Re: [Marxism] Marxist Interventions 2010

2010-05-29 Thread glparramatta
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


For an alternative analysis, which unfortuately the article below 
largely ignores (and while mentioned, does not provide the correct link) 
can be found at http://links.org.au/node/155 (The left and UN military 
intervention in East Timor).

--- In greenleft_discuss...@yahoogroups.com, "Tom O'Lincoln" 
 wrote:
 >
 > http://www.anu.edu.au/polsci/mi/2/2.htm
 >
 > Marxist Interventions is an Australian on-line journal. The articles 
in this
 > issue focus on major controversies within and beyond the Australian left.
 >
 > Few issues have challenged the Australian left as much as the Howard
 > Government's 1999 military intervention in East Timor. Contrary to the
 > common view that the intervention was a humanitarian action forced on a
 > reluctant government by popular pressure, Sam Pietsch analyses it as an
 > imperialist use of military power to secure longstanding strategic 
interests
 > of the Australian state. The intervention also enabled the Howard 
Government
 > to increase military spending and act more aggressively to assert 
imperial



Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


[Marxism] Marxist Interventions 2010 release

2010-05-28 Thread Tom O'Lincoln
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


http://www.anu.edu.au/polsci/mi/2/2.htm

Marxist Interventions is an on-line Australian journal. The articles in this 
issue focus on major controversies within and beyond the Australian left.

Few issues have challenged the Australian left as much as the Howard 
Government's 1999 military intervention in East Timor. Contrary to the 
common view that the intervention was a humanitarian action forced on a 
reluctant government by popular pressure, Sam Pietsch analyses it as an 
imperialist use of military power to secure longstanding strategic interests 
of the Australian state. The intervention also enabled the Howard Government 
to increase military spending and act more aggressively to assert imperial 
power in the Southwest Pacific.

Marxist strategies for change often centre on the potential of organised 
labour struggles. Yet labour is divided in many ways, including between 
leaders and the rank and file. The tradition to which Marxist Interventions 
belongs has long argued that the union rank and file has different interests 
to those of the labour bureaucracy. Robert Bollard's essay on the Great 
Strike of 1917 is a defence of our position, in response to critics such as 
conservative historian Jonathan Zeitlin.

There is now an exhaustive literature about the global financial crisis. 
Australia's peculiar position remains a matter for somewhat puzzled debate. 
Ben Hillier looks closely at the effects of the crisis on the Australian 
economy. He considers how the relative stability of Chinese demand, the 
buoyancy of the housing market and the circumstances of the financial sector 
have so far insulated Australia from the carnage witnessed in Europe, Japan 
and the US. Since the article was completed, upheavals in Greece have showed 
how fragile the situation is.

In March and April 2010, a major debate broke out in the Australian media 
over Anzac Day, featuring such issues as militarism, race and gender. Class 
differences in society have received relatively little attention. Kyla 
Cassells presents a comparative study of Anzac Day and Labor Day in Victoria 
between the World Wars, which explores how these days were used by Trades 
Hall, the Australian Labor Party, and the RSL to perpetuate political 
agendas. She also considers the contestation of these agendas by such groups 
as the Communist Party, women, and the unemployed.

During 2008 and 2009, Muslims at RMIT University in Melbourne ran a 
successful and important campaign for the return of dedicated Muslim Prayer 
Rooms on campus. Because the campaign's central demand was for a religious 
space, much of the left dismissed the movement outright or even supported 
University management. This raises serious questions concerning the 
Australia left's clarity about racism. Katie Wood and Liam Ward consider the 
campaign and its lessons. 




Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com