora Marketing mailing list
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org