Workflow Activity Centric Approach in GNOME 3.0

2008-11-26 Thread Seamus Malan
Hi, I came across this LWN article i.e. http://lwn.net/Articles/304982/ 
outlining the philosophy and plans for GNOME 3.0. A most interesting read 
indeed. While it seems like a clear majority of those who commented were in 
favor of a journaled (e.g. Nemo) and activity paradigm (e.g. Mayanna), there 
are a few who do not have the same zeal or stomach for it. Had me thinking. Why 
can't we instead have more flexibility and have ourselves an approach that 
combines the journal along with tagging and while we are at it also a revision 
control system e.g. Subversion? 

Rgds,
Shaun

-- 
___
Surf the Web in a faster, safer and easier way:
Download Opera 9 at http://www.opera.com

Powered by Outblaze
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list


Re: Cultural Issue with the Foot Logo

2008-11-03 Thread Seamus Malan
Hi,

I may not be a Thai but my understanding is the foot is offensive not just to 
Thais but rest of the Tai-Kedai people also. The Thais are just but one group 
within the Tai-Kedai ethnicity although without doubt they are numerically 
speaking the largest. Other Tai-Kedai people include the Zhuang, Li, Laotians 
(for a complete listing, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tai_peoples). The 
whole sum i.e. potential target market comes up to be about ~105-110 million of 
them depending on which estimates you want to believe.

This may sound ludcicrous but I do know of some Thai friends who are from 
Bangkok as well as Isaan (i.e. north-eastern Thais who are ethnic Lao) and all 
said they would prefer not to use any operating system or DEs with a foot as 
its logo.


Rgds,
Shaun - Singaporean Chinese

 - Original Message -
 From: Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Cultural Issue with the Foot Logo
 Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:42:45 +0700
 
 
 On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I come from Malaysia. I do understand about the cultural issue regarding
  foot in people  especially in the South East Asia area.
 
  Currently, from my observation, there is no setback from people in Malaysia
  with the usage of foot as GNOME logo. Most of the people that are interested
  to use GNOME did not really care about the foot logo, but some do ask
  question why foot was chosen as the logo.
 
 Thanks for the information. Actually, I think people who are willing to
 accept GNOME can accept its logo. But the problem I've been facing
 is about introducing it to people who are totally new. And I'd say,
 almost *everyone* I introduce GNOME to asks me the question, with
 different levels of reactions. And repeatedly answering the question
 over time becomes too much for me. I think I'm more happy to answer
 technical or philosophical questions instead.
 
  As for alternative of the foot logo, maybe GNOME team can come up with a
  simple G logo, that can be used for community that thinks foot is not nice
  to associated with.
 
  The same logo can then be used in the user interface, documentation, or
  other material when you are trying to introduce GNOME to them.
 
 Thanks for supporting the alternative logo, and for the suggestion.
 
 Regards,
 --
 Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
 http://linux.thai.net/~thep/
 --
 marketing-list mailing list
 marketing-list@gnome.org
 http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list




-- 
___
Surf the Web in a faster, safer and easier way:
Download Opera 9 at http://www.opera.com

Powered by Outblaze
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list