Re: [Marxism] ‘Folk City: New York and the American Folk Music Revival’

2015-08-09 Thread Greg McDonald via Marxism
  POSTING RULES  NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly  permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

Al Kooper describes the scene at Newport:

http://www.britannica.com/biography/Bob-Dylan-American-musician/images-videos/Al-Kooper-describing-Bob-Dylans-performance-at-the-1965-Newport/19603
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


[Marxism] ‘Folk City: New York and the American Folk Music Revival’

2015-08-09 Thread Louis Proyect via Marxism

  POSTING RULES  NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly  permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

(A surprisingly affectionate review by an ultraright ex-Communist.)

NY Times Sunday Book Review, August 9 2015
‘Folk City: New York and the American Folk Music Revival’
By RONALD RADOSH

FOLK CITY
New York and the American Folk Music Revival
By Stephen Petrus and Ronald D. Cohen
Illustrated. 320 pp. Oxford University Press. $39.95.

How New York City and specifically Greenwich Village came to be at the 
epicenter of an American folk music revival between 1950 and 1965 is the 
subject of Stephen Petrus and Ronald D. Cohen’s “Folk City.” This 
handsome book, which includes rarely seen photographs, reminiscences of 
participants and a lively narrative, adds depth to an exhibition of the 
same name on view at the Museum of the City of New York until January.


The authors do a fine job of presenting the various facets of the folk 
revival, including its impact on the city and its role in changing the 
larger culture. However, they might have spent more time explaining why 
traditional folk music, which concentrated on lost love and life’s woes, 
had anything to do with the politics they emphasize throughout. There 
is, after all, quite a distance between “Pretty Polly” and “Which Side 
Are You On?”


Petrus, a fellow at the Museum of the City of New York, and Cohen, an 
emeritus professor of history at Indiana University Northwest, range 
from the arrival of Woody Guthrie in New York in 1940 through Bob 
Dylan’s arrival some 20 years later in search of Guthrie. In between, we 
are introduced to the musicians and entrepreneurs who created the 
revival, which drew not only upon traditional music, but also on the 
songs of European peasants and African slaves.


A theme that runs throughout the book is the importance of the left in 
redefining “the genre of folk music from a quaint musical form 
associated with rural life” to a “weapon” to be used in the 
­Communist-led Popular Front of the ’30s (and later by the civil rights 
and anti-­Vietnam War movements). The left’s dedication to folk music 
paved the way for a younger generation that took to the music in the 
1950s and ’60s.


These singers and musicians flocked to Washington Square Park where, on 
Sunday afternoons, devotees congregated to play all strands of folk 
music. Recalling those days, the folk singer Happy Traum writes in his 
recollection that “the Square” was “an unorganized, free-form kind of 
social club,” with a group of regulars that included Marshall Brickman, 
Eric Weissberg and Dave Van Ronk. As the New Lost City Ramblers, John 
Cohen, Mike Seeger and Tom Paley rescued old-time music for a new 
audience. Roger Sprung was the man who introduced bluegrass to the city.


From these roots there soon developed a nationwide craze. Life magazine 
put the Kingston Trio on its cover after its recording of “Tom Dooley” 
became the country’s No. 1 song in 1958. Many folkies formed their own 
groups, like the Tarriers, the Journeymen and the Rooftop Singers. Only 
Peter, Paul and Mary enjoyed genuine success, but all carried on what 
had been started by the Weavers in the late 1940s.


Bob Dylan gets a chapter of his own. He captivated everyone, both 
because of his songwriting abilities and because he constantly 
reinvented himself. Besides changing his name from Robert Zimmerman to 
Bob Dylan, he claimed to be variously “an Okie, an orphan from New 
Mexico, an Italian orphan or a descendant of the Sioux Nation” who 
learned cowboy music from “real cowboys” in Cheyenne. All apparently 
were attempts to gain some kind of authenticity in folk circles along 
the lines of his hero Guthrie.


Dylan was drawn into politics, releasing “The Times They Are a-Changin’  
” in 1964, but he soon rebelled against the prevailing political 
orthodoxy. In a New Yorker article he declared, “I’m not part of no 
Movement. If I was, I wouldn’t be able to do anything else but be in 
‘the Movement.’ I just can’t have people sit around and make rules for 
me.” Of course, he broke one of the biggest rules of the folkies when he 
turned electric at the 1965 Newport Folk Festival, giving Pete Seeger 
heartburn.


Dylan’s apostasy was the most significant indication that New York 
folkies were broadening their musical range with electric instruments. 
One Village-based group, the Lovin’ Spoonful, led by the Washington 
Square veteran John Sebastian, became what was probably the city’s first 
folk-rock band. They were connected to another city group, the Mamas and 
the Papas, whose leader, John Phillips, had been one of the Journeymen — 
and the success of these bands, Petrus and Cohen suggest, signaled the 
end of the bustling New York City folk scene.


Ronald