AFK from Mar 17 until Mar 31
I'll be away for these two weeks plusminus some days. Roland ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: Fw: [patch] Synchronization of the panels (fwd)
Hello Andrey, On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Siver Andrey wrote: - Original Message - From: Miguel de Icaza [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Pavel Tsekov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: MC dev mc-devel@gnome.org Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2005 7:40 PM Subject: Re: [patch] Synchronization of the panels (fwd) Hello, The patch still needs a lot of work, for example, why do we have an include file at all with the code? (The core of the code lives in sync.inc). It's not a problem if it's the last problem (it's easy to embed sync.inc straight into main.c). Well, it is even easier to create a new set of files (.h and .c) devoted to this new feature and then patch the Makefile.am files to include the new module in the build. Configure patches, fall back patches are missing as well. I would like to ask somebody to update configure scripts (WITH_SYNC need to be defined if kernel version = 2.4. If it's not defined - the patch gives nothing new, so I do not understand what do you mean by fall back patches). Is anybody ready to do it? It must be you . You can get some help/advice in the process of reviewing your patch - but do not expect others to do your job. ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: New syntax highlight files, please add it to the distro
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 07:45:45AM +0200, Mike V. Gorchak wrote: because assembler keywords different in the each product (WASM, MASM, TASM, GAS, NASM, etc) and I have tryied to add as much as possible keywords, i'm strictly against putting all the asm syntaxes in one file. it is annoying enough for c vs. c++; for asm (with completely different syntax of gas compared to the rest) it would be a nightmare. -- Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please! -- Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done. ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: New syntax highlight files, please add it to the distro
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 07:29:27AM +0200, Mike V. Gorchak wrote: It's works fine for me with GAS, NASM and TASM. oh, sure it works. with my variable ah in gas being highlighted, etc. just as useful as new and class, etc. all over my c sources. And how you planning to split NASM sources with GAS for example, both can contain .s and .asm extension. that's indeed a problem - the same as with c vs. c++ header files. see my last post on this topic some days ago. -- Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please! -- Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done. ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: New syntax highlight files, please add it to the distro
Hello, Oswald! OB oh, sure it works. with my variable ah in gas being highlighted, etc. OB just as useful as new and class, etc. all over my c sources. That's bad style :) Write hundred times Do not name variables as registers names. The same as in linux 2.4.x kernels was numerous variables 'new', 'list', etc which has been highlighted, but ... these headers failed to be compiled when was included in the c++ application, because of reserved names. So it's another side of bad style. With best regards, Mike V. Gorchak. E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
