This piece is from The Blanket.
Provisional Pushover
Tom Luby • 26 November 2004
They are two of the most intriguing questions swirling around Gerry
Adams. Why does he keep on denying that he was and is in the Provisional
IRA, something that the proverbial dogs in the street, from Ballymurphy to
Ballyholme, know full well? And why does he keep attacking those in the
media with the temerity to say so?
The first of those questions is the more difficult to answer for it
requires a journey deep into a mind that not every investigator would wish
to explore, an expedition not for the faint-hearted!
It can’t be because of fear of self-incrimination, for those days have
gone forever. Indeed it would not be stretching credulity too far to suggest
that if tomorrow the British or Irish governments were to stumble upon a
filing cabinet stuffed with signed confessions of IRA membership, the Great
Bearded One would never have to stand in front of a judge and the filing
cabinet would be disappeared as quickly and completely as...well, Jean
McConville.
The reason the GBO denies any connection to the IRA, that he disavows
responsibility and deeds that other comrades are obliged, and occasionally
happy to admit, can only be speculated upon but there can be little doubt
that he does so because it suits his interests.
It enables him to lie during negotiations with Unionists and the
British about his influence over issues like decommissioning and to take
refuge in the fiction that he must go to the IRA” to get approval for every
concession.
As important, it creates a public relations-friendly image of a
peaceful political activist who intervened to escort misguided colleagues
out of the cul-de-sac of violence, an image that goes down well with the
“useful idiots” who fawn over him in places like Hollywood. Would Martin
Sheen and Fionnuala Flanagan be so eager to host cocktail parties for the
GBO in their Beverly Hills homes if they thought this is the man under whose
leadership the Belfast IRA developed and perfected the car bomb now used by
Jihadists around the world? Or that this is the man who was disappearing
people when General Pinochet was only a faint glint in Henry Kissinger’s
eye?
And it sets the stage for that day, perhaps in seven years or so, when
he makes his bid to become tenant of that mansion in Phoenix Park currently
occupied by Mary McAleese. To win the presidency of Ireland, to take his
place alongside Dev as the modern giant of peace, the GBO must by then have
completely bleached his image of any association with Jean McConville or the
devices that wrought such carnage in Donegall Street or on Bloody Friday.
That’s where the second question comes in, the reason why he bullies
the media every time one of its number raises the issue of his links with
the Provisional IRA. He does this, quite simply, because bullying the media
per se in these days of the peace process works. It works because the Irish
media are terrified of being labelled “unhelpful” to the process, terrified
of being accused of aiding dissidents or weakening the Provisionals’ peace
camp by asking awkward questions.
A startling example of the GBO’s growing ability to bend the Irish
media to his will has come in a dispute between Gerry Adams and the Irish
Times’ Northern Editor, Gerry Moriarty over that journalist’s use of the tag
“Provisional” when writing about Sinn Fein and/or the IRA.
Last July 20th, Adams sent an angry letter to the paper’s editor,
Geraldine Kennedy, protesting Moriarty and the paper’s practice. He wrote:
“My position is straightforward and consistent. A paper of record should be
just that. There is no such organisation as Provisional Sinn Fein. Gerry
Kelly is not a Provisional Republican. He is a republican, full stop. He is
also a North Belfast MLA. A paper of record should reflect that.”
Leaving aside the fact that if the Irish Times were truly a paper of
record it would also report that Adams sits on the Provisional IRA's Army
Council and that Gerry Kelly is a very recent Adjutant-General of that body,
it is clear that Adams’ admonition of the paper and its Northern Editor had
a quite remarkable effect.
The evidence is there in a simple Lexis-Nexis search of the Irish
Times before and after Adams’ wrote his ill-tempered missive.
In the three months before Adams’ letter, that is between April 20th
and July 20th 2004, Moriarty, either by himself or in a joint byline, wrote
56 articles about Sinn Fein and/or the IRA of which 9 used the term
“Provisional” or “Provisionals” - that is 16 per cent of the time.
Now the dispassionate observer might wonder what Adams was making all
this fuss about, after all using the “P” word in sixteen out of every
hundred articles is not exactly excessive.
But nonetheless the Irish Times reacted as if it had
