Re: [Marxism] HTML versus plain text?

2011-01-22 Thread Ambrose Andrews
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


On 23 January 2011 13:41, Joaquín Bustelo jbust...@bellsouth.net wrote:

 Other advantages are more flexibility in formatting, abandoning kludges
 like asterisking words or phrases [*blah blah blah*] for emphasis and so
 on. But those are secondary or tertiary.

These secondary and tertiary ones also contain potential problems with
accessibility.

For me being *sometimes* confined to a terminal falls under that broad
category of accessibility.

Ease off on the belittling parodies of 'super geek' purity - fact is,
people read this list under a range of circumstances, chosen or
otherwise, it is important to be able to understand this, which may
involve stepping outside one's own particular circumstances and
expectations.

Yes there are advantages, but there's another side to the story which
may tend towards excluding some people.

Personally, my health has deteriorated over the last couple of years
such that looking at a standard computer screen at length makes me
sick.  The more I am able to control the formatting as a *reader* (not
a writer) the more I am able to lessen the suffering associated with
it.  To the extent that formatting is imposed on me arbitrarily by the
author, there are barriers in the way of me making those adjustments
to my own taste, or piping the content to some other less nauseating
medium.

Just one consideration among many of course, and it isn't an absolute
question, but a matter relative convenience and inconvenience.

It does sound like Joaquín Bustelo's blog would be a worthy piece of
hypertext should such a blog come into being.

  -AA.


Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] HTML versus plain text?

2011-01-21 Thread Ambrose Andrews
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


On 21 January 2011 23:49, Les Schaffer schaf...@optonline.net wrote:
 ==
 Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
 ==


 On 1/21/11 7:39 AM, Louis Proyect wrote:

 Any thoughts on this from comrades?

Count me as generally against.  I don't see the advantage.


 i've been thinking for a while we could start allowing html  ... if
 enough people are annoyed by it, its easy to turn off again.

 another issue: at the moment, we have it set up so that if  a post
 contains BOTH plain text and html, we forward only the plain text. i can
 turn that off, but the byte count will go up by roughly double for posts
 that include both ... and we may have to adjust the max size parameter
 if people are going to post large emails with both plain text and html
 included.

 so, does byte count matter to anyone anymore??


Byte count is no big deal for me personally, but even as someone who
has never touched emacs in his life, I do still frequently find myself
confined to using a terminal, and in that context HTML-alone can be
really inconvenient.  IMO comrades having to express themselves in
text is less inconvenient and is not a bad discipline.  There are
other accessibility considerations which don't (yet) apply to me, but
I try to think of others, and my future self.

  -AA.


-- 
Ambrose Andrews
LPO box 8274 ANU Acton ACT 0200 Australia
http://www.vrvl.net/~ambrose/
mailto:ambr...@vrvl.net
voicemail:+61_261112936
work:+61_261256749
mobile:+61_415544621
irc:{undernet|freenode|oftc}:znalo
xmpp:ambr...@jabber.fsfe.org
skype:znalo7
CE38 8B79 C0A7 DF4A 4F54  E352 2647 19A1 DB3B F823
556A 6D19 0904 827C 9DB8  3697 32D0 1E11 403F 2BE1


Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] Making a Mockery of the Real Crime of Rape: Assange Beseiged

2010-11-21 Thread Ambrose Andrews
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


On 22 November 2010 12:50, Intense Red intns...@golgotha.net wrote:

   I don't think this has been posted to the list, but considering the
 Assange discussion, this oddly-written article which makes a link to
 Assange's rape victims and the CIA is worth reading:


Some good points in the article's content, but Israel Shamir is a
very dubious character.

see:
http://www.nigelparry.com/issues/shamir/originalletter.html
http://www.marxists.de/racism/antisemitism/counterpunch.htm

  -AA.

-- 
Ambrose Andrews
LPO box 8274 ANU Acton ACT 0200 Australia
http://www.vrvl.net/~ambrose/
mailto:ambr...@vrvl.net
voicemail:+61_261112936
work:+61_261256749
mobile:+61_415544621
irc:{undernet|freenode|oftc}:znalo
xmpp:ambr...@jabber.fsfe.org
skype:znalo7
CE38 8B79 C0A7 DF4A 4F54  E352 2647 19A1 DB3B F823
556A 6D19 0904 827C 9DB8  3697 32D0 1E11 403F 2BE1


Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] Making a Mockery of the Real Crime of Rape: Assange Beseiged

2010-11-21 Thread Ambrose Andrews
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


On 22 November 2010 13:51, Shane Mage shm...@pipeline.com wrote:
 Yes.  I was gasping at his totally irrelevant invocation of the arch-
 antisemitic stereotype  *Judas*.

I guess he couldn't resist.

He also couldn't resist going on a *long* rant about 'male-bashing',
'castrating feminists', or referring to The brilliant Israeli writer
Gilad Atzmon, or this little teaser: Pseudo Anti-Zionists are
currently being used to hamstring a genuine Pro-Palestinian movement.

Yuck.  every time i glance at it i see something else.

Imagine if I took the time to actually read it through!

 -AA.

-- 
Ambrose Andrews
LPO box 8274 ANU Acton ACT 0200 Australia
http://www.vrvl.net/~ambrose/
mailto:ambr...@vrvl.net
voicemail:+61_261112936
work:+61_261256749
mobile:+61_415544621
irc:{undernet|freenode|oftc}:znalo
xmpp:ambr...@jabber.fsfe.org
skype:znalo7
CE38 8B79 C0A7 DF4A 4F54  E352 2647 19A1 DB3B F823
556A 6D19 0904 827C 9DB8  3697 32D0 1E11 403F 2BE1


Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] A question to mathematicians on this list

2010-07-12 Thread Ambrose Andrews
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==



 Can anyone calculate the probabilities that Paul the octopus has
 reached his results by chance?


Are we permitted to take into account all the other octopuses (and
snails and squids and roosters and bats and carnivorous plants) in the
world who failed to get even nine correct answers?  In a large world,
the probability of existence of an unlikely animal are high.

  -AA.



-- 
Ambrose Andrews
LPO box 8274 ANU Acton ACT 0200 Australia
http://www.vrvl.net/~ambrose/
mailto:ambr...@vrvl.net
voicemail:+61_261112936
work:+61_261256749
mobile:+61_415544621
irc:{undernet|freenode|oftc}:znalo
xmpp:ambr...@jabber.fsfe.org
skype:znalo7
CE38 8B79 C0A7 DF4A 4F54  E352 2647 19A1 DB3B F823
556A 6D19 0904 827C 9DB8  3697 32D0 1E11 403F 2BE1


Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] A question to mathematicians on this list

2010-07-12 Thread Ambrose Andrews
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


On 13 July 2010 11:17, reg aka0...@hotmail.com wrote:

 Spanish flag to all others, and preferred the German flag next.,
 Symbolically p(Spain)p(Germany)p(all others).  Then the odds of being
 correct on all trials could be much greater than 0.003.

 Just sayin'.

 Rick G.

In any case 'Paul' became a worldwide celebrity having gotten seven in a row.

All those other under-reported non-lottery-winning opctopuses who
failed at seven, six, five or four are part of the sample, and are
being discarded in favour of this seven-in-a-row special case...

Who then went on the get four more...

The odds of which are (sorry) less impressive, even if an octopus is
just a variation on the theme of coin.

i.e. the odds me being struck twice my lightning are less than the
odds of someone unspecified being struck twice by lightning
(especially someone who has already been struck by lightning being
struck by lightning again, since they have done half the work already)

  -AA.


-- 
Ambrose Andrews
LPO box 8274 ANU Acton ACT 0200 Australia
http://www.vrvl.net/~ambrose/
mailto:ambr...@vrvl.net
voicemail:+61_261112936
work:+61_261256749
mobile:+61_415544621
irc:{undernet|freenode|oftc}:znalo
xmpp:ambr...@jabber.fsfe.org
skype:znalo7
CE38 8B79 C0A7 DF4A 4F54  E352 2647 19A1 DB3B F823
556A 6D19 0904 827C 9DB8  3697 32D0 1E11 403F 2BE1


Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] Is Imperialism a different mode of production?

2010-06-07 Thread Ambrose Andrews
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


On 7 June 2010 02:37, Joaquín Bustelo jbust...@bellsouth.net wrote:

 Thus Lenin's pamphlet Imperialism is NOT NOT NOT the actual content
 of Lenin's [theory of] imperialism. It was limited to economics by the
 tsarist censorship; and according to Lenin, was just a snapshot of
 pre-WWI international relations as revealed by the admissions of
 bourgeois scholars.


Yup,
A better starting point for Lenin's views on imperialism in its whole-system
political meaning would be Imperialism and the split in socialism.

  -AA.

-- 
Ambrose Andrews
LPO box 8274 ANU Acton ACT 0200 Australia
http://www.vrvl.net/~ambrose/
mailto:ambr...@vrvl.net
voicemail:+61_261112936
work:+61_261256749
mobile:+61_415544621
irc:{undernet|freenode|oftc}:znalo
xmpp:ambr...@jabber.fsfe.org
skype:znalo7
CE38 8B79 C0A7 DF4A 4F54  E352 2647 19A1 DB3B F823
556A 6D19 0904 827C 9DB8  3697 32D0 1E11 403F 2BE1


Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] Fw: The Anthropocene Debate: Marking Humanity's Impact

2010-05-19 Thread Ambrose Andrews
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


 --- On Tue, 5/18/10, modera...@portside.org modera...@portside.org wrote:
 Subject: The Anthropocene Debate: Marking Humanity's Impact

 Date: Tuesday, May 18, 2010, 7:50 PM

 By Elizabeth Kolbert

 May 17, 2010, Yale Environment 360

   http://e360.yale.edu/content/feature.msp?id=2274

 The Holocene - or wholly recent epoch - is what
 geologists
 call the 11,000 years or so since the end of the last ice
 age. As epochs go, the Holocene is barely out of diapers;
 its
 immediate predecessor, the Pleistocene, lasted more than
 two
 million years, while many earlier epochs, like the Eocene,
 went on for more than 20 million years. Still, the
 Holocene
 may be done for. People have become such a driving force
 on
 the planet that many geologists argue a new epoch -
 informally dubbed the Anthropocene - has begun.



A video lecture by one of the authors of the 2007 paper The
Anthropocene: are humans now overwhelming the great forces of Nature?
( http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18240674 ) is available here:

http://fennerschool-lectures.anu.edu.au/lectures/2009/ENVS1001/lectures_and_tutorials/panels/global_change.html

  -AA.

-- 
Ambrose Andrews
LPO box 8274 ANU Acton ACT 0200 Australia
http://www.vrvl.net/~ambrose/
mailto:ambr...@vrvl.net
voicemail:+61_261112936
work:+61_261256749
mobile:+61_415544621
irc:{undernet|freenode|oftc}:znalo
xmpp:ambr...@jabber.fsfe.org
skype:znalo7
CE38 8B79 C0A7 DF4A 4F54  E352 2647 19A1 DB3B F823
556A 6D19 0904 827C 9DB8  3697 32D0 1E11 403F 2BE1


Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] Communist debate group chooses Stalin as next topic

2010-05-18 Thread Ambrose Andrews
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


On 18 May 2010 23:55, Louis Proyect l...@panix.com wrote:

 The real measure of your radicalism is not what emblems you wear
 on your clothing (the Che Guevara t-shirt the worst offender) but
 your ability to reach people, especially working people, with
 socialist ideas. Anything that gets in the way of opening such a
 conversation must be rejected.


But the key is *opening* the conversation, and who you're likely to be
opening the conversation with. (Especially when you lack a mass
audience most of the time)

In practice the people who are open to radical ideas are
self-selecting.  What constitutes a barrier to opening discussion with
them may differ from the social norm because we're talking about a
small radicalising minority who are distinguished mostly only by their
questioning, and their seeking-after-solutions outside the realm of
official alternatives.  A mass audience of workers may not appreciate
explicit communists, but any amount of dressing up isn't going to get
you that audience right now anyway.

(thinking here of the US SWP and their insistence on dressing straight
and normal under a variety of circumstances in maybe a formalistic
application of Louis's advice.)

Experimentation is good, and learning the direct way what works and
what doesn't is good.

  -AA.


-- 
Ambrose Andrews
LPO box 8274 ANU Acton ACT 0200 Australia
http://www.vrvl.net/~ambrose/
mailto:ambr...@vrvl.net
voicemail:+61_261112936
work:+61_261256749
mobile:+61_415544621
irc:{undernet|freenode|oftc}:znalo
xmpp:ambr...@jabber.fsfe.org
skype:znalo7
CE38 8B79 C0A7 DF4A 4F54  E352 2647 19A1 DB3B F823
556A 6D19 0904 827C 9DB8  3697 32D0 1E11 403F 2BE1


Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] The Millibands

2010-04-12 Thread Ambrose Andrews
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


On 13 April 2010 04:56, Les Schaffer schaf...@optonline.net wrote:

 it would be nice to know more about the tree... who is daddy millband?


Among other things, he was co-editor of the annual 'Socilialist
Register' with Leo Panitch.

And author of many good books:

http://www.librarything.com/author/milibandralph

(and two of his offspring now populate the Brown ministry.)

  -AA.


-- 
Ambrose Andrews
LPO box 8274 ANU Acton ACT 0200 Australia
http://www.vrvl.net/~ambrose/
mailto:ambr...@vrvl.net
voicemail:+61_261112936
work:+61_261256749
mobile:+61_415544621
irc:{undernet|freenode|oftc}:znalo
xmpp:ambr...@jabber.fsfe.org
skype:znalo7
CE38 8B79 C0A7 DF4A 4F54  E352 2647 19A1 DB3B F823
556A 6D19 0904 827C 9DB8  3697 32D0 1E11 403F 2BE1


Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] I miss Peter Camejo

2010-03-19 Thread Ambrose Andrews
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


http://www.haymarketbooks.org/pb/North-Star-Challenging-the-Power

Available for ordering...

  -AA.


-- 
Ambrose Andrews
LPO box 8274 ANU Acton ACT 0200 Australia
http://www.vrvl.net/~ambrose/
mailto:ambr...@vrvl.net
voicemail:+61_261112936
work:+61_261256749
mobile:+61_415544621
irc:{undernet|freenode|oftc}:znalo
xmpp:ambr...@jabber.fsfe.org
skype:znalo7
CE38 8B79 C0A7 DF4A 4F54  E352 2647 19A1 DB3B F823
556A 6D19 0904 827C 9DB8  3697 32D0 1E11 403F 2BE1


Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] Minimal philosophy reading list?

2010-02-03 Thread Ambrose Andrews
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


On 4 February 2010 08:05, Einde O'Callaghan eind...@freenet.de wrote:

 Actually you'll find some very interesting discussions of dialectics in
 the writings of Stephen J. Gould, Lev Lewontin and Steven Rose - all
 practising biologists in different fields.

Yes Gould, Lewontin and Rose...

and Richard Levins.

Like Rose's Lifelines and Lewontin and Levins' The Dialectical
Biologist and Biology under the Influence

  -AA.


-- 
Ambrose Andrews
LPO box 8274 ANU Acton ACT 0200 Australia
http://www.vrvl.net/~ambrose/
mailto:ambr...@vrvl.net
voicemail:+61_261112936
work:+61_261256749
mobile:+61_415544621
irc:{undernet|freenode|oftc}:znalo
xmpp:ambr...@jabber.fsfe.org
skype:znalo7
CE38 8B79 C0A7 DF4A 4F54  E352 2647 19A1 DB3B F823
556A 6D19 0904 827C 9DB8  3697 32D0 1E11 403F 2BE1


Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] Post

2009-10-23 Thread Ambrose Andrews
2009/10/23 Ryan Neighbors rnei...@uark.edu:
 Hello,

 I'm new to the study of Marxist theory, so I was hoping some of you
 could help me.  I need to know (for a paper) a few Marxist theorists
 who deal extensively with the ideas of war, pacifism, and/or
 revolution.  I'm primarily interested in the idea of pacifism (and
 even more specifically pacifism in cultural texts) from a Marxist
 standpoint.  Can anyone point me in the right direction?

 Thanks,
 Ryan



Here's a fairly recent talk describing a marxist approach to war:

http://rsp.org.au/?p=231

the following on Pacifism comes from the above:


The Marxist approach to war differs radically from the pacifist
approach. In his classic pamphlet, Socialism and War, Lenin
distinguished between the Marxist and pacifist oppositions to war:

Socialists [Lenin wrote] have always condemned wars between nations as
barbarous and brutal. Our attitude towards war is fundamentally
different from that of the bourgeois pacifists … in that we understand
the inevitable connection between wars and the class struggle within a
country; we understand that wars cannot be abolished unless classes
are abolished and socialism is created; we also differ in that we
regard civil wars, i.e., wars waged by an oppressed class against the
oppressor class, by slaves against slaveholders, by serfs against
landowners, and by wage workers against the bourgeoisie, as fully
legitimate, progressive and necessary. We Marxists differ from
pacifists … in that we deem it necessary to study each war
historically (from the standpoint of Marx’s dialectical materialism)
and separately. There have been in the past numerous wars which,
despite all the horrors, atrocities, distress and suffering that
inevitably accompany all wars, were progressive, i.e., benefited the
development of mankind.1

We Marxists reject an absolute position on war. We examine each war
concretely and separately, locating each in its distinct historical
context. We disagree with pacifists that all war is bad, immoral and
harmful to those who engage in it. Those are ahistorical, moralistic
dogmas divorced from material reality. Indeed, from our working-class
viewpoint, rejecting necessary or liberating violence is inherently
immoral. A gun used in war by a Warsaw Ghetto fighter aimed at a
German soldier was an instrument of liberation. The same gun in the
hands of a German soldier aimed at a Jew in the Warsaw Ghetto was an
instrument of Nazi terror. An abstract disgust with guns and violence
cannot see this truth — only politics and class morality can.

We Marxists don’t equate the violence of the oppressor with the
violence of the oppressed. We don’t agree with pacifists that the
violence of oppressed people or workers’ revolution debases the human
spirit by practising hatred, and that it should be replaced by a
strategy of winning over enemies through nonviolent reconciliation,
Christian love or moral witness. Pacifists preach peaceful
reconciliation of differences between oppressor and oppressed —
“nonviolent conflict resolution” — not the class hostility and hatred
workers should feel for their exploiters.

Ruling classes have never in all of recorded human history paid the
slightest attention to pacifist or moral pleadings to peacefully give
up their wealth and power. Pacifists consequently direct their appeals
to the oppressed, which disarms and weakens successful resistance and
contributes to the maintenance of the system which causes war.


  -AA.


-- 
Ambrose Andrews
LPO box 8274 ANU Acton ACT 0200 Australia
http://www.vrvl.net/~ambrose/
mailto:ambr...@vrvl.net
voicemail:+61_261112936
work:+61_261256749
mobile:+61_415544621
irc:{undernet|freenode|oftc}:znalo
xmpp:ambr...@jabber.fsfe.org
skype:znalo7
CE38 8B79 C0A7 DF4A 4F54  E352 2647 19A1 DB3B F823
556A 6D19 0904 827C 9DB8  3697 32D0 1E11 403F 2BE1


YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] Free pamphlet: `The Labour Aristocracy: The material basis of opportunism in the labour movement'

2009-09-18 Thread Ambrose Andrews
2009/9/18 Harry Feldman harry.feld...@gmail.com:
Quoting
Jeffrey Thomas Piercy [mqd...@mqduck.net]:

 Actually, that's what freeware means. Unfortunately, there's no convenient
 term in English for GNU-style free software, at least not without borrowing
 from other languages (libre software/software libre being a good
 choice).

 Isn't the expression 'open source'?

Some use that term to overcome the ambiguity,

some don't:

http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-software-for-freedom.html

  -AA.


-- 
Ambrose Andrews
LPO box 8274 ANU Acton ACT 0200 Australia
http://www.vrvl.net/~ambrose/
mailto:ambr...@vrvl.net
voicemail:+61_261112936
work:+61_261256749
mobile:+61_415544621
irc:{undernet|freenode|oftc}:znalo
xmpp:ambr...@jabber.fsfe.org
skype:znalo7
CE38 8B79 C0A7 DF4A 4F54  E352 2647 19A1 DB3B F823
556A 6D19 0904 827C 9DB8  3697 32D0 1E11 403F 2BE1


YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] Free pamphlet: `The Labour Aristocracy: The material basis of opportunism in the labour movement' | Links International Journal of Socialist Renewal

2009-09-17 Thread Ambrose Andrews
2009/9/18 Joaquin Bustelo jbust...@bellsouth.net:

 Freeware/free software to me means both free as in freedom and as in free
 beer, not just free of charge.


Usually in English language software circles a distinction is made
between 'freeware'
(zero dollars up front) and Free ('Libre') Software.

Anyway the pamphlet is very good, and reads well in conjunction with
Lenin's 'Imperialism and the split in Socialism'
(and I'd throw in Lenin's article 'In Australia' which sometime
appears in the Progress Moscow collection 'On Britain')

It wasn't the only tantalising 'Part One' produced by Line of March
that never ended up having a 'Part Two'.  (Another that would
certainly interest Joachin if it became available would be the
'critique of the Black Nation thesis' by Bob Wing.)

so fire up your choice of Free PDF reader:

http://pdfreaders.org/

and grab the file:

http://www.readingfromtheleft.com/PDF/LabourAristocracy.pdf

  -AA.


-- 
Ambrose Andrews
LPO box 8274 ANU Acton ACT 0200 Australia
http://www.vrvl.net/~ambrose/
mailto:ambr...@vrvl.net
voicemail:+61_261112936
work:+61_261256749
mobile:+61_415544621
irc:{undernet|freenode|oftc}:znalo
xmpp:ambr...@jabber.fsfe.org
skype:znalo7
CE38 8B79 C0A7 DF4A 4F54  E352 2647 19A1 DB3B F823
556A 6D19 0904 827C 9DB8  3697 32D0 1E11 403F 2BE1


YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] Long posts not allowed??

2009-09-02 Thread Ambrose Andrews
 Patrick Bond wrote:
 I'm voting, as usual, for full posting of articles - copyrights be damned.

I agree, generally the burden of requiring *interactive* getting (by
web) of things in the context of poor connectivity is greater than the
burden of getting a large amount of redundant, but easily ignored
plain text, even in that same context.

2009/9/1 Les Schaffer schaf...@optonline.net:

 i can think of two or three solutions to this problem...

 1. a separate companion list for news and forwards

I forsee a lot of confusion and peopl eforwarding to the long list and
a lot of reminders and reinforcements being required to make this
work.

 3. Mailman has a Topics feature which is currently disabled, see
 details below. if everyone who forwarded would put a keyword like [fwd]
 or [news-item] in their subject line,  i think we could handle this.

That might be the most realistic solution, and the easiest to teach
people to conform to.

  -AA.


-- 
Ambrose Andrews
LPO box 8274 ANU Acton ACT 0200 Australia
http://www.vrvl.net/~ambrose/
mailto:ambr...@vrvl.net
voicemail:+61_261112936
work:+61_261256749
mobile:+61_415544621
irc:{undernet|freenode|oftc}:znalo
xmpp:ambr...@jabber.fsfe.org
skype:znalo7
CE38 8B79 C0A7 DF4A 4F54  E352 2647 19A1 DB3B F823
556A 6D19 0904 827C 9DB8  3697 32D0 1E11 403F 2BE1


YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com