Re: [Marxism] Atheism & Humanism as Bourgeois Ideology

2012-11-18 Thread Gulf Mann
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


Bones--This is an audio only, which I'm not gonna listen to. However, if
you click on the link, you'll find there is listed a second audio about a
Hungarian novelist.~H/

On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Jim Farmelant  wrote:

> ==
> Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
> ==
>
>
>  Ralph Dumaon on the atheist/humanist/skeptics movements in the US:
> http://www.thinktwiceradio.com/dumain/dumain.html  Ralph summarizes the
> contents of his podcast as follows: "I propose a framework in which the
> intellectual basis of the atheist - humanist - skeptical movement,
> particularly in the USA, can be seen as a progressive bourgeois ideology
> that, while marking an historical advance beyond pre-modern,
> pre-industrial, pre-technological, pre-capitalist, supernaturally based
> forms of unreason, addresses only one half of the cognitive sources of
> irrationality of the modern world, and is ill-equipped to grapple with the
> secular forms of unreason, which can be denoted by the term "ideology". I
> argue that the Anglo-American intellectual heritage of atheism has never
> absorbed the indispensable heritage of German philosophy and social theory
> from Hegel to Marx to 20th century critical theory and thus remains
> philosophically underdeveloped and ensconced in a naive scientism. I
> furthermore argue that American atheism/humanism lacks adequate historical
> perspective due to the historical amnesia induced by the two historical
> breaks of McCarthyism and Reaganism. To combat historical amnesia I
> highlight not only relevant intellectual history but the buried history of
> working class atheism. I also sketch out some relevant philosophical
> aspects of the history of the American humanist movement beginning with the
> first Humanist Manifesto of 1933. I then discuss the intellectual
> consequences of the political repression of the McCarthy era. From there I
> discuss two prominent influences of the 1960s and 1970s, atheist Madalyn
> Murray O'Hair and humanist Paul Kurtz. I highlight Kurtz's dialogue with
> the Yugoslav Marxist-Humanist philosophers and his failure to learn from
> the encounter. Finally, I discuss the intellectual shortcomings of the
> so-called "new atheism" and today's celebrity atheists in the context of
> the depressing political perspective of our reactionary neoliberal era. I
> also don't spare the dissidents within the movement from my accusations of
> intellectual superficiality. I end on a note of bleak pessimism. "
> Jim Farmelant http://independent.academia.edu/JimFarmelant
> http://www.foxymath.com Learn or Review Basic Math
>
> 
> Fast, Secure, NetZero 4G Mobile Broadband. Try it.
> http://www.netzero.net/?refcd=NZINTISP0512T4GOUT2
> 
> Send list submissions to: Marxism@greenhouse.economics.utah.edu
> Set your options at:
> http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/gulfmann%40gmail.com
>

Send list submissions to: Marxism@greenhouse.economics.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


[Marxism] Atheism & Humanism as Bourgeois Ideology

2012-11-18 Thread Jim Farmelant
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


 Ralph Dumaon on the atheist/humanist/skeptics movements in the US: 
http://www.thinktwiceradio.com/dumain/dumain.html  Ralph summarizes the 
contents of his podcast as follows: "I propose a framework in which the 
intellectual basis of the atheist - humanist - skeptical movement, particularly 
in the USA, can be seen as a progressive bourgeois ideology that, while marking 
an historical advance beyond pre-modern, pre-industrial, pre-technological, 
pre-capitalist, supernaturally based forms of unreason, addresses only one half 
of the cognitive sources of irrationality of the modern world, and is 
ill-equipped to grapple with the secular forms of unreason, which can be 
denoted by the term "ideology". I argue that the Anglo-American intellectual 
heritage of atheism has never absorbed the indispensable heritage of German 
philosophy and social theory from Hegel to Marx to 20th century critical theory 
and thus remains philosophically underdeveloped and ensconced in a naive 
scientism. I furthermore argue that American atheism/humanism lacks adequate 
historical perspective due to the historical amnesia induced by the two 
historical breaks of McCarthyism and Reaganism. To combat historical amnesia I 
highlight not only relevant intellectual history but the buried history of 
working class atheism. I also sketch out some relevant philosophical aspects of 
the history of the American humanist movement beginning with the first Humanist 
Manifesto of 1933. I then discuss the intellectual consequences of the 
political repression of the McCarthy era. From there I discuss two prominent 
influences of the 1960s and 1970s, atheist Madalyn Murray O'Hair and humanist 
Paul Kurtz. I highlight Kurtz's dialogue with the Yugoslav Marxist-Humanist 
philosophers and his failure to learn from the encounter. Finally, I discuss 
the intellectual shortcomings of the so-called "new atheism" and today's 
celebrity atheists in the context of the depressing political perspective of 
our reactionary neoliberal era. I also don't spare the dissidents within the 
movement from my accusations of intellectual superficiality. I end on a note of 
bleak pessimism. " 
Jim Farmelant http://independent.academia.edu/JimFarmelant 
http://www.foxymath.com Learn or Review Basic Math


Fast, Secure, NetZero 4G Mobile Broadband. Try it.
http://www.netzero.net/?refcd=NZINTISP0512T4GOUT2

Send list submissions to: Marxism@greenhouse.economics.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com