This piece is from The Blanket.

      Provisional Pushover


      Tom Luby • 26 November 2004

      They are two of the most intriguing questions swirling around Gerry 
Adams. Why does he keep on denying that he was and is in the Provisional 
IRA, something that the proverbial dogs in the street, from Ballymurphy to 
Ballyholme, know full well? And why does he keep attacking those in the 
media with the temerity to say so?

      The first of those questions is the more difficult to answer for it 
requires a journey deep into a mind that not every investigator would wish 
to explore, an expedition not for the faint-hearted!

      It can’t be because of fear of self-incrimination, for those days have 
gone forever. Indeed it would not be stretching credulity too far to suggest 
that if tomorrow the British or Irish governments were to stumble upon a 
filing cabinet stuffed with signed confessions of IRA membership, the Great 
Bearded One would never have to stand in front of a judge and the filing 
cabinet would be disappeared as quickly and completely as.......well, Jean 
McConville.

      The reason the GBO denies any connection to the IRA, that he disavows 
responsibility and deeds that other comrades are obliged, and occasionally 
happy to admit, can only be speculated upon but there can be little doubt 
that he does so because it suits his interests.

      It enables him to lie during negotiations with Unionists and the 
British about his influence over issues like decommissioning and to take 
refuge in the fiction that he must "go to the IRA” to get approval for every 
concession.

      As important, it creates a public relations-friendly image of a 
peaceful political activist who intervened to escort misguided colleagues 
out of the cul-de-sac of violence, an image that goes down well with the 
“useful idiots” who fawn over him in places like Hollywood. Would Martin 
Sheen and Fionnuala Flanagan be so eager to host cocktail parties for the 
GBO in their Beverly Hills homes if they thought this is the man under whose 
leadership the Belfast IRA developed and perfected the car bomb now used by 
Jihadists around the world? Or that this is the man who was disappearing 
people when General Pinochet was only a faint glint in Henry Kissinger’s 
eye?

      And it sets the stage for that day, perhaps in seven years or so, when 
he makes his bid to become tenant of that mansion in Phoenix Park currently 
occupied by Mary McAleese. To win the presidency of Ireland, to take his 
place alongside Dev as the modern giant of peace, the GBO must by then have 
completely bleached his image of any association with Jean McConville or the 
devices that wrought such carnage in Donegall Street or on Bloody Friday.

      That’s where the second question comes in, the reason why he bullies 
the media every time one of its number raises the issue of his links with 
the Provisional IRA. He does this, quite simply, because bullying the media 
per se in these days of the peace process works. It works because the Irish 
media are terrified of being labelled “unhelpful” to the process, terrified 
of being accused of aiding dissidents or weakening the Provisionals’ peace 
camp by asking awkward questions.

      A startling example of the GBO’s growing ability to bend the Irish 
media to his will has come in a dispute between Gerry Adams and the Irish 
Times’ Northern Editor, Gerry Moriarty over that journalist’s use of the tag 
“Provisional” when writing about Sinn Fein and/or the IRA.

      Last July 20th, Adams sent an angry letter to the paper’s editor, 
Geraldine Kennedy, protesting Moriarty and the paper’s practice. He wrote: 
“My position is straightforward and consistent. A paper of record should be 
just that. There is no such organisation as Provisional Sinn Fein. Gerry 
Kelly is not a Provisional Republican. He is a republican, full stop. He is 
also a North Belfast MLA. A paper of record should reflect that.”

      Leaving aside the fact that if the Irish Times were truly a paper of 
record it would also report that Adams sits on the Provisional IRA's Army 
Council and that Gerry Kelly is a very recent Adjutant-General of that body, 
it is clear that Adams’ admonition of the paper and its Northern Editor had 
a quite remarkable effect.

      The evidence is there in a simple Lexis-Nexis search of the Irish 
Times before and after Adams’ wrote his ill-tempered missive.

      In the three months before Adams’ letter, that is between April 20th 
and July 20th 2004, Moriarty, either by himself or in a joint byline, wrote 
56 articles about Sinn Fein and/or the IRA of which 9 used the term 
“Provisional” or “Provisionals” - that is 16 per cent of the time.

      Now the dispassionate observer might wonder what Adams was making all 
this fuss about, after all using the “P” word in sixteen out of every 
hundred articles is not exactly excessive.

      But nonetheless the Irish Times reacted as if it had been accused of 
advocating the planting of firebombs in Clery’s department store in O’Connell 
Street. In the three months following the receipt of Adams’ letter Moriarty, 
either by himself or in a joint byline, wrote 55 pieces about Sinn Fein 
and/or the IRA - about the same as in the three months prior - and guess how 
many times the “P” word was used?

      It appeared exactly once - that is 1.8 per cent of the time. Adams’ 
angry letter had produced a near ninefold decrease in the paper’s use of the 
term which had so offended the president of Provisional Sinn Fein.

      The story doesn’t end there. The sole occasion on which the word 
“Provisional” was employed was in a piece on the life of the recently 
deceased former Chief of Staff and Belfast Commander, Joe Cahill. Now, it 
would be pretty difficult not to use the "P" word in a credible account of 
Cahill’s IRA career. I mean how would you describe what Cahill did at the 
time of the 1969 split in a way that would not offend Gerry Adams? Like 
this, perhaps: “When the IRA and Sinn Fein split into the IRA and Sinn Fein, 
Joe Cahill went with the IRA and Sinn Fein”? I think not. What that article 
demonstrates is that if Cahill had not died the word “Provisional” would 
have been totally erased from the Irish Times’ lexicon.

      A sad chapter for the Irish Times (perhaps the paper should tell us 
whether such a decision has indeed been made and if so where, in Belfast or 
Dublin?) but a significant feather in the cap for Gerry Adams. Anyone 
willing to put money on the chances that by the time the Provisional Sinn 
Fein and Provisional IRA leader is running for the Park not a journalist in 
Ireland will dare breathe a word about you know what?













_______________________________________________
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis

Reply via email to