Re: [matplotlib-devel] Matlab parula colormap

2014-10-29 Thread Pierre Haessig

Le 21/10/2014 10:09, Eric Firing a écrit :

That's the big question: what is the IP status?
So Nathaniel and I asked, and the blog post author, Steve Eddins, took 
the time to answer :


   Nathaniel and Pierre—Thanks for your interest in the new parula
   colormap. /Parula is the end result of a creative design effort over
   an extended period of time. I am pleased that you find it so
   appealing. The colormap is, however, MathWorks intellectual
   property, and it would not be appropriate or acceptable to copy or
   re-use it in non-MathWorks plotting tools./

   You might look at other sources of high-quality colormaps. I have
   listed some in my technical paper on rainbow colormaps, published
   earlier this month on mathworks.com.


http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2014/10/20/a-new-colormap-for-matlab-part-2-troubles-with-rainbows/#comment-27702

So they claim the IP. Next question is: is this claim valid, and I'm not 
a lawyer to answer it. I suspect that the answer could be country specific.


The only things that bother me in this IP claim, is the status of all 
the plots produced with this colormap. They are in a sense a 
/derivative/ work, am I right ? So the question becomes : does Mathworks 
owns IP right for all these plots ?!


Pierre
--
___
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel


Re: [matplotlib-devel] Matlab parula colormap

2014-10-29 Thread Eric Firing
On 2014/10/28, 10:30 PM, Pierre Haessig wrote:
> Le 21/10/2014 10:09, Eric Firing a écrit :
>> That's the big question: what is the IP status?
> So Nathaniel and I asked, and the blog post author, Steve Eddins, took
> the time to answer :
>
> Nathaniel and Pierre—Thanks for your interest in the new parula
> colormap. /Parula is the end result of a creative design effort over
> an extended period of time. I am pleased that you find it so
> appealing. The colormap is, however, MathWorks intellectual
> property, and it would not be appropriate or acceptable to copy or
> re-use it in non-MathWorks plotting tools./
>
> You might look at other sources of high-quality colormaps. I have
> listed some in my technical paper on rainbow colormaps, published
> earlier this month on mathworks.com.
>
>
> http://blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2014/10/20/a-new-colormap-for-matlab-part-2-troubles-with-rainbows/#comment-27702
>
> So they claim the IP. Next question is: is this claim valid, and I'm not
> a lawyer to answer it. I suspect that the answer could be country specific.

Regardless, we should respect their claim.  I agree with the basic idea: 
it was the result of a creative process, and they choose to keep that as 
proprietary IP. Therefore mpl will not include a clone of this color 
map.  If a user decides to make and use a clone, that's their business, 
not ours.  We shouldn't encourage it.

>
> The only things that bother me in this IP claim, is the status of all
> the plots produced with this colormap. They are in a sense a
> /derivative/ work, am I right ? So the question becomes : does Mathworks
> owns IP right for all these plots ?!

Perhaps they could claim copyright infringement; but from the mpl 
perspective, I don't think it matters.  The question will only arise in 
practice if a user makes a plot with a clone of parula, and Mathworks 
chooses to turn it into a legal issue.  I think it is unlikely this will 
happen; but if and when it does, I don't think mpl will be involved.  We 
will not be supplying the colormap or in any way encouraging or 
condoning its use in mpl, unless and until Mathworks releases it.

Eric

>
> Pierre
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> ___
> Matplotlib-devel mailing list
> Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
>


--
___
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel