Re: Help testing release candidate / mc-4.8.22-rc1

2019-01-03 Thread Jack Woehr via mc-devel
In IBM i PASE environment, we're back to having struct timespect trouble
with this snapshot:

make[3]: Entering directory '/home/JWOEHR/work/mc_build/src/filemanager'
  CC   achown.lo
  CC   boxes.lo
  CC   chmod.lo
  CC   chown.lo
  CC   cmd.lo
  CC   command.lo
  CC   dir.lo
  CC   ext.lo
  CC   file.lo
/home/JWOEHR/work/mc-4.8.21-108-g4b46e6194/src/filemanager/file.c: In
function 'get_times':
/home/JWOEHR/work/mc-4.8.21-108-g4b46e6194/src/filemanager/file.c:899:17:
error: incompatible types when assigning to type 'struct timespec' from
type 'st_timespec_t {aka const struct st_timespec}'
 (*times)[0] = sb->st_atim;
 ^
/home/JWOEHR/work/mc-4.8.21-108-g4b46e6194/src/filemanager/file.c:900:17:
error: incompatible types when assigning to type 'struct timespec' from
type 'st_timespec_t {aka const struct st_timespec}'
 (*times)[1] = sb->st_mtim;


On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 11:42 AM Yury V. Zaytsev  wrote:

> Hi there,
>
> TLDR; I would appreciate if you could please test the following tarball
> on your systems and report any blocker regressions as compared to the
> previous 4.8.21 release:
>
>
> https://www.midnight-commander.org/nopaste/tarball/mc-4.8.21-108-g4b46e6194.tar.xz
>

-- 
Jack Woehr
Absolute Performance, Inc.
12303 Airport Way, Suite 100
Broomfield, CO 80021

NON-DISCLOSURE NOTICE:  This communication including any and all
attachments is for the intended recipient(s) only and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  If you are not the intended
recipient of this communication, any disclosure, copying further
distribution or use of this communication is prohibited.  If you received
this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete/destroy
all copies of this communication immediately.
___
mc-devel mailing list
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel


Re: Help testing release candidate / mc-4.8.22-rc1

2019-01-03 Thread Jack Woehr via mc-devel
Yuri, Andrew ... I tried with a different build script which I wrote when
we were working on this months ago. The current snapshot builds correctly.

So there is no problem. I just used an older (and incorrect) build script.

On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 11:21 PM Andrew Borodin  wrote:

> On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 19:46:16 -0700 Jack Woehr via mc 
>  wrote:
> > In IBM i PASE environment, we're back to having struct timespect trouble
> > with this snapshot:
>
> This is weird.
>
> > /home/JWOEHR/work/mc-4.8.21-108-g4b46e6194/src/filemanager/file.c: In
> > function 'get_times':
> > /home/JWOEHR/work/mc-4.8.21-108-g4b46e6194/src/filemanager/file.c:899:17:
> > error: incompatible types when assigning to type 'struct timespec' from
> > type 'st_timespec_t {aka const struct st_timespec}'
> >  (*times)[0] = sb->st_atim;
> >  ^
> > /home/JWOEHR/work/mc-4.8.21-108-g4b46e6194/src/filemanager/file.c:900:17:
> > error: incompatible types when assigning to type 'struct timespec' from
> > type 'st_timespec_t {aka const struct st_timespec}'
> >  (*times)[1] = sb->st_mtim;
>
> Looks like HAVE_UTIMENSAT is defined. But there no any changes around
> checking of utimensat() since 09/09 (commit a453376).
>
> --
> Andrew
>


-- 
Jack Woehr
Absolute Performance, Inc.
12303 Airport Way, Suite 100
Broomfield, CO 80021

NON-DISCLOSURE NOTICE:  This communication including any and all
attachments is for the intended recipient(s) only and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  If you are not the intended
recipient of this communication, any disclosure, copying further
distribution or use of this communication is prohibited.  If you received
this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete/destroy
all copies of this communication immediately.
___
mc-devel mailing list
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel


Re: Help testing release candidate / mc-4.8.22-rc1

2018-12-29 Thread Andrew Borodin
On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 19:46:16 -0700 Jack Woehr via mc 
 wrote:
> In IBM i PASE environment, we're back to having struct timespect trouble
> with this snapshot:

This is weird.

> /home/JWOEHR/work/mc-4.8.21-108-g4b46e6194/src/filemanager/file.c: In
> function 'get_times':
> /home/JWOEHR/work/mc-4.8.21-108-g4b46e6194/src/filemanager/file.c:899:17:
> error: incompatible types when assigning to type 'struct timespec' from
> type 'st_timespec_t {aka const struct st_timespec}'
>  (*times)[0] = sb->st_atim;
>  ^
> /home/JWOEHR/work/mc-4.8.21-108-g4b46e6194/src/filemanager/file.c:900:17:
> error: incompatible types when assigning to type 'struct timespec' from
> type 'st_timespec_t {aka const struct st_timespec}'
>  (*times)[1] = sb->st_mtim;

Looks like HAVE_UTIMENSAT is defined. But there no any changes around
checking of utimensat() since 09/09 (commit a453376).

-- 
Andrew
___
mc mailing list
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc


Re: Help testing release candidate / mc-4.8.22-rc1

2018-12-29 Thread Andrew Borodin
On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 19:46:16 -0700 Jack Woehr via mc 
 wrote:
> In IBM i PASE environment, we're back to having struct timespect trouble
> with this snapshot:

This is weird.

> /home/JWOEHR/work/mc-4.8.21-108-g4b46e6194/src/filemanager/file.c: In
> function 'get_times':
> /home/JWOEHR/work/mc-4.8.21-108-g4b46e6194/src/filemanager/file.c:899:17:
> error: incompatible types when assigning to type 'struct timespec' from
> type 'st_timespec_t {aka const struct st_timespec}'
>  (*times)[0] = sb->st_atim;
>  ^
> /home/JWOEHR/work/mc-4.8.21-108-g4b46e6194/src/filemanager/file.c:900:17:
> error: incompatible types when assigning to type 'struct timespec' from
> type 'st_timespec_t {aka const struct st_timespec}'
>  (*times)[1] = sb->st_mtim;

Looks like HAVE_UTIMENSAT is defined. But there no any changes around
checking of utimensat() since 09/09 (commit a453376).

-- 
Andrew
___
mc-devel mailing list
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel


Re: Help testing release candidate / mc-4.8.22-rc1

2018-12-29 Thread Jack Woehr via mc
In IBM i PASE environment, we're back to having struct timespect trouble
with this snapshot:

make[3]: Entering directory '/home/JWOEHR/work/mc_build/src/filemanager'
  CC   achown.lo
  CC   boxes.lo
  CC   chmod.lo
  CC   chown.lo
  CC   cmd.lo
  CC   command.lo
  CC   dir.lo
  CC   ext.lo
  CC   file.lo
/home/JWOEHR/work/mc-4.8.21-108-g4b46e6194/src/filemanager/file.c: In
function 'get_times':
/home/JWOEHR/work/mc-4.8.21-108-g4b46e6194/src/filemanager/file.c:899:17:
error: incompatible types when assigning to type 'struct timespec' from
type 'st_timespec_t {aka const struct st_timespec}'
 (*times)[0] = sb->st_atim;
 ^
/home/JWOEHR/work/mc-4.8.21-108-g4b46e6194/src/filemanager/file.c:900:17:
error: incompatible types when assigning to type 'struct timespec' from
type 'st_timespec_t {aka const struct st_timespec}'
 (*times)[1] = sb->st_mtim;


On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 11:42 AM Yury V. Zaytsev  wrote:

> Hi there,
>
> TLDR; I would appreciate if you could please test the following tarball
> on your systems and report any blocker regressions as compared to the
> previous 4.8.21 release:
>
>
> https://www.midnight-commander.org/nopaste/tarball/mc-4.8.21-108-g4b46e6194.tar.xz
>

-- 
Jack Woehr
Absolute Performance, Inc.
12303 Airport Way, Suite 100
Broomfield, CO 80021

NON-DISCLOSURE NOTICE:  This communication including any and all
attachments is for the intended recipient(s) only and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  If you are not the intended
recipient of this communication, any disclosure, copying further
distribution or use of this communication is prohibited.  If you received
this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete/destroy
all copies of this communication immediately.
___
mc mailing list
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc


Help testing release candidate / mc-4.8.22-rc1

2018-12-29 Thread Yury V. Zaytsev
Hi there,

TLDR; I would appreciate if you could please test the following tarball
on your systems and report any blocker regressions as compared to the
previous 4.8.21 release: 

https://www.midnight-commander.org/nopaste/tarball/mc-4.8.21-108-g4b46e6194.tar.xz

$ sha256sum mc-4.8.21-108-g4b46e6194.tar.xz
95eb67435d0ab7ab08753c6057250b2a791468218c0ad5758e8b6bd2df3630d2  
mc-4.8.21-108-g4b46e6194.tar.xz

I've built this tarball out of the latest master with translations from
Transifex pulled in on a fresh Fedora 29 VM which I'm also going to use
to build the final release early next year if nothing serious comes up.

Many thanks!

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Yury V. Zaytsev



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
mc mailing list
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc


Help testing release candidate / mc-4.8.22-rc1

2018-12-29 Thread Yury V. Zaytsev
Hi there,

TLDR; I would appreciate if you could please test the following tarball
on your systems and report any blocker regressions as compared to the
previous 4.8.21 release: 

https://www.midnight-commander.org/nopaste/tarball/mc-4.8.21-108-g4b46e6194.tar.xz

$ sha256sum mc-4.8.21-108-g4b46e6194.tar.xz
95eb67435d0ab7ab08753c6057250b2a791468218c0ad5758e8b6bd2df3630d2  
mc-4.8.21-108-g4b46e6194.tar.xz

I've built this tarball out of the latest master with translations from
Transifex pulled in on a fresh Fedora 29 VM which I'm also going to use
to build the final release early next year if nothing serious comes up.

Many thanks!

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Yury V. Zaytsev



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
mc-devel mailing list
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel