[Marxism] History of CPUSA

2011-05-16 Thread Red Arnie
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


I know William Z Foster, History of the CP of the US (1952). 

Anyone know: 

Fraser M Ottanelli, The CP of the US: From the Depression to WWII (1991)?

Harvey Klehr, The Heyday of American Communism: The Depression Decade (1984)?

Roger Keeran, The CP and the Auto Workers Unions (1980)?

Red Arnie




Send list submissions to: Marxism@greenhouse.economics.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] History of CPUSA

2011-05-14 Thread Louis Proyect

==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


On 5/14/11 9:49 AM, Mark Lause wrote:


A turn to industry means many things in the concept but have an impactr
very different when implimented.  In the case of the SWP, we can think of a
number of plausible ideas promulgated in a boneheaded way that had
boneheaded results.




The irony is that vast numbers of SWP'ers had public type jobs covered 
by AFSCME, the AFT and other such unions. They were pressured into 
going into industry or resigning. One was Ray Markey, president of the 
librarian's union in NY who is now on the Central Labor Council. Isn't 
it obvious that the public sector is in the same key position as auto or 
steel were in the late 30s? Frankly, the basic mistake was to project 
the 1930s on 1980s reality.



Send list submissions to: Marxism@greenhouse.economics.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] History of CPUSA

2011-05-14 Thread Dayne Goodwin
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Mark Lause markala...@gmail.com wrote:

 . . .
 My only point was that, in the context of an organization that had an
 exclusive political orientation to the campus, the idea of a turn to
 industry could have meant anything...including the idea of just
 encouraging
 members to graduate and get into the work force, including white collar
 jobs.

 It didn't necessarily mean a draconian forced march from the campus to the
 factory...or the retrograde abandonment of some industries for others...
  To
 say nothing of making membership (for all but the top of the group)
 contingent on proving ones loyalty like it was a motorcycle gang...or a
 strange kind of fraternity/sorority.  In the hands of the SWP leadership, a
 turn to industry quickly became a matter of exercising control over the
 organization and its members.

 My only point was that they did this with just about everything.



including the turn a decade before that everyone must get on a campus,
including members then (circa 1970) rooted in industrial unions

Send list submissions to: Marxism@greenhouse.economics.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] History of CPUSA

2011-05-14 Thread Dayne Goodwin
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


Rank-And-File Rebellion: Teamsters for a Democratic Union by Dan LaBotzalso
see:  http://www.tdu.org/view/history


On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 9:39 PM, aaron s. amaral amaral1...@gmail.comwrote:

To add a query to the original questionI'm curious as to whether any
 comprehensive (or attempts at generalised) histories exist addressing these
 attempts at 'colonization' among the revolutionary left as a whole, from
 the
 late 60s thru the 80s. I've read various accounts  - from individuals from
 different political tendencies - of attempts to build locally within, for
 example, the auto industry, mining, and within the teamsters. Of course,
 some of these are more focused on the issue of building rank and file
 groups
 within the Unions and others provide accounts related to the various party
 building efforts. But if I could be directed to any broad survey histories,
 or even histories focused on particular industries/ unions - but with a
 national focus, during this period, It'd be appreciated



Send list submissions to: Marxism@greenhouse.economics.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] History of CPUSA

2011-05-14 Thread Peggy Dobbins
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


Why hasn't Red or anyone on this list googled CPUSA and asked?  Pretty
insulting, and revealing as to degree of non-sectarianism here.
 


 On May 13, 2011, at 12:04 PM, Red Arnie wrote:



 Comrades,

 Can anyone point me to info on any program of CPUSA to send members into
 factories during the '20s or '30s and approx numbers?

 Red Arnie


-- 
  *Equitable exchange of different forms of labor time, the **productivity
of which develops over time
unevenly*http://www.peggydobbins.net/dwellingintents/epilogue.html
* inevitably and so creates in time Surplus Labor Time, due to one yet due
the other.  This is the **Common
wealth*http://www.peggydobbins.net/dwellingintents/5originsurpluslaborti.html
*; we still see money changers steal, til here and there we read a bill to
guarantee us all a **Right to
Work*http://www.peggydobbins.net/dwellingintents/8whatistobedone.html
* 20 hours a week (1000/year) that earns our **Right to
Life*http://www.peggydobbins.net/dwellingintents.html
*, a livable wage pegged to the price of necessities*.

Send list submissions to: Marxism@greenhouse.economics.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] History of CPUSA

2011-05-14 Thread DW
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


I should provided this answer as well: if you want to read what the CP
did do, you have to get a hold of their convention reports. Some were
published in Political Affairs, some in the People's Weekly World and
so on. They report about building their influence in particular
sectors of the work force. But it's in all their convention reports.

David


Send list submissions to: Marxism@greenhouse.economics.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


[Marxism] History of CPUSA

2011-05-13 Thread Red Arnie
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


Comrades,

Can anyone point me to info on any program of CPUSA to send members into 
factories during the '20s or '30s and approx numbers?

Red Arnie

Send list submissions to: Marxism@greenhouse.economics.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] History of CPUSA

2011-05-13 Thread Michael Smith
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


On Fri, 13 May 2011 16:06:22 -0400
Louis Proyect l...@panix.com wrote:

  Vivian Gornick's 
 Romance of American Communism has a terrific chapter on a couple 
 of middle class CP'ers who went into auto. Their experiences were 
 similar to the millions of SWP'ers who went through a similar 
 absurd experience.

Millions? Really? That must have been some organization. 

-- 
--

Michael J. Smith
m...@smithbowen.net

http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org
http://www.cars-suck.org
http://fakesprogress.blogspot.com


Send list submissions to: Marxism@greenhouse.economics.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] History of CPUSA

2011-05-13 Thread Mark Lause
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


Tetragazillions, actually.

But that counts the YSA, too.

ML

Send list submissions to: Marxism@greenhouse.economics.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] History of CPUSA

2011-05-13 Thread Louis Proyect

==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


On 5/13/11 4:48 PM, Michael Smith wrote:


Millions? Really? That must have been some organization.



And here I thought you were the mordant wit.



Send list submissions to: Marxism@greenhouse.economics.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] History of CPUSA

2011-05-13 Thread Rod Holt

==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


It was really quite an organization. Its peak dues paying membership  
was over 100,000 and many historians have said that over a million  
were at one time or another in the USCP during the 1930s.

--rod
On May 13, 2011, at 1:48 PM, Michael Smith wrote:


==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


On Fri, 13 May 2011 16:06:22 -0400
Louis Proyect l...@panix.com wrote:


 Vivian Gornick's
Romance of American Communism has a terrific chapter on a couple
of middle class CP'ers who went into auto. Their experiences were
similar to the millions of SWP'ers who went through a similar
absurd experience.


Millions? Really? That must have been some organization.

--
--

Michael J. Smith
m...@smithbowen.net

http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org
http://www.cars-suck.org
http://fakesprogress.blogspot.com


Send list submissions to: Marxism@greenhouse.economics.utah.edu
Set your options at: http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/ 
options/marxism/rholt%40planeteria.net




Send list submissions to: Marxism@greenhouse.economics.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] History of CPUSA

2011-05-13 Thread Jim Farmelant
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


 
On Fri, 13 May 2011 16:48:31 -0400 Michael Smith m...@smithbowen.net
writes:
 ==
 Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a 
 message.
 ==
 
 
 On Fri, 13 May 2011 16:06:22 -0400
 Louis Proyect l...@panix.com wrote:
 
   Vivian Gornick's 
  Romance of American Communism has a terrific chapter on a couple 
 
  of middle class CP'ers who went into auto. Their experiences were 
 
  similar to the millions of SWP'ers who went through a similar 
  absurd experience.
 
 Millions? Really? That must have been some organization. 

You would think that an organization of that size would have
succeeded in making a revolution.

Jim Farmelant
http://independent.academia.edu/JimFarmelant
www.foxymath.com
Learn or Review Basic Math

 
 -- 
 --
 
 Michael J. Smith
 m...@smithbowen.net
 
 http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org
 http://www.cars-suck.org
 http://fakesprogress.blogspot.com
 
 
 

Groupon.com Official Site
1 huge daily deal on the best stuff to do in your city. Try it today!
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4dcdcc3164f563f96ebst04vuc


Send list submissions to: Marxism@greenhouse.economics.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] History of CPUSA

2011-05-13 Thread DW
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


OK, first, yes, come by and see me when you are in the Bay Area, the
Holt Labor Library is open Mon-Fri, 9am to 4pm. We have *tons* of
stuff including The Militant and the People's World going to back to
when Hoover was President. Among other things.

The question was a legitimate one asked by Red Arnie. The question on
the CP during it's formative years and, comparisons with, say, the SWP
later, are, however silly and a-historical. There is no comparison.

The CP did build fractions in targeted industries. They didn't do it
by sending in people, however. They did it by *recruiting workers* in
industry. They recruited whole fractions that way. In some cases, such
as in Maritime, the Profintern took an early position that communists
should dominate the maritime trades internationally. This is detailed
somewhat in Jan Valient's Out of the Night (1940). There are other
references to this in various other accounts of the period. I also
personally knew one of the Comintern's US organizers in Maritime who
noted that the Maritime fractions in the US were specialized and not
like other fractions. So they did send people in this way as well. But
even here it was the organizing ability of the CPers and their
anti-racism that helped recruit, most notably in the NMU.

But by and large they used regional organizers to go to factories or
use union organizers to do dual recruitment, not unlike the way the
Socialists did it prior to and during WWI. Workers basically just
joined.

I might add this applies to the Trotskyists as well. With the success,
for example, of the organizing drive among truckers in Minneapolis in
1934, the Trotskyists parlayed that into the first area wide contract
in IBT history, the Central Conference of Teamsters. Where the
Teamsters organized locals, a branch of the Communist League and later
the SWP was sure to follow, so that the SWP had IBT branches in places
like Fargo, ND, Lawrence and Witchita, KS, and so on.

So actual 'colonization' wasn't what the CP was about (or other left
groups). That was a 60's thing and became the dominent way of
organizing in factories by the far left (including the CP) into the
1970s and early 1980s. Some groups, most notably in the
anti-Revisionist strain, often did quite well in this regard and
recruited out of it.

David


Send list submissions to: Marxism@greenhouse.economics.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] History of CPUSA

2011-05-13 Thread aaron s. amaral
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 10:35 PM, DW dwalters...@gmail.com wrote:



 ... So actual 'colonization' wasn't what the CP was about (or other left
 groups). That was a 60's thing and became the dominent way of
 organizing in factories by the far left (including the CP) into the
 1970s and early 1980s. Some groups, most notably in the
 anti-Revisionist strain, often did quite well in this regard and
 recruited out of it.

 David


To add a query to the original questionI'm curious as to whether any
comprehensive (or attempts at generalised) histories exist addressing these
attempts at 'colonization' among the revolutionary left as a whole, from the
late 60s thru the 80s. I've read various accounts  - from individuals from
different political tendencies - of attempts to build locally within, for
example, the auto industry, mining, and within the teamsters. Of course,
some of these are more focused on the issue of building rank and file groups
within the Unions and others provide accounts related to the various party
building efforts. But if I could be directed to any broad survey histories,
or even histories focused on particular industries/ unions - but with a
national focus, during this period, It'd be appreciated

-aaron

NYCSOCIALIST.ORG

Send list submissions to: Marxism@greenhouse.economics.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com