Re: Compile from git clone fails (SOLVED).

2013-12-27 Thread Mike Smithson

Problem solved:

I just now upgraded m4, autoconf, and automake to the freshest from
http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu, and then it couldn't even get through
autogen.sh.

I upgraded libtool, and now everything works.

Strange thing too, because I remembered upgrading these within the
last year, but when I looked at the versions, I must have done a
deliberate *minimal* upgrade, because even though they were compiled
on Jan 29 2013, the versions were ancient (2006).

Heh, you can see what a dinosaur I am. :)

Anyway, now I can keep going on my git tutorial and stuff.

Thank you very much.

--
Peace and Cheer
___
mc mailing list
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc


Re: background or foreground copies, CPU eating

2013-12-27 Thread Yury V. Zaytsev
On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 10:47 +0100, wwp wrote:
 
 Could anyone tell me what's the difference between foreground and
 background copies? Are background copies being 'niced' down or
 low-system prioritized? If so, could that be an option for foreground
 copies, to make them more user-friendly? 

I think that this has been discussed before and the conclusion was that
it's related to the perpetual re-drawing of the copy progress dialog. 

Unfortunately, if you redraw it often enough, it slows things down, but
if you don't, then it's not interactive anymore...

I'm not sure whether there is a nice solution to this problem, other
than using background operations, when you know in advance that it will
take a lot of time.

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Yury V. Zaytsev


___
mc mailing list
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc