[Marxism-Thaxis] Stan Goff's reply to Li'l Joe on Haiti (from Marxmail)

2005-01-10 Thread Jim Farmelant


>I have no idea who “Joe Radical” is or where he gets his information on 
>Haiti, but the idea that the former FRAPH and FAdH paramilitaries that
are 
>demanding back pay in Haiti are some expression of “proletarian 
>contestation” – if not asserted out of pure ignorance of Haiti’s class 
>dynamics – is worthy of Timothy Leary on his best mescaline.  The
soldiers 
>were put out of their jobs when the army was disbanded, whereupon they 
>migrated to DR with the help of Uncle Sugar and began plotting the next 
>takeover.  Back pay!  Their back pay should be a bullet for each brain 
>stem.  Their latest method for showing who’s boss in small villes is to 
>shoot teenage girls in the crotch with 12-guage shotguns.
>
>These are representatives of the most reactionary sector of Haitian 
>society, and their fight with the compradors of 184/Convergence is a
fight 
>for political power between Duvalierist caudillos and financial 
>technocrats like Apaid and Bazin.  The masses – which are largely 
>peasants, not proletarians – are feared by both these sectors equally,
and 
>it is the uprisings of the masses that continually force these two
ruling 
>factions back into one another’s arms during their internecine truces –
as 
>they combined to oust Aristide who was elected by 92% of the Haitian
people.
>
>His conflation of the former military and the urban intifada in the
slums 
>shows he knows nothing about Haiti.  The paramilitaries have been busy, 
>busy, busy killing people in the slums for months now in an effort to 
>extinguish this rebellion.
>
>By the way, it is Jean-Bertrand Aristide, not Bernard.
>
>“Seminal moment and portent of things to come,” indeed.  Pass the crack
pipe.

___
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis


[Marxism-Thaxis] Statement on Haiti

2005-01-10 Thread Lil Joe


Statement on Haiti

Lil Joe and Aduku Addae

The crisis in Haiti has been covered in a mystical shroud of racism,
theatrical historicism and plain old superstition.  The popular version has
this drama packaged as a battle between the black and white races, wrapped
up in the spirit of the epic struggle of the “Black Jacobins,” drawing
lavishly on the lure of Voodoo for maximum dramatic effect.  It is a
wondrous “tale from the crypt” and the audience is just lapping it up.

But while the world is consumed by this “tale from the twilight zone” a
struggle of epic historical proportions is taking place.  It is a struggle
between classes of people which is based in the temporal, material, economic
and social life of the Haitian people.  Yes, the class struggle, defined in
its classic Marxian sense, is taking place in Haiti!

The latest episode of the struggle has Maxine Waters casting the
“ex-soldiers,” who have been universally credited as the agents of Aristide’
s demise, as “thugs” and “murderers” who are prospective recipients of bribe
money.  This is the manner in which she has disposed herself to discredit
the approximately  6000 strong former employees of the Haitian state who
have mounted a spirited and discipline struggle to force the representatives
of the Haitian State to pay ten years in back pay.  Thus Ms Walters have set
the tone for another salvo in the ideological war.

We begin with a few basic propositions, as we must, in conducting these
sorts of discourses, if we hope to gain any clarity.

The Haitian population is divided into social classes. These classes are
determined by the divisions of labor which arises in the course of the
economic activities which these humans in Haiti undertake to produce and
reproduce their material being – this being construed as their economic
life. The manner in which they produce their material existence, their
economic endeavors, and the divisions of labor thereby occasioned, are
determined by the tools in existence at a given period. Moreover, the manner
of appropriation is conditional upon the division of labor and on the
property relations so determined. So, the nature of classes and class
relations, then, is determined ultimately by the nature of the tools
available to the human community in Haiti.  We posit, also, that contending
class interests is the motor of the class struggle and that unending class
struggles is the very essence of politics.

We posit these premises, derived from the most rigorous of scientific
investigation, as our point of departure.  We don’t want any confusion as we
go along.

The battle in Haiti is for the material wealth of that country. It has
brought into contention the US/France/Brazil/Group 184 conglomerate, on the
one hand and the impoverished workers of the numerous slums of Haiti
together with elements of the petty bourgeoisie, on the other hand.  The
conglomeration of the US, France, Brazil and the Haitian Group 184 is the
very embodiment of the marauding global capital. The Haitian petty
bourgeoisie is comprised of a variegated collection of laborers who own
property and who generally are proprietors of their means of production.
What we see in Haiti, therefore, is an alignment of the global bourgeoisie,
the trans-national capitalist players, against the petty capitalist (mostly
of agrarian vintage) in combination with the utterly dispossessed hoards,
the proletarian masses, of the slum cities of Haiti, including Bel Air and
Cite Soleil. That is the basic manner in which the contending forces are
aligned against each other. The Haitian petty-bourgeoisie is in contention
with the global bourgeoisie.

The elements of the working-class engaged in this struggle is engaged as the
armed champions of one or either of the contending sides. The global
bourgeoisie has enlisted the service of the so-called ex-soldiers while the
“hapless” members of the street gangs from the slum cities have been forced
by default, due to their prior association with the party of the petty
bourgeoisie, Fanmi Lavalas, to become the arm bearers of the Haitian petty
bourgeoisie.  From this vantage point we can see that the armed workers are
indisputably the decisive force, the very fulcrum on which the struggle
turns.

A cautionary note must be sounded here. Though they bear the arms
proletarian partisans have no over-riding class-conscious objective. This is
an unqualified detriment. As long as this remains the case they will be used
against each other and become decimated in the contest between the factions
of the bourgeoisie.

Bottom-line, the conflict in Haiti is being driven by a fractious dispute
between elements of the bourgeoisie about how production should be organized
in Haiti and about how surplus value will be appropriated.  It is not yet a
dispute, strictly speaking, centered on class war and the very critical
question of the abolition of private property through the seizure of the
productive forces. By this I mean to say that the Haiti

[Marxism-Thaxis] Fwd: International Socialism journal

2005-01-10 Thread Sebastian Budgen

Begin forwarded message:
From: "ISJ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: January 10, 2005 5:11:45 PM CET
To: 
Subject: International Socialism journal
International Socialism 105 (winter 2005)
Quarterly journal of socialist theory
 
 
New bumper issue out this week
 
Articles include:
 
IRAQ: The rise of the resistance
The most thorough account yet published of the resistance movement. 
Anne Alexander and Simon Assaf challenge the lies and misinformation 
abundent not only in the media, but on the left.

 
Bush's next target? Women and workers in the Islamic Republic of Iran
What is life really like in Iran? This interview with Iranian activist 
and author Elaheh Rostami Povey challenges widespread preconceptions.

 
The birth of our politics: Marxists and the 1905 Revolution by Mark 
Thomas

The events in Russia in 1905 set a pattern for the rest of the century 
- and the ideas formed hold a crucial relevance today.

 
Polemic: Trade union struggle in Britain today
Gregor Gall and Martin Smith debate the balance of class forces.
 
Rifondazione's U-turn
Europe's most successful far left party is mistakenly making overtures 
to the centre left, argues Italian socialist Fabio Ruggiero.

 
Plus:
Post-Marxism and commodity fetishism; an appreciation of Mulk Raj 
Anand; an interview with the editors of the Marxists Internet Archive; 
book reviews on Zionism, Max Weber, Bob Dylan, Hardt and Negri's 
Multitude, and Marxist historian John Saville
 

 
lOrder your copy for £5 (plus 50p P&P) from 020 7538 3308, e-mail 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], or write to IS journal, PO Box 82, London E3 3LH

 
lSubscription rates for one year (4 issues): Individual UK £22  
 Europe/N America £24/€34   Rest of world £26

 Special rate for the Indian Subcontinent £13    Institutional rate £30
 
lWe accept Visa/Mastercard/Eurocard/Switch/Solo or UK cheques in 
sterling made payable to ISJ.

 
 
Capitalism: Where it came from and where it's going
A dayschool organised by International Socialism and Historical 
Materialism, which took place on Sunday 14 November 2004.

 
Robert Brenner debates Alex Callinicos, Chris Harman and Rob Hoveman
 
Available in audio form at www.resistancemp3.lpi.org.uk/dayschool.htm
 
 
We're going on-line
 
www.isj.org.uk
 
Coming soon... Current and recent issues on-line, extra articles and 
debates that won't appear in print, links to useful sites and 
articles, secure credit/debit card subscriptions and orders and more.

___
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis