Re: mc and me

[Slava Zanko]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


Hi Yury,

> I'm all for granting Egmont commit access.

+1 from me.

- --
*From:* Yury V. Zaytsev
*To:* Egmont Koblinger, Slava Zanko, Andrew Borodin
*Cc:* Mc Devel
*Subject:* Re: mc and me
*Sent:* 06.11.2015 11:12:23



05.11.2015 23:55, Yury V. Zaytsev пишет:
> On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 22:09 +0100, Egmont Koblinger wrote:
>> 
>> Hereby I'm requesting to become a member of the team, with git
>> access, getting to know the development process, policies (e.g.
>> which changes require approval, when to git branch, etc.), and
>> requesting to get faster responses to my patches that require
>> review – or to be able to submit them if I don't get response in
>> a certain amount of time.  (We can still revert a change later if
>> someone disagrees.)
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Just briefly: I'm all for granting Egmont commit access. Slava,
> Andrew?
> 
> He's proven his engineering and communication skills through
> numerous extensive and technically challenging contributions, and
> I'm confident that even if he happens to break something in the
> future, he'll get back to it, find the root of the problem and fix
> it.
> 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEARECAAYFAlY8YQYACgkQb3oGR6aVLpqmvQCfTbuvmlWGiJmxn7KDXZ6kkbj8
C1oAn1O5mPju68JGMKbXwoe3Q9fE5icr
=NPj2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
mc-devel mailing list
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel

Re: Please release 4.8.15

[Slava Zanko]

Hi Yury V.,

Sorry, I'll busy at weekend. I'm ready to start releasing process today.
 


*From:* Yury V. Zaytsev
*To:* Slava Zanko
*Cc:* Mc Devel
*Subject:* Re: Please release 4.8.15
*Sent:* 06.11.2015 11:28:05



06.11.2015 00:17, Yury V. Zaytsev пишет:
> On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 11:48 +0300, Slava Zanko wrote:
>>
>> I going to review cleanup branch and I'll help with releasing new
>> version.
> 
> Great, would you find time this weekend? For me, Sunday would be best.
> 
> It would be great if I could do it once together with you, and then
> maybe Egmont can go it once together with me the next time.
> 
___
mc-devel mailing list
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel

Re: mc and me

[Andrew Borodin]

On Fri, 6 Nov 2015 11:12:55 +0300 Slava Zanko wrote:
> > I'm all for granting Egmont commit access.
> 
> +1 from me.

Me too.

-- 
Andrew
___
mc-devel mailing list
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel

Re: mc and me

[Egmont Koblinger]

Thanks to all of you guys!

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:13 PM, Yury V. Zaytsev  wrote:

> How about doing it the other way around from now on? You put the branch
> on review, and if there is no vote coming, and no one vehemently objects
> on technically substantiated grounds, it can go into master after 4
> weeks, or I can rubber-stamp it if you want to keep the formalities :-)

Could we make it more flexible based on the weight of the change?
E.g. for an mcview rewrite 4 weeks is totally reasonable.  For
user-visible changes such as dimming wrapped lines (3546) it's also
okay for me to wait that long for input, to give you time to speak up
against it or come up with alternative approaches.

For minor changes, such as a followup bugfix in the viewer (e.g. 3531)
I wouldn't want to wait for more than a couple of days; let's say a
week at most.  Does this sound okay?

> The obligations anyone here has are at best the "moral" ones. There is
> no signing of contracts involved in getting commit access. Only I'd
> expect you not wiping the repository after a tequila party, feeling
> responsible for fixing stuff you happened to break, being careful with
> the private keys if you need/want access to more infra, etc. and in
> general keep the pills handy. I don't think this would be a problem,
> would it?

This is of course obvious.  (I didn't sign anything for gnome-terminal
either, at least I can't remember... I might have had to click once on
some legal stuff, but definitely nothing more than that.)


Thanks a lot,
egmont
___
mc-devel mailing list
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel