[MLL]Test

2001-04-12 Thread erik andersson



Test


[MLL]test

2001-03-30 Thread Charles F. Moreira

test


___
Marxist-Leninist-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.wwpublish.com/mailman/listinfo/marxist-leninist-list



Re: [MLL]Test of English language

2001-03-29 Thread Partija rada

 I have an idea. Do you people can imagine how it looks like to
non-speaking
 English to read long discussions? I do not say that we do not need
 discussions. I just say that is hard for most of us to participate on the
 list on the way which we would like just because English is not our
 language.
 Milan


Milan.
You seem to speak English pretty well to me.  I have no doubt you are doing
a
much better job with English than I could with your language, so please
bear
with us.

Fraternally,

Klo


Thank you Comrade!
But, it is true that I can't express my opinion quite well. And there is
many of us with the same problem. Anyway, I'll bear with you.
Revolutionary greetings,
Milan


___
Marxist-Leninist-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.wwpublish.com/mailman/listinfo/marxist-leninist-list



Re: [MLL]Test

2001-03-27 Thread Partija rada


-Original Message-
From: Charles F. Moreira
Date: 26 March, 2001 9:38 AM
Subject: Re: [MLL]Test


Klo,

Thanks for your assessment and the commentary by Barry Stoller which is
interesting and which I'll have to study in greater detail later.

 Your assessment is correct.  It has, indeed, drifted into a
news
 posting list.  Where are Jim Hillier, Sven, bon moun, and many others?
Are
 they still with us?

With regards discussions on this list, I've been wondering whether we
should
have discussions dealing with contemporary issues like the one you, Steele
and Stoller are discussing with references back to the classics and
contemporary writings?

Have we been discussing theoretical and historical issues in a vacuum which
results in people quickly losing interest in continuing the thread of the
discussion?

On the other hand, is this a common occurrence on most lists, since I
haven't received anything from the Cuba Si list since the 22nd, though
activity on the Stalinskaya list appears to be picking up?

Could a lack of list activity be because with the current slowdown in the
economy, collapse of dotcom companies, retrenchments in the information
technology and Internet industries, people simply have less time to spend
on
lists like this?

Any ideas??

Charles


I have an idea. Do you people can imagine how it looks like to non-speaking
English to read long discussions? I do not say that we do not need
discussions. I just say that is hard for most of us to participate on the
list on the way which we would like just because English is not our
language.
Milan


___
Marxist-Leninist-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.wwpublish.com/mailman/listinfo/marxist-leninist-list



Re: [MLL]Test

2001-03-27 Thread KloMcKinsey

Partija rada wrote:

 -Original Message-
 From: Charles F. Moreira
 Date: 26 March, 2001 9:38 AM
 Subject: Re: [MLL]Test

 Klo,
 
 Thanks for your assessment and the commentary by Barry Stoller which is
 interesting and which I'll have to study in greater detail later.
 
  Your assessment is correct.  It has, indeed, drifted into a
 news
  posting list.  Where are Jim Hillier, Sven, bon moun, and many others?
 Are
  they still with us?
 
 With regards discussions on this list, I've been wondering whether we
 should
 have discussions dealing with contemporary issues like the one you, Steele
 and Stoller are discussing with references back to the classics and
 contemporary writings?
 
 Have we been discussing theoretical and historical issues in a vacuum which
 results in people quickly losing interest in continuing the thread of the
 discussion?
 
 On the other hand, is this a common occurrence on most lists, since I
 haven't received anything from the Cuba Si list since the 22nd, though
 activity on the Stalinskaya list appears to be picking up?
 
 Could a lack of list activity be because with the current slowdown in the
 economy, collapse of dotcom companies, retrenchments in the information
 technology and Internet industries, people simply have less time to spend
 on
 lists like this?
 
 Any ideas??
 
 Charles

 I have an idea. Do you people can imagine how it looks like to non-speaking
 English to read long discussions? I do not say that we do not need
 discussions. I just say that is hard for most of us to participate on the
 list on the way which we would like just because English is not our
 language.
 Milan


Milan.
You seem to speak English pretty well to me.  I have no doubt you are doing a
much better job with English than I could with your language, so please bear
with us.

Fraternally,

Klo




___
Marxist-Leninist-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.wwpublish.com/mailman/listinfo/marxist-leninist-list



[MLL]Test

2001-03-25 Thread George G

This is just a test. I have gotten only about 1 message from the ML list in
a few days, and one that I sent out to the list was returnred to me as
undeliverable.

George



___
Marxist-Leninist-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.wwpublish.com/mailman/listinfo/marxist-leninist-list



Re: [MLL]Test

2001-03-25 Thread Charles F. Moreira

Comrades



 George G wrote:

  This is just a test. I have gotten only about 1 message from the ML list
in
  a few days, and one that I sent out to the list was returnred to me as
  undeliverable.
 
  George
 
 I am experiencing the same thing George.  Messages are very sparse.

 Fraternally,

 Klo

I checked the server and just released six messages and approved three
applications for subscription.

I've sent a message to the moderators on these problems and also about
problems of  a lack of enthusiasm and sustainability of discussion on this
list, which has become more of a posting board for political news,
statements and commentaries with very occassional discussion like what's
been going on between Klo and Harry Steele about Webb's statement.

More in this matter later.

Fraternally

Charles




___
Marxist-Leninist-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.wwpublish.com/mailman/listinfo/marxist-leninist-list



Re: [MLL]Test

2001-03-25 Thread Charles F. Moreira

Klo,

Thanks for your assessment and the commentary by Barry Stoller which is
interesting and which I'll have to study in greater detail later.

 Your assessment is correct.  It has, indeed, drifted into a
news
 posting list.  Where are Jim Hillier, Sven, bon moun, and many others?
Are
 they still with us?

With regards discussions on this list, I've been wondering whether we should
have discussions dealing with contemporary issues like the one you, Steele
and Stoller are discussing with references back to the classics and
contemporary writings?

Have we been discussing theoretical and historical issues in a vacuum which
results in people quickly losing interest in continuing the thread of the
discussion?

On the other hand, is this a common occurrence on most lists, since I
haven't received anything from the Cuba Si list since the 22nd, though
activity on the Stalinskaya list appears to be picking up?

Could a lack of list activity be because with the current slowdown in the
economy, collapse of dotcom companies, retrenchments in the information
technology and Internet industries, people simply have less time to spend on
lists like this?

Any ideas??

Charles



___
Marxist-Leninist-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.wwpublish.com/mailman/listinfo/marxist-leninist-list



Re: [MLL]Test

2001-03-25 Thread Charles F. Moreira

Comrades,

Klo wrote:-

 PS.  I got the following message from Barry Stoller.  Does anyone have any
info
 regarding the orientation of his list.  Barry sounds pretty good.

  Klo
 
  Your post to the Marxist-Leninist list about anti-monopoly tactics (re:
  CPUSA) was brilliant. Cut quick to the real problem among the left and
  quasi-left today: petty-bourgoeis mentality radicalized in the rhetoric
  of anarchism.
 
  While Marxists acknowledge the dialectical movement of centralized
  capitalism INTO collectivized ownership of the means of production,
  today's 'populist' opposition to capitalism is, alas, confined to an
  anti-CORPORATISM which, with little encouragement, opposes collectivized
  socialism with as much vitriol.

Indeed this is very true. Much of the anti-corporate sentiment found among
the environmental, ecological, sustainable development, hippie, consumer,
Libertarian, marijuana legalisation, anti-war and other such movements may
seem anti-capitalist but they are not.

In reality they are virulently anti-communist and even racist and fascist.
Just visit Web sites of Britain's neo-Nazi British National Party and other
such neo-Nazi or fascist organsiations and one can see this anti-corporatism
linked to anti-Semitism.

Fraternally

Charles


 
  I am forwarding your essay to my debate forum, downwithcapitalism,
  address below, in the hopes of promulgating your fine presentation of
  this problem.
 
  Please visit, subscribe or participate:
 
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/downwithcapitalism
 
  Barry Stoller
  http://utopia2000.org
 
 





___
Marxist-Leninist-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.wwpublish.com/mailman/listinfo/marxist-leninist-list



[MLL]test

2001-01-29 Thread Charles F. Moreira

test


___
Marxist-Leninist-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.wwpublish.com/mailman/listinfo/marxist-leninist-list



[MLL] test

2000-07-17 Thread Alan Dover

this is a test message only please ignore.

___
Marxist-Leninist-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.wwpublish.com/mailman/listinfo/marxist-leninist-list